TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 Coast. Carolina  14-18 (0.438)  |  Sun Belt
All-Play Percentage: 0.409 (207th)
Schedule Strength: 0.470 (193rd)
Record Quality: -0.138 (244th)
Avg. Season Rank: 183.14 (185th)
Pace: 69.69 (202nd)
Momentum: -1.56 (241st)
Off. Momentum: 0.88 (137th)
Def. Momentum: -2.44 (285th)
Consistency: -8.72 (136th)
Res. Consistency: -8.59 (10th)
Away From Home: 0.80 (57th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.09 (87th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 98.86 28.66 72.71 80.87 42.26 29.14 33.19 23.48 30.58 28.24 61.34 8.79 15.56 6.67 36.03 29.04 34.93 2.01
RANK: 222nd 70th 137th 227th 257th 222nd 277th 140th 344th 178th 108th 281st 127th 171st 211th 124th 170th 147th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 104.14 31.24 -- 80.55 42.77 35.27 35.55 22.02 36.94 23.26 59.26 13.69 11.54 4.85 43.79 27.34 28.87 2.15
RANK: 196th 324th -- 114th 104th 330th 182nd 155th 159th 22nd 144th 336th 13th 17th 337th 179th 22nd 10th

ANALYSIS:
While not an atrocious team by any means, Coast. Carolina is not exactly one that should appear in many top-100 rankings either. They are ranked #207 (out of 351) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 14-18. They are also ranked by this site as the #8 team (out of 12) in the Sun Belt (average ranking 185.7).

Coast. Carolina sports an offensive attack that is mediocre at best. Rated at #222 in offensive efficiency, they score about 99 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Coast. Carolina is downright rotten when shooting the mid-range jumper. The team is ranked eighth from the bottom in field goal percentage from that distance, making only 30.6% of their mid-range attempts vs. AO. Coast. Carolina also tends to be very careless with the ball and allows far too many breakaway opportunities off of their own turnovers. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 13.69, which ranks 336th in D1.

Coast. Carolina doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 104 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #196 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Coast. Carolina commits too many fouls, which leads to plentiful free throw attempts for the opposition. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 31.24 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #324 in the country in that category. If Coast. Carolina does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their success stopping opponents from earning second-chance opportunities via offensive boards. The team has a rating of 11.54 in potential points allowed off of second chances vs. AO, which ranks 13th-best in college hoops.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint, Coast. Carolina often performs better than normal. Coast. Carolina is more efficient than usual 68% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 57.13%. In their other contests, Coast. Carolina performs better than the norm 20% of the time.
Coast. Carolina does better vs. clubs that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass. When playing squads that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.54%, Coast. Carolina performs above average 71% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 25% of the time.
Coast. Carolina performs better against squads that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. When facing teams that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 12.66, Coast. Carolina is more efficient than normal 65% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 22% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25335th335th319th329thSun Belt346th306th285th319th79th301st
2023-24316th316th322nd322ndSun Belt56th178th202nd98th97th314th
2022-23298th298th290th299thSun Belt129th228th202nd57th295th265th
2021-22177th177th143rd184thSun Belt155th198th215th204th262nd166th
2020-21194th193rd56th158thSun Belt65th48th312th215th211th167th
2019-20180th180th211th200thSun Belt23rd257th149th221st77th169th
2018-19140th140th183rd183rdSun Belt111th216th141st43rd149th160th
2017-18207th207th230th244thSun Belt202nd136th193rd87th57th185th
2016-17229th229th178th169thSun Belt57th258th163rd313th348th227th
2015-16186th186th90th162ndBig South252nd159th282nd159th173rd177th
2014-15141st141st45th125thBig South208th246th302nd98th101st136th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25312th154th249th293rd323rd234th164th206th345th186th342nd364th246th304th197th187th148th150th
2023-24310th266th330th280th232nd311th259th80th268th237th156th262nd299th207th291st66th205th115th
2022-23209th270th18th41st304th115th330th266th343rd43rd244th118th129th98th160th289th70th120th
2021-22198th167th295th200th179th237th131st223rd296th66th203rd121st153rd211th233rd217th65th79th
2020-21253rd73rd84th263rd285th226th289th258th327th85th246th187th29th105th207th249th66th99th
2019-20141st127th138th141st151st263rd156th135th11th72nd301st55th67th172nd280th144th89th69th
2018-1973rd36th127th131st138th175th68th146th294th166th103rd73rd168th250th187th159th178th177th
2017-18222nd70th137th227th257th222nd277th140th344th178th108th281st127th171st211th124th170th147th
2016-17264th330th315th48th265th84th277th139th93rd227th273rd198th198th151st111th164th257th259th
2015-16224th247th273rd104th266th90th223rd242nd249th118th279th246th140th220th118th255th136th201st
2014-15106th96th175th80th178th183rd135th23rd13th321st260th126th189th254th206th25th329th264th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25346th343rd--347th206th208th201st362nd253rd27th339th356th154th51st123rd361st12th70th
2023-24276th210th--339th137th361st134th22nd53rd169th292nd359th221st158th357th10th103rd16th
2022-23340th171st--275th236th362nd348th11th207th76th212th207th161st284th362nd6th50th11th
2021-22149th77th--315th79th357th115th111th156th58th143rd323rd262nd150th351st64th31st8th
2020-21149th62nd--320th79th353rd123rd109th91st110th165th340th249th182nd347th67th69th25th
2019-20245th342nd--30th133rd334th210th9th119th39th242nd277th145th69th349th18th67th14th
2018-19246th340th--144th160th323rd51st129th185th55th328th137th238th239th331st130th47th23rd
2017-18196th324th--114th104th330th182nd155th159th22nd144th336th13th17th337th179th22nd10th
2016-17163rd86th--196th125th347th159th94th200th28th214th88th107th59th350th83rd22nd5th
2015-16126th87th--337th66th344th21st282nd182nd52nd190th282nd218th53rd324th237th15th13th
2014-15195th185th--242nd114th306th185th203rd115th88th169th142nd213th132nd299th181st59th48th