Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2019-20 Cal Baptist 21-10 (0.677) | WAC

All-Play Percentage: 0.386 (217^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.338 (312^th)	Record Quality: 0.032 (166^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 200.98 (203^rd)
Pace: 69.42 (188^th)	Momentum: -4.00 (327^th)	Off. Momentum: -2.36 (325^th)	Def. Momentum: -1.64 (243^rd)
Consistency: -11.03 (343^rd)	Res. Consistency: -13.62 (289^th)	Away From Home: 0.36 (122^nd)	Paper Tiger Factor: -4.22 (345^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through March 11, 2020. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

100.42

22.84

79.56

85.44

40.75

35.62

35.40

21.88

35.76

27.95

51.49

8.43

14.08

4.78

41.68

25.60

32.71

2.09

RANK:

147^th

282^nd

7^th

33^rd

293^rd

42^nd

67^th

201^st

227^th

193^rd

338^th

309^th

110^th

192^nd

64^th

225^th

248^th

277^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

105.14

27.12

85.84

44.42

29.93

32.57

24.07

38.24

31.84

60.23

12.81

12.18

4.96

34.87

28.04

37.09

1.98

RANK:

295^th

255^th

322^nd

227^th

138^th

129^th

238^th

226^th

304^th

215^th

303^rd

117^th

170^th

74^th

199^th

261^st

278^th

ANALYSIS:
Regardless of what the win percentage says, Cal Baptist isn't a very good team this year. They are ranked #217 (out of 353) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 21-10. Of the nine schools in the WAC (average ranking 236.0), they're currently ranked as our #3 team in the conference.

Cal Baptist will likely rely on their offense more than anything else to win games. The team is ranked 147th in offensive efficiency and scores more than 100 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Cal Baptist is deadly accurate at the free throw line. Making 79.6% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked seventh nationally in free throw percentage. Unfortunately, with a free throw attempt rate of just 22.84 vs. AO, they don't provide themselves a whole lot of opportunities at the foul line. Cal Baptist also has one of the better squads in the college game when it comes to maximizing opportunities to score. The team is ranked 33rd in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 85.44 vs. AO. Conversely, the squad isn't all that good at draining those shots, converting about 40.8% of their total attempts vs. AO. If Cal Baptist does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's troubles converting from the inside. The squad makes just 51.5% of their near-proximity field goal attempts vs. AO, which ranks 16th-worst in Division I.

The defense for Cal Baptist, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the offense is. The team is ranked 295th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 105 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Cal Baptist struggles on occasion to deny opponents opportunities to shoot from the floor. The team is ranked 322nd in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 85.84 vs. AO. Cal Baptist also does a pretty inadequate job to provide chances for themselves to score quickly off of steals. They're ranked #309 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 8.43 vs. AO.

