TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2019-20 San Jose State  7-24 (0.226)  |  Mountain West
All-Play Percentage: 0.099 (319th)
Schedule Strength: 0.631 (79th)
Record Quality: -0.204 (274th)
Avg. Season Rank: 295.42 (300th)
Pace: 73.60 (20th)
Momentum: -3.50 (316th)
Off. Momentum: -2.28 (320th)
Def. Momentum: -1.23 (210th)
Consistency: -10.14 (296th)
Res. Consistency: -15.89 (345th)
Away From Home: -1.82 (297th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.26 (125th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through March 11, 2020. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 91.54 27.46 71.73 79.30 38.98 34.31 29.20 19.49 34.89 25.50 55.26 10.96 13.07 3.70 43.27 24.58 32.16 2.11
RANK: 301st 90th 156th 277th 338th 69th 334th 272nd 269th 282nd 283rd 169th 160th 306th 47th 258th 261st 305th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.73 24.11 -- 84.63 46.42 29.72 35.16 22.29 37.64 32.62 62.66 13.11 13.80 5.16 35.12 26.34 38.54 1.97
RANK: 308th 122nd -- 288th 310th 129th 269th 172nd 196th 325th 284th 316th 237th 205th 79th 141st 305th 299th

ANALYSIS:
If you're looking for a squad in the bottom quartile of all Division I basketball teams this year, San Jose State likely fits the bill. Haslametrics has them ranked 319th overall (out of 353) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 7-24. Of the 11 schools in the MWC (average ranking 131.7), they're currently ranked as the worst team in the conference.

San Jose State will certainly not be one of the stingier defenses opponents will encounter. Allowing more than 105 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked down at #308 in defensive efficiency. San Jose State allows opponents' field goal percentages to get far too high. The ball-club ranks #310 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO will convert approximately 46.4% of their total attempts from the floor.

San Jose State doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 92 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #301 in the nation in offensive efficiency. San Jose State is among the worst of the worst when it comes to field goal shooting. The team is rated #338 in the country in field goal percentage, making good on a meager 39.0% of their attempts vs. AO. They especially struggle when shooting the three, making just 29.2% of their attempts from behind the arc vs. AO (ranked 334th in the NCAA). San Jose State also has some difficulty protecting the ball efficiently when in possession, which leads to some quick and easy baskets for the opposition. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 13.11, which ranks 316th in D1.

