Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 USC 12-20 (0.375) | Pac-12

All-Play Percentage: 0.583 (147^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.644 (72^nd)	Record Quality: -0.025 (187^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 156.98 (152^nd)
Pace: 68.60 (31^st)	Momentum: 0.24 (149^th)	Off. Momentum: 2.55 (63^rd)	Def. Momentum: -2.31 (268^th)
Consistency: -8.72 (110^th)	Res. Consistency: -11.22 (155^th)	Away From Home: 0.26 (134^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: 0.54 (62^nd)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

99.05

27.07

64.41

82.44

44.55

23.85

34.24

28.81

33.57

29.78

63.43

13.15

15.99

6.93

28.93

34.95

36.12

1.93

RANK:

185^th

243^rd

315^th

152^nd

102^nd

303^rd

179^th

79^th

253^rd

115^th

45^th

64^th

124^th

140^th

305^th

72^nd

117^th

62^nd

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

97.53

24.94

85.61

40.85

31.38

32.50

23.90

33.53

30.33

55.27

11.23

16.20

7.64

36.65

27.92

35.43

2.01

RANK:

103^rd

46^th

319^th

69^th

303^rd

66^th

112^th

81^st

252^nd

72^nd

152^nd

251^st

253^rd

272^nd

67^th

198^th

144^th

ANALYSIS:
As an average to slightly above-average foe, USC should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. They are ranked #147 (out of 351) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 12-20. They are also ranked by this site as the #11 team (out of 12) in the Pac-12 (average ranking 82.7).

If there is a strength for USC this year, it's probably on the defensive end of the court. The team is rated 103rd in defensive efficiency, allowing fewer than 98 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. USC does a pretty solid job avoiding careless fouls and minimizing opponents' opportunities from the free throw line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 24.94 vs. AO, they are currently rated 46th in the country in that category. USC will also look to secure a relatively healthy number of easy scoring opportunities off of steals. They're ranked 64th in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 13.15. If USC does exhibit a weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's propensity to allow too many shot attempts per trip. The squad has a rating of 85.61 in defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO, which ranks 33rd-worst in college basketball.

