TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
2024-25      2023-24      2022-23      2021-22
2020-21      2019-20      2018-19      2017-18
2016-17      2015-16      2014-15     
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
2024-25      2023-24      2022-23      2021-22
2020-21      2019-20      2018-19      2017-18
2016-17      2015-16      2014-15     
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Long Beach St.  21-15 (0.583)  |  Big West
All-Play Percentage: 0.562 (159th)
 Schedule Strength: 0.445 (161st)
 Record Quality: 0.058 (140th)
 Avg. Season Rank: 163.74 (160th)
Pace: 70.92 (30th)
 Momentum: 0.42 (153rd)
 Off. Momentum: 1.75 (92nd)
 Def. Momentum: -1.33 (229th)
Consistency: -8.49 (88th)
 Res. Consistency: -11.69 (143rd)
 Away From Home: 1.25 (49th)
 Paper Tiger Factor: 0.46 (64th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 106.23 29.56 70.87 87.62 43.88 26.30 31.90 30.95 38.15 30.36 60.10 13.39 16.31 6.50 30.02 35.33 34.66 1.95
RANK: 157th 61st 239th 82nd 188th 326th 297th 22nd 220th 198th 100th 80th 57th 86th 339th 26th 233rd 82nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.84 24.49 -- 85.83 43.59 36.82 36.28 20.71 36.23 28.30 58.46 11.71 12.75 4.82 42.89 24.13 32.98 2.10
RANK: 181st 101st -- 192nd 146th 344th 294th 90th 62nd 78th 203rd 202nd 129th 89th 346th 78th 72nd 22nd

ANALYSIS:
Per this website's calculations, Long Beach St. is somewhere between an average to slightly above-average D1 ball-club. Ranked 159th overall (out of 362) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 21-15. Of the 11 schools in the Big West (average ranking 193.5), they're currently ranked as our #3 team in the conference.

If there is a strength for Long Beach St. this year, it's probably on the offensive end of the court. The team is rated 157th in offensive efficiency, scoring more than 106 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Long Beach St. favors the mid-range jumper over any of the others. The club is ranked 26th in ratio of mid-range attempts to total field goal attempts. As far as converting those mid-range shots goes, the team shoots a mediocre 38.2% vs. AO. Long Beach St. also does an adequate job of creating chances for themselves off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 16.31 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked 57th in the NCAA).

Long Beach St. plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 181st nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 106 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Long Beach St. has been fairly decent in preventing teams from draining shots from between the three-point stripe and the low post. They're ranked 62nd in Division I in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 36.2% of their attempts from that distance.

On the road, Long Beach St. performs somewhat better than their norm, as the squad is nationally ranked 49th in our away-from-home metric.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Long Beach St. does better vs. clubs that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. When playing squads that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 38.39%, Long Beach St. performs above average 63% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 20% of the time.
Long Beach St. performs worse against squads that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities. When facing teams that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 85.46, Long Beach St. is more efficient than normal 20% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 63% of the time.
When playing teams that favor a faster tempo, Long Beach St. usually performs worse than average. Long Beach St. is more efficient than normal 27% of the time when facing clubs that have a pace vs. AO greater than 67.85. In all other contests, Long Beach St. performs better than average 61% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25301st301st339th333rdBig West346th295th149th189th66th281st
2023-24159th159th134th140thBig West30th88th161st64th49th160th
2022-23182nd182nd183rd175thBig West5th1st158th151st64th169th
2021-22172nd172nd124th124thBig West21st147th145th301st193rd245th
2020-21217th217th284th250thBig West5th60th164th205th70th272nd
2019-20305th305th292nd264thBig West54th225th122nd92nd84th309th
2018-19214th213th229th215thBig West26th16th164th27th205th215th
2017-18172nd172nd214th195thBig West29th60th116th307th168th184th
2016-17225th225th237th244thBig West116th79th197th166th172nd230th
2015-16101st101st138th96thBig West77th102nd53rd117th153rd112th
2014-15133rd133rd190th133rdBig West144th212th47th108th280th103rd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25282nd189th71st350th222nd313th139th98th140th306th293rd342nd266th188th265th58th257th164th
2023-24157th61st239th82nd188th326th297th22nd220th198th100th80th57th86th339th26th233rd82nd
2022-23185th92nd306th140th120th354th342nd70th207th9th147th43rd3rd1st358th79th13th3rd
2021-22153rd33rd91st296th152nd286th89th62nd227th301st117th49th205th133rd262nd40th276th173rd
2020-21249th234th222nd300th153rd241st193rd201st137th192nd177th138th204th237th206th182nd140th143rd
2019-20329th214th249th338th242nd323rd216th22nd162nd342nd182nd282nd273rd320th302nd4th328th193rd
2018-19222nd29th210th297th192nd332nd235th10th188th334th59th101st73rd168th330th6th317th156th
2017-18159th55th106th314th92nd335th110th81st159th161st101st72nd53rd48th329th54th110th45th
2016-17175th163rd92nd144th196th301st179th17th111th279th202nd303rd36th60th308th14th288th144th
2015-1697th56th160th232nd107th133rd44th255th129th149th175th120th158th206th121st252nd131st196th
2014-15170th211th231st122nd165th112th240th88th102nd303rd74th89th257th222nd130th92nd314th280th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25311th295th--275th206th246th331st263rd199th135th164th328th287th214th211th239th110th123rd
2023-24181st101st--192nd146th344th294th90th62nd78th203rd202nd129th89th346th78th72nd22nd
2022-23191st98th--210th151st314th271st53rd41st213th183rd326th220th249th303rd40th201st111th
2021-22214th45th--166th227th315th306th138th173rd59th313th127th73rd132nd319th143rd60th40th
2020-21159th292nd--167th101st250th114th142nd22nd151st254th324th141st79th261st143rd144th115th
2019-20268th117th--267th199th323rd280th244th205th45th255th345th230th182nd309th230th32nd27th
2018-19198th141st--266th199th164th108th271st230th201st248th282nd290th303rd124th249th161st205th
2017-18202nd28th--275th227th138th209th284th250th177th239th340th94th160th101st271st143rd191st
2016-17254th189th--173rd270th146th320th337th274th25th314th253rd200th252nd134th338th24th69th
2015-16122nd186th--85th126th246th106th102nd119th126th173rd63rd65th70th276th123rd147th106th
2014-15128th161st--139th101st331st82nd81st175th64th171st79th208th198th336th86th61st21st
© Copyright 2025 Erik Haslam, All Rights Reserved
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.