Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2019-20 UT Rio Grande 14-16 (0.467) | WAC

All-Play Percentage: 0.324 (238^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.436 (224^th)	Record Quality: -0.185 (263^rd)	Avg. Season Rank: 258.91 (259^th)
Pace: 71.61 (65^th)	Momentum: -0.41 (200^th)	Off. Momentum: 0.85 (166^th)	Def. Momentum: -1.26 (216^th)
Consistency: -8.36 (86^th)	Res. Consistency: -9.57 (36^th)	Away From Home: -0.83 (228^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: 0.23 (91^st)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through March 11, 2020. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

95.71

25.17

72.93

82.15

41.91

25.78

32.97

31.78

39.31

24.58

54.64

14.11

11.25

4.32

31.38

38.69

29.93

2.01

RANK:

230^th

179^th

117^th

158^th

245^th

313^th

204^th

8^th

84^th

313^th

295^th

32^nd

260^th

237^th

319^th

9^th

308^th

144^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

102.44

31.75

74.60

46.54

27.70

37.07

18.88

38.60

28.02

61.24

10.07

11.90

5.87

37.13

25.31

37.56

2.00

RANK:

247^th

336^th

8^th

312^th

64^th

336^th

39^th

238^th

150^th

246^th

87^th

97^th

281^st

156^th

96^th

280^th

246^th

ANALYSIS:
UT Rio Grande has a squad that most likely falls somewhere in the bottom half of NCAA Division I teams this year. Carrying a record of 14-16, they are currently rated #238 overall (out of 353) in All-Play Percentage this season. Of the nine schools in the WAC (average ranking 236.0), they're currently ranked as our #5 team in the conference.

Though their defense is far from abysmal, UT Rio Grande is not really proficient on that end of the court either. Allowing about 102 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they are ranked #247 in defensive efficiency. UT Rio Grande fouls far too much and sends the opposition to the line way too often. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 31.75 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #336 in the country in that category. UT Rio Grande also does an extremely poor job to deny the opposition behind the arc. They rank 336th nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 37.1% of their attempts from afar. If UT Rio Grande does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to limit the number of shot attempts by the opposition. The team has a defensive field goal attempt rate of 74.60 vs. AO, which ranks eighth-best in college basketball.

