TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Alabama  25-12 (0.676)  |  SEC
All-Play Percentage: 0.964 (14th)
Schedule Strength: 0.779 (1st)
Record Quality: 0.401 (13th)
Avg. Season Rank: 9.87 (7th)
Pace: 71.93 (13th)
Momentum: -0.14 (180th)
Off. Momentum: 0.28 (180th)
Def. Momentum: -0.42 (179th)
Consistency: -10.51 (319th)
Res. Consistency: -14.84 (331st)
Away From Home: -2.34 (342nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -4.02 (344th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 122.93 28.96 76.67 86.97 49.02 40.14 38.54 11.33 40.99 35.50 63.43 13.20 16.25 7.10 46.15 13.03 40.82 2.05
RANK: 5th 76th 31st 102nd 12th 8th 12th 361st 101st 36th 38th 86th 60th 45th 11th 361st 50th 271st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.61 27.80 -- 85.90 41.19 30.90 29.88 24.67 37.00 30.33 56.13 12.20 12.83 5.04 35.97 28.72 35.31 2.01
RANK: 85th 250th -- 198th 52nd 157th 8th 262nd 93rd 157th 115th 239th 135th 116th 136th 261st 146th 188th

ANALYSIS:
A top-25 caliber adversary, Alabama will likely be a stiff test for any team in Division I. Their record this season is 25-12, and the club is ranked 14th overall (out of 362) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #3 team (out of 14) in the SEC (average ranking 60.4). Sporting a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.779 (the highest in the country), Alabama has prepared themselves by challenging some of the best teams in the college game.

Alabama will create problems for opponents with their extremely prolific offense. Scoring roughly 123 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO and embracing a very up-tempo style of play (the 13th-fastest pace in D1), the squad is rated #5 in offensive efficiency. Alabama lives and dies by the three-ball and will launch from long-distance early and often. The team ranks 11th in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. And they'll absolutely kill you if you let them shoot from behind the arc. The squad makes 38.5% of its attempts from long-distance vs. AO, 12th-best in the nation. Alabama is also one of the best field goal shooting teams that opposing defenses will have the displeasure of facing this season. The squad is ranked 12th in the country in field goal percentage, making approximately 49.0% of their attempts vs. AO.

Alabama is also a fairly decent team on the defensive end of the court. The team ranks 85th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 101 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Alabama does an outstanding job shutting down the opposition from behind the arc. They rank eighth in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 29.9% of their attempts from afar. Alabama has also had some success this season preventing opponents from converting many of their overall field goal attempts. The team ranks #52 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO only makes good on about 41.2% of their total attempts from the floor.

Alabama has been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 319th in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most. On the road, Alabama performs noticeably worse than they do at home. The team is currently ranked 342nd in the country in the away-from-home metric we track.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities, Alabama usually performs better than average. Alabama is more efficient than normal 78% of the time when facing clubs that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 9.54. In all other contests, Alabama performs better than average 21% of the time.
Alabama is typically better vs. teams that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. Against foes that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 55.40%, Alabama performs above their norm 83% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 32% of the time.
When facing teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint, Alabama often performs worse than normal. Alabama is more efficient than usual 40% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 60.25%. In their other contests, Alabama performs better than the norm 92% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-258th8th25th7thSEC1st70th1st59th180th10th
2023-2414th14th62nd13thSEC13th319th1st344th342nd7th
2022-233rd3rd5th1stSEC15th338th10th126th322nd9th
2021-2242nd42nd143rd50thSEC10th229th2nd12th215th23rd
2020-216th6th16th5thSEC23rd280th18th23rd246th17th
2019-2058th57th183rd81stSEC6th74th36th56th181st56th
2018-1963rd63rd156th70thSEC89th30th23rd16th129th60th
2017-1861st61st152nd54thSEC156th119th4th63rd238th57th
2016-1750th50th143rd76thSEC308th101st51st220th148th60th
2015-16105th105th157th82ndSEC323rd97th27th45th228th102nd
2014-1555th55th140th78thSEC292nd174th40th55th40th53rd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2510th10th183rd218th5th54th25th357th1st33rd36th117th72nd39th45th357th27th185th
2023-245th76th31st102nd12th8th12th361st101st36th38th86th60th45th11th361st50th271st
2022-2320th30th175th72nd86th7th151st359th137th41st100th215th109th65th12th361st62nd272nd
2021-2220th22nd138th67th66th19th252nd353rd191st22nd36th72nd88th69th34th356th41st218th
2020-2117th135th159th23rd50th17th51st355th102nd9th166th6th16th7th36th357th21st178th
2019-2039th45th266th124th89th11th80th346th96th134th118th98th109th218th9th348th147th316th
2018-19120th52nd319th242nd77th248th125th130th108th189th57th297th151st57th234th116th163rd138th
2017-1891st7th309th324th30th283rd204th237th100th98th20th88th165th53rd240th212th57th68th
2016-17114th62nd325th117th118th177th260th169th196th115th62nd142nd138th100th191st179th139th156th
2015-16148th83rd336th263rd119th52nd158th275th142nd298th52nd184th300th269th36th272nd276th321st
2014-1544th16th123rd287th40th82nd220th251st10th283rd17th88th337th229th61st227th267th291st
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2524th121st--236th18th25th7th361st90th88th34th98th103rd35th14th362nd69th239th
2023-2485th250th--198th52nd157th8th262nd93rd157th115th239th135th116th136th261st146th188th
2022-232nd123rd--286th1st23rd3rd362nd13th46th1st86th20th5th14th363rd28th206th
2021-2287th246th--58th87th121st230th162nd40th148th56th93rd78th216th170th191st188th204th
2020-212nd61st--145th6th132nd3rd312th24th66th65th141st92nd98th128th319th73rd131st
2019-20116th219th--164th85th113th124th269th110th130th85th288th133rd165th109th266th133rd195th
2018-1939th39th--264th51st54th26th346th82nd94th115th247th269th155th26th345th73rd209th
2017-1827th197th--118th19th225th79th289th94th23rd27th51st259th40th246th301st27th48th
2016-1710th226th--59th14th67th65th285th7th52nd27th142nd66th11th102nd319th85th163rd
2015-1649th244th--221st21st148th53rd317th139th59th13th75th250th67th135th314th46th117th
2014-1583rd219th--145th40th307th56th219th62nd19th114th34th14th12th320th226th19th16th