TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2019-20 Texas A&M-CC  14-18 (0.438)  |  Southland
All-Play Percentage: 0.151 (300th)
Schedule Strength: 0.368 (283rd)
Record Quality: -0.194 (268th)
Avg. Season Rank: 296.75 (302nd)
Pace: 67.81 (284th)
Momentum: 0.02 (180th)
Off. Momentum: 2.35 (68th)
Def. Momentum: -2.34 (282nd)
Consistency: -9.24 (197th)
Res. Consistency: -12.40 (208th)
Away From Home: 0.63 (104th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.26 (123rd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through March 11, 2020. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 90.26 21.35 69.18 77.18 42.05 29.24 36.19 29.09 36.28 18.85 60.06 8.53 11.33 4.57 37.88 37.70 24.42 2.13
RANK: 318th 312th 234th 336th 239th 221st 40th 30th 202nd 352nd 138th 305th 253rd 206th 169th 17th 349th 331st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.97 31.44 -- 79.90 44.47 30.25 32.78 24.13 39.44 25.52 63.09 14.12 14.00 5.07 37.86 30.20 31.94 2.06
RANK: 272nd 334th -- 93rd 230th 152nd 139th 239th 261st 61st 294th 339th 258th 188th 191st 261st 70th 112th

ANALYSIS:
Not one of the better ball-clubs in college basketball, Texas A&M-CC should be a fairly easy win for most capable opponents. They have a record of 14-18 and are ranked 300th overall (out of 353) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #9 team (out of 13) in the Southland (average ranking 253.4).

Offense is not the strong suit when it comes to Texas A&M-CC. The team is ranked 318th in offensive efficiency and scores fewer than 91 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Texas A&M-CC tends to be very careless with the ball and allows far too many breakaway opportunities off of their own turnovers. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 14.12, which ranks 339th in D1. Texas A&M-CC also happens to be one of the very worst in the game when it comes to maximizing the number of shot attempts they get off from the floor. The team is nationally ranked 336th in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 77.18 vs. AO. If Texas A&M-CC does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to sink threes. The squad converts 36.2% of their three-point attempts vs. AO, which ranks 40th in the nation.