San Jose State has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 316th in the country in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter, San Jose State usually performs better than average. San Jose State is more efficient than normal 89% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.10. In all other contests, San Jose State performs better than average 33% of the time.
San Jose State is typically better vs. teams that convert well from outside the arc. Against foes that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.30%, San Jose State performs above their norm 79% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 25% of the time.
When facing teams that aren't terribly skilled defensively, San Jose State often performs better than normal. San Jose State is more efficient than usual 82% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 99.02. In their other contests, San Jose State performs better than the norm 32% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Toppin scores 20, leads No. 3 Dayton to 84-57 win over Rhody
(3/4/2020 11:45:00 PM) KINGSTON, R.I. (AP) — Obi Toppin scored 20 points and Trey Landers had 14 points and 14 rebounds for No. 3 Dayton on Wednesday night to lead the Flyers to their 19th straight win, 84-57 over Rhode
Locke's 3s help Gators take control late to beat Dogs 66-54
(3/4/2020 9:11:00 PM) ATHENS, Ga. -- Noah Locke sank back-to-back 3-pointers during Florida's decisive run of 10 unanswered points in the second half and the Gators strengthened their NCAA Tournament hopes by beating Georgia 66-54 on Wednesday night.
Jackson carries New Mexico past San Jose St. in MWC tourney
(3/4/2020 8:10:00 PM) Vance Jackson had 26 points and 12 rebounds as New Mexico beat San Jose State 79-66 in the first round of the Mountain West Conference tournament
Lobos beat San Jose State in MWC Tournament
(3/4/2020 7:24:00 PM) The Lobos, seeded 7, were dominant for most of the game against San Jose State, the 10 seed. The Lobos built up a 45-29 lead by halftime and didn't look back. New Mexico won, 79-66. The Lobos will play Utah State Thursday at 7 p.m.. UNM beat the Aggies in the final game of the season.
Hart’s career-high 30 leads Fresno State past San Jose State
(2/13/2020 12:50:00 PM) SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP) — Freshman guard Niven Hart scored a career-high 30 points, including 11 in overtime, as Fresno State defeated San Jose State 84-78 on Wednesday night. Hart, whose previous career high was 29 points against Colorado State last week, came off the bench to hit 3 of 6 3-pointers, 10 of 19 shots overall and 7 of 11 from the ...
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25179th179th252nd201stMWC194th135th94th156th233rd183rd
2023-24261st261st326th287thMWC258th262nd103rd244th192nd208th
2022-23101st100th118th82ndMWC357th183rd83rd294th220th135th
2021-22278th277th326th262ndMWC282nd313th92nd330th19th289th
2020-21351st351st315th327thMWC56th146th159th325th301st348th
2019-20319th319th335th274thMWC20th296th79th125th297th300th
2018-19347th347th350th339thMWC90th313th185th131st273rd338th
2017-18282nd282nd346th317thMWC229th110th77th92nd297th279th
2016-17201st200th217th190thMWC60th145th104th61st40th180th
2015-16253rd253rd306th287thMWC108th243rd117th100th178th264th
2014-15344th344th351st341stMWC158th86th104th141st256th344th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25199th244th107th175th201st171st127th200th226th160th245th131st261st290th174th203rd156th174th
2023-24207th358th236th143rd120th70th155th309th71st115th155th231st336th214th69th318th121st230th
2022-2394th313th288th1st191st31st227th302nd352nd11th122nd326th10th82nd94th334th64th156th
2021-22246th353rd331st258th162nd46th91st335th106th184th216th327th163rd196th33rd331st162nd299th
2020-21318th262nd314th151st334th141st274th211th351st148th281st223rd269th272nd150th219th151st188th
2019-20301st90th156th277th338th69th334th272nd269th282nd283rd169th160th306th47th258th261st305th
2018-19338th198th322nd320th328th302nd248th159th344th194th315th333rd125th179th258th117th138th97th
2017-18302nd230th272nd334th202nd315th107th90th164th266th268th351st161st197th291st57th206th117th
2016-17229th130th175th340th128th327th150th204th102nd91st241st238th264th203rd292nd151st45th32nd
2015-16294th148th316th301st263rd135th322nd261st218th239th167th278th214th154th94th241st190th245th
2014-15348th300th283rd323rd347th28th316th289th341st344th316th338th301st347th16th265th335th345th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25156th53rd--287th209th128th119th232nd125th294th274th258th299th238th87th214th264th283rd
2023-24292nd256th--217th276th188th357th103rd58th297th212th97th195th129th166th84th293rd261st
2022-23169th116th--349th63rd181st168th317th158th243rd17th42nd184th145th99th283rd164th224th
2021-22286th86th--334th276th97th245th171st315th351st123rd289th324th272nd50th116th341st334th
2020-21355th179th--356th307th332nd160th177th279th341st323rd250th356th348th209th70th261st213th
2019-20308th122nd--288th310th129th269th172nd196th325th284th316th237th205th79th141st305th299th
2018-19348th15th--353rd289th353rd317th54th347th162nd243rd353rd198th209th351st13th62nd9th
2017-18230th55th--323rd137th351st119th29th170th112th226th350th42nd98th351st8th78th6th
2016-17195th230th--88th243rd22nd86th50th296th339th132nd140th96th206th32nd60th347th344th
2015-16187th323rd--124th160th47th154th32nd61st331st90th296th238th244th59th25th341st333rd
2014-15297th297th--140th294th156th306th103rd211th246th267th332nd145th235th165th105th261st235th