TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2020-21 Incarnate Word  8-14 (0.364)  |  Southland
All-Play Percentage: 0.051 (339th)
Schedule Strength: 0.319 (318th)
Record Quality: -0.397 (342nd)
Avg. Season Rank: 323.05 (332nd)
Pace: 67.19 (300th)
Momentum: -6.68 (344th)
Off. Momentum: -1.96 (309th)
Def. Momentum: -4.72 (340th)
Consistency: -9.55 (205th)
Res. Consistency: -15.81 (314th)
Away From Home: 1.27 (73rd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.11 (121st)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2021. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 89.83 23.44 70.36 78.41 39.89 29.76 36.22 27.12 37.39 21.53 48.11 7.13 8.25 1.97 37.95 34.58 27.46 2.10
RANK: 317th 224th 204th 311th 320th 208th 66th 66th 198th 348th 357th 348th 349th 356th 169th 43rd 345th 297th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 110.70 27.11 -- 84.55 47.91 31.75 32.74 26.08 47.67 26.73 66.15 12.11 17.12 6.47 37.55 30.84 31.61 2.06
RANK: 339th 267th -- 292nd 330th 228th 110th 302nd 354th 117th 342nd 247th 352nd 319th 186th 278th 87th 110th

ANALYSIS:
Not one of the better ball-clubs in college basketball, Incarnate Word should be a fairly easy win for most capable opponents. They have a record of 8-14 and are ranked 339th overall (out of 357) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #10 team (out of 13) in the Southland (average ranking 265.5).

Defense is the farthest thing from a strength for Incarnate Word this year. The team ranks 339th in defensive efficiency, allowing more than 110 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Incarnate Word allows opposing teams far too many easy chances from the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four main defensive field goal shooting categories. They are exceptionally deficient defending inside the three-point line, allowing AO to make good on 47.7% of their mid-range jumpers (fourth from the bottom in the nation), 66.2% of their near-proximity chances (342nd), and 47.9% of their total shots from the field (330th). Incarnate Word also gives up far too many offensive rebounds and second chances to their opponents. The club has a rating of 17.12 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (sixth from the bottom nationally), and they let AO convert a healthy 6.5% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 319th) as well. Incarnate Word is lastly extremely underskilled to force steals that turn into quick and easy points. They're ranked #348 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 7.13 vs. AO.

Incarnate Word doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 90 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #317 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Incarnate Word will have a really tough time winning games when taking into consideration their shooting percentage near the basket. The team is ranked last in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 48.1% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. Moreover, they find themselves in the bottom-50 in overall offensive field goal percentage, converting just 39.9% of their total attempts vs. AO. Incarnate Word also does a terrible job to take advantage of scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team converts only 2.0% of all second-chance opportunities (second from the bottom nationally), and with a rating of 8.25, they're ninth from the bottom in potential points scored off of the offensive boards as well.

