TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2015-16 UC Irvine  28-10 (0.737)  |  Big West
All-Play Percentage: 0.786 (76th)
Schedule Strength: 0.579 (107th)
Record Quality: 0.258 (59th)
Avg. Season Rank: 74.94 (77th)
Pace: 68.96 (225th)
Momentum: 0.63 (141st)
Off. Momentum: -0.82 (247th)
Def. Momentum: 1.45 (59th)
Consistency: -8.52 (121st)
Res. Consistency: -11.17 (150th)
Away From Home: -0.38 (218th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -2.54 (292nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2016. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.63 25.98 68.23 82.85 46.20 25.08 37.30 28.33 38.87 29.44 60.84 11.29 16.00 7.68 30.27 34.20 35.53 1.95
RANK: 130th 267th 235th 133rd 60th 291st 57th 57th 54th 140th 119th 136th 114th 83rd 298th 60th 159th 75th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 95.05 27.30 -- 83.74 38.57 31.63 33.11 28.25 35.02 23.86 50.03 8.47 14.22 4.92 37.77 33.74 28.49 2.09
RANK: 46th 116th -- 242nd 12th 291st 77th 310th 131st 16th 4th 24th 125th 22nd 269th 304th 9th 25th

ANALYSIS:
UC Irvine is a moderately good team, capable of testing many an opponent that they'll encounter. Haslametrics has them ranked 76th overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 28-10. Of the nine schools in the Big West (average ranking 160.1), they're currently ranked as our #2 team in the conference.

The primary strength for UC Irvine is defense. The team is ranked 46th in efficiency, allowing fewer than 96 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. UC Irvine does tremendous work shutting down the opposition from the inside. They are ranked fourth in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 50.0% of their attempts from close-up. Because of this, AO takes nowhere near as many inside shots as they typically would -- just 28.5% of AO's field goal attempts will come from short-distance. UC Irvine is also one of the very best in the land in overall defensive field goal percentage. The team ranks #12 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO only makes good on about 38.6% of their total attempts from the floor. UC Irvine lastly does a fantastic job to prevent opposing teams from capitalizing on chances from offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 4.9% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 22nd in the NCAA).

UC Irvine is also a fairly decent team on the offensive end of the court. The team ranks 130th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 104 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. UC Irvine allows very few breakaway opportunities for the opposition, which typically translates to fewer turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 8.47, which ranks #24 in the country. UC Irvine also does fairly solid work converting shots between the three-point stripe and the low post. The squad is ranked 54th nationally in mid-range field goal percentage, making about 38.9% of their attempts from those locations vs. AO. The team will take a fair amount of shots from those in-between locations, too. Approximately 34.2% of their attempts vs. AO are of the mid-range variety, which puts the team in the top-75 in that category nationally.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
UC Irvine performs worse against squads that do a nice job converting inside the paint. When facing teams that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 61.16%, UC Irvine is more efficient than normal 9% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 60% of the time.
When playing teams that aren't terribly skilled defensively, UC Irvine usually performs better than average. UC Irvine is more efficient than normal 58% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 98.70. In all other contests, UC Irvine performs better than average 17% of the time.
UC Irvine is typically worse vs. teams that shoot the ball well from the field. Against foes that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 43.08%, UC Irvine performs above their norm 29% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 67% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2582nd81st8th25thBig West104th238th137th46th17th78th
2023-2493rd93rd38th82ndBig West120th58th157th85th85th87th
2022-2396th96th72nd104thBig West80th166th180th115th11th82nd
2021-22136th136th126th133rdBig West268th199th148th6th351st101st
2020-21109th109th68th86thBig West260th175th124th275th321st123rd
2019-20106th104th72nd139thBig West204th23rd216th11th150th114th
2018-1961st60th10th41stBig West320th344th239th344th55th73rd
2017-18155th155th179th167thBig West220th162nd125th290th247th170th
2016-17128th128th122nd165thBig West268th249th234th237th261st156th
2015-1676th76th40th59thBig West225th121st107th292nd218th77th
2014-1590th90th99th96thBig West275th23rd110th7th118th120th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25150th169th2nd289th118th300th90th171st223rd144th139th275th161st83rd275th150th121st82nd
2023-24101st152nd84th111th65th348th187th63rd42nd46th153rd254th76th66th351st64th60th11th
2022-23132nd276th133rd118th87th285th91st76th64th130th157th122nd166th143rd302nd91st161st91st
2021-22228th161st14th286th171st340th287th8th5th341st300th292nd124th185th340th4th334th149th
2020-21154th186th64th74th145th346th208th3rd58th208th242nd294th72nd64th349th6th234th48th
2019-20109th291st100th80th55th301st78th10th27th271st89th126th28th23rd314th19th290th127th
2018-1975th255th183rd23rd70th269th73rd193rd95th10th201st214th97th82nd313th227th24th16th
2017-18249th277th232nd137th206th287th264th111th185th75th244th284th56th105th298th113th81st62nd
2016-17190th306th221st56th195th203rd127th132nd254th75th228th279th45th233rd228th153rd112th115th
2015-16130th267th235th133rd60th291st57th57th54th140th119th136th114th83rd298th60th159th75th
2014-15110th315th230th40th78th266th77th21st34th178th135th265th169th164th293rd34th237th116th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2547th14th--330th30th163rd195th347th174th120th1st152nd251st178th103rd339th71st148th
2023-2482nd215th--139th83rd39th242nd348th185th72nd24th102nd93rd53rd43rd351st80th209th
2022-2383rd282nd--150th29th187th132nd311th107th37th14th23rd248th91st202nd320th34th75th
2021-2293rd187th--299th48th111th3rd351st218th55th90th331st275th115th75th349th32nd141st
2020-2150th213th--228th7th276th69th283rd85th46th8th101st128th62nd262nd276th35th49th
2019-20140th269th--271st42nd70th241st352nd166th40th9th305th296th98th44th352nd24th155th
2018-1959th174th--338th15th146th122nd329th94th207th1st91st209th104th70th306th136th214th
2017-1855th304th--241st15th118th37th292nd216th141st5th191st118th37th96th290th122nd176th
2016-1790th260th--286th28th131st121st330th48th129th25th186th171st51st86th323rd92nd182nd
2015-1646th116th--242nd12th291st77th310th131st16th4th24th125th22nd269th304th9th25th
2014-1582nd140th--299th37th124th113th328th69th169th10th18th277th159th82nd312th127th200th