Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Evansville11-21 (0.344) | Missouri Valley
All-Play Percentage: 0.427 (209th)
Schedule Strength: 0.533 (113th)
Record Quality: -0.106 (233rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 246.36 (244th)
Pace: 66.48 (189th)
Momentum: -0.03 (180th)
Off. Momentum: 0.53 (166th)
Def. Momentum: -0.56 (202nd)
Consistency: -12.92 (363rd)
Res. Consistency: -16.83 (345th)
Away From Home: -2.05 (318th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.13 (107th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
100.18
66.58
25.41
70.66
83.93
35.53
42.33
34.49
11.17
32.40
18.72
6.07
32.43
30.71
18.28
59.53
8.24
10.79
4.85
41.10
22.31
36.59
2.05
RANK:
304th
184th
249th
239th
323rd
306th
251st
156th
207th
271st
260th
308th
335th
220th
202nd
148th
347th
337th
291st
118th
243rd
171st
231st
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
105.68
66.38
27.51
--
88.62
36.60
41.30
37.41
12.27
32.79
20.76
7.95
38.28
30.45
16.38
53.80
13.57
13.80
5.34
42.21
23.42
34.37
2.08
RANK:
118th
168th
191st
--
245th
100th
68th
320th
268th
103rd
157th
190th
217th
117th
57th
36th
283rd
118th
99th
307th
139th
98th
67th
ANALYSIS: If you see Evansville on the schedule, you will likely get one of the average to below-average teams in college hoops. Haslametrics has them ranked 209th overall (out of 364) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 11-21. They are also ranked by this site as the worst team (out of 12) in the MVC (average ranking 141.2).
Based on their performances this year, Evansville will likely find more success on defense than they will on offense. Allowing about 106 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #118 slot in the ratings for defensive efficiency. Evansville has done a really good job this year to prevent opponents from making shots from the inside. They are ranked 36th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 53.8% of their attempts from close-up. Evansville has also had some success this season preventing opponents from converting many of their overall field goal attempts. The team ranks #68 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO only makes good on about 41.3% of their total attempts from the floor. If Evansville does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's unwillingness to take risks in order to score fast points off of the opposition's turnovers. The squad only has a rating of 8.24 in potential points scored off of steals vs. AO, which ranks 18th-worst in the college game.
Unfortunately, Evansville is not even remotely close to being as good on offense as they are on defense. The team is ranked 304th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 100 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Evansville does a fairly poor job cleaning the offensive glass. Against AO, the ball-club has a rating of 10.79 in potential points scored off of second chances (337th nationally). Evansville also needs improvement when it comes to draining the mid-range shot. The team is ranked 335th in field goal percentage from that distance, making only 32.4% of their mid-range attempts vs. AO.
Evansville has been one of the most erratic teams in college basketball this year (currently ranked second from the bottom overall in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their future games far more difficult to predict. When playing on the road, Evansville performs somewhat worse than they normally do on their home court. The club is nationally ranked 318th in our site's away-from-home metric.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Evansville performs better against squads that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. When facing teams that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 58.51%, Evansville is more efficient than normal 70% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 27% of the time.
When playing teams that prefer the outside shot, Evansville usually performs better than average. Evansville is more efficient than normal 82% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.07. In all other contests, Evansville performs better than average 40% of the time.
Evansville is typically worse vs. teams that find ways to get to the free throw line. Against foes that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 27.58, Evansville performs above their norm 39% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 77% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.