TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 UC Riverside  21-13 (0.618)  |  Big West
All-Play Percentage: 0.592 (149th)
Schedule Strength: 0.501 (136th)
Record Quality: 0.128 (108th)
Avg. Season Rank: 169.82 (166th)
Pace: 66.76 (176th)
Momentum: -0.57 (205th)
Off. Momentum: 1.59 (98th)
Def. Momentum: -2.17 (280th)
Consistency: -10.37 (293rd)
Res. Consistency: -13.58 (249th)
Away From Home: -1.51 (283rd)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.35 (22nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 110.23 25.06 77.09 91.11 43.14 36.46 33.74 26.43 38.75 28.23 59.38 10.05 14.63 5.65 40.02 29.00 30.98 2.09
RANK: 132nd 264th 38th 30th 211th 97th 195th 50th 125th 315th 152nd 294th 177th 215th 144th 73rd 335th 298th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 111.19 28.54 -- 89.16 43.30 35.04 34.92 24.08 36.95 30.04 58.16 10.25 13.15 4.63 39.30 27.01 33.69 2.06
RANK: 240th 236th -- 274th 129th 254th 227th 295th 157th 99th 152nd 48th 73rd 43rd 212th 277th 71st 97th

ANALYSIS:
UC Riverside is a fairly decent basketball team that, while likely better than average, isn't quite good enough to crack any top-25 rankings this year. Ranked 149th overall (out of 364) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 21-13. They are also ranked by this site as the #5 team (out of 11) in the Big West (average ranking 191.7).

If there is a strength for UC Riverside this year, it's probably on the offensive end of the court. The team is rated 132nd in offensive efficiency, scoring more than 110 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. UC Riverside has one of the better squads in the college game when it comes to maximizing opportunities to score. The team is ranked 30th in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 91.11 vs. AO. As far as making those field goal attempts goes, the team is somewhat middle-of-the-road, converting about 43.1% of them vs. AO. UC Riverside also does a really good job converting from the free throw line. Making 77.1% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked 38th nationally in free throw percentage. Unfortunately, with a free throw attempt rate of just 25.06 vs. AO, they don't provide themselves a whole lot of opportunities at the foul line.

The defense for UC Riverside, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the offense is. The team is ranked 240th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 111 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. UC Riverside will fail to secure many opportunities to score quickly off of steals. They're ranked #294 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 10.05 vs. AO. If UC Riverside does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to prevent opponents from converting second-chance opportunities via offensive rebounds. The team has a defensive second-chance conversion percentage of 4.6% vs. AO, which ranks 43rd-best in the nation.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot, UC Riverside often performs better than normal. UC Riverside is more efficient than usual 82% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.54%. In their other contests, UC Riverside performs better than the norm 38% of the time.
UC Riverside does better vs. clubs that convert well from outside the arc. When playing squads that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.33%, UC Riverside performs above average 67% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 27% of the time.
UC Riverside performs worse against squads that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. When facing teams that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 10.93, UC Riverside is more efficient than normal 41% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 80% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25149th149th104th108thBig West176th293rd136th22nd283rd166th
2023-24207th207th223rd220thBig West193rd116th172nd268th236th240th
2022-23143rd143rd78th105thBig West215th37th163rd230th69th142nd
2021-22146th145th146th167thBig West254th201st209th117th179th145th
2020-21101st101st96th106thBig West263rd223rd188th149th55th132nd
2019-20225th225th166th216thBig West344th62nd252nd246th139th206th
2018-19324th324th314th328thBig West339th260th245th127th180th317th
2017-18281st279th315th299thBig West175th291st162nd186th199th285th
2016-17302nd301st318th330thBig West196th187th267th111th290th302nd
2015-16205th204th233rd234thBig West213th48th198th163rd75th197th
2014-15218th216th219th209thBig West110th5th139th238th291st229th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25132nd264th38th30th211th97th195th50th125th315th152nd294th177th215th144th73rd335th298th
2023-24208th249th226th15th323rd36th236th108th190th289th327th285th127th273rd66th140th331st334th
2022-23125th340th273rd11th165th74th106th56th31st269th247th265th217th227th131st99th325th303rd
2021-22194th296th135th304th85th164th151st154th50th317th47th324th357th333rd121st130th302nd275th
2020-21134th347th145th71st137th35th104th266th8th162nd296th288th298th301st59th283rd192nd274th
2019-20297th313th275th267th261st102nd151st274th151st217th306th350th333rd298th74th261st180th253rd
2018-19307th353rd303rd198th220th117th99th158th255th270th214th281st283rd307th112th155th267th271st
2017-18332nd275th217th231st320th232nd311th55th290th308th237th208th274th296th222nd45th303rd228th
2016-17335th324th209th289th302nd252nd308th100th177th264th304th201st282nd186th231st79th233rd176th
2015-16219th208th53rd268th237th134th209th221st303rd265th145th207th127th178th108th204th228th255th
2014-15283rd269th237th177th262nd174th287th254th321st83rd220th82nd144th97th167th262nd77th128th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25240th236th--274th129th254th227th295th157th99th152nd48th73rd43rd212th277th71st97th
2023-24223rd203rd--110th285th123rd233rd313th315th42nd312th88th41st115th141st327th50th105th
2022-23171st276th--43rd293rd8th223rd322nd311th84th271st214th12th48th29th349th139th266th
2021-22115th59th--275th140th72nd44th349th177th83rd256th148th52nd36th51st348th51st189th
2020-2141st176th--187th41st163rd52nd254th72nd150th46th219th59th12th148th252nd134th166th
2019-20137th183rd--219th89th81st317th330th32nd105th74th118th82nd56th63rd325th89th206th
2018-19324th119th--281st330th219th330th66th351st320th180th281st16th108th173rd50th304th258th
2017-18168th259th--200th109th327th94th180th83rd62nd250th327th271st207th322nd178th55th28th
2016-17203rd153rd--223rd136th322nd229th147th287th79th85th260th198th103rd321st135th60th34th
2015-16214th248th--145th183rd123rd204th276th138th103rd248th236th209th207th140th287th110th148th
2014-15153rd288th--33rd132nd113th315th186th71st72nd117th97th137th193rd176th246th111th143rd