UT Rio Grande doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 96 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #230 in the nation in offensive efficiency. UT Rio Grande fares worse than most teams when it comes to converting from locations close to the hoop. The team is ranked 295th in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 54.6% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Tue 11/5/2019	@ South Dakota St.₁₂₇	L 67.61 - 79.70	L 57-70	0-1	96.54	77.79	▼ 18.75	106.96	90.80	▲ 16.16	▼ 2.59
Mon 11/11/2019	vs Howard Payne	---	W 93-42	1-1	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Fri 11/15/2019	vs North Dakota St.₁₀₄ *	L 65.83 - 75.70	L 70-76	1-2	95.19	94.37	▼ 0.82	108.41	105.56	▲ 2.85	▲ 2.03
Sat 11/16/2019	vs Stony Brook₂₀₀ *	L 68.08 - 70.92	L 58-69	1-3	94.25	86.57	▼ 7.68	97.07	104.15	▼ 7.08	▼ 14.76
Sun 11/17/2019	@ Texas A&M-CC₃₀₀	W 67.74 - 67.00	L 55-63	1-4	99.96	92.61	▼ 7.35	93.22	102.55	▼ 9.33	▼ 16.68
Mon 11/25/2019	vs TX A&M-Intl	---	W 79-52	2-4	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Sat 11/30/2019	vs Texas A&M-CC₃₀₀	W 71.16 - 63.64	L 52-55	2-5	99.96	68.54	▼ 31.42	93.22	75.78	▲ 17.44	▼ 13.98
Tue 12/3/2019	vs Sam Houston₂₁₈	W 73.69 - 71.99	W 90-86 (2OT)	3-5	98.33	82.92	▼ 15.41	99.99	90.78	▲ 9.21	▼ 6.20
Fri 12/6/2019	vs Mid-America CU	---	W 92-50	4-5	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Fri 12/13/2019	@ Creighton₈	L 62.57 - 87.93	L 58-89	4-6	90.89	79.14	▼ 11.75	120.29	116.11	▲ 4.18	▼ 7.57
Sun 12/15/2019	@ Omaha₂₂₄	L 70.52 - 75.53	L 82-92	4-7	100.54	102.12	▲ 1.58	101.12	112.58	▼ 11.46	▼ 9.88
Sat 12/21/2019	@ Texas Tech₁₉	L 57.87 - 81.31	L 58-68	4-8	85.68	87.43	▲ 1.75	112.43	96.82	▲ 15.61	▲ 17.36
Mon 12/30/2019	@ Oklahoma₄₁	L 61.47 - 82.05	L 72-91	4-9	87.57	88.27	▲ 0.70	109.69	121.43	▼ 11.74	▼ 11.04
Thu 1/2/2020	@ Cal Baptist₂₁₇	L 70.67 - 76.38	L 67-76	4-10	101.83	93.60	▼ 8.23	104.03	97.89	▲ 6.14	▼ 2.09
Thu 1/9/2020	vs UMKC₂₂₁	W 67.16 - 65.04	W 76-64	5-10	96.33	120.13	▲ 23.80	96.94	102.45	▼ 5.51	▲ 18.29
Sat 1/11/2020	vs Chicago State₃₅₃	W 84.17 - 58.82	W 87-63	6-10	113.52	117.22	▲ 3.70	83.70	78.25	▲ 5.45	▲ 9.15
Thu 1/16/2020	@ Seattle₂₀₈	L 69.43 - 75.74	L 74-91	6-11	97.78	106.80	▲ 9.02	100.20	123.64	▼ 23.44	▼ 14.42
Sat 1/18/2020	@ Utah Valley₂₄₂	L 69.35 - 72.80	L 70-72	6-12	97.57	102.45	▲ 4.88	96.58	101.90	▼ 5.32	▼ 0.44
Sat 1/25/2020	vs New Mexico St.₉₉	L 63.93 - 70.35	L 62-67	6-13	92.91	97.55	▲ 4.64	106.30	106.87	▼ 0.57	▲ 4.07
Thu 1/30/2020	vs Grand Canyon₂₈₀	W 77.15 - 71.38	L 79-87	6-14	106.16	111.63	▲ 5.47	102.02	120.02	▼ 18.00	▼ 12.53
Sat 2/1/2020	vs CSU Bakersfield₂₆₆	W 68.73 - 63.85	W 70-59	7-14	97.18	103.21	▲ 6.03	94.05	87.96	▲ 6.09	▲ 12.12
Thu 2/6/2020	@ UMKC₂₂₁	L 63.81 - 68.35	W 73-60	8-14	96.33	118.88	▲ 22.55	96.94	67.36	▲ 29.58	▲ 52.13
Sat 2/8/2020	@ Chicago State₃₅₃	W 80.58 - 62.38	W 75-64	9-14	113.52	106.93	▼ 6.59	83.70	78.15	▲ 5.55	▼ 1.04
Thu 2/13/2020	vs Utah Valley₂₄₂	W 72.94 - 69.23	W 80-72	10-14	97.57	99.85	▲ 2.28	96.58	94.14	▲ 2.44	▲ 4.72
Sat 2/15/2020	vs Seattle₂₀₈	W 73.01 - 72.05	W 79-72	11-14	97.78	102.67	▲ 4.89	100.20	91.64	▲ 8.56	▲ 13.45
Tue 2/18/2020	vs TX Perm Basin	---	W 93-80	12-14	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Sat 2/22/2020	@ New Mexico St.₉₉	L 60.63 - 73.64	L 62-78	12-15	92.91	97.61	▲ 4.70	106.30	114.48	▼ 8.18	▼ 3.48
Thu 2/27/2020	@ CSU Bakersfield₂₆₆	L 65.33 - 67.18	L 59-79	12-16	97.18	87.52	▼ 9.66	94.05	106.12	▼ 12.07	▼ 21.73
Sat 2/29/2020	@ Grand Canyon₂₈₀	L 73.64 - 74.95	W 88-80	13-16	106.16	128.16	▲ 22.00	102.02	113.49	▼ 11.47	▲ 10.53
Sat 3/7/2020	vs Cal Baptist₂₁₇	W 74.17 - 72.71	W 79-76 (OT)	14-16	101.83	88.53	▼ 13.30	104.03	98.16	▲ 5.87	▼ 7.43
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	When playing teams that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities, UT Rio Grande usually performs worse than average. UT Rio Grande is more efficient than normal 13% of the time when facing clubs that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 11.94. In all other contests, UT Rio Grande performs better than average 50% of the time.
	UT Rio Grande is typically worse vs. teams that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities. Against foes that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 79.86, UT Rio Grande performs above their norm 21% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 58% of the time.
	When facing teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds, UT Rio Grande often performs worse than normal. UT Rio Grande is more efficient than usual 25% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 4.27%. In their other contests, UT Rio Grande performs better than the norm 60% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	Varner takes over late sending UTRGV past Cal Baptist in OT (3/7/2020 10:56:00 PM) Lesley Varner II scored 22 points and his 3-pointer with four seconds left gave UT Rio Grande Valley a 79-76 win over California Baptist on Saturday. De'jon Davis tied the game at 76 for California Baptist just three seconds before Varner's shot.
	Varner powers UT Rio Grande Valley past Grand Canyon, 88-80 (2/29/2020 11:00:00 PM) PHOENIX — Lesley Varner II had 32 points as Texas Rio Grande Valley topped Grand Canyon 88-80 on Saturday night. Varner II shot 5 for 6 from behind the arc and 9 for 10 from the line. He added seven rebounds.
	Texas Rio Grande Valley tops Texas Permian Basin 93-80 (2/18/2020 6:08:00 PM) Get real-time COLLEGEBASKETBALL basketball coverage and scores as TX-Permian Basin Falcons takes on UTRGV Vaqueros. We bring you the latest game previews, live stats, and recaps on CBSSports.com
	Varner helps UT Rio Grande Valley hold off Seattle, 79-72 (2/15/2020 11:05:00 PM) Lesley Varner II scored 23 points and grabbed eight rebounds as Texas Rio Grande Valley held off Seattle to earn a 79-72 win on Saturday night.
	NMSU looks to extend streak vs Utah Valley (2/14/2020 7:00:00 AM) BOTTOM LINE: New Mexico State looks for its 30th straight conference win against Utah Valley. New Mexico State's last WAC loss came against the California Baptist Lancers 82-76 on Jan. 3, 2019. Utah Valley came up short in an 80-72 game at Texas Rio Grande Valley in its last outing.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR
2024-25	228	0.375	16-15 (0.516)	0.516	-0.106	Southland	69.26	-8.99	0.377	0.47	2.32	206.55
2023-24	340	0.061	6-25 (0.194)	0.194	-0.357	WAC	70.47	-8.34	0.455	1.70	-1.77	324.75
2022-23	230	0.367	15-17 (0.469)	0.469	-0.092	WAC	71.96	-9.00	0.435	-0.11	-1.38	262.17
2021-22	305	0.148	8-23 (0.258)	0.258	-0.289	WAC	71.98	-9.78	0.433	-1.78	1.77	280.07
2020-21	272	0.239	9-10 (0.474)	0.474	-0.222	WAC	71.68	-7.59	0.406	-0.57	-0.65	239.51
2019-20	238	0.324	14-16 (0.467)	0.467	-0.185	WAC	71.61	-8.36	0.436	0.23	-0.83	258.91
2018-19	189	0.466	20-17 (0.541)	0.541	-0.005	WAC	71.54	-9.34	0.475	0.23	1.50	192.77
2017-18	276	0.214	15-18 (0.455)	0.455	-0.114	WAC	75.09	-7.13	0.450	0.10	0.43	248.97
2016-17	297	0.154	10-22 (0.313)	0.313	-0.284	WAC	76.31	-9.66	0.455	-1.13	-0.37	300.73
2015-16	346	0.014	8-22 (0.267)	0.267	-0.381	WAC	69.83	-9.10	0.422	0.25	-1.20	340.80
2014-15	327	0.069	10-21 (0.323)	0.323	-0.365	WAC	65.20	-9.92	0.397	0.20	0.48	302.72

