TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Illinois  22-13 (0.629)  |  Big Ten
All-Play Percentage: 0.948 (20th)
Schedule Strength: 0.765 (12th)
Record Quality: 0.343 (38th)
Avg. Season Rank: 15.91 (12th)
Pace: 69.65 (26th)
Momentum: -3.53 (320th)
Off. Momentum: 1.57 (100th)
Def. Momentum: -5.10 (356th)
Consistency: -12.15 (357th)
Res. Consistency: -17.02 (349th)
Away From Home: -1.83 (303rd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -5.80 (359th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 124.22 31.68 77.87 89.35 48.17 39.81 33.85 17.01 41.03 32.53 69.42 8.94 15.01 6.79 44.55 19.04 36.41 2.08
RANK: 14th 45th 27th 82nd 28th 34th 188th 297th 53rd 155th 2nd 329th 154th 96th 46th 309th 179th 290th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 98.76 21.67 -- 92.56 39.84 29.26 31.78 29.24 32.38 34.06 53.18 12.74 14.53 4.36 31.62 31.59 36.79 1.95
RANK: 41st 15th -- 354th 32nd 27th 52nd 360th 27th 270th 29th 226th 177th 27th 7th 357th 185th 327th

ANALYSIS:
Despite their unexceptional win percentage, Illinois should be regarded as one of the better teams in college hoops. Ranked 20th overall (out of 364) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 22-13. Of the 18 schools in the Big Ten (average ranking 42.1), they're currently ranked as our #5 team in the conference. With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.765 (which ranks 12th nationally), Illinois is one of the more battle-tested teams in the college game.

Illinois is one of the very most competent offensive teams in the country. Ranked 14th in offensive efficiency, they'll rack up more than 124 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Illinois is one of the nation's most effective teams finishing close to the iron. The team is ranked second in the country in near-proximity field goal percentage, making approximately 69.4% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. The squad likewise lands in the top-50 in overall offensive field goal percentage and makes good on about 48.2% of their total attempts vs. AO. Illinois also does a really good job converting from the free throw line. Making 77.9% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked 27th nationally in free throw percentage. Moreover, they get ample opportunity to beat you from the line, as the ball-club falls in the top-50 in free throw attempt rate with a rating of 31.68 vs. AO.

Illinois plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 41st nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 99 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Illinois is a superior unit when it comes to preventing opponents from getting to the foul line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 21.67 vs. AO, they are currently rated 15th in the country in that category. Illinois is also one of the better teams when it comes to not allowing opponents to convert scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 4.4% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 27th in the NCAA). If Illinois does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's propensity to allow too many shot attempts per trip. The squad has a rating of 92.56 in defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO, which ranks 11th-worst in college basketball.

Illinois has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 320th in the country in positive momentum. Illinois has also been one of the most erratic teams in college basketball this year (currently ranked eighth from the bottom overall in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their future games far more difficult to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that find ways to get to the free throw line, Illinois usually performs worse than average. Illinois is more efficient than normal 40% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 29.02. In all other contests, Illinois performs better than average 90% of the time.
Illinois is typically worse vs. teams that convert well from outside the arc. Against foes that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.98%, Illinois performs above their norm 42% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 82% of the time.
When facing teams that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities, Illinois often performs better than normal. Illinois is more efficient than usual 67% of the time when facing teams that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 9.87. In their other contests, Illinois performs better than the norm 27% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2520th20th93rd38thBig Ten26th357th12th359th303rd12th
2023-2411th11th22nd7thBig Ten90th336th22nd203rd48th15th
2022-2350th50th111th61stBig Ten77th98th56th344th280th31st
2021-2220th20th56th20thBig Ten198th300th8th255th304th15th
2020-215th5th18th4thBig Ten100th270th10th315th130th4th
2019-2029th29th54th29thBig Ten254th179th30th238th211th32nd
2018-1968th68th280th145thBig Ten98th187th10th209th321st63rd
2017-1881st81st230th143rdBig Ten105th223rd53rd282nd271st78th
2016-1767th66th127th60thBig Ten265th152nd29th200th334th74th
2015-16137th137th221st149thBig Ten234th57th58th155th221st128th
2014-1554th54th129th70thBig Ten201st72nd55th351st345th33rd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2514th45th27th82nd28th34th188th297th53rd155th2nd329th154th96th46th309th179th290th
2023-243rd6th131st24th18th116th57th290th211th17th18th279th78th32nd166th315th42nd93rd
2022-2386th16th297th221st72nd116th306th318th245th82nd13th72nd119th79th110th321st75th155th
2021-2230th21st230th179th52nd73rd50th305th301st144th17th233rd91st32nd72nd311th140th236th
2020-2111th5th251st226th2nd330th21st250th42nd8th10th146th49th5th328th245th8th5th
2019-2045th60th157th61st42nd286th230th59th144th112th19th198th188th143rd305th68th141st73rd
2018-1947th97th113th89th90th135th74th216th275th92nd65th41st202nd202nd163rd229th124th157th
2017-1857th90th85th93rd74th140th144th70th28th289th45th26th124th98th152nd79th300th263rd
2016-17109th229th200th115th112th107th95th22nd55th347th22nd170th273rd217th125th26th348th333rd
2015-16154th316th52nd174th131st68th115th25th28th350th44th156th341st327th71st18th350th344th
2014-1567th192nd4th23rd209th79th103rd5th176th348th43rd83rd125th195th136th11th350th338th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2541st15th--354th32nd27th52nd360th27th270th29th226th177th27th7th357th185th327th
2023-2464th31st--334th57th17th82nd356th49th272nd43rd87th227th167th5th350th196th327th
2022-2333rd125th--165th42nd27th59th334th117th167th19th323rd196th181st31st340th160th278th
2021-2229th92nd--304th20th39th28th358th88th17th45th118th37th24th21st358th6th149th
2020-218th70th--243rd9th15th33rd356th45th39th30th42nd80th26th12th356th28th223rd
2019-2024th14th--228th39th43rd134th350th59th41st72nd26th6th14th30th350th34th186th
2018-19115th310th--10th182nd32nd68th138th281st129th181st89th14th46th97th220th234th251st
2017-18128th332nd--2nd249th55th122nd63rd157th64th329th186th7th67th212th153rd167th141st
2016-1739th22nd--176th61st152nd28th340th110th19th226th143rd4th17th141st342nd16th60th
2015-16147th12th--212th207th272nd311th277th120th44th293rd9th23rd105th263rd274th31st47th
2014-1557th63rd--161st76th115th49th333rd37th49th270th14th174th84th120th336th51st123rd