Incarnate Word has been playing some of their worst basketball of the season as of late, and they're presently ranked 344th in positive momentum because of it.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Incarnate Word performs worse against squads that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities. When facing teams that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 11.69, Incarnate Word is more efficient than normal 18% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 88% of the time.
When playing teams that convert well from the charity stripe, Incarnate Word usually performs worse than average. Incarnate Word is more efficient than normal 11% of the time when facing clubs that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 0.72%. In all other contests, Incarnate Word performs better than average 80% of the time.
Incarnate Word is typically better vs. teams that convert well from outside the arc. Against foes that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 32.89%, Incarnate Word performs above their norm 73% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 13% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Willis leads Incarnate Word over Texas A&M-CC 58-53
(2/6/2021 6:59:56 PM) CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas (AP) — Keaston Willis posted 17 points and Incarnate Word narrowly defeated Texas A&M-Corpus Christi 58-53 on Saturday.
Larsson leads Incarnate Word past McMurry 81-54
(1/1/2021 4:48:15 PM) SAN ANTONIO (AP) — Marcus Larsson had a career-high 20 points plus 13 rebounds as Incarnate Word easily defeated McMurry 81-54 on Friday.
Adams carries Texas State over Incarnate Word 72-64
(12/5/2020 5:43:02 PM) SAN MARCOS, Texas (AP) -- Shelby Adams registered 15 points as Texas State defeated Incarnate Word 72-64 on Saturday.
Mullins scores 15 to lift Rice over Incarnate Word 68-53
(11/27/2020 4:25:35 PM) SAN ANTONIO (AP) — Chris Mullins registered 15 points as Rice defeated Incarnate Word 68-53 in a on Friday.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25211th211th179th228thSouthland300th255th288th119th48th267th
2023-24353rd353rd335th353rdSouthland51st31st353rd67th176th333rd
2022-23332nd331st277th337thSouthland171st2nd356th324th67th344th
2021-22353rd353rd337th348thSouthland266th95th287th152nd310th348th
2020-21339th339th268th342ndSouthland300th205th318th121st73rd332nd
2019-20338th338th310th338thSouthland271st77th290th111th92nd342nd
2018-19342nd342nd341st352ndSouthland284th309th285th23rd42nd331st
2017-18335th335th324th344thSouthland93rd25th287th61st53rd331st
2016-17299th299th254th317thSouthland45th68th303rd66th156th264th
2015-16302nd302nd127th194thSouthland166th302nd310th350th219th278th
2014-15263rd263rd98th186thSouthland47th217th322nd136th58th217th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25181st235th273rd42nd180th268th224th17th45th271st232nd174th34th24th300th21st306th169th
2023-24336th213th145th321st341st229th287th134th187th291st358th288th227th320th183rd111th261st226th
2022-23318th245th46th254th309th336th244th43rd234th230th328th79th324th351st327th29th209th79th
2021-22314th346th2nd251st332nd84th179th103rd76th351st355th333rd324th316th64th91st348th340th
2020-21317th224th204th311th320th208th66th66th198th348th357th348th349th356th169th43rd345th297th
2019-20338th339th57th193rd326th201st318th107th238th231st305th150th321st268th200th102nd235th191st
2018-19303rd304th3rd350th162nd327th131st187th54th197th275th216th353rd306th288th126th99th68th
2017-18335th181st42nd336th313th328th292nd242nd336th43rd332nd317th285th237th315th209th14th12th
2016-17248th69th216th343rd227th246th104th216th231st203rd298th266th318th342nd205th174th129th135th
2015-16282nd292nd11th278th294th116th104th206th258th292nd328th295th339th350th89th197th264th280th
2014-15189th132nd78th279th195th161st242nd244th85th202nd215th86th280th280th129th223rd165th201st
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25237th316th--102nd285th16th257th234th352nd286th102nd195th283rd330th18th252nd314th337th
2023-24351st333rd--129th334th187th358th208th348th135th197th346th62nd75th197th221st144th153rd
2022-23321st265th--73rd358th91st341st21st304th332nd305th282nd283rd329th112th31st350th331st
2021-22354th158th--209th356th270th348th208th342nd107th357th251st278th354th249th195th93rd85th
2020-21339th267th--292nd330th228th110th302nd354th117th342nd247th352nd319th186th278th87th110th
2019-20332nd265th--184th336th170th245th11th286th339th308th256th246th209th173rd9th340th301st
2018-19352nd314th--83rd353rd252nd323rd2nd348th297th352nd326th44th342nd295th2nd323rd207th
2017-18337th257th--274th293rd257th315th47th321st305th147th286th273rd263rd229th30th288th232nd
2016-17324th234th--298th309th33rd242nd274th314th328th237th167th294th340th17th239th295th330th
2015-16306th151st--170th335th172nd331st241st336th136th309th177th163rd238th169th245th131st144th
2014-15330th211th--256th313th72nd299th216th199th313th296th105th261st264th48th190th297th307th