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	106.04	19.45	71.60	89.94	43.69	41.67	32.47	20.45	40.46	27.82	62.87	15.38	13.30	5.59	46.33	22.73	30.94	2.15
2023-24	92.92	27.29	71.43	82.08	39.73	26.97	30.44	25.56	37.56	29.55	50.08	12.20	11.70	4.01	32.86	31.14	36.00	1.97
2022-23	101.35	29.22	69.34	81.93	43.54	29.36	33.21	18.22	36.99	34.34	55.85	7.91	15.73	6.80	35.84	22.25	41.91	1.94
2021-22	96.62	27.64	69.59	80.15	42.93	28.57	29.97	20.99	39.08	30.59	57.68	10.44	14.86	6.27	35.64	26.19	38.17	1.97
2020-21	89.78	26.82	63.57	83.45	38.83	29.25	27.09	23.37	32.21	30.83	54.98	15.17	17.05	5.76	35.04	28.01	36.95	1.98
2019-20	95.71	25.17	72.93	82.15	41.91	25.78	32.97	31.78	39.31	24.58	54.64	14.11	11.25	4.32	31.38	38.69	29.93	2.01
2018-19	97.95	29.81	70.01	80.54	43.08	24.18	31.80	26.25	37.15	30.10	57.30	17.30	14.01	5.21	30.03	32.60	37.38	1.93
2017-18	95.20	29.15	73.75	81.53	40.26	25.70	31.29	26.57	36.58	29.26	51.50	12.96	12.40	4.92	31.53	32.59	35.88	1.96
2016-17	96.65	24.13	73.36	82.37	41.52	31.83	33.12	25.30	35.92	25.24	57.73	13.37	12.83	6.39	38.65	30.71	30.64	2.08
2015-16	90.46	22.35	68.06	81.79	40.12	29.67	32.44	26.36	33.56	25.76	55.68	7.90	10.87	4.36	36.28	32.22	31.50	2.05
2014-15	90.11	27.76	69.75	81.07	39.85	22.50	27.27	30.44	35.63	28.13	54.47	10.10	16.53	6.51	27.75	37.55	34.70	1.93

