TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 UC Irvine  21-13 (0.618)  |  Big West
All-Play Percentage: 0.746 (90th)
Schedule Strength: 0.566 (110th)
Record Quality: 0.138 (96th)
Avg. Season Rank: 120.17 (120th)
Pace: 64.03 (275th)
Momentum: 0.82 (121st)
Off. Momentum: 0.17 (209th)
Def. Momentum: 0.65 (89th)
Consistency: -7.60 (23rd)
Res. Consistency: -10.49 (101st)
Away From Home: 0.42 (118th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.91 (7th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.99 24.60 67.64 85.33 45.20 25.10 36.68 31.95 39.06 28.28 59.72 9.90 15.29 6.75 29.41 37.45 33.14 1.96
RANK: 110th 315th 230th 40th 78th 266th 77th 21st 34th 178th 135th 265th 169th 164th 293rd 34th 237th 116th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 96.01 28.00 -- 85.03 39.43 26.91 33.68 29.68 33.18 28.45 51.37 8.72 16.68 6.64 31.64 34.90 33.46 1.98
RANK: 82nd 140th -- 299th 37th 124th 113th 328th 69th 169th 10th 18th 277th 159th 82nd 312th 127th 200th

ANALYSIS:
As an average to slightly above-average foe, UC Irvine should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. Haslametrics has them ranked 90th overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 21-13. Of the nine schools in the Big West (average ranking 152.7), they're currently ranked as our #2 team in the conference.

The primary strength for UC Irvine is defense. The team is ranked 82nd in efficiency, allowing fewer than 97 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. UC Irvine does tremendous work shutting down the opposition from the inside. They are ranked tenth in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 51.4% of their attempts from close-up. UC Irvine also boasts one of the better overall defensive field goal percentages in the country. The team ranks #37 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO only makes good on about 39.4% of their total attempts from the floor.

UC Irvine plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 110th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 103 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. UC Irvine allows very few breakaway opportunities for the opposition, which typically translates to fewer turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 8.72, which ranks #18 in the country. UC Irvine also has a keen ability to drain field goals between the three-point line and the low post. The squad is ranked 34th nationally in mid-range field goal percentage, making about 39.1% of their attempts from those locations vs. AO. The team will take a fair amount of shots from those in-between locations, too. Approximately 37.4% of their attempts vs. AO are of the mid-range variety, which puts the team in the top-50 in that category nationally. If UC Irvine does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's inability to get to the free throw line. The squad has a free throw attempt rate of only 24.60 vs. AO, which ranks 37th-worst in the country.

UC Irvine is one of the most consistent teams in NCAA basketball (currently ranked 23rd in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their upcoming games far easier to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
UC Irvine performs worse against squads that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. When facing teams that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 10.09, UC Irvine is more efficient than normal 32% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 92% of the time.
When playing teams that allow opponents to shoot well from the field, UC Irvine usually performs worse than average. UC Irvine is more efficient than normal 23% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 42.73%. In all other contests, UC Irvine performs better than average 79% of the time.
UC Irvine is typically worse vs. teams that do not defend well on the perimeter. Against foes that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 35.14%, UC Irvine performs above their norm 23% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 79% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2582nd81st8th25thBig West104th238th137th46th17th78th
2023-2493rd93rd38th82ndBig West120th58th157th85th85th87th
2022-2396th96th72nd104thBig West80th166th180th115th11th82nd
2021-22136th136th126th133rdBig West268th199th148th6th351st101st
2020-21109th109th68th86thBig West260th175th124th275th321st123rd
2019-20106th104th72nd139thBig West204th23rd216th11th150th114th
2018-1961st60th10th41stBig West320th344th239th344th55th73rd
2017-18155th155th179th167thBig West220th162nd125th290th247th170th
2016-17128th128th122nd165thBig West268th249th234th237th261st156th
2015-1676th76th40th59thBig West225th121st107th292nd218th77th
2014-1590th90th99th96thBig West275th23rd110th7th118th120th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25150th169th2nd289th118th300th90th171st223rd144th139th275th161st83rd275th150th121st82nd
2023-24101st152nd84th111th65th348th187th63rd42nd46th153rd254th76th66th351st64th60th11th
2022-23132nd276th133rd118th87th285th91st76th64th130th157th122nd166th143rd302nd91st161st91st
2021-22228th161st14th286th171st340th287th8th5th341st300th292nd124th185th340th4th334th149th
2020-21154th186th64th74th145th346th208th3rd58th208th242nd294th72nd64th349th6th234th48th
2019-20109th291st100th80th55th301st78th10th27th271st89th126th28th23rd314th19th290th127th
2018-1975th255th183rd23rd70th269th73rd193rd95th10th201st214th97th82nd313th227th24th16th
2017-18249th277th232nd137th206th287th264th111th185th75th244th284th56th105th298th113th81st62nd
2016-17190th306th221st56th195th203rd127th132nd254th75th228th279th45th233rd228th153rd112th115th
2015-16130th267th235th133rd60th291st57th57th54th140th119th136th114th83rd298th60th159th75th
2014-15110th315th230th40th78th266th77th21st34th178th135th265th169th164th293rd34th237th116th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2547th14th--330th30th163rd195th347th174th120th1st152nd251st178th103rd339th71st148th
2023-2482nd215th--139th83rd39th242nd348th185th72nd24th102nd93rd53rd43rd351st80th209th
2022-2383rd282nd--150th29th187th132nd311th107th37th14th23rd248th91st202nd320th34th75th
2021-2293rd187th--299th48th111th3rd351st218th55th90th331st275th115th75th349th32nd141st
2020-2150th213th--228th7th276th69th283rd85th46th8th101st128th62nd262nd276th35th49th
2019-20140th269th--271st42nd70th241st352nd166th40th9th305th296th98th44th352nd24th155th
2018-1959th174th--338th15th146th122nd329th94th207th1st91st209th104th70th306th136th214th
2017-1855th304th--241st15th118th37th292nd216th141st5th191st118th37th96th290th122nd176th
2016-1790th260th--286th28th131st121st330th48th129th25th186th171st51st86th323rd92nd182nd
2015-1646th116th--242nd12th291st77th310th131st16th4th24th125th22nd269th304th9th25th
2014-1582nd140th--299th37th124th113th328th69th169th10th18th277th159th82nd312th127th200th