TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 UC Davis  22-11 (0.667)  |  Big West
All-Play Percentage: 0.597 (143rd)
Schedule Strength: 0.494 (170th)
Record Quality: 0.157 (94th)
Avg. Season Rank: 129.61 (125th)
Pace: 68.94 (240th)
Momentum: -1.71 (256th)
Off. Momentum: -0.17 (208th)
Def. Momentum: -1.54 (231st)
Consistency: -9.45 (227th)
Res. Consistency: -10.23 (71st)
Away From Home: -0.40 (174th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.33 (116th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.74 27.51 72.30 76.96 46.26 25.87 37.30 21.35 37.65 29.73 60.24 11.78 9.91 5.20 33.62 27.75 38.63 1.95
RANK: 190th 104th 150th 342nd 79th 313th 81st 219th 142nd 116th 153rd 113th 337th 291st 281st 160th 61st 58th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 99.25 27.06 -- 79.25 43.69 31.35 33.11 18.84 35.90 29.06 60.16 10.52 14.57 6.17 39.55 23.78 36.67 2.03
RANK: 108th 210th -- 60th 136th 222nd 62nd 42nd 123rd 189th 173rd 144th 171st 109th 264th 47th 234th 154th

ANALYSIS:
They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but UC Davis, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. Carrying a record of 22-11, they are currently rated #143 overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage this season. They are also ranked by this site as the #2 team (out of nine) in the Big West (average ranking 208.3).

Based on their performances this year, UC Davis will likely find more success on defense than they will on offense. Allowing about 99 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #108 slot in the ratings for defensive efficiency. UC Davis has been doing fairly decent work to prevent opponents from getting off shots from the field. The club is ranked 60th in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 79.25 vs. AO. UC Davis also owns a pretty good track record against teams that shoot the three. They rank 62nd in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 33.1% of their attempts from afar.

UC Davis doesn't perform as well offensively as they do defensively. The team is ranked 190th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 101 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. UC Davis happens to be one of the very worst in the game when it comes to maximizing the number of shot attempts they get off from the floor. The team is nationally ranked tenth from the bottom in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 76.96 vs. AO. UC Davis also poses no threat whatsoever to grab rebounds off their own misses. Against AO, the ball-club has a rating of 9.91 in potential points scored off of second chances (337th nationally).
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
UC Davis is typically better vs. teams that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. Against foes that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 43.19%, UC Davis performs above their norm 61% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 15% of the time.
When facing teams that have trouble defending the mid-range shot, UC Davis often performs better than normal. UC Davis is more efficient than usual 55% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 36.46%. In their other contests, UC Davis performs better than the norm 11% of the time.
UC Davis does better vs. clubs that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. When playing squads that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.57%, UC Davis performs above average 67% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 32% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25254th253rd218th205thBig West206th54th160th34th51st214th
2023-24162nd162nd111th144thBig West198th81st214th149th32nd170th
2022-23188th188th142nd166thBig West49th5th205th270th104th175th
2021-22222nd222nd167th192ndBig West164th18th279th84th45th214th
2020-21212th212th142nd187thBig West118th68th208th125th194th250th
2019-20216th216th242nd248thBig West158th178th214th128th133rd219th
2018-19249th249th282nd278thBig West251st67th194th258th22nd254th
2017-18143rd142nd66th94thBig West240th227th170th116th174th125th
2016-17211th211th75th143rdBig West133rd45th282nd284th300th210th
2015-16220th220th266th260thBig West276th227th170th61st182nd213th
2014-15108th108th18th50thBig West266th3rd163rd59th115th127th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25314th102nd126th345th290th340th283rd71st255th260th276th162nd343rd346th328th39th189th89th
2023-24234th137th65th322nd202nd234th266th128th100th300th170th116th267th226th190th101st271st225th
2022-23212th15th238th276th250th263rd280th292nd216th54th294th57th75th226th246th282nd26th56th
2021-22281st180th205th223rd248th329th338th120th293rd49th226th240th168th242nd328th113th46th19th
2020-21246th149th42nd290th200th323rd273rd199th228th72nd224th268th107th117th301st173rd45th31st
2019-20152nd220th11th312th112th192nd17th161st112th291st206th325th315th286th150th121st259th244th
2018-19295th305th189th310th179th239th242nd254th144th139th205th134th337th346th198th236th87th110th
2017-18190th104th150th342nd79th313th81st219th142nd116th153rd113th337th291st281st160th61st58th
2016-17300th91st284th310th262nd319th249th122nd186th158th306th269th124th114th297th93rd100th52nd
2015-16322nd331st327th314th171st341st101st10th74th339th195th255th335th297th327th4th322nd132nd
2014-1559th196th23rd332nd18th180th1st212th20th310th83rd333rd307th88th106th163rd277th260th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25176th308th--67th141st99th312th126th31st214th103rd279th255th187th140th165th262nd257th
2023-24119th245th--65th142nd81st160th119th82nd254th130th318th165th192nd101st147th289th282nd
2022-23167th202nd--84th255th38th289th151st135th301st186th217th54th136th65th161st330th335th
2021-22126th239th--228th84th175th150th178th202nd249th21st134th330th148th161st166th231st230th
2020-21181st344th--4th272nd23rd277th50th202nd197th197th244th124th297th82nd115th311th318th
2019-20297th249th--88th317th228th252nd98th312th117th333rd298th114th145th262nd117th147th115th
2018-19161st264th--24th268th149th186th108th340th82nd237th101st137th284th221st163rd142nd134th
2017-18108th210th--60th136th222nd62nd42nd123rd189th173rd144th171st109th264th47th234th154th
2016-17100th78th--168th137th181st79th89th253rd274th81st311th278th246th169th81st280th246th
2015-1682nd86th--164th101st240th32nd192nd123rd114th209th328th244th227th248th196th115th102nd
2014-15202nd126th--275th156th283rd211th173rd182nd183rd141st148th340th208th249th140th143rd122nd