TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2015-16 Pacific  8-20 (0.286)  |  West Coast
All-Play Percentage: 0.423 (203rd)
Schedule Strength: 0.580 (106th)
Record Quality: -0.232 (288th)
Avg. Season Rank: 222.92 (225th)
Pace: 68.92 (227th)
Momentum: 1.14 (116th)
Off. Momentum: -0.17 (211th)
Def. Momentum: 1.31 (66th)
Consistency: -7.69 (34th)
Res. Consistency: -8.98 (24th)
Away From Home: -0.66 (243rd)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.77 (14th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2016. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 97.86 30.01 67.49 77.20 44.26 28.25 32.77 20.14 41.31 28.81 57.60 8.02 13.14 6.68 36.59 26.09 37.32 1.99
RANK: 225th 120th 264th 339th 135th 194th 268th 297th 15th 165th 205th 320th 259th 169th 134th 266th 97th 154th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.72 36.67 -- 78.29 42.49 28.80 35.35 21.07 35.86 28.43 54.64 10.71 14.64 6.79 36.78 26.91 36.31 2.00
RANK: 175th 348th -- 42nd 109th 177th 203rd 63rd 165th 166th 46th 164th 158th 166th 245th 99th 220th 162nd

ANALYSIS:
Pacific has a squad that most likely falls somewhere in the bottom half of NCAA Division I teams this year. They are ranked #203 (out of 351) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 8-20. Of the 10 schools in the WCC (average ranking 151.3), they're currently ranked as our #7 team in the conference.

Based on their performances this year, Pacific will likely find more success on defense than they will on offense. Allowing about 103 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #175 slot in the ratings for defensive efficiency. Pacific does a really good job to prevent opponents from getting off shots from the field. The club is ranked 42nd in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 78.29 vs. AO. Pacific has also done a really good job this year to prevent opponents from making shots from the inside. They are ranked 46th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 54.6% of their attempts from close-up. If Pacific does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's tendency to send opponents to the line too much by fouling. The squad has a rating of 36.67 in defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO, which ranks fourth-worst in the country.

Pacific is not quite as good on the offensive end of the floor. The team is ranked 225th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 98 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Pacific happens to be one of the very worst in the game when it comes to maximizing the number of shot attempts they get off from the floor. The team is nationally ranked 339th in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 77.20 vs. AO. If Pacific does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to successfully hit from mid-range locations on the court. The team makes 41.3% of their in-between field goal attempts vs. AO, which ranks 15th in the NCAA.

Pacific is one of the more consistent teams in Division I (presently ranked 34th in consistency), so forecasting the outcomes of their future contests tends to be easier than the norm.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Pacific is typically worse vs. teams that allow more chances at the line. Against foes that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 28.47, Pacific performs above their norm 29% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 75% of the time.
When facing teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot, Pacific often performs better than normal. Pacific is more efficient than usual 78% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 38.70%. In their other contests, Pacific performs better than the norm 35% of the time.
Pacific does better vs. clubs that tend to get off more shots. When playing squads that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 82.31, Pacific performs above average 67% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 27% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25269th269th330th305thWCC193rd276th129th7th1st278th
2023-24355th355th352nd338thWCC163rd361st147th2nd346th340th
2022-23214th214th230th189thWCC41st109th128th223rd36th214th
2021-22279th279th324th303rdWCC84th1st141st200th213th256th
2020-21145th145th179th137thWCC259th342nd85th339th332nd158th
2019-20122nd122nd51st86thWCC323rd207th183rd291st97th121st
2018-19211th211th230th203rdWCC298th210th115th139th184th216th
2017-18158th158th230th199thWCC264th28th113th146th26th162nd
2016-17223rd222nd288th262ndWCC244th184th133rd85th250th234th
2015-16203rd202nd313th288thWCC227th34th106th14th243rd225th
2014-15223rd223rd262nd228thWCC306th21st99th241st82nd202nd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25277th224th152nd321st197th258th311th234th51st143rd259th268th242nd170th216th214th103rd102nd
2023-24344th105th354th353rd309th270th303rd325th327th69th324th317th352nd333rd223rd302nd27th57th
2022-23142nd149th155th294th133rd117th28th316th172nd148th239th301st276th265th86th305th111th214th
2021-22321st120th292nd333rd299th245th311th273rd348th128th213th181st284th221st210th251st67th100th
2020-21192nd292nd332nd48th126th287th320th174th176th12th131st269th171st249th316th201st16th17th
2019-20131st164th298th36th124th310th163rd82nd244th23rd169th292nd43rd33rd331st100th47th16th
2018-19267th33rd74th341st273rd318th85th144th261st213th328th139th242nd142nd286th99th140th90th
2017-18148th19th166th205th169th333rd176th42nd137th133rd233rd181st123rd156th331st39th121st42nd
2016-17245th153rd222nd88th281st306th220th26th261st213th268th302nd133rd139th314th32nd234th99th
2015-16225th120th264th339th135th194th268th297th15th165th205th320th259th169th134th266th97th154th
2014-15211th109th281st150th261st107th151st181st240th211th286th334th18th173rd120th193rd216th226th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25270th281st--180th194th218th282nd56th119th275th131st355th74th97th219th50th288th222nd
2023-24356th294th--219th350th298th282nd15th343rd300th320th224th327th360th297th12th294th194th
2022-23251st290th--142nd271st230th186th35th284th280th235th89th225th163rd238th34th297th223rd
2021-22229th120th--88th218th295th329th95th229th65th190th200th1st3rd318th114th87th49th
2020-21131st220th--157th75th246th218th236th197th64th27th143rd50th2nd259th241st71st64th
2019-20114th322nd--52nd92nd49th185th233rd138th121st50th62nd143rd24th72nd270th172nd237th
2018-19163rd317th--9th225th201st242nd55th262nd57th247th142nd29th214th308th108th115th70th
2017-18193rd190th--150th164th239th191st166th220th127th164th190th64th43rd248th173rd130th118th
2016-17199th323rd--81st154th283rd126th178th247th27th253rd120th42nd50th315th214th39th27th
2015-16175th348th--42nd109th177th203rd63rd165th166th46th164th158th166th245th99th220th162nd
2014-15272nd255th--151st189th281st202nd306th345th9th156th58th54th100th287th318th9th18th