USC doesn't perform as well offensively as they do defensively. The team is ranked 185th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 99 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. USC is not one of the better teams when it comes to sinking foul shots. Converting just 64.4% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #315 overall in free throw percentage. If USC does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to convert efficiently from the inside. The squad makes 63.4% of their near-proximity field goal attempts vs. AO, which ranks 45th in the country.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Sat 11/15/2014	vs Portland State₂₆₆	W 75.16 - 63.35	L 68-76	0-1	105.43	91.06	▼ 14.37	93.81	110.22	▼ 16.41	▼ 30.78
Mon 11/17/2014	vs Tenn. Tech₂₃₈	W 75.65 - 66.13	W 70-58	1-1	105.16	94.25	▼ 10.91	97.06	80.75	▲ 16.31	▲ 5.40
Thu 11/20/2014	vs Akron₁₀₀ *	L 64.38 - 67.85	L 46-66	1-2	95.06	70.00	▼ 25.06	99.68	100.00	▼ 0.32	▼ 25.38
Fri 11/21/2014	vs Drexel₂₅₆ *	W 66.59 - 60.10	W 72-70	2-2	102.25	109.09	▲ 6.84	92.14	106.06	▼ 13.92	▼ 7.08
Sun 11/23/2014	vs Penn State₆₈ *	L 63.19 - 69.77	L 61-63	2-3	91.12	92.42	▲ 1.30	99.58	95.45	▲ 4.13	▲ 5.43
Tue 11/25/2014	vs CSU Fullerton₂₅₇	W 73.97 - 63.30	W 53-49	3-3	103.59	76.13	▼ 27.46	93.28	75.03	▲ 18.25	▼ 9.21
Sun 11/30/2014	@ New Mexico₁₄₃	L 61.16 - 65.26	W 66-54	4-3	94.38	105.96	▲ 11.58	94.06	80.61	▲ 13.45	▲ 25.03
Wed 12/3/2014	vs Loyola Marymount₂₅₄	W 72.37 - 61.89	W 77-61	5-3	104.59	106.12	▲ 1.53	94.44	84.51	▲ 9.93	▲ 11.46
Sun 12/7/2014	vs Utah State₁₂₉	W 69.38 - 66.43	W 89-84	6-3	98.71	115.70	▲ 16.99	99.31	114.97	▼ 15.66	▲ 1.33
Sat 12/13/2014	vs Army₂₈₄	W 77.88 - 64.86	L 77-85 (OT)	6-4	104.63	84.87	▼ 19.76	91.70	92.01	▼ 0.31	▼ 20.07
Sun 12/21/2014	@ Boston College₈₅	L 63.29 - 71.66	W 75-71	7-4	96.98	108.60	▲ 11.62	103.58	98.46	▲ 5.12	▲ 16.74
Tue 12/30/2014	vs Vermont₉₇	W 65.91 - 65.57	W 64-56	8-4	92.79	87.17	▼ 5.62	97.34	79.68	▲ 17.66	▲ 12.04
Fri 1/2/2015	@ Utah₈	L 53.09 - 73.83	L 55-79	8-5	85.21	88.69	▲ 3.48	110.68	121.59	▼ 10.91	▼ 7.43
Sun 1/4/2015	@ Colorado₁₀₄	L 64.27 - 71.27	L 65-86	8-6	96.34	94.64	▼ 1.70	100.29	119.61	▼ 19.32	▼ 21.02
Wed 1/7/2015	vs California₁₁₄	W 67.97 - 66.11	W 71-57	9-6	94.33	103.00	▲ 8.67	97.12	88.05	▲ 9.07	▲ 17.74
Sun 1/11/2015	vs Stanford₄₇	L 67.27 - 72.14	L 76-78	9-7	94.64	102.58	▲ 7.94	106.33	111.30	▼ 4.97	▲ 2.97
Wed 1/14/2015	vs UCLA₅₀	L 66.82 - 71.25	L 66-83	9-8	93.50	86.58	▼ 6.92	104.67	119.39	▼ 14.72	▼ 21.64
Thu 1/22/2015	@ Oregon₄₂	L 65.58 - 78.93	L 67-75	9-9	96.22	92.83	▼ 3.39	109.24	98.71	▲ 10.53	▲ 7.14
Sat 1/24/2015	@ Oregon State₉₈	L 56.22 - 63.31	L 55-59	9-10	89.13	91.68	▲ 2.55	93.93	93.75	▲ 0.18	▲ 2.73
Thu 1/29/2015	vs Colorado₁₀₄	W 68.12 - 67.27	L 94-98 (3OT)	9-11	96.34	89.99	▼ 6.35	100.29	95.93	▲ 4.36	▼ 1.99
Sun 2/1/2015	vs Utah₈	L 56.69 - 70.03	L 39-67	9-12	85.21	51.75	▼ 33.46	110.68	104.86	▲ 5.82	▼ 27.64
Thu 2/5/2015	@ California₁₁₄	L 64.06 - 70.04	L 69-70	9-13	94.33	94.97	▲ 0.64	97.12	90.36	▲ 6.76	▲ 7.40
Sun 2/8/2015	@ Stanford₄₇	L 63.41 - 76.24	L 62-70	9-14	94.64	88.89	▼ 5.75	106.33	92.92	▲ 13.41	▲ 7.66
Wed 2/11/2015	vs Oregon₄₂	L 69.50 - 74.69	L 75-80	9-15	96.22	104.17	▲ 7.95	109.24	115.65	▼ 6.41	▲ 1.54
Sat 2/14/2015	vs Oregon State₉₈	W 59.86 - 59.55	W 68-55	10-15	89.13	98.52	▲ 9.39	93.93	85.06	▲ 8.87	▲ 18.26
Thu 2/19/2015	@ Arizona₄	L 56.14 - 82.10	L 57-87	10-16	83.23	85.11	▲ 1.88	113.45	126.85	▼ 13.40	▼ 11.52
Sun 2/22/2015	@ Arizona State₇₂	L 63.18 - 72.81	L 59-64	10-17	93.89	91.03	▼ 2.86	101.50	94.00	▲ 7.50	▲ 4.64
Wed 2/25/2015	vs Washington St.₁₈₉	W 76.65 - 69.45	L 66-70	10-18	105.89	91.31	▼ 14.58	100.54	101.56	▼ 1.02	▼ 15.60
Sat 2/28/2015	vs Washington₁₁₇	W 70.22 - 68.07	W 70-55	11-18	99.41	100.38	▲ 0.97	101.32	83.25	▲ 18.07	▲ 19.04
Wed 3/4/2015	@ UCLA₅₀	L 62.94 - 75.24	L 74-85	11-19	93.50	109.12	▲ 15.62	104.67	127.80	▼ 23.13	▼ 7.51
Wed 3/11/2015	vs Arizona State₇₂ *	L 65.12 - 70.83	W 67-64	12-19	93.89	104.69	▲ 10.80	101.50	96.97	▲ 4.53	▲ 15.33
Thu 3/12/2015	vs UCLA₅₀ *	L 64.88 - 73.24	L 70-96	12-20	93.50	98.36	▲ 4.86	104.67	137.10	▼ 32.43	▼ 27.57
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	USC does worse vs. clubs that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities. When playing squads that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 83.67, USC performs above average 20% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 73% of the time.
	USC performs better against squads that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. When facing teams that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.21%, USC is more efficient than normal 75% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 25% of the time.
	When playing teams that have trouble defending the mid-range shot, USC usually performs better than average. USC is more efficient than normal 71% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.25%. In all other contests, USC performs better than average 27% of the time.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR
2024-25	55	0.851	17-17 (0.500)	0.500	0.159	Big Ten	67.23	-9.88	0.721	-1.15	-1.25	59.60
2023-24	68	0.814	15-18 (0.455)	0.455	0.129	Pac-12	67.85	-9.26	0.708	-0.51	-0.99	72.90
2022-23	44	0.881	22-11 (0.667)	0.667	0.318	Pac-12	68.28	-8.79	0.672	0.13	0.59	54.73
2021-22	61	0.832	26-8 (0.765)	0.765	0.385	Pac-12	67.24	-7.35	0.600	-0.85	1.63	35.08
2020-21	7	0.983	25-8 (0.758)	0.758	0.522	Pac-12	67.91	-8.90	0.818	1.65	0.30	30.38
2019-20	54	0.847	22-9 (0.710)	0.710	0.369	Pac-12	68.90	-10.43	0.665	1.32	1.05	78.00
2018-19	79	0.778	16-17 (0.485)	0.485	0.057	Pac-12	69.25	-9.10	0.599	-2.66	-0.14	99.09
2017-18	50	0.860	24-12 (0.667)	0.667	0.302	Pac-12	68.90	-8.56	0.656	-2.00	1.16	51.71
2016-17	54	0.849	26-10 (0.722)	0.722	0.323	Pac-12	69.96	-7.77	0.633	-1.13	-1.66	56.27
2015-16	61	0.829	21-13 (0.618)	0.618	0.260	Pac-12	71.77	-8.31	0.676	-1.81	-2.06	46.61
2014-15	147	0.583	12-20 (0.375)	0.375	-0.025	Pac-12	68.60	-8.72	0.644	0.54	0.26	156.98