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	112.33	26.11	--	89.63	45.28	33.63	35.08	23.43	39.22	32.56	60.17	11.88	18.09	7.57	37.52	26.14	36.33	2.01
2023-24	112.49	24.35	--	87.18	47.87	31.08	35.75	23.92	41.77	32.18	64.10	13.48	14.04	5.63	35.65	27.44	36.91	1.99
2022-23	108.24	28.10	--	84.05	45.71	29.57	34.42	23.36	39.59	31.12	61.03	13.65	14.69	7.67	35.19	27.79	37.02	1.98
2021-22	109.98	28.43	--	84.74	46.43	33.45	33.69	22.78	45.14	28.51	62.40	12.57	16.71	6.31	39.48	26.88	33.64	2.06
2020-21	100.27	30.34	--	77.83	44.62	27.03	34.60	19.74	39.61	31.05	56.53	9.85	14.56	5.81	34.74	25.37	39.90	1.95
2019-20	102.44	31.75	--	74.60	46.54	27.70	37.07	18.88	38.60	28.02	61.24	10.07	11.90	5.87	37.13	25.31	37.56	2.00
2018-19	100.96	29.70	--	75.99	46.01	28.23	35.65	16.09	35.93	31.66	60.37	11.25	12.64	6.59	37.15	21.18	41.67	1.95
2017-18	106.28	33.51	--	77.18	47.10	26.59	38.29	16.80	39.53	33.79	57.80	11.42	13.32	6.43	34.45	21.76	43.79	1.91
2016-17	110.09	37.25	--	76.69	48.66	25.83	38.60	16.90	37.53	33.97	61.85	12.04	14.89	8.02	33.68	22.03	44.29	1.89
2015-16	113.31	29.15	--	90.18	46.50	29.29	34.51	24.30	42.08	36.58	59.04	12.02	20.12	8.62	32.48	26.95	40.57	1.92
2014-15	110.39	29.81	--	84.41	46.32	29.24	35.59	23.15	39.07	32.03	61.34	13.48	17.17	8.54	34.63	27.42	37.94	1.97

