TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 Jacksonville  17-16 (0.515)  |  Atlantic Sun
All-Play Percentage: 0.169 (292nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.316 (331st)
Record Quality: -0.186 (263rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 259.24 (261st)
Pace: 70.24 (178th)
Momentum: 0.00 (171st)
Off. Momentum: -0.57 (234th)
Def. Momentum: 0.56 (91st)
Consistency: -8.08 (72nd)
Res. Consistency: -9.02 (42nd)
Away From Home: 1.69 (20th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -2.10 (278th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 98.16 25.06 72.67 79.17 42.43 34.80 36.71 16.67 37.58 27.70 52.52 12.16 10.67 3.72 43.96 21.05 34.99 2.09
RANK: 219th 258th 104th 290th 243rd 33rd 105th 333rd 120th 206th 326th 83rd 325th 348th 20th 331st 169th 295th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 110.03 29.28 -- 79.22 49.31 31.13 39.12 17.96 38.30 30.13 66.40 12.59 13.19 7.92 39.30 22.67 38.03 2.01
RANK: 304th 243rd -- 77th 339th 251st 328th 12th 251st 246th 323rd 303rd 82nd 283rd 294th 10th 283rd 186th

ANALYSIS:
Despite having a win percentage north of .500, Jacksonville is definitely a below-average ball-club in college hoops this year. Ranked 292nd overall (out of 351) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 17-16. They are also ranked by this site as the #7 team (out of eight) in the Atlantic Sun (average ranking 243.4). With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.316 (which ranks 331st in the nation), Jacksonville has faced some of the easiest opponents in all of college basketball.

Jacksonville does not provide much of a challenge on defense. They are ranked at #304 in efficiency on that end of the court and give up about 110 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Jacksonville allows opposing teams far too many easy chances from the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four main defensive field goal shooting categories. AO will convert a healthy 39.1% of their three-pointers (328th in the nation), 66.4% of their near-proximity attempts (323rd), and 49.3% of their total shots from the field (339th).

Though they rate better on offense than they do on defense, Jacksonville still isn't one of the more capable offensive teams in college hoops. Scoring roughly 98 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #219 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Jacksonville does a terrible job to take advantage of scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team converts only 3.7% of all second-chance opportunities (fourth from the bottom nationally), and with a rating of 10.67, they're 325th in potential points scored off of the offensive boards as well. Jacksonville also won't provide opponents much of a scare with their shooting percentage from the inside. The team is ranked 326th in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 52.5% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO.

When playing on the road, Jacksonville has played their best basketball this season. The team is currently ranked 20th in the country in the away-from-home metric our site tracks.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Jacksonville does worse vs. clubs that do a nice job converting inside the paint. When playing squads that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 59.36%, Jacksonville never performs above average. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 65% of the time.
Jacksonville performs better against squads that aren't terribly skilled defensively. When facing teams that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 107.09, Jacksonville is more efficient than normal 63% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 10% of the time.
When playing teams that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities, Jacksonville usually performs worse than average. Jacksonville is more efficient than normal 10% of the time when facing clubs that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 10.42. In all other contests, Jacksonville performs better than average 63% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25213th213th134th172ndAtlantic Sun196th186th225th312th241st192nd
2023-24282nd282nd208th275thAtlantic Sun299th359th294th345th319th299th
2022-23223rd222nd240th247thAtlantic Sun360th293rd192nd247th92nd195th
2021-22167th166th68th144thAtlantic Sun356th335th284th277th346th223rd
2020-21283rd283rd209th267thAtlantic Sun155th15th274th219th338th309th
2019-20241st241st242nd278thAtlantic Sun232nd295th273rd311th72nd222nd
2018-19251st249th271st287thAtlantic Sun64th282nd243rd77th50th280th
2017-18320th320th214th294thAtlantic Sun196th288th316th222nd254th329th
2016-17292nd292nd168th263rdAtlantic Sun178th72nd331st278th20th261st
2015-16292nd292nd186th252ndAtlantic Sun82nd59th284th96th113th295th
2014-15341st341st304th339thAtlantic Sun212th228th334th335th241st343rd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25244th263rd324th128th215th291st109th101st139th122nd332nd64th92nd62nd295th105th140th78th
2023-24284th144th278th175th301st269th238th102nd249th179th340th175th63rd106th278th96th181st116th
2022-23274th355th23rd209th239th140th217th64th9th353rd319th288th344th344th130th54th352nd321st
2021-22216th93rd227th94th247th313th280th26th55th194th319th304th28th138th326th29th212th77th
2020-21304th124th289th333rd283rd169th286th109th61st344th278th183rd229th276th109th81st340th312th
2019-20280th250th310th196th254th233rd260th106th36th203rd325th215th73rd111th234th99th193rd150th
2018-19266th202nd313th236th183rd303rd290th176th237th73rd174th156th172nd175th292nd162nd60th53rd
2017-18326th302nd331st175th291st305th283rd96th317th96th274th252nd262nd318th309th92nd96th59th
2016-17219th258th104th290th243rd33rd105th333rd120th206th326th83rd325th348th20th331st169th295th
2015-16280th303rd321st135th279th175th48th61st161st300th339th181st186th315th181st62nd313th252nd
2014-15312th173rd308th305th285th233rd118th175th215th249th334th193rd329th343rd199th140th195th166th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25174th298th--68th231st42nd273rd70th81st324th163rd294th101st133rd74th87th345th333rd
2023-24241st319th--49th268th181st267th83rd287th165th229th329th213th281st234th114th215th172nd
2022-23173rd137th--271st82nd355th65th180th246th18th239th320th177th20th350th140th7th9th
2021-22130th243rd--189th83rd327th16th260th350th16th86th90th106th2nd325th258th13th14th
2020-21228th162nd--268th215th253rd109th316th269th55th317th186th328th329th232nd309th33rd58th
2019-20189th123rd--343rd99th274th70th338th317th56th84th195th263rd288th195th324th20th56th
2018-19248th102nd--273rd262nd84th282nd148th202nd339th157th283rd203rd260th43rd113th327th330th
2017-18288th82nd--313th272nd255th98th82nd320th310th247th225th201st186th193rd43rd278th241st
2016-17304th243rd--77th339th251st328th12th251st246th323rd303rd82nd283rd294th10th283rd186th
2015-16267th108th--204th301st312th255th39th271st231st303rd47th79th178th307th22nd226th121st
2014-15344th284th--158th341st257th340th51st344th229th314th343rd186th324th269th48th230th166th