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	118.53	30.89	73.93	84.55	49.79	29.40	39.11	21.72	42.93	33.44	63.65	12.21	15.17	8.10	34.77	25.68	39.54	1.95
2023-24	110.32	28.05	68.75	83.18	47.87	29.96	38.05	22.27	39.19	30.95	63.61	14.50	14.64	7.00	36.02	26.77	37.21	1.99
2022-23	110.17	28.50	73.68	82.82	47.70	27.25	37.28	29.37	41.00	26.20	66.05	11.14	13.78	6.70	32.90	35.46	31.64	2.01
2021-22	106.66	27.58	66.15	84.83	46.07	27.34	37.45	27.37	40.85	30.12	58.65	8.56	17.18	6.91	32.23	32.26	35.51	1.97
2020-21	113.63	28.68	64.54	84.90	49.59	28.14	38.78	29.70	44.90	27.06	65.97	9.41	16.28	6.48	33.15	34.98	31.87	2.01
2019-20	102.60	28.18	67.50	80.68	46.01	26.76	34.86	23.66	38.26	30.27	61.93	12.50	13.84	6.63	33.16	29.32	37.51	1.96
2018-19	109.82	23.42	66.16	86.91	47.01	32.27	39.05	24.26	36.60	30.38	63.79	11.35	15.03	7.03	37.13	27.91	34.96	2.02
2017-18	112.17	25.56	70.81	84.81	48.62	30.87	37.61	22.25	40.17	31.68	65.27	13.41	16.15	9.16	36.40	26.24	37.36	1.99
2016-17	112.20	32.27	74.54	81.32	47.53	29.11	37.27	20.33	37.51	31.87	63.29	12.35	16.21	8.19	35.80	25.00	39.20	1.97
2015-16	110.35	30.20	66.88	83.90	47.48	27.13	38.59	24.49	36.34	32.29	63.41	10.58	17.48	8.21	32.34	29.18	38.48	1.94
2014-15	99.05	27.07	64.41	82.44	44.55	23.85	34.24	28.81	33.57	29.78	63.43	13.15	15.99	6.93	28.93	34.95	36.12	1.93

