TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2020-21 Evansville  9-16 (0.360)  |  Missouri Valley
All-Play Percentage: 0.371 (224th)
Schedule Strength: 0.508 (169th)
Record Quality: -0.139 (241st)
Avg. Season Rank: 254.87 (262nd)
Pace: 65.06 (352nd)
Momentum: 0.78 (136th)
Off. Momentum: 2.73 (41st)
Def. Momentum: -1.95 (271st)
Consistency: -10.07 (260th)
Res. Consistency: -11.94 (171st)
Away From Home: -2.14 (324th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.13 (106th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2021. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.03 20.47 72.79 81.90 44.19 39.43 37.41 17.58 38.22 24.89 59.14 7.92 7.77 3.16 48.14 21.46 30.39 2.18
RANK: 128th 332nd 123rd 183rd 142nd 9th 33rd 324th 169th 298th 173rd 331st 352nd 330th 5th 326th 296th 350th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 106.68 26.87 -- 77.73 50.70 22.86 41.43 21.92 38.99 32.95 64.93 9.30 12.35 6.69 29.41 28.20 42.39 1.87
RANK: 306th 256th -- 27th 356th 2nd 357th 120th 210th 333rd 331st 60th 161st 334th 5th 186th 353rd 354th

ANALYSIS:
Evansville has a squad that most likely falls somewhere in the bottom half of NCAA Division I teams this year. They have a record of 9-16 and are ranked 224th overall (out of 357) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the 10 schools in the MVC (average ranking 156.7), they're currently ranked as our #9 team in the conference.

Based on the data, Evansville will likely find more success on offense than on defense. Scoring about 102 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO and utilizing an extremely deliberate pace (the sixth-slowest in D1), they currently occupy the #128 slot in the rankings for offensive efficiency. Evansville lives and dies by the three-ball and will launch from long-distance early and often. The team ranks fifth in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. If you do allow them to shoot from long, they have the ability to punish you for it, too. Ranked in the top-50 in three-point shooting percentage, they make approximately 37.4% of their three-point attempts vs. AO. Evansville is also fairly competent protecting the ball on offense, which minimizes opportunities for the opponent to score quickly off of steals. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 9.30, which ranks #60 in the country. If Evansville does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's difficulties obtaining second-chance opportunities from offensive rebounds. The squad only has a rating of 7.77 vs. AO in potential points off of second chances, which ranks sixth-worst in college hoops.

Unfortunately, Evansville is not even remotely close to being as good on defense as they are on offense. The team is ranked 306th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 107 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Evansville allows opposing teams far too many easy chances from the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four main defensive field goal shooting categories. AO will convert a healthy 41.4% of their three-pointers (last in the nation), 64.9% of their near-proximity attempts (331st), and 50.7% of their total shots from the field (second from the bottom). Evansville is also one of the very worst teams in the game when it comes to preventing opponents from scoring off of offensive rebounds. The team allows AO to convert 6.7% of all second-chance opportunities (334th nationally). If Evansville does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to limit the number of shot attempts by the opposition. The team has a defensive field goal attempt rate of 77.73 vs. AO, which ranks 27th-best in college basketball.

