TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 Old Dominion  19-12 (0.613)  |  Conference USA
All-Play Percentage: 0.657 (121st)
Schedule Strength: 0.473 (193rd)
Record Quality: 0.097 (117th)
Avg. Season Rank: 123.98 (118th)
Pace: 64.85 (346th)
Momentum: 0.22 (158th)
Off. Momentum: 1.26 (137th)
Def. Momentum: -1.03 (211th)
Consistency: -9.18 (201st)
Res. Consistency: -11.36 (175th)
Away From Home: 1.48 (29th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 2.07 (9th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 97.11 26.74 64.11 86.14 41.72 24.54 32.95 36.39 33.92 25.21 61.52 8.76 16.37 6.86 28.49 42.24 29.26 1.99
RANK: 244th 200th 329th 15th 275th 322nd 271st 1st 286th 298th 103rd 287th 82nd 145th 339th 1st 325th 134th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 94.62 28.57 -- 78.77 40.54 30.74 34.67 24.52 32.80 23.50 56.30 9.78 12.13 4.28 39.03 31.13 29.84 2.09
RANK: 49th 211th -- 55th 42nd 233rd 130th 210th 37th 26th 73rd 94th 25th 8th 290th 256th 41st 38th

ANALYSIS:
As an average to slightly above-average foe, Old Dominion should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. They have a record of 19-12 and are ranked 121st overall (out of 351) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #3 team (out of 14) in Conference USA (average ranking 201.9).

Old Dominion has a fairly effective defensive attack. Occupying the #49 slot in our defensive efficiency ratings and preferring an extremely deliberate pace (the sixth-slowest in D1), they will allow about 95 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Old Dominion does a fantastic job to prevent opposing teams from capitalizing on chances from offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 4.3% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked eighth in the NCAA), and with a rating of 12.13, they're 25th in potential points allowed off of the offensive glass as well. Old Dominion has also been able to successfully prevent opponents from making shots between the three-point stripe and the low post. They're ranked 37th in Division I in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 32.8% of their attempts from that distance.

Unfortunately, Old Dominion is not even remotely close to being as good on offense as they are on defense. The team is ranked 244th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 97 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Old Dominion has had serious struggles making their free throws this year. Converting just 64.1% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #329 overall in free throw percentage. If Old Dominion does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to successfully get off shots each possession. The squad has a field goal attempt rate of 86.14 vs. AO, which ranks #15 in college basketball.

On the road, Old Dominion performs somewhat better than their norm, as the squad is nationally ranked 29th in our away-from-home metric.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds, Old Dominion often performs better than normal. Old Dominion is more efficient than usual 55% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 13.80. In their other contests, Old Dominion performs better than the norm 11% of the time.
Old Dominion does better vs. clubs that are typically efficient on offense. When playing squads that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 96.85, Old Dominion performs above average 55% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 11% of the time.
Old Dominion performs worse against squads that have trouble defending the mid-range shot. When facing teams that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.78%, Old Dominion is more efficient than normal 11% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 55% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25293rd293rd252nd261stSun Belt249th29th221st277th116th320th
2023-24295th295th345th326thSun Belt43rd76th149th196th128th265th
2022-23207th207th106th125thSun Belt270th152nd156th30th142nd208th
2021-22193rd193rd256th221stConference USA286th303rd136th225th358th204th
2020-21158th157th83rd99thConference USA219th183rd158th131st191st155th
2019-20172nd172nd264th219thConference USA269th52nd143rd140th258th187th
2018-19130th130th33rd54thConference USA312th52nd184th87th229th120th
2017-1880th80th19th51stConference USA319th135th167th283rd257th81st
2016-17121st121st99th117thConference USA346th201st193rd9th29th118th
2015-1694th94th74th110thConference USA348th266th213th299th268th96th
2014-1573rd73rd19th43rdConference USA336th193rd171st243rd340th58th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25299th220th134th15th356th182nd360th36th329th212th312th200th9th57th240th57th283rd194th
2023-24306th328th334th103rd283rd214th258th83rd313th227th208th64th222nd239th234th92nd245th188th
2022-23251st35th309th81st318th311th346th50th329th103rd255th71st6th115th322nd60th129th60th
2021-22232nd65th288th68th233rd347th354th15th275th119th124th156th32nd117th348th19th146th30th
2020-21188th125th192nd130th157th322nd342nd84th291st67th40th50th153rd163rd326th91st74th33rd
2019-20242nd240th253rd18th301st203rd323rd79th348th103rd148th186th10th74th261st96th157th112th
2018-19232nd212th300th19th312th222nd217th32nd288th146th303rd210th32nd121st278th54th208th127th
2017-18116th117th278th17th173rd205th225th26th265th212th49th17th36th11th267th44th266th167th
2016-17244th200th329th15th275th322nd271st1st286th298th103rd287th82nd145th339th1st325th134th
2015-16137th261st247th1st188th333rd332nd1st67th248th95th182nd36th56th348th1st323rd83rd
2014-15111th262nd268th4th174th138th269th26th162nd192nd67th106th126th185th217th64th288th208th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25245th275th--224th258th92nd169th254th241st241st269th182nd143rd88th81st246th228th272nd
2023-24231st327th--61st187th303rd272nd36th86th101st245th110th263rd217th335th46th134th61st
2022-23131st291st--132nd90th333rd157th147th66th34th208th94th277th217th342nd141st35th19th
2021-22150th188th--233rd101st341st219th175th54th40th177th35th196th105th338th160th30th18th
2020-21133rd230th--81st112th258th291st187th75th34th130th229th162nd123rd298th214th49th41st
2019-2096th246th--76th67th287th212th181st98th19th90th19th27th1st330th205th25th21st
2018-1934th206th--111th40th231st62nd147th23rd92nd66th41st90th20th260th159th117th106th
2017-1843rd93rd--68th68th260th137th161st27th51st146th3rd56th69th300th204th71st51st
2016-1749th211th--55th42nd233rd130th210th37th26th73rd94th25th8th290th256th41st38th
2015-1667th125th--169th42nd229th90th175th100th161st28th32nd89th77th234th180th145th128th
2014-1539th263rd--13th84th200th40th182nd109th10th243rd38th88th88th288th256th25th35th