TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 San Jose State  4-26 (0.133)  |  Mountain West
All-Play Percentage: 0.197 (282nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.631 (77th)
Record Quality: -0.315 (317th)
Avg. Season Rank: 276.44 (279th)
Pace: 69.17 (229th)
Momentum: -1.18 (221st)
Off. Momentum: 1.67 (90th)
Def. Momentum: -2.85 (302nd)
Consistency: -8.53 (110th)
Res. Consistency: -10.26 (73rd)
Away From Home: -1.77 (297th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.01 (92nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 94.10 24.66 69.15 77.72 43.53 25.75 36.48 25.63 37.19 26.33 56.58 5.37 15.03 6.32 33.14 32.98 33.88 1.99
RANK: 302nd 230th 272nd 334th 202nd 315th 107th 90th 164th 266th 268th 351st 161st 197th 291st 57th 206th 117th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.84 22.71 -- 86.00 43.69 40.86 34.51 18.01 37.17 27.13 61.85 14.58 12.57 6.07 47.51 20.94 31.55 2.16
RANK: 230th 55th -- 323rd 137th 351st 119th 29th 170th 112th 226th 350th 42nd 98th 351st 8th 78th 6th

ANALYSIS:
San Jose State is not one of the better teams in Division I this year. They have a record of 4-26 and are ranked 282nd overall (out of 351) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the worst team (out of 11) in the MWC (average ranking 114.9).

San Jose State is not one of the most productive teams on offense. Scoring fewer than 95 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are rated at #302 in offensive efficiency. San Jose State tends to be very careless with the ball and allows far too many breakaway opportunities off of their own turnovers. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 14.58, which ranks second from the bottom in D1. San Jose State also happens to be one of the very worst in the game when it comes to maximizing the number of shot attempts they get off from the floor. The team is nationally ranked 334th in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 77.72 vs. AO.

Though they rate better on defense than they do on offense, San Jose State still isn't one of the more capable defensive teams in college hoops. Allowing roughly 106 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #230 in the nation in defensive efficiency. San Jose State is extremely underskilled to force steals that turn into quick and easy points. They're ranked #351 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 5.37 vs. AO. San Jose State also struggles on occasion to deny opponents opportunities to shoot from the floor. The team is ranked 323rd in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 86.00 vs. AO. If San Jose State does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their success stopping opponents from earning second-chance opportunities via offensive boards. The team has a rating of 12.57 in potential points allowed off of second chances vs. AO, which ranks 42nd-best in college hoops.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass, San Jose State often performs better than normal. San Jose State is more efficient than usual 80% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.76%. In their other contests, San Jose State performs better than the norm 32% of the time.
San Jose State does better vs. clubs that find ways to get to the free throw line. When playing squads that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 29.39, San Jose State performs above average 78% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 35% of the time.
San Jose State performs better against squads that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities. When facing teams that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 81.25, San Jose State is more efficient than normal 67% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 29% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25177th177th252nd201stMWC194th130th92nd152nd233rd182nd
2023-24261st261st326th287thMWC258th262nd103rd244th192nd208th
2022-23101st100th118th82ndMWC357th183rd83rd294th220th135th
2021-22278th277th326th262ndMWC282nd313th92nd330th19th289th
2020-21351st351st315th327thMWC56th146th159th325th301st348th
2019-20319th319th335th274thMWC20th296th79th125th297th300th
2018-19347th347th350th339thMWC90th313th185th131st273rd338th
2017-18282nd282nd346th317thMWC229th110th77th92nd297th279th
2016-17201st200th217th190thMWC60th145th104th61st40th180th
2015-16253rd253rd306th287thMWC108th243rd117th100th178th264th
2014-15344th344th351st341stMWC158th86th104th141st256th344th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25196th242nd107th177th202nd171st113th203rd231st160th247th131st261st291st174th203rd155th176th
2023-24207th358th236th143rd120th70th155th309th71st115th155th231st336th214th69th318th121st230th
2022-2394th313th288th1st191st31st227th302nd352nd11th122nd326th10th82nd94th334th64th156th
2021-22246th353rd331st258th162nd46th91st335th106th184th216th327th163rd196th33rd331st162nd299th
2020-21318th262nd314th151st334th141st274th211th351st148th281st223rd269th272nd150th219th151st188th
2019-20301st90th156th277th338th69th334th272nd269th282nd283rd169th160th306th47th258th261st305th
2018-19338th198th322nd320th328th302nd248th159th344th194th315th333rd125th179th258th117th138th97th
2017-18302nd230th272nd334th202nd315th107th90th164th266th268th351st161st197th291st57th206th117th
2016-17229th130th175th340th128th327th150th204th102nd91st241st238th264th203rd292nd151st45th32nd
2015-16294th148th316th301st263rd135th322nd261st218th239th167th278th214th154th94th241st190th245th
2014-15348th300th283rd323rd347th28th316th289th341st344th316th338th301st347th16th265th335th345th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25148th51st--288th207th129th110th232nd129th294th274th260th303rd234th86th213th265th284th
2023-24292nd256th--217th276th188th357th103rd58th297th212th97th195th129th166th84th293rd261st
2022-23169th116th--349th63rd181st168th317th158th243rd17th42nd184th145th99th283rd164th224th
2021-22286th86th--334th276th97th245th171st315th351st123rd289th324th272nd50th116th341st334th
2020-21355th179th--356th307th332nd160th177th279th341st323rd250th356th348th209th70th261st213th
2019-20308th122nd--288th310th129th269th172nd196th325th284th316th237th205th79th141st305th299th
2018-19348th15th--353rd289th353rd317th54th347th162nd243rd353rd198th209th351st13th62nd9th
2017-18230th55th--323rd137th351st119th29th170th112th226th350th42nd98th351st8th78th6th
2016-17195th230th--88th243rd22nd86th50th296th339th132nd140th96th206th32nd60th347th344th
2015-16187th323rd--124th160th47th154th32nd61st331st90th296th238th244th59th25th341st333rd
2014-15297th297th--140th294th156th306th103rd211th246th267th332nd145th235th165th105th261st235th