TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2020-21 Stanford  14-13 (0.519)  |  Pac-12
All-Play Percentage: 0.854 (53rd)
Schedule Strength: 0.821 (5th)
Record Quality: 0.244 (61st)
Avg. Season Rank: 48.10 (46th)
Pace: 70.22 (151st)
Momentum: -7.08 (346th)
Off. Momentum: -2.50 (322nd)
Def. Momentum: -4.58 (338th)
Consistency: -8.99 (155th)
Res. Consistency: -12.99 (217th)
Away From Home: 0.57 (135th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.97 (251st)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2021. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 104.46 26.21 72.90 77.74 49.04 25.35 35.89 18.11 40.12 34.28 63.48 12.19 12.68 5.60 32.60 23.30 44.10 1.89
RANK: 91st 117th 121st 338th 14th 327th 80th 314th 105th 16th 54th 108th 188th 99th 304th 300th 6th 8th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 92.50 19.33 -- 83.40 39.98 33.92 32.01 22.14 36.63 27.34 52.58 11.73 10.42 3.76 40.67 26.55 32.78 2.08
RANK: 40th 17th -- 232nd 33rd 309th 73rd 133rd 115th 148th 16th 225th 34th 45th 300th 113th 122nd 71st

ANALYSIS:
Despite what their win percentage might indicate, Stanford is a good team that can cause more than enough trouble for most opponents. They are ranked #53 (out of 357) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 14-13. Of the 12 schools in the Pac-12 (average ranking 44.9), they're currently ranked as our #8 team in the conference. Sporting a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.821 (the fifth-highest in the country), Stanford has prepared themselves by challenging some of the best teams in the college game.

Stanford will mainly try to find success through their defense. They are ranked 40th in defensive efficiency and allow fewer than 93 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Stanford does tremendous work shutting down the opposition from the inside. They are ranked 16th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 52.6% of their attempts from close-up. Stanford is also a superior unit when it comes to preventing opponents from getting to the foul line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 19.33 vs. AO, they are currently rated 17th in the country in that category.

Stanford is also a fairly decent team on the offensive end of the court. The team ranks 91st nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 104 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Stanford will routinely look to penetrate, pound the ball inside, and score from as short a distance as possible. The ball-club is sixth in the NCAA in ratio of near-proximity attempts to total field goal attempts. If you do allow them to get to the inside, they are undoubtedly capable of making you pay. Presently rated in the top-75 in near-proximity shooting percentage, they make roughly 63.5% of their attempts from short-distance vs. AO. Stanford is also one of the best field goal shooting teams that opposing defenses will have the displeasure of facing this season. The squad is ranked 14th in the country in field goal percentage, making approximately 49.0% of their attempts vs. AO. If Stanford does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's difficulties in getting off a sufficient number of shots each possession. The squad has a field goal attempt rate of just 77.74 vs. AO, which ranks 20th-worst in college basketball.

