TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 GA Southern  17-16 (0.515)  |  Sun Belt
All-Play Percentage: 0.309 (252nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.334 (293rd)
Record Quality: -0.069 (214th)
Avg. Season Rank: 258.94 (261st)
Pace: 68.32 (70th)
Momentum: 2.10 (87th)
Off. Momentum: 1.15 (126th)
Def. Momentum: 0.95 (109th)
Consistency: -8.29 (37th)
Res. Consistency: -8.73 (6th)
Away From Home: 0.60 (77th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.44 (225th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.63 22.06 64.38 89.35 42.33 39.31 35.09 14.03 27.98 36.01 55.81 14.36 18.54 6.56 43.99 15.70 40.30 2.04
RANK: 242nd 343rd 353rd 86th 252nd 44th 117th 345th 362nd 42nd 275th 63rd 30th 119th 57th 350th 69th 217th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 111.55 33.18 -- 84.99 44.74 33.59 34.30 19.29 38.41 32.11 59.47 13.08 15.18 6.81 39.53 22.69 37.78 2.02
RANK: 246th 345th -- 79th 204th 171st 193rd 83rd 224th 183rd 200th 248th 227th 281st 229th 103rd 227th 183rd

ANALYSIS:
They're far from the worst of the worst, but GA Southern should not be a terribly frightening opponent for most clubs. Ranked 252nd overall (out of 364) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 17-16. They are also ranked by this site as the #9 team (out of 14) in the Sun Belt (average ranking 222.8).

Defensively, GA Southern finds itself in the lower half of our ratings. The team is ranked 246th in defensive efficiency, giving up more than 111 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. GA Southern fouls far too much and sends the opposition to the line way too often. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 33.18 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #345 in the country in that category.

GA Southern doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 104 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #242 in the nation in offensive efficiency. GA Southern is downright rotten when shooting the mid-range jumper. The team is ranked third from the bottom in field goal percentage from that distance, making only 28.0% of their mid-range attempts vs. AO. GA Southern also has had serious struggles making their free throws this year. Converting just 64.4% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #353 overall in free throw percentage. GA Southern lastly does an extremely poor job drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 22.06 vs. AO, they are 343rd in the overall rankings for that category. If GA Southern does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's knack for obtaining second-chance opportunities from offensive rebounds. The squad has a rating of 18.54 in potential points off of second chances vs. AO, which ranks 30th in all of college hoops.

GA Southern is one of the more consistent teams in Division I (presently ranked 37th in consistency), so forecasting the outcomes of their future contests tends to be easier than the norm.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
GA Southern does worse vs. clubs that do a nice job converting inside the paint. When playing squads that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 55.96%, GA Southern performs above average 30% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 75% of the time.
GA Southern performs worse against squads that have trouble defending the mid-range shot. When facing teams that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 39.25%, GA Southern is more efficient than normal 20% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 59% of the time.
When playing teams that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass, GA Southern usually performs worse than average. GA Southern is more efficient than normal 20% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.43%. In all other contests, GA Southern performs better than average 59% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25252nd252nd183rd214thSun Belt70th37th293rd225th77th261st
2023-24252nd250th332nd319thSun Belt67th294th199th31st301st292nd
2022-23191st190th183rd201stSun Belt167th273rd199th53rd230th222nd
2021-22281st281st231st250thSun Belt219th55th210th212th56th238th
2020-21281st280th179th273rdSun Belt251st51st286th209th161st276th
2019-20133rd133rd113th132ndSun Belt37th34th151st220th99th147th
2018-1993rd93rd81st92ndSun Belt20th240th98th158th76th113th
2017-18160th160th84th125thSun Belt92nd241st200th101st178th137th
2016-17202nd202nd154th156thSun Belt125th147th164th73rd179th168th
2015-16182nd182nd213th233rdSun Belt131st344th207th110th334th231st
2014-15149th149th43rd119thSun Belt265th118th265th76th132nd140th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25242nd343rd353rd86th252nd44th117th345th362nd42nd275th63rd30th119th57th350th69th217th
2023-24190th275th98th224th186th73rd110th312th74th176th272nd89th274th204th53rd309th163rd264th
2022-23271st217th227th147th261st287th311th71st253rd160th209th96th215th222nd297th80th189th103rd
2021-22318th133rd336th325th253rd290th348th209th168th145th212th272nd275th127th258th165th85th73rd
2020-21299th147th318th292nd270th195th302nd255th336th174th150th175th179th152nd163rd237th123rd162nd
2019-20171st116th291st234th109th219th170th142nd163rd209th64th49th69th89th205th126th187th169th
2018-1990th170th206th205th12th339th240th164th27th19th38th110th310th146th343rd158th13th2nd
2017-18155th45th327th102nd214th155th205th215th195th84th263rd51st130th193rd165th232nd101st136th
2016-17176th98th266th285th208th71st116th293rd151st270th254th85th185th205th43rd278th242nd297th
2015-16153rd94th123rd88th280th37th228th288th323rd160th256th8th94th190th43rd302nd205th292nd
2014-15221st120th222nd74th302nd41st321st206th313th235th183rd112th48th48th54th234th270th297th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25246th345th--79th204th171st193rd83rd224th183rd200th248th227th281st229th103rd227th183rd
2023-24289th361st--34th260th101st263rd19th336th286th92nd299th209th108th163rd31st330th300th
2022-23111th231st--85th136th184th125th129th73rd143rd214th77th201st174th227th143rd183rd156th
2021-22184th318th--153rd144th268th177th116th99th150th160th286th203rd204th265th108th152nd106th
2020-21249th115th--208th267th175th331st64th76th311th233rd292nd333rd338th164th56th306th276th
2019-2098th27th--161st193rd241st28th81st36th230th337th167th259th284th237th77th221st166th
2018-19108th94th--133rd154th141st77th95th104th261st188th141st170th161st155th95th272nd249th
2017-18152nd277th--92nd178th182nd132nd80th167th183rd199th8th276th240th227th106th217th167th
2016-17212th170th--158th206th296th277th40th23rd205th258th58th275th195th302nd36th207th116th
2015-16210th299th--50th224th320th160th27th114th79th328th35th274th317th338th34th120th37th
2014-1590th81st--169th81st313th85th176th201st38th116th49th295th254th321st183rd32nd24th