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	104.49	26.41	--	85.49	43.08	34.10	31.96	22.53	39.62	28.86	58.92	12.30	14.70	6.87	39.89	26.36	33.76	2.06
2023-24	98.46	24.82	--	85.45	40.15	33.93	34.39	24.91	37.13	26.61	50.32	12.13	14.97	3.64	39.71	29.15	31.14	2.09
2022-23	95.59	24.81	--	88.24	38.32	32.69	32.39	27.10	31.48	28.44	51.66	11.35	19.03	5.83	37.05	30.72	32.24	2.05
2021-22	93.82	24.05	--	86.88	38.51	30.13	32.32	26.94	32.75	29.80	49.99	11.76	12.32	3.21	34.69	31.01	34.30	2.00
2020-21	88.73	19.13	--	88.16	36.64	31.62	31.86	31.12	32.50	25.42	47.65	9.59	13.01	4.08	35.86	35.30	28.84	2.07
2019-20	89.92	21.75	--	85.03	37.52	34.96	30.41	24.53	33.23	25.54	51.37	13.43	10.88	3.69	41.12	28.85	30.03	2.11
2018-19	101.07	22.15	--	88.30	41.85	35.12	33.05	23.20	36.57	29.98	56.23	10.71	14.15	5.29	39.78	26.27	33.95	2.06
2017-18	97.17	19.58	--	85.30	42.35	32.65	33.72	26.40	39.02	26.25	56.44	9.80	16.10	7.42	38.27	30.95	30.78	2.07
2016-17	98.74	20.69	--	86.82	41.79	32.27	35.66	24.47	34.02	30.08	54.68	9.53	14.68	5.51	37.17	28.19	34.64	2.03
2015-16	99.52	21.43	--	88.17	41.59	31.72	33.36	25.63	36.40	30.82	54.36	10.21	15.19	6.28	35.98	29.07	34.96	2.01
2014-15	97.53	24.94	--	85.61	40.85	31.38	32.50	23.90	33.53	30.33	55.27	11.23	16.20	7.64	36.65	27.92	35.43	2.01