Stanford has definitely not been as efficient as of late compared to earlier in the season and, consequently, the team is nationally ranked 346th in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Stanford performs better against squads that have trouble defending the mid-range shot. When facing teams that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 36.16%, Stanford is more efficient than normal 88% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 32% of the time.
When playing teams that allow more chances at the line, Stanford usually performs better than average. Stanford is more efficient than normal 67% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 21.41. In all other contests, Stanford performs better than average 11% of the time.
Stanford is typically worse vs. teams that shoot the ball well from the field. Against foes that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 48.80%, Stanford performs above their norm 13% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 63% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Cal MBB to face Stanford in the Pac-12 Tournament once again
(3/10/2021 1:44:28 AM) On Wednesday at 7:00 PM PST on Pac-12 Networks and KGO 810 AM, Cal will face Stanford in the Pac-12 tournament.
Duarte, Oregon hold off Stanford 71-68
(2/25/2021 11:24:26 PM) STANFORD, Calif. - Chris Duarte had 17 of his 24 points in the final 10 minutes and Oregon held off Stanford for a 71-68 win on Thursday night.
Williams, No. 6 Stanford roll past Arizona State 80-41
(2/19/2021 11:58:23 PM) Kiana Williams scored 18 points and had three steals to lead a Stanford defense that held Arizona State without a basket for the first nine minutes of the game and the sixth-ranked Cardinal throttled the Sun Devils 80-41 on Friday night. Hannah Jump added a s…
Cykle populacyjne kieruj? histori? ludzko?ci
(2/19/2021 4:01:46 AM) Od fazy eugenicznej do fazy dysgenicznej i upadku.
Stanford handles Washington behind Oscar da Silva’s 18 points
(2/19/2021 1:24:27 AM) The Stanford Cardinal defeated the Washington Huskies, 79-61. Stanford’s Oscar da Silva dropped 18 points in the win over Washington. The Cardinal improved to 14-8 on the season.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2585th84th123rd68thACC264th201st81st295th346th84th
2023-24112th112th249th132ndPac-1264th105th73rd93rd331st100th
2022-2367th65th253rd154thPac-12284th246th63rd286th305th75th
2021-22108th108th188th102ndPac-12245th77th42nd216th130th108th
2020-2153rd53rd175th61stPac-12151st155th5th251st135th46th
2019-2039th39th91st61stPac-12161st250th78th215th262nd20th
2018-19121st120th203rd148thPac-12100th257th83rd136th322nd122nd
2017-18100th100th161st89thPac-1240th10th59th70th314th113th
2016-1796th96th230th138thPac-12174th271st50th299th304th89th
2015-16111th111th186th99thPac-12305th295th13th325th349th93rd
2014-1547th47th78th44thPac-12131st124th56th174th251st46th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2576th218th7th58th142nd95th96th131st211th253rd85th135th142nd185th125th147th294th271st
2023-24107th254th114th314th37th130th58th269th89th232nd26th216th277th246th90th255th189th249th
2022-2324th136th281st167th11th154th2nd206th40th159th78th284th181st101st155th207th176th193rd
2021-22130th215th328th221st68th152nd79th240th134th164th77th301st136th118th147th241st148th189th
2020-2191st117th121st338th14th327th80th314th105th16th54th108th188th99th304th300th6th8th
2019-20105th181st185th340th7th289th19th349th139th5th113th75th312th174th248th343rd1st6th
2018-19174th39th317th303rd79th306th285th335th207th6th145th215th260th141st275th332nd2nd4th
2017-18111th10th280th326th55th329th53rd291st84th6th225th282nd23rd5th324th275th1st4th
2016-17123rd52nd213th259th71st337th188th160th114th41st130th34th29th24th329th138th30th14th
2015-16114th4th200th291st110th243rd236th238th122nd102nd115th92nd67th86th219th213th67th85th
2014-1535th23rd63rd151st77th231st32nd90th147th216th84th231st71st42nd234th87th223rd152nd
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25112th189th--104th140th47th181st322nd166th108th143rd6th14th86th64th337th123rd223rd
2023-24129th15th--299th130th311th219th213th164th144th128th128th257th207th278th180th107th83rd
2022-23141st68th--239th96th327th240th160th110th117th94th124th78th54th315th124th79th50th
2021-2281st95th--109th143rd228th59th117th236th157th158th308th3rd5th243rd122nd177th136th
2020-2140th17th--232nd33rd309th73rd133rd115th148th16th225th34th45th300th113th122nd71st
2019-208th86th--73rd19th176th5th103rd198th146th10th49th119th91st222nd132nd193rd160th
2018-1997th142nd--304th80th4th168th317th217th340th12th97th104th78th1st303rd321st348th
2017-1882nd81st--316th49th199th113th216th74th274th23rd282nd129th58th127th167th231st234th
2016-1785th130th--42nd119th255th261st123rd62nd45th149th242nd78th99th305th169th66th47th
2015-16105th214th--108th85th309th192nd133rd54th51st126th188th12th28th325th152nd59th32nd
2014-1578th157th--218th47th163rd248th338th82nd40th21st48th40th31st142nd338th29th80th