TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 UC Riverside  9-22 (0.290)  |  Big West
All-Play Percentage: 0.203 (281st)
Schedule Strength: 0.499 (162nd)
Record Quality: -0.262 (299th)
Avg. Season Rank: 283.10 (285th)
Pace: 70.19 (175th)
Momentum: 3.41 (33rd)
Off. Momentum: 2.23 (67th)
Def. Momentum: 1.19 (76th)
Consistency: -10.14 (291st)
Res. Consistency: -13.62 (289th)
Away From Home: -0.66 (199th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.97 (186th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 91.35 23.46 70.61 80.73 40.57 28.88 32.11 27.30 34.13 24.55 57.69 10.41 12.27 5.00 35.77 33.82 30.41 2.05
RANK: 332nd 275th 217th 231st 320th 232nd 311th 55th 290th 308th 237th 208th 274th 296th 222nd 45th 303rd 228th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.63 28.16 -- 82.61 43.00 34.79 33.89 22.57 35.09 25.24 62.64 13.33 16.07 7.13 42.12 27.33 30.55 2.12
RANK: 168th 259th -- 200th 109th 327th 94th 180th 83rd 62nd 250th 327th 271st 207th 322nd 178th 55th 28th

ANALYSIS:
UC Riverside presently has one of the below-average teams in college basketball. They are ranked #281 (out of 351) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 9-22. Of the nine schools in the Big West (average ranking 208.3), they're currently ranked as our #7 team in the conference.

If there is a strength for UC Riverside this year, it's probably on the defensive end of the court. The team is rated 168th in defensive efficiency, allowing fewer than 103 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. UC Riverside has been fairly decent in preventing teams from draining shots from between the three-point stripe and the low post. They're ranked 83rd in Division I in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 35.1% of their attempts from that distance.

Unfortunately, UC Riverside is not even remotely close to being as good on offense as they are on defense. The team is ranked 332nd in offensive efficiency, scoring about 91 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. UC Riverside tends to be very careless with the ball and allows far too many breakaway opportunities off of their own turnovers. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 13.33, which ranks 327th in D1. UC Riverside also has a hard time converting field goals attempts on offense. The team is rated #320 in the country in field goal percentage, making good on a meager 40.6% of their attempts vs. AO.

UC Riverside has been playing better basketball in their most recent outings, as evidenced by the team's #33 ranking in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
UC Riverside performs worse against squads that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. When facing teams that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 7.12%, UC Riverside is more efficient than normal 18% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 72% of the time.
When playing teams that effectively clean the offensive glass, UC Riverside usually performs worse than average. UC Riverside is more efficient than normal 23% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 15.63. In all other contests, UC Riverside performs better than average 75% of the time.
UC Riverside is typically worse vs. teams that tend to get off more shots. Against foes that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 81.28, UC Riverside performs above their norm 27% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 79% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25149th149th104th108thBig West175th291st135th21st282nd166th
2023-24207th207th223rd220thBig West193rd116th172nd268th236th240th
2022-23143rd143rd78th105thBig West215th37th163rd230th69th142nd
2021-22146th145th146th167thBig West254th201st209th117th179th145th
2020-21101st101st96th106thBig West263rd223rd188th149th55th132nd
2019-20225th225th166th216thBig West344th62nd252nd246th139th206th
2018-19324th324th314th328thBig West339th260th245th127th180th317th
2017-18281st279th315th299thBig West175th291st162nd186th199th285th
2016-17302nd301st318th330thBig West196th187th267th111th290th302nd
2015-16205th204th233rd234thBig West213th48th198th163rd75th197th
2014-15218th216th219th209thBig West110th5th139th238th291st229th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25132nd264th38th29th213th94th194th50th125th316th156th291st175th216th139th73rd336th301st
2023-24208th249th226th15th323rd36th236th108th190th289th327th285th127th273rd66th140th331st334th
2022-23125th340th273rd11th165th74th106th56th31st269th247th265th217th227th131st99th325th303rd
2021-22194th296th135th304th85th164th151st154th50th317th47th324th357th333rd121st130th302nd275th
2020-21134th347th145th71st137th35th104th266th8th162nd296th288th298th301st59th283rd192nd274th
2019-20297th313th275th267th261st102nd151st274th151st217th306th350th333rd298th74th261st180th253rd
2018-19307th353rd303rd198th220th117th99th158th255th270th214th281st283rd307th112th155th267th271st
2017-18332nd275th217th231st320th232nd311th55th290th308th237th208th274th296th222nd45th303rd228th
2016-17335th324th209th289th302nd252nd308th100th177th264th304th201st282nd186th231st79th233rd176th
2015-16219th208th53rd268th237th134th209th221st303rd265th145th207th127th178th108th204th228th255th
2014-15283rd269th237th177th262nd174th287th254th321st83rd220th82nd144th97th167th262nd77th128th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25238th236th--266th136th242nd226th295th157th101st157th47th70th43rd211th276th78th105th
2023-24223rd203rd--110th285th123rd233rd313th315th42nd312th88th41st115th141st327th50th105th
2022-23171st276th--43rd293rd8th223rd322nd311th84th271st214th12th48th29th349th139th266th
2021-22115th59th--275th140th72nd44th349th177th83rd256th148th52nd36th51st348th51st189th
2020-2141st176th--187th41st163rd52nd254th72nd150th46th219th59th12th148th252nd134th166th
2019-20137th183rd--219th89th81st317th330th32nd105th74th118th82nd56th63rd325th89th206th
2018-19324th119th--281st330th219th330th66th351st320th180th281st16th108th173rd50th304th258th
2017-18168th259th--200th109th327th94th180th83rd62nd250th327th271st207th322nd178th55th28th
2016-17203rd153rd--223rd136th322nd229th147th287th79th85th260th198th103rd321st135th60th34th
2015-16214th248th--145th183rd123rd204th276th138th103rd248th236th209th207th140th287th110th148th
2014-15153rd288th--33rd132nd113th315th186th71st72nd117th97th137th193rd176th246th111th143rd