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR
2024-25	55^th	55	55^th	55	196^th	196	94^th	94	Big Ten	Big Ten	136^th	136	232^nd	232	35^th	35	190^th	190	258^th	258	59^th	59
2023-24	68^th	68	68^th	68	241^st	241	111^th	111	Pac-12	Pac-12	171^st	171	184^th	184	21^st	21	131^st	131	274^th	274	69^th	69
2022-23	44^th	44	44^th	44	63^rd	63	33^rd	33	Pac-12	Pac-12	160^th	160	130^th	130	46^th	46	91^st	91	52^nd	52	52^nd	52
2021-22	61^st	61	60^th	60	28^th	28	25^th	25	Pac-12	Pac-12	214^th	214	6^th	6	86^th	86	182^nd	182	43^rd	43	31^st	31
2020-21	7^th	7	7^th	7	24^th	24	6^th	6	Pac-12	Pac-12	272^nd	272	139^th	139	7^th	7	26^th	26	154^th	154	29^th	29
2019-20	54^th	54	54^th	54	43^rd	43	25^th	25	Pac-12	Pac-12	222^nd	222	318^th	318	66^th	66	24^th	24	66^th	66	77^th	77
2018-19	79^th	79	79^th	79	195^th	195	141^st	141	Pac-12	Pac-12	128^th	128	121^st	121	89^th	89	301^st	301	186^th	186	93^rd	93
2017-18	50^th	50	50^th	50	66^th	66	43^rd	43	Pac-12	Pac-12	242^nd	242	114^th	114	68^th	68	275^th	275	35^th	35	49^th	49
2016-17	54^th	54	54^th	54	43^rd	43	41^st	41	Pac-12	Pac-12	200^th	200	46^th	46	75^th	75	188^th	188	307^th	307	55^th	55
2015-16	61^st	61	61^st	61	106^th	106	54^th	54	Pac-12	Pac-12	70^th	70	98^th	98	51^st	51	260^th	260	329^th	329	40^th	40
2014-15	147^th	147	147^th	147	269^th	269	187^th	187	Pac-12	Pac-12	31^st	31	110^th	110	72^nd	72	62^nd	62	134^th	134	152^nd	152

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	42^nd	42	58^th	58	119^th	119	301^st	301	11^th	11	313^th	313	10^th	10	180^th	180	23^rd	23	123^rd	123	49^th	49	177^th	177	149^th	149	24^th	24	287^th	287	157^th	157	91^st	91	65^th	65
2023-24	90^th	90	115^th	115	298^th	298	287^th	287	33^rd	33	240^th	240	21^st	21	188^th	188	173^rd	173	175^th	175	36^th	36	48^th	48	120^th	120	52^nd	52	215^th	215	172^nd	172	138^th	138	140^th	140
2022-23	55^th	55	56^th	56	112^th	112	258^th	258	24^th	24	306^th	306	29^th	29	40^th	40	56^th	56	315^th	315	18^th	18	154^th	154	198^th	198	53^rd	53	299^th	299	23^rd	23	295^th	295	158^th	158
2021-22	79^th	79	63^rd	63	334^th	334	142^nd	142	58^th	58	281^st	281	17^th	17	88^th	88	44^th	44	133^rd	133	178^th	178	299^th	299	22^nd	22	24^th	24	282^nd	282	90^th	90	135^th	135	78^th	78
2020-21	13^th	13	35^th	35	330^th	330	58^th	58	9^th	9	266^th	266	14^th	14	28^th	28	16^th	16	219^th	219	17^th	17	265^th	265	37^th	37	46^th	46	295^th	295	37^th	37	258^th	258	134^th	134
2019-20	104^th	104	69^th	69	285^th	285	218^th	218	44^th	44	296^th	296	92^nd	92	137^th	137	121^st	121	95^th	95	83^rd	83	86^th	86	123^rd	123	38^th	38	286^th	286	123^rd	123	87^th	87	62^nd	62
2018-19	61^st	61	278^th	278	321^st	321	37^th	37	41^st	41	173^rd	173	14^th	14	75^th	75	140^th	140	161^st	161	48^th	48	182^nd	182	98^th	98	62^nd	62	218^th	218	97^th	97	213^th	213	169^th	169
2017-18	31^st	31	184^th	184	209^th	209	47^th	47	27^th	27	164^th	164	67^th	67	184^th	184	61^st	61	57^th	57	35^th	35	42^nd	42	98^th	98	26^th	26	192^nd	192	215^th	215	90^th	90	115^th	115
2016-17	36^th	36	25^th	25	56^th	56	199^th	199	44^th	44	191^st	191	74^th	74	281^st	281	122^nd	122	45^th	45	74^th	74	70^th	70	85^th	85	47^th	47	185^th	185	283^rd	283	42^nd	42	82^nd	82
2015-16	42^nd	42	109^th	109	292^nd	292	91^st	91	27^th	27	235^th	235	29^th	29	157^th	157	124^th	124	44^th	44	64^th	64	177^th	177	53^rd	53	53^rd	53	254^th	254	188^th	188	58^th	58	60^th	60
2014-15	185^th	185	243^rd	243	315^th	315	152^nd	152	102^nd	102	303^rd	303	179^th	179	79^th	79	253^rd	253	115^th	115	45^th	45	64^th	64	124^th	124	140^th	140	305^th	305	72^nd	72	117^th	117	62^nd	62