When playing on the road, Evansville performs somewhat worse than they normally do on their home court. The club is nationally ranked 324th in our site's away-from-home metric.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Evansville is typically worse vs. teams that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. Against foes that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 12.66, Evansville performs above their norm 29% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 88% of the time.
When facing teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot, Evansville often performs better than normal. Evansville is more efficient than usual 65% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 36.97%. In their other contests, Evansville performs better than the norm 13% of the time.
Evansville does worse vs. clubs that tend to get off more shots. When playing squads that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 82.57, Evansville performs above average 22% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 63% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Indiana State comes out on top in low-scoring affair with Evansville, 53-43
(3/5/2021 6:20:41 PM) Tyreke Key posted 19 points and nine rebounds as Indiana State defeated Evansville 53-43 in the Missouri Valley Conference Tourney quarterfinals on Friday.
Key scores 19 to carry Indiana State over Evansville in MVC
(3/5/2021 6:03:45 PM) ST. LOUIS (AP) — Tyreke Key posted 19 points and nine rebounds as Indiana State defeated Evansville 53-43 in the Missouri Valley Conference Tourney quarterfinals on Friday.
Fourth-seeded Indiana State finishes strong
(3/5/2021 6:00:00 PM) Indiana State closed out their quarterfinal with a 7-0 run and beat fifth-seeded Evansville in MVC play.
Yesufu scores 36 & 32 points in Drake sweep of Evansville
(2/22/2021 10:25:41 PM) DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Joseph Yesufu had a career-high 36 points as Drake topped Evansville 74-63 on Monday night.
Yesufu scores 32 to carry Drake over Evansville 85-71
(2/21/2021 6:35:15 PM) DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Joseph Yesufu had a career-high 32 points as Drake beat Evansville 85-71 on Sunday.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25209th209th313th234thMVC189th363rd113th108th318th245th
2023-24227th227th205th169thMVC125th284th117th354th294th221st
2022-23354th354th356th342ndMVC72nd129th187th187th153rd336th
2021-22319th319th342nd290thMVC319th355th99th349th291st298th
2020-21224th224th269th241stMVC352nd260th169th106th324th262nd
2019-20258th258th316th275thMVC194th288th141st23rd224th247th
2018-19233rd233rd289th258thMVC73rd333rd126th41st245th211th
2017-18156th156th166th144thMVC275th129th119th278th344th155th
2016-17151st147th195th198thMVC219th218th121st172nd310th145th
2015-1664th64th42nd73rdMVC148th147th182nd226th156th54th
2014-15112th112th64th85thMVC62nd183rd150th123rd39th118th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25304th247th239th323rd252nd158th270th259th335th220th146th346th337th291st119th244th170th232nd
2023-24277th302nd194th298th192nd244th192nd147th262nd243rd126th174th335th227th218th135th207th174th
2022-23360th322nd360th309th349th266th267th168th361st215th330th155th316th345th243rd139th181st137th
2021-22341st343rd164th306th339th17th221st315th314th327th320th270th358th358th6th310th321st349th
2020-21128th332nd123rd183rd142nd9th33rd324th169th298th173rd331st352nd330th5th326th296th350th
2019-20283rd239th80th316th271st127th288th269th240th236th209th264th344th334th84th247th194th255th
2018-19265th93rd136th344th243rd120th160th310th338th263rd198th289th342nd315th54th287th187th274th
2017-18270th227th9th338th171st344th21st21st251st293rd201st304th346th338th340th7th256th63rd
2016-17167th13th158th324th82nd351st132nd11th110th109th145th275th220th229th351st4th64th4th
2015-16115th47th77th316th34th347th136th142nd106th45th75th275th303rd307th340th108th22nd9th
2014-15133rd45th49th334th36th350th214th119th88th64th60th222nd336th220th349th62nd21st5th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25119th191st--246th69th320th106th157th217th117th36th283rd117th99th305th137th98th67th
2023-24170th104th--166th166th286th260th41st37th227th182nd308th94th248th294th35th232nd143rd
2022-23305th131st--169th318th188th344th22nd78th333rd246th237th118th282nd192nd19th337th279th
2021-22272nd205th--85th350th7th303rd124th306th348th277th121st49th257th12th142nd356th354th
2020-21306th256th--27th356th2nd357th120th210th333rd331st60th161st334th5th186th353rd354th
2019-20264th223rd--119th313th15th159th228th288th295th280th113th53rd175th15th242nd324th333rd
2018-19164th300th--164th148th36th236th310th87th182nd148th200th57th96th28th316th181st273rd
2017-1848th203rd--66th54th293rd68th146th15th41st217th290th73rd95th319th182nd56th31st
2016-17170th316th--57th133rd197th213th144th32nd80th224th144th99th109th249th188th112th90th
2015-1639th38th--197th58th57th76th322nd14th107th195th111th173rd127th52nd323rd99th201st
2014-15116th67th--111th168th180th254th248th173rd61st203rd163rd24th118th211th267th71st86th