TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 Incarnate Word  12-17 (0.414)  |  Southland
All-Play Percentage: 0.149 (299th)
Schedule Strength: 0.371 (303rd)
Record Quality: -0.303 (317th)
Avg. Season Rank: 260.93 (264th)
Pace: 72.87 (45th)
Momentum: 1.28 (110th)
Off. Momentum: 0.07 (201st)
Def. Momentum: 1.21 (57th)
Consistency: -8.02 (68th)
Res. Consistency: -9.40 (57th)
Away From Home: -0.08 (156th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.46 (66th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 96.88 30.31 69.06 77.16 42.74 27.16 36.75 22.27 35.18 27.73 54.69 9.21 10.96 4.18 35.20 28.86 35.94 1.99
RANK: 248th 69th 216th 343rd 227th 246th 104th 216th 231st 203rd 298th 266th 318th 342nd 205th 174th 129th 135th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 111.57 29.11 -- 84.87 47.57 25.93 36.75 26.06 40.03 32.88 62.09 10.72 16.48 9.49 30.56 30.70 38.74 1.92
RANK: 324th 234th -- 298th 309th 33rd 242nd 274th 314th 328th 237th 167th 294th 340th 17th 239th 295th 330th

ANALYSIS:
If you're looking for a squad in the bottom quartile of all Division I basketball teams this year, Incarnate Word likely fits the bill. Their record this season is 12-17, and the club is ranked 299th overall (out of 351) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #8 team (out of 13) in the Southland (average ranking 263.9).

Incarnate Word will certainly not be one of the stingier defenses opponents will encounter. Allowing more than 111 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked down at #324 in defensive efficiency. Incarnate Word is one of the very worst teams in the game when it comes to preventing opponents from scoring off of offensive rebounds. The team allows AO to convert 9.5% of all second-chance opportunities (340th nationally). Incarnate Word has also done a lackluster job this year when defending the mid-range shot. The squad is ranked 314th nationally in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on 40.0% of their attempts from those in-between spots on the floor.

Though they rate better on offense than they do on defense, Incarnate Word still isn't one of the more capable offensive teams in college hoops. Scoring roughly 97 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #248 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Incarnate Word happens to be one of the very worst in the game when it comes to maximizing the number of shot attempts they get off from the floor. The team is nationally ranked ninth from the bottom in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 77.16 vs. AO. Incarnate Word also does a terrible job to take advantage of scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team converts only 4.2% of all second-chance opportunities (tenth from the bottom nationally), and with a rating of 10.96, they're 318th in potential points scored off of the offensive boards as well.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that convert well from outside the arc, Incarnate Word often performs better than normal. Incarnate Word is more efficient than usual 88% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.03%. In their other contests, Incarnate Word performs better than the norm 29% of the time.
Incarnate Word does better vs. clubs that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.38%, Incarnate Word performs above average 67% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 20% of the time.
Incarnate Word performs better against squads that find ways to get to the free throw line. When facing teams that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 27.16, Incarnate Word is more efficient than normal 63% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 22% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25212th212th179th228thSouthland300th256th288th120th47th271st
2023-24353rd353rd335th353rdSouthland51st31st353rd67th176th333rd
2022-23332nd331st277th337thSouthland171st2nd356th324th67th344th
2021-22353rd353rd337th348thSouthland266th95th287th152nd310th348th
2020-21339th339th268th342ndSouthland300th205th318th121st73rd332nd
2019-20338th338th310th338thSouthland271st77th290th111th92nd342nd
2018-19342nd342nd341st352ndSouthland284th309th285th23rd42nd331st
2017-18335th335th324th344thSouthland93rd25th287th61st53rd331st
2016-17299th299th254th317thSouthland45th68th303rd66th156th264th
2015-16302nd302nd127th194thSouthland166th302nd310th350th219th278th
2014-15263rd263rd98th186thSouthland47th217th322nd136th58th217th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25180th235th273rd41st180th268th222nd18th46th271st232nd172nd32nd23rd301st22nd305th169th
2023-24336th213th145th321st341st229th287th134th187th291st358th288th227th320th183rd111th261st226th
2022-23318th245th46th254th309th336th244th43rd234th230th328th79th324th351st327th29th209th79th
2021-22314th346th2nd251st332nd84th179th103rd76th351st355th333rd324th316th64th91st348th340th
2020-21317th224th204th311th320th208th66th66th198th348th357th348th349th356th169th43rd345th297th
2019-20338th339th57th193rd326th201st318th107th238th231st305th150th321st268th200th102nd235th191st
2018-19303rd304th3rd350th162nd327th131st187th54th197th275th216th353rd306th288th126th99th68th
2017-18335th181st42nd336th313th328th292nd242nd336th43rd332nd317th285th237th315th209th14th12th
2016-17248th69th216th343rd227th246th104th216th231st203rd298th266th318th342nd205th174th129th135th
2015-16282nd292nd11th278th294th116th104th206th258th292nd328th295th339th350th89th197th264th280th
2014-15189th132nd78th279th195th161st242nd244th85th202nd215th86th280th280th129th223rd165th201st
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25237th317th--103rd285th16th264th236th352nd287th101st195th282nd330th18th255th314th337th
2023-24351st333rd--129th334th187th358th208th348th135th197th346th62nd75th197th221st144th153rd
2022-23321st265th--73rd358th91st341st21st304th332nd305th282nd283rd329th112th31st350th331st
2021-22354th158th--209th356th270th348th208th342nd107th357th251st278th354th249th195th93rd85th
2020-21339th267th--292nd330th228th110th302nd354th117th342nd247th352nd319th186th278th87th110th
2019-20332nd265th--184th336th170th245th11th286th339th308th256th246th209th173rd9th340th301st
2018-19352nd314th--83rd353rd252nd323rd2nd348th297th352nd326th44th342nd295th2nd323rd207th
2017-18337th257th--274th293rd257th315th47th321st305th147th286th273rd263rd229th30th288th232nd
2016-17324th234th--298th309th33rd242nd274th314th328th237th167th294th340th17th239th295th330th
2015-16306th151st--170th335th172nd331st241st336th136th309th177th163rd238th169th245th131st144th
2014-15330th211th--256th313th72nd299th216th199th313th296th105th261st264th48th190th297th307th