TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
2024-25      2023-24      2022-23      2021-22
2020-21      2019-20      2018-19      2017-18
2016-17      2015-16      2014-15     
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
2024-25      2023-24      2022-23      2021-22
2020-21      2019-20      2018-19      2017-18
2016-17      2015-16      2014-15     
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 UC Irvine  32-7 (0.821)  |  Big West
All-Play Percentage: 0.774 (83rd)
 Schedule Strength: 0.505 (135th)
 Record Quality: 0.370 (31st)
 Avg. Season Rank: 80.36 (78th)
Pace: 67.90 (99th)
 Momentum: -1.03 (227th)
 Off. Momentum: -0.23 (218th)
 Def. Momentum: -0.81 (217th)
Consistency: -9.64 (202nd)
 Res. Consistency: -11.90 (133rd)
 Away From Home: 1.32 (26th)
 Paper Tiger Factor: 0.51 (53rd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 109.19 27.88 80.23 84.47 45.18 29.65 35.36 22.02 36.17 32.80 60.11 10.36 14.89 7.15 35.10 26.06 38.83 1.96
RANK: 151st 152nd 4th 304th 118th 310th 104th 171st 228th 146th 123rd 278th 164th 70th 278th 147th 115th 78th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 99.59 21.98 -- 91.27 39.46 34.33 34.08 27.09 36.82 29.85 48.04 12.06 15.81 5.97 37.62 29.68 32.70 2.05
RANK: 47th 22nd -- 337th 24th 221st 178th 350th 147th 95th 1st 174th 271st 169th 142nd 341st 49th 113th

ANALYSIS:
UC Irvine has a fairly solid squad that likely falls within the top quartile of all teams in college basketball this year. They have a record of 32-7 and are ranked 83rd overall (out of 364) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #2 team (out of 11) in the Big West (average ranking 191.7).

The primary strength for UC Irvine is defense. The team is ranked 47th in efficiency, allowing fewer than 100 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. UC Irvine does tremendous work shutting down the opposition from the inside. They are ranked first in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 48.0% of their attempts from close-up. Because of this, AO takes nowhere near as many inside shots as they typically would -- just 32.7% of AO's field goal attempts will come from short-distance. UC Irvine is also a superior unit when it comes to preventing opponents from getting to the foul line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 21.98 vs. AO, they are currently rated 22nd in the country in that category. UC Irvine is lastly one of the very best in the land in overall defensive field goal percentage. The team ranks #24 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO only makes good on about 39.5% of their total attempts from the floor. If UC Irvine does exhibit a weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's propensity to allow too many shot attempts per trip. The squad has a rating of 91.27 in defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO, which ranks 28th-worst in college basketball.

Though they're not quite as efficient offensively as they are defensively, UC Irvine still does OK when they have possession of the ball. The team ranks 151st nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 109 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. UC Irvine is deadly accurate at the free throw line. Making 80.2% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked fourth nationally in free throw percentage. UC Irvine also does a pretty solid job of scoring points off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team successfully converts 7.1% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 70th nationally).

On the road, UC Irvine performs somewhat better than their norm, as the squad is nationally ranked 26th in our away-from-home metric.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that favor a faster tempo, UC Irvine often performs better than normal. UC Irvine is more efficient than usual 62% of the time when facing teams that have a pace vs. AO greater than 65.34. In their other contests, UC Irvine performs better than the norm 25% of the time.
UC Irvine does worse vs. clubs that do not defend well on the perimeter. When playing squads that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.99%, UC Irvine performs above average 39% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 75% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2583rd82nd11th31stBig West99th202nd135th53rd26th78th
2023-2493rd93rd38th82ndBig West120th58th157th85th85th87th
2022-2396th96th72nd104thBig West80th166th180th115th11th82nd
2021-22136th136th126th133rdBig West268th199th148th6th351st101st
2020-21109th109th68th86thBig West260th175th124th275th321st123rd
2019-20106th104th72nd139thBig West204th23rd216th11th150th114th
2018-1961st60th10th41stBig West320th344th239th344th55th73rd
2017-18155th155th179th167thBig West220th162nd125th290th247th170th
2016-17128th128th122nd165thBig West268th249th234th237th261st156th
2015-1676th76th40th59thBig West225th121st107th292nd218th77th
2014-1590th90th99th96thBig West275th23rd110th7th118th120th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25151st152nd4th304th118th310th104th171st228th146th123rd278th164th70th278th147th115th78th
2023-24101st152nd84th111th65th348th187th63rd42nd46th153rd254th76th66th351st64th60th11th
2022-23132nd276th133rd118th87th285th91st76th64th130th157th122nd166th143rd302nd91st161st91st
2021-22228th161st14th286th171st340th287th8th5th341st300th292nd124th185th340th4th334th149th
2020-21154th186th64th74th145th346th208th3rd58th208th242nd294th72nd64th349th6th234th48th
2019-20109th291st100th80th55th301st78th10th27th271st89th126th28th23rd314th19th290th127th
2018-1975th255th183rd23rd70th269th73rd193rd95th10th201st214th97th82nd313th227th24th16th
2017-18249th277th232nd137th206th287th264th111th185th75th244th284th56th105th298th113th81st62nd
2016-17190th306th221st56th195th203rd127th132nd254th75th228th279th45th233rd228th153rd112th115th
2015-16130th267th235th133rd60th291st57th57th54th140th119th136th114th83rd298th60th159th75th
2014-15110th315th230th40th78th266th77th21st34th178th135th265th169th164th293rd34th237th116th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2547th22nd--337th24th221st178th350th147th95th1st174th271st169th142nd341st49th113th
2023-2482nd215th--139th83rd39th242nd348th185th72nd24th102nd93rd53rd43rd351st80th209th
2022-2383rd282nd--150th29th187th132nd311th107th37th14th23rd248th91st202nd320th34th75th
2021-2293rd187th--299th48th111th3rd351st218th55th90th331st275th115th75th349th32nd141st
2020-2150th213th--228th7th276th69th283rd85th46th8th101st128th62nd262nd276th35th49th
2019-20140th269th--271st42nd70th241st352nd166th40th9th305th296th98th44th352nd24th155th
2018-1959th174th--338th15th146th122nd329th94th207th1st91st209th104th70th306th136th214th
2017-1855th304th--241st15th118th37th292nd216th141st5th191st118th37th96th290th122nd176th
2016-1790th260th--286th28th131st121st330th48th129th25th186th171st51st86th323rd92nd182nd
2015-1646th116th--242nd12th291st77th310th131st16th4th24th125th22nd269th304th9th25th
2014-1582nd140th--299th37th124th113th328th69th169th10th18th277th159th82nd312th127th200th
© Copyright 2025 Erik Haslam, All Rights Reserved
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.