TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 UC Davis  15-17 (0.469)  |  Big West
All-Play Percentage: 0.306 (254th)
Schedule Strength: 0.452 (160th)
Record Quality: -0.057 (205th)
Avg. Season Rank: 213.38 (215th)
Pace: 66.25 (207th)
Momentum: -1.75 (254th)
Off. Momentum: 2.55 (55th)
Def. Momentum: -4.30 (349th)
Consistency: -8.51 (52nd)
Res. Consistency: -12.75 (197th)
Away From Home: 0.90 (52nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.87 (34th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 99.34 29.14 73.71 82.88 41.67 27.40 32.09 25.57 35.42 29.91 55.79 12.50 10.50 3.65 33.06 30.85 36.09 1.97
RANK: 314th 101st 126th 345th 290th 340th 283rd 71st 255th 260th 276th 161st 343rd 346th 326th 39th 188th 89th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 108.37 30.75 -- 84.61 43.47 31.80 36.58 20.16 32.60 32.65 56.88 13.50 15.63 6.06 37.59 23.83 38.59 1.99
RANK: 176th 309th -- 68th 141st 99th 311th 127th 33rd 215th 104th 278th 254th 188th 141st 165th 263rd 257th

ANALYSIS:
If you see UC Davis on the schedule, you will likely get one of the average to below-average teams in college hoops. Their record this season is 15-17, and the club is ranked 254th overall (out of 364) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. Of the 11 schools in the Big West (average ranking 191.6), they're currently ranked as our #8 team in the conference.

Based on their performances this year, UC Davis will likely find more success on defense than they will on offense. Allowing about 108 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #176 slot in the ratings for defensive efficiency. UC Davis has been able to successfully prevent opponents from making shots between the three-point stripe and the low post. They're ranked 33rd in Division I in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 32.6% of their attempts from that distance. UC Davis also has been doing fairly decent work to prevent opponents from getting off shots from the field. The club is ranked 68th in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 84.61 vs. AO.

The offense for UC Davis, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the defense is. The team is ranked 314th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 99 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. UC Davis does a terrible job to take advantage of scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team converts only 3.7% of all second-chance opportunities (346th nationally), and with a rating of 10.50, they're 343rd in potential points scored off of the offensive boards as well. UC Davis also happens to be one of the very worst in the game when it comes to maximizing the number of shot attempts they get off from the floor. The team is nationally ranked 345th in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 82.88 vs. AO.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
UC Davis performs worse against squads that find ways to get to the free throw line. When facing teams that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 25.22, UC Davis is more efficient than normal 35% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 90% of the time.
When playing teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds, UC Davis usually performs worse than average. UC Davis is more efficient than normal 31% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.74%. In all other contests, UC Davis performs better than average 79% of the time.
UC Davis is typically better vs. teams that prefer the outside shot. Against foes that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.07, UC Davis performs above their norm 82% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 37% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25254th253rd218th205thBig West207th52nd160th34th52nd215th
2023-24162nd162nd111th144thBig West198th81st214th149th32nd170th
2022-23188th188th142nd166thBig West49th5th205th270th104th175th
2021-22222nd222nd167th192ndBig West164th18th279th84th45th214th
2020-21212th212th142nd187thBig West118th68th208th125th194th250th
2019-20216th216th242nd248thBig West158th178th214th128th133rd219th
2018-19249th249th282nd278thBig West251st67th194th258th22nd254th
2017-18143rd142nd66th94thBig West240th227th170th116th174th125th
2016-17211th211th75th143rdBig West133rd45th282nd284th300th210th
2015-16220th220th266th260thBig West276th227th170th61st182nd213th
2014-15108th108th18th50thBig West266th3rd163rd59th115th127th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25314th101st126th345th290th340th283rd71st255th260th276th161st343rd346th326th39th188th89th
2023-24234th137th65th322nd202nd234th266th128th100th300th170th116th267th226th190th101st271st225th
2022-23212th15th238th276th250th263rd280th292nd216th54th294th57th75th226th246th282nd26th56th
2021-22281st180th205th223rd248th329th338th120th293rd49th226th240th168th242nd328th113th46th19th
2020-21246th149th42nd290th200th323rd273rd199th228th72nd224th268th107th117th301st173rd45th31st
2019-20152nd220th11th312th112th192nd17th161st112th291st206th325th315th286th150th121st259th244th
2018-19295th305th189th310th179th239th242nd254th144th139th205th134th337th346th198th236th87th110th
2017-18190th104th150th342nd79th313th81st219th142nd116th153rd113th337th291st281st160th61st58th
2016-17300th91st284th310th262nd319th249th122nd186th158th306th269th124th114th297th93rd100th52nd
2015-16322nd331st327th314th171st341st101st10th74th339th195th255th335th297th327th4th322nd132nd
2014-1559th196th23rd332nd18th180th1st212th20th310th83rd333rd307th88th106th163rd277th260th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25176th309th--68th141st99th311th127th33rd215th104th278th254th188th141st165th263rd257th
2023-24119th245th--65th142nd81st160th119th82nd254th130th318th165th192nd101st147th289th282nd
2022-23167th202nd--84th255th38th289th151st135th301st186th217th54th136th65th161st330th335th
2021-22126th239th--228th84th175th150th178th202nd249th21st134th330th148th161st166th231st230th
2020-21181st344th--4th272nd23rd277th50th202nd197th197th244th124th297th82nd115th311th318th
2019-20297th249th--88th317th228th252nd98th312th117th333rd298th114th145th262nd117th147th115th
2018-19161st264th--24th268th149th186th108th340th82nd237th101st137th284th221st163rd142nd134th
2017-18108th210th--60th136th222nd62nd42nd123rd189th173rd144th171st109th264th47th234th154th
2016-17100th78th--168th137th181st79th89th253rd274th81st311th278th246th169th81st280th246th
2015-1682nd86th--164th101st240th32nd192nd123rd114th209th328th244th227th248th196th115th102nd
2014-15202nd126th--275th156th283rd211th173rd182nd183rd141st148th340th208th249th140th143rd122nd