TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 DePaul  9-23 (0.281)  |  Big East
All-Play Percentage: 0.491 (179th)
Schedule Strength: 0.669 (62nd)
Record Quality: -0.115 (228th)
Avg. Season Rank: 169.96 (167th)
Pace: 69.83 (207th)
Momentum: 0.69 (139th)
Off. Momentum: 0.85 (167th)
Def. Momentum: -0.16 (142nd)
Consistency: -10.73 (331st)
Res. Consistency: -12.99 (278th)
Away From Home: -2.53 (337th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -3.73 (332nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 99.65 27.72 73.52 80.06 43.80 25.65 35.62 25.60 34.15 28.81 59.67 12.23 15.93 7.65 32.04 31.98 35.99 1.96
RANK: 195th 160th 79th 256th 177th 294th 151st 109th 279th 149th 165th 78th 97th 79th 277th 95th 125th 72nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 101.78 28.82 -- 79.09 44.37 31.03 33.68 22.14 36.28 25.92 64.08 10.34 13.28 6.63 39.23 27.99 32.78 2.06
RANK: 162nd 224th -- 72nd 170th 242nd 76th 111th 145th 78th 283rd 137th 89th 157th 293rd 144th 107th 70th

ANALYSIS:
While not an atrocious team by any means, DePaul is not exactly one that should appear in many top-100 rankings either. They have a record of 9-23 and are ranked 179th overall (out of 351) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the worst team (out of 10) in the Big East (average ranking 58.1).

Based on their performances this year, DePaul will likely find more success on defense than they will on offense. Allowing about 102 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #162 slot in the ratings for defensive efficiency. DePaul has been doing fairly decent work to prevent opponents from getting off shots from the field. The club is ranked 72nd in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 79.09 vs. AO.

DePaul is not quite as good on the offensive end of the floor. The team is ranked 195th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 100 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. DePaul has some difficulties converting mid-range shot attempts. The team is ranked 279th in field goal percentage from that distance, making only 34.1% of their mid-range attempts vs. AO.

DePaul has been one of the most erratic teams in college basketball this year (currently ranked 331st overall in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their future games far more difficult to predict. On the road, DePaul performs noticeably worse than they do at home. The team is currently ranked 337th in the country in the away-from-home metric we track.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
DePaul performs worse against squads that favor a faster tempo. When facing teams that have a pace vs. AO greater than 70.69, DePaul is more efficient than normal 18% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 62% of the time.
When playing teams that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities, DePaul usually performs worse than average. DePaul is more efficient than normal 32% of the time when facing clubs that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 10.97. In all other contests, DePaul performs better than average 69% of the time.
DePaul is typically worse vs. teams that do not defend well on the perimeter. Against foes that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 31.11%, DePaul performs above their norm 36% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 70% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25106th106th272nd168thBig East227th311th66th363rd329th97th
2023-24313th313th359th321stBig East144th269th14th331st50th276th
2022-23138th136th326th210thBig East95th124th14th174th145th142nd
2021-2294th93rd201st127thBig East105th219th73rd345th299th84th
2020-21141st141st310th205thBig East78th113th46th309th145th100th
2019-20109th109th192nd107thBig East59th151st38th193rd137th65th
2018-19126th126th163rd102ndBig East124th263rd86th123rd56th103rd
2017-1892nd91st282nd185thBig East76th33rd35th254th49th105th
2016-17179th179th312th228thBig East207th331st62nd332nd337th167th
2015-16155th155th306th211thBig East249th238th17th285th163rd148th
2014-15140th138th269th171stBig East81st230th49th47th303rd144th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25103rd297th157th190th82nd32nd147th291st188th266th10th232nd293rd222nd28th292nd269th334th
2023-24267th203rd93rd354th173rd293rd124th245th296th162nd185th296th341st327th239th199th84th91st
2022-23110th209th114th169th109th171st15th106th320th275th50th81st228th197th177th110th285th244th
2021-2294th14th275th89th143rd228th229th127th224th102nd110th134th23rd61st241st147th125th103rd
2020-21243rd298th296th101st189th329th147th46th272nd98th179th69th44th39th334th50th122nd38th
2019-20188th89th301st187th129th321st225th167th174th24th217th74th17th31st324th164th23rd11th
2018-1942nd64th124th73rd44th305th128th65th63rd66th77th143rd162nd88th326th74th100th49th
2017-18157th166th246th53rd167th241st309th105th242nd74th89th119th22nd86th271st116th102nd78th
2016-17195th160th79th256th177th294th151st109th279th149th165th78th97th79th277th95th125th72nd
2015-16165th193rd161st285th61st318th125th114th52nd117th122nd300th174th74th309th89th82nd41st
2014-1599th156th110th243rd104th62nd121st226th74th295th73rd103rd302nd228th53rd217th286th308th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25104th80th--233rd156th53rd155th299th139th253rd150th307th273rd312th41st286th234th307th
2023-24342nd70th--316th300th328th334th184th209th163rd326th357th316th227th304th145th116th77th
2022-23188th225th--249th139th132nd174th224th194th273rd88th50th353rd279th98th208th259th262nd
2021-22105th97th--223rd104th63rd135th164th113th326th36th33rd62nd102nd58th150th329th325th
2020-2162nd259th--85th39th282nd48th68th153rd111th18th102nd282nd89th312th75th133rd66th
2019-2071st176th--71st58th255th138th64th5th114th134th260th187th138th291st82nd152nd94th
2018-19293rd134th--237th248th302nd325th206th229th88th230th202nd7th39th288th192nd71st58th
2017-1851st100th--57th66th254th107th150th65th57th107th331st38th23rd297th196th80th62nd
2016-17162nd224th--72nd170th242nd76th111th145th78th283rd137th89th157th293rd144th107th70th
2015-16181st286th--80th118th295th246th145th67th37th169th298th46th33rd318th172nd49th33rd
2014-15218th339th--62nd203rd57th12th131st141st220th308th232nd305th309th83rd176th272nd281st