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR
2024-25	228^th	228	228^th	228	181^st	181	233^rd	233	Southland	Southland	36^th	36	109^th	109	253^rd	253	55^th	55	2^nd	2	206^th	206
2023-24	340^th	340	339^th	339	351^st	351	332^nd	332	WAC	WAC	39^th	39	68^th	68	152^nd	152	12^th	12	324^th	324	332^nd	332
2022-23	230^th	230	228^th	228	220^th	220	227^th	227	WAC	WAC	10^th	10	157^th	157	195^th	195	114^th	114	276^th	276	264^th	264
2021-22	305^th	305	305^th	305	326^th	326	311^th	311	WAC	WAC	13^th	13	242^nd	242	175^th	175	264^th	264	35^th	35	286^th	286
2020-21	272^nd	272	272^nd	272	203^rd	203	283^rd	283	WAC	WAC	82^nd	82	40^th	40	240^th	240	161^st	161	241^st	241	237^th	237
2019-20	238^th	238	238^th	238	233^rd	233	263^rd	263	WAC	WAC	65^th	65	86^th	86	224^th	224	91^st	91	228^th	228	259^th	259
2018-19	189^th	189	188^th	188	152^nd	152	176^th	176	WAC	WAC	39^th	39	146^th	146	201^st	201	75^th	75	21^st	21	193^rd	193
2017-18	276^th	276	276^th	276	214^th	214	225^th	225	WAC	WAC	13^th	13	6^th	6	221^st	221	86^th	86	91^st	91	254^th	254
2016-17	297^th	297	297^th	297	295^th	295	311^th	311	WAC	WAC	5^th	5	264^th	264	215^th	215	187^th	187	195^th	195	303^rd	303
2015-16	346^th	346	346^th	346	318^th	318	330^th	330	WAC	WAC	164^th	164	206^th	206	245^th	245	91^st	91	286^th	286	346^th	346
2014-15	327^th	327	327^th	327	298^th	298	327^th	327	WAC	WAC	192^nd	192	263^rd	263	286^th	286	90^th	90	112^th	112	306^th	306

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	210^th	210	362^nd	362	211^th	211	58^th	58	183^rd	183	12^th	12	267^th	267	219^th	219	67^th	67	324^th	324	63^rd	63	37^th	37	241^st	241	222^nd	222	22^nd	22	233^rd	233	336^th	336	351^st	351
2023-24	346^th	346	147^th	147	215^th	215	326^th	326	342^nd	342	316^th	316	337^th	337	112^th	112	246^th	246	235^th	235	351^st	351	133^rd	133	256^th	256	318^th	318	292^nd	292	76^th	76	187^th	187	103^rd	103
2022-23	198^th	198	34^th	34	274^th	274	307^th	307	192^nd	192	251^st	251	224^th	224	336^th	336	225^th	225	27^th	27	268^th	268	324^th	324	88^th	88	42^nd	42	227^th	227	328^th	328	10^th	10	42^nd	42
2021-22	261^st	261	59^th	59	249^th	249	337^th	337	194^th	194	244^th	244	320^th	320	292^nd	292	104^th	104	108^th	108	205^th	205	188^th	188	87^th	87	54^th	54	206^th	206	264^th	264	60^th	60	90^th	90
2020-21	321^st	321	94^th	94	340^th	340	103^rd	103	345^th	345	229^th	229	355^th	355	171^st	171	334^th	334	63^rd	63	277^th	277	18^th	18	23^rd	23	92^nd	92	253^rd	253	184^th	184	83^rd	83	82^nd	82
2019-20	230^th	230	179^th	179	117^th	117	158^th	158	245^th	245	313^th	313	204^th	204	8^th	8	84^th	84	313^th	313	295^th	295	32^nd	32	260^th	260	237^th	237	319^th	319	9^th	9	308^th	308	144^th	144
2018-19	261^st	261	42^nd	42	204^th	204	301^st	301	208^th	208	348^th	348	301^st	301	34^th	34	110^th	110	177^th	177	239^th	239	5^th	5	146^th	146	254^th	254	346^th	346	24^th	24	135^th	135	32^nd	32
2017-18	285^th	285	52^nd	52	100^th	100	191^st	191	328^th	328	316^th	316	324^th	324	68^th	68	197^th	197	147^th	147	340^th	340	54^th	54	269^th	269	304^th	304	318^th	318	61^st	61	135^th	135	65^th	65
2016-17	255^th	255	291^st	291	84^th	84	139^th	139	284^th	284	98^th	98	268^th	268	117^th	117	201^st	201	295^th	295	223^rd	223	33^rd	33	267^th	267	188^th	188	109^th	109	125^th	125	303^rd	303	285^th	285
2015-16	328^th	328	343^rd	343	246^th	246	185^th	185	307^th	307	147^th	147	279^th	279	97^th	97	268^th	268	301^st	301	268^th	268	323^rd	323	327^th	327	332^nd	332	144^th	144	96^th	96	309^th	309	266^th	266
2014-15	322^nd	322	210^th	210	164^th	164	212^th	212	301^st	301	324^th	324	349^th	349	44^th	44	163^rd	163	186^th	186	275^th	275	251^st	251	100^th	100	190^th	190	322^nd	322	33^rd	33	173^rd	173	67^th	67

