TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 Idaho State  11-21 (0.344)  |  Big Sky
All-Play Percentage: 0.320 (247th)
Schedule Strength: 0.393 (243rd)
Record Quality: -0.244 (302nd)
Avg. Season Rank: 253.91 (254th)
Pace: 65.40 (322nd)
Momentum: 1.48 (104th)
Off. Momentum: 2.17 (91st)
Def. Momentum: -0.70 (179th)
Consistency: -9.10 (168th)
Res. Consistency: -11.22 (118th)
Away From Home: -0.49 (162nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.09 (96th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 98.91 20.57 72.61 83.78 43.44 33.81 33.11 24.73 43.77 25.24 56.94 9.08 11.23 4.71 40.36 29.52 30.12 2.10
RANK: 257th 350th 147th 217th 195th 86th 230th 155th 12th 332nd 237th 277th 310th 248th 76th 144th 331st 328th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 108.40 27.44 -- 85.12 45.65 27.55 32.59 24.70 38.62 32.87 61.88 11.03 12.23 5.07 32.37 29.02 38.61 1.94
RANK: 288th 271st -- 192nd 273rd 49th 102nd 221st 216th 319th 284th 206th 50th 150th 45th 223rd 317th 337th

ANALYSIS:
Idaho State has a squad that most likely falls somewhere in the bottom half of NCAA Division I teams this year. They are ranked #247 (out of 363) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 11-21. Of the 10 schools in the Big Sky (average ranking 204.9), they're currently ranked as our #8 team in the conference.

Defense is not exactly a strength for Idaho State this year. The team is ranked 288th in defensive efficiency and allows more than 108 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Idaho State does not stand out in a positive manner when they're asked to defend in the paint. The team is ranked 284th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on 61.9% of their attempts from close-up. And with such little resistance, AO will merrily cut, slash, and drive right to the hoop as often as possible. Of AO's total field goals, a big portion of them (38.6%) will be from short-distance. If Idaho State does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their success stopping opponents from earning second-chance opportunities via offensive boards. The team has a rating of 12.23 in potential points allowed off of second chances vs. AO, which ranks 50th-best in college hoops.

Idaho State doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 99 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #257 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Idaho State does an extremely poor job drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 20.57 vs. AO, they are 350th in the overall rankings for that category. If Idaho State does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to successfully hit from mid-range locations on the court. The team makes 43.8% of their in-between field goal attempts vs. AO, which ranks 12th in the NCAA.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Idaho State does worse vs. clubs that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities. When playing squads that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 9.87, Idaho State performs above average 10% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 65% of the time.
Idaho State performs worse against squads that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass. When facing teams that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.09%, Idaho State is more efficient than normal 30% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 80% of the time.
When playing teams that favor a faster tempo, Idaho State usually performs worse than average. Idaho State is more efficient than normal 28% of the time when facing clubs that have a pace vs. AO greater than 67.02. In all other contests, Idaho State performs better than average 75% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25241st241st196th242ndBig Sky285th259th274th174th242nd227th
2023-24229th229th270th294thBig Sky350th129th284th217th138th268th
2022-23247th247th295th302ndBig Sky322nd168th243rd96th162nd254th
2021-22344th344th333rd345thBig Sky339th347th305th310th65th344th
2020-21258th258th153rd254thBig Sky325th207th239th86th114th299th
2019-20275th274th323rd305thBig Sky240th128th130th122nd81st276th
2018-19318th318th278th306thBig Sky215th62nd278th62nd10th282nd
2017-18227th227th211th224thBig Sky206th91st252nd203rd227th245th
2016-17324th324th347th339thBig Sky124th130th210th245th145th315th
2015-16282nd282nd175th242ndBig Sky84th166th326th243rd197th294th
2014-15295th295th335th342ndBig Sky194th44th295th22nd121st307th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25177th135th101st9th327th141st354th43rd266th183rd212th320th15th82nd219th79th272nd204th
2023-24210th186th269th105th221st183rd276th52nd134th306th129th246th45th19th210th57th317th258th
2022-23257th350th147th217th195th86th230th155th12th332nd237th277th310th248th76th144th331st328th
2021-22328th207th297th314th323rd58th328th229th243rd346th167th354th280th282nd32nd191st338th343rd
2020-21295th38th218th307th323rd102nd340th215th242nd321st205th353rd54th156th62nd186th311th316th
2019-20189th80th276th222nd173rd248th159th177th291st124th153rd324th74th61st238th167th111th104th
2018-19214th277th76th183rd252nd56th171st156th150th329th203rd176th246th264th52nd154th327th333rd
2017-18162nd223rd273rd327th80th110th29th285th8th261st262nd210th349th345th70th263rd204th272nd
2016-17284th178th240th339th237th169th181st198th138th316th247th75th338th288th113th146th280th272nd
2015-16273rd152nd72nd324th273rd161st222nd248th197th274th291st44th334th337th106th216th216th250th
2014-15276th209th289th209th219th338th89th165th311th8th297th56th218th251st341st164th7th6th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25293rd203rd--174th314th121st359th193rd145th233rd288th125th67th179th124th198th235th248th
2023-24272nd137th--185th346th6th277th176th248th353rd286th306th254th342nd8th171st359th362nd
2022-23288th271st--192nd273rd49th102nd221st216th319th284th206th50th150th45th223rd317th337th
2021-22344th268th--292nd332nd98th268th205th292nd329th300th338th249th236th67th167th314th314th
2020-21162nd273rd--215th111th35th241st231st8th321st105th339th296th219th25th209th315th333rd
2019-20333rd50th--342nd340th21st152nd262nd329th352nd301st264th278th332nd6th209th348th351st
2018-19350th78th--346th341st211th345th332nd324th167th322nd75th188th301st115th308th100th173rd
2017-18278th202nd--314th257th99th86th339th341st111th275th57th291st289th52nd335th79th168th
2016-17339th128th--280th327th300th340th273rd339th74th312th249th323rd318th266th245th48th54th
2015-16273rd117th--316th205th341st145th195th216th120th307th115th333rd288th317th148th74th40th
2014-15325th167th--235th246th337th265th55th323rd143rd196th158th175th206th334th34th125th49th