TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 Alabama  19-14 (0.576)  |  SEC
All-Play Percentage: 0.885 (42nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.775 (2nd)
Record Quality: 0.303 (50th)
Avg. Season Rank: 24.83 (23rd)
Pace: 72.19 (10th)
Momentum: -3.84 (319th)
Off. Momentum: -2.27 (316th)
Def. Momentum: -1.57 (252nd)
Consistency: -9.63 (229th)
Res. Consistency: -11.24 (126th)
Away From Home: -0.25 (215th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.92 (12th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 112.38 29.21 73.00 86.53 45.76 37.30 31.83 15.31 37.41 33.92 64.86 12.66 14.81 5.98 43.11 17.69 39.20 2.04
RANK: 20th 22nd 138th 67th 66th 19th 252nd 353rd 191st 22nd 36th 72nd 88th 69th 34th 356th 41st 218th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 96.58 26.44 -- 81.63 41.41 29.36 34.32 24.02 34.14 28.25 54.98 9.66 11.81 5.23 35.97 29.43 34.61 2.01
RANK: 87th 246th -- 58th 87th 121st 230th 162nd 40th 148th 56th 93rd 78th 216th 170th 191st 188th 204th

ANALYSIS:
This website places Alabama in the top 25% of all NCAA college basketball teams this year. Their record this season is 19-14, and the club is ranked 42nd overall (out of 358) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #7 team (out of 14) in the SEC (average ranking 63.8). Sporting a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.775 (the second-highest in the country), Alabama has prepared themselves by challenging some of the best teams in the college game.

Alabama will create problems for opponents with their extremely prolific offense. Scoring roughly 112 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO and embracing a feverish pace (the tenth-fastest in D1), the squad is rated #20 in offensive efficiency. Alabama does a super job in their efforts to get to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 29.21 vs. AO, they are ranked 22nd in the nation at getting to the charity stripe, where the team shoots a rather mediocre 73.0%. Alabama will also make a concerted effort to fire off quite a few three-pointers each game. The team ranks 34th in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. When it comes to actually making their three-point attempts, the squad shoots a so-so 31.8% from beyond the arc vs. AO.

Alabama is also a fairly decent team on the defensive end of the court. The team ranks 87th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 97 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Alabama has been able to successfully prevent opponents from making shots between the three-point stripe and the low post. They're ranked 40th in Division I in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 34.1% of their attempts from that distance. Alabama has also been pretty good preventing teams from hitting shots in the paint. They are ranked 56th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 55.0% of their attempts from close-up.

Alabama has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 319th in the country in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities, Alabama usually performs worse than average. Alabama is more efficient than normal 10% of the time when facing clubs that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 10.49. In all other contests, Alabama performs better than average 74% of the time.
Alabama is typically better vs. teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. Against foes that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.16%, Alabama performs above their norm 70% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 20% of the time.
When facing teams that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities, Alabama often performs worse than normal. Alabama is more efficient than usual 33% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 81.69. In their other contests, Alabama performs better than the norm 80% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Notre Dame keeps rolling, beats Alabama 78-64 in first round
(3/18/2022 8:41:40 PM) Cormac Ryan's career-high 29 points, featuring seven 3-pointers, led Notre Dame to a first-round upset of Alabama.
Alabama's Quinerly has 'significant' knee injury
(3/18/2022 8:08:15 PM) Alabama guard Jahvon Quinerly suffered a "significant [left] knee injury" in the opening minutes of the Crimson Tide's 78-64 loss to Notre Dame.
Cormac Ryan’s career-high 29 points power Notre Dame’s upset over Alabama
(3/18/2022 6:43:54 PM) Cormac Ryan called this run a dream. Friday was close to a fantasy.
March Madness continues: Ranking the best men's NCAA Tournament games to watch Friday
(3/18/2022 10:28:44 AM) Day two of the NCAA men's basketball tournament's round of 64 promises more of why we love March Madness. Here's a ranking of games to watch.
Texas A&M tops No. 25 Alabama 87-71 behind Jackson, Radford
(3/2/2022 10:26:44 PM) TUSCALOOSA, Ala. (AP) — Quenton Jackson and Texas A&M kept the game close for 20 minutes, then made sure it didn’t stay that way.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-258th8th25th7thSEC1st70th1st59th180th10th
2023-2414th14th62nd13thSEC13th319th1st344th342nd7th
2022-233rd3rd5th1stSEC15th338th10th126th322nd9th
2021-2242nd42nd143rd50thSEC10th229th2nd12th215th23rd
2020-216th6th16th5thSEC23rd280th18th23rd246th17th
2019-2058th57th183rd81stSEC6th74th36th56th181st56th
2018-1963rd63rd156th70thSEC89th30th23rd16th129th60th
2017-1861st61st152nd54thSEC156th119th4th63rd238th57th
2016-1750th50th143rd76thSEC308th101st51st220th148th60th
2015-16105th105th157th82ndSEC323rd97th27th45th228th102nd
2014-1555th55th140th78thSEC292nd174th40th55th40th53rd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2510th10th183rd218th5th54th25th357th1st33rd36th117th72nd39th45th357th27th185th
2023-245th76th31st102nd12th8th12th361st101st36th38th86th60th45th11th361st50th271st
2022-2320th30th175th72nd86th7th151st359th137th41st100th215th109th65th12th361st62nd272nd
2021-2220th22nd138th67th66th19th252nd353rd191st22nd36th72nd88th69th34th356th41st218th
2020-2117th135th159th23rd50th17th51st355th102nd9th166th6th16th7th36th357th21st178th
2019-2039th45th266th124th89th11th80th346th96th134th118th98th109th218th9th348th147th316th
2018-19120th52nd319th242nd77th248th125th130th108th189th57th297th151st57th234th116th163rd138th
2017-1891st7th309th324th30th283rd204th237th100th98th20th88th165th53rd240th212th57th68th
2016-17114th62nd325th117th118th177th260th169th196th115th62nd142nd138th100th191st179th139th156th
2015-16148th83rd336th263rd119th52nd158th275th142nd298th52nd184th300th269th36th272nd276th321st
2014-1544th16th123rd287th40th82nd220th251st10th283rd17th88th337th229th61st227th267th291st
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2524th121st--236th18th25th7th361st90th88th34th98th103rd35th14th362nd69th239th
2023-2485th250th--198th52nd157th8th262nd93rd157th115th239th135th116th136th261st146th188th
2022-232nd123rd--286th1st23rd3rd362nd13th46th1st86th20th5th14th363rd28th206th
2021-2287th246th--58th87th121st230th162nd40th148th56th93rd78th216th170th191st188th204th
2020-212nd61st--145th6th132nd3rd312th24th66th65th141st92nd98th128th319th73rd131st
2019-20116th219th--164th85th113th124th269th110th130th85th288th133rd165th109th266th133rd195th
2018-1939th39th--264th51st54th26th346th82nd94th115th247th269th155th26th345th73rd209th
2017-1827th197th--118th19th225th79th289th94th23rd27th51st259th40th246th301st27th48th
2016-1710th226th--59th14th67th65th285th7th52nd27th142nd66th11th102nd319th85th163rd
2015-1649th244th--221st21st148th53rd317th139th59th13th75th250th67th135th314th46th117th
2014-1583rd219th--145th40th307th56th219th62nd19th114th34th14th12th320th226th19th16th