Texas A&M-CC doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 104 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #272 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Texas A&M-CC fouls far too much and sends the opposition to the line way too often. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 31.44 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #334 in the country in that category. Texas A&M-CC also does a pretty inadequate job to provide chances for themselves to score quickly off of steals. They're ranked #305 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 8.53 vs. AO.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Texas A&M-CC is typically better vs. teams that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities. Against foes that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 12.56, Texas A&M-CC performs above their norm 75% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 33% of the time.
When facing teams that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities, Texas A&M-CC often performs worse than normal. Texas A&M-CC is more efficient than usual 38% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 76.76. In their other contests, Texas A&M-CC performs better than the norm 78% of the time.
Texas A&M-CC does worse vs. clubs that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. When playing squads that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 12.35, Texas A&M-CC performs above average 38% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 78% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
NSU offensive explosion leads to Southland Tournament win
(3/11/2020 11:52:00 PM) KATY, Texas – Forget that no Northwestern State player has ... Forget that No. 8 seed Texas A&M-Corpus Christi combusted to start Wednesday’s game, roaring to a 14-point lead. The No. 5 seed Demons didn’t sweat as they controlled the final 32 minutes to run away with a 79-62 win in the first round of the Southland Conference Tournament.
Gophers use strong 2nd half to pull away from Northwestern
(3/11/2020 9:52:00 PM) INDIANAPOLIS -- Daniel Oturu and Marcus Carr played their typical roles for Minnesota on Wednesday. And if it was their final act in front of a big crowd this season, they gave the fans a performance to remember.
Northwestern St. downs Texas A&M-CC to advance in Southland
(3/11/2020 9:48:00 PM) KATY, Texas (AP) — Chudier Bile came off the bench to score 17 points and Northwestern State beat Texas A&M-Corpus Christi 79-62 in the first round of the Southland Conference Tournament on Wednesday. Fifth-seeded Northwestern State (15-15) now has won ...
Islanders men's basketball clinches spot in Southland Conference Tournament
(3/8/2020 12:48:00 AM) The Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi men's basketball defeated Houston Baptist, 84-78, on Saturday afternoon to clinch a berth in the 2020 Southland ... game (32-of-64), and connected on 10-of-21 three point attempts (47.6 percent). - Texas A&M-Corpus Christi went 10-of-12 (83.3 percent) from the free throw line. - The Islanders held an ...
No. 14 Villanova edges No. 8 Hall, Big East up for grabs
(3/4/2020 11:22:00 PM) NEWARK, N.J. -- Saddiq Bey scored 20 points and No. 14 Villanova overcame some late free-throw shooting woes to prevent No. 8 Seton Hall from clinching the Big East regular-season title with a 79-77 victory on Wednesday night.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25174th174th129th187thSouthland181st27th257th322nd336th172nd
2023-24185th185th84th202ndSouthland94th120th344th17th230th210th
2022-23178th176th57th176thSouthland68th216th347th249th219th184th
2021-22240th240th75th207thSouthland62nd47th358th86th12th265th
2020-21335th335th326th352ndSouthland102nd206th250th97th303rd335th
2019-20300th300th242nd268thSouthland284th197th283rd123rd104th302nd
2018-19272nd270th230th285thSouthland300th65th292nd71st66th240th
2017-18309th308th273rd311thSouthland182nd250th296th113th10th302nd
2016-17177th177th61st151stSouthland132nd51st315th23rd235th202nd
2015-16192nd192nd27th97thSouthland140th176th299th205th171st189th
2014-15228th228th120th193rdSouthland257th210th336th20th100th284th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25195th99th363rd194th80th353rd197th157th170th7th158th81st191st101st353rd152nd4th5th
2023-24263rd83rd204th101st303rd337th314th183rd341st4th334th31st33rd83rd344th198th7th2nd
2022-23153rd154th2nd70th273rd295th139th140th292nd29th337th159th144th259th311th168th45th27th
2021-22278th48th108th244th312th334th308th153rd286th29th346th58th109th204th337th150th18th11th
2020-21346th293rd155th320th318th299th153rd55th268th337th335th194th341st355th269th23rd320th211th
2019-20318th312th234th336th239th221st40th30th202nd352nd138th305th253rd206th169th17th349th331st
2018-19324th318th205th190th290th304th269th50th147th200th318th228th187th269th307th51st188th98th
2017-18324th273rd90th277th269th340th288th7th93rd324th298th270th216th266th335th5th314th118th
2016-17196th192nd130th221st131st325th294th68th52nd152nd151st6th277th268th320th57th142nd43rd
2015-16209th170th35th99th286th200th286th40th265th287th181st4th104th194th225th51st305th215th
2014-15251st26th196th319th245th258th271st76th113th334th205th130th261st205th226th37th310th223rd
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25135th330th--33rd162nd153rd320th54th102nd164th83rd335th111th120th239th91st232nd183rd
2023-24111th336th--10th190th129th79th35th305th109th194th109th11th27th252nd91st216th163rd
2022-23200th304th--35th265th288th202nd47th323rd51st316th146th71st221st334th77th85th38th
2021-22200th350th--20th145th313th164th30th63rd20th312th214th147th91st348th70th48th15th
2020-21319th127th--234th314th298th254th82nd332nd208th290th295th10th163rd297th61st196th120th
2019-20272nd334th--93rd230th152nd139th239th261st61st294th339th258th188th191st261st70th112th
2018-19201st344th--39th127th272nd196th3rd49th204th87th258th80th131st324th4th266th131st
2017-18228th341st--5th287th292nd322nd17th283rd43rd285th203rd18th101st341st37th100th25th
2016-17140th250th--19th193rd308th142nd2nd68th173rd247th135th218th289th334th2nd254th78th
2015-16180th278th--47th188th193rd279th7th124th270th92nd212th306th308th250th9th307th242nd
2014-15193rd306th--78th188th230th117th141st194th69th299th66th280th275th273rd186th89th72nd