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	260^th	260	125^th	125	--	--	289^th	289	243^rd	243	176^th	176	235^th	235	271^st	271	249^th	249	211^th	211	230^th	230	155^th	155	354^th	354	337^th	337	136^th	136	242^nd	242	164^th	164	194^th	194
2023-24	322^nd	322	94^th	94	--	--	271^st	271	345^th	345	164^th	164	264^th	264	234^th	234	298^th	298	249^th	249	349^th	349	313^th	313	237^th	237	199^th	199	120^th	120	215^th	215	209^th	209	234^th	234
2022-23	283^rd	283	296^th	296	--	--	145^th	145	277^th	277	121^st	121	209^th	209	173^rd	173	256^th	256	255^th	255	257^th	257	348^th	348	247^th	247	361^st	361	121^st	121	171^st	171	270^th	270	258^th	258
2021-22	325^th	325	313^th	313	--	--	195^th	195	308^th	308	293^rd	293	198^th	198	112^th	112	354^th	354	158^th	158	292^nd	292	311^th	311	348^th	348	312^th	312	279^th	279	97^th	97	140^th	140	90^th	90
2020-21	179^th	179	342^nd	342	--	--	32^nd	32	211^th	211	43^rd	43	214^th	214	42^nd	42	231^st	231	295^th	295	93^rd	93	95^th	95	292^nd	292	277^th	277	78^th	78	69^th	69	334^th	334	325^th	325
2019-20	247^th	247	336^th	336	--	--	8^th	8	312^th	312	64^th	64	336^th	336	39^th	39	238^th	238	150^th	150	246^th	246	87^th	87	97^th	97	281^st	281	156^th	156	96^th	96	280^th	280	246^th	246
2018-19	123^rd	123	305^th	305	--	--	2^nd	2	257^th	257	29^th	29	240^th	240	10^th	10	163^rd	163	230^th	230	185^th	185	143^rd	143	96^th	96	244^th	244	128^th	128	40^th	40	330^th	330	304^th	304
2017-18	245^th	245	349^th	349	--	--	20^th	20	284^th	284	31^st	31	306^th	306	12^th	12	274^th	274	327^th	327	95^th	95	228^th	228	81^st	81	130^th	130	73^rd	73	22^nd	22	349^th	349	334^th	334
2016-17	306^th	306	350^th	350	--	--	17^th	17	331^st	331	30^th	30	314^th	314	5^th	5	205^th	205	338^th	338	227^th	227	265^th	265	206^th	206	290^th	290	78^th	78	7^th	7	350^th	350	340^th	340
2015-16	340^th	340	184^th	184	--	--	349^th	349	282^nd	282	202^nd	202	151^st	151	191^st	191	341^st	341	345^th	345	159^th	159	268^th	268	349^th	349	305^th	305	67^th	67	102^nd	102	314^th	314	313^th	313
2014-15	332^nd	332	200^th	200	--	--	272^nd	272	300^th	300	235^th	235	230^th	230	82^nd	82	310^th	310	302^nd	302	250^th	250	317^th	317	298^th	298	315^th	315	196^th	196	55^th	55	285^th	285	236^th	236