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	101^st	101	138^th	138	--	--	97^th	97	120^th	120	209^th	209	61^st	61	235^th	235	267^th	267	59^th	59	181^st	181	191^st	191	191^st	191	288^th	288	249^th	249	258^th	258	72^nd	72	86^th	86
2023-24	51^st	51	117^th	117	--	--	173^rd	173	24^th	24	287^th	287	180^th	180	271^st	271	98^th	98	28^th	28	8^th	8	234^th	234	290^th	290	13^th	13	291^st	291	272^nd	272	27^th	27	36^th	36
2022-23	44^th	44	165^th	165	--	--	325^th	325	9^th	9	253^rd	253	91^st	91	308^th	308	5^th	5	127^th	127	10^th	10	228^th	228	363^rd	363	253^rd	253	200^th	200	279^th	279	69^th	69	107^th	107
2021-22	43^rd	43	153^rd	153	--	--	281^st	281	15^th	15	154^th	154	128^th	128	287^th	287	18^th	18	220^th	220	8^th	8	258^th	258	108^th	108	16^th	16	113^th	113	274^th	274	175^th	175	223^rd	223
2020-21	12^th	12	10^th	10	--	--	350^th	350	1^st	1	224^th	224	67^th	67	350^th	350	16^th	16	68^th	68	1^st	1	74^th	74	197^th	197	80^th	80	111^th	111	343^rd	343	18^th	18	91^st	91
2019-20	23^rd	23	47^th	47	--	--	302^nd	302	7^th	7	329^th	329	36^th	36	259^th	259	38^th	38	62^nd	62	13^th	13	325^th	325	40^th	40	29^th	29	304^th	304	232^nd	232	35^th	35	28^th	28
2018-19	124^th	124	32^nd	32	--	--	343^rd	343	71^st	71	295^th	295	88^th	88	282^nd	282	197^th	197	147^th	147	64^th	64	108^th	108	217^th	217	93^rd	93	228^th	228	239^th	239	92^nd	92	110^th	110
2017-18	73^rd	73	5^th	5	--	--	303^rd	303	86^th	86	264^th	264	85^th	85	300^th	300	257^th	257	87^th	87	63^rd	63	80^th	80	272^nd	272	230^th	230	220^th	220	282^nd	282	59^th	59	90^th	90
2016-17	101^st	101	8^th	8	--	--	337^th	337	65^th	65	292^nd	292	189^th	189	207^th	207	71^st	71	242^nd	242	49^th	49	76^th	76	192^nd	192	57^th	57	225^th	225	150^th	150	163^rd	163	153^rd	153
2015-16	117^th	117	5^th	5	--	--	342^nd	342	75^th	75	296^th	296	88^th	88	244^th	244	189^th	189	252^nd	252	43^rd	43	110^th	110	185^th	185	124^th	124	216^th	216	171^st	171	168^th	168	147^th	147
2014-15	103^rd	103	46^th	46	--	--	319^th	319	69^th	69	303^rd	303	66^th	66	112^th	112	81^st	81	252^nd	252	72^nd	72	152^nd	152	251^st	251	253^rd	253	272^nd	272	67^th	67	198^th	198	144^th	144