Cal Baptist has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 327th in the country in positive momentum. Cal Baptist has also been one of the most erratic teams in college basketball this year (currently ranked 343rd overall in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their future games far more difficult to predict.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Tue 11/5/2019	vs Jackson State₂₈₃	W 72.35 - 64.30	W 93-70	1-0	100.87	108.82	▲ 7.95	94.35	84.20	▲ 10.15	▲ 18.10
Fri 11/8/2019	vs Cal Lutheran	---	W 112-56	2-0	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Tue 11/12/2019	@ Texas₆₇	L 60.11 - 73.88	L 54-67	2-1	92.84	75.73	▼ 17.11	107.06	90.89	▲ 16.17	▼ 0.94
Fri 11/15/2019	@ California₁₄₅	L 63.89 - 71.87	L 62-82	2-2	98.28	94.25	▼ 4.03	105.21	125.42	▼ 20.21	▼ 24.24
Fri 11/22/2019	vs Cent. Arkansas₂₉₃	W 80.79 - 71.58	W 104-98 (OT)	3-2	106.83	112.99	▲ 6.16	99.48	117.11	▼ 17.63	▼ 11.47
Sat 11/23/2019	vs Georgia State₁₃₀	L 74.69 - 77.11	L 60-69	3-3	100.03	79.44	▼ 20.59	108.30	95.89	▲ 12.41	▼ 8.18
Wed 11/27/2019	vs South Dakota₁₆₃	L 76.70 - 77.07	L 83-84	3-4	104.92	111.44	▲ 6.52	110.27	117.02	▼ 6.75	▼ 0.23
Wed 12/4/2019	vs UC Riverside₂₂₅	W 65.80 - 62.09	W 79-67	4-4	98.91	117.40	▲ 18.49	97.76	102.06	▼ 4.30	▲ 14.19
Sat 12/7/2019	@ UC Irvine₁₀₆	L 66.02 - 76.83	W 68-60	5-4	98.71	101.00	▲ 2.29	108.55	83.27	▲ 25.28	▲ 27.57
Sat 12/14/2019	vs Bethune-Cookman₃₀₇	W 79.14 - 68.77	W 87-68	6-4	105.46	112.49	▲ 7.03	96.24	78.92	▲ 17.32	▲ 24.35
Wed 12/18/2019	vs Southern₂₇₀	W 72.55 - 65.44	W 78-61	7-4	104.00	122.12	▲ 18.12	98.55	99.26	▼ 0.71	▲ 17.41
Sun 12/22/2019	vs Miss. Valley St.₃₅₁	W 92.62 - 67.21	W 103-66	8-4	118.46	132.64	▲ 14.18	90.28	87.24	▲ 3.04	▲ 17.22
Sat 12/28/2019	vs Ottawa (AZ)	---	W 92-75 (OT)	9-4	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Thu 1/2/2020	vs UT Rio Grande₂₃₈	W 76.38 - 70.67	W 76-67	10-4	104.03	97.89	▼ 6.14	101.83	93.60	▲ 8.23	▲ 2.09
Sat 1/4/2020	vs New Mexico St.₉₉	L 65.14 - 69.79	L 71-86	10-5	97.47	105.74	▲ 8.27	109.36	132.73	▼ 23.37	▼ 15.10
Wed 1/8/2020	@ CSU Bakersfield₂₆₆	W 66.96 - 66.93	W 83-75	11-5	102.43	113.41	▲ 10.98	97.20	98.90	▼ 1.70	▲ 9.28
Sat 1/11/2020	@ Grand Canyon₂₈₀	W 74.91 - 74.35	W 61-57	12-5	110.97	83.78	▼ 27.19	104.86	73.55	▲ 31.31	▲ 4.12
Fri 1/17/2020	vs Bethesda	---	W 96-62	13-5	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Wed 1/22/2020	vs Chicago State₃₅₃	W 85.72 - 58.84	W 85-53	14-5	118.76	131.56	▲ 12.80	86.59	73.88	▲ 12.71	▲ 25.51
Sat 1/25/2020	vs UMKC₂₂₁	W 68.86 - 64.77	L 57-67	14-6	101.66	91.57	▼ 10.09	100.04	109.89	▼ 9.85	▼ 19.94
Wed 1/29/2020	@ Utah Valley₂₄₂	L 70.92 - 72.52	W 65-61	15-6	102.45	102.28	▼ 0.17	99.60	91.90	▲ 7.70	▲ 7.53
Sat 2/1/2020	@ Seattle₂₀₈	L 71.18 - 75.21	W 72-65	16-6	102.93	108.33	▲ 5.40	102.99	91.75	▲ 11.24	▲ 16.64
Thu 2/6/2020	vs CSU Bakersfield₂₆₆	W 70.40 - 63.71	W 74-69	17-6	102.43	111.84	▲ 9.41	97.20	111.97	▼ 14.77	▼ 5.36
Sat 2/8/2020	vs Grand Canyon₂₈₀	W 78.46 - 70.90	L 98-103	17-7	110.97	131.64	▲ 20.67	104.86	142.67	▼ 37.81	▼ 17.14
Thu 2/13/2020	vs Westcliff	---	W 107-45	18-7	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Wed 2/19/2020	@ UMKC₂₂₁	L 65.46 - 67.97	L 63-69	18-8	101.66	104.03	▲ 2.37	100.04	109.52	▼ 9.48	▼ 7.11
Sat 2/22/2020	@ Chicago State₃₅₃	W 82.08 - 62.29	W 95-53	19-8	118.76	144.67	▲ 25.91	86.59	68.98	▲ 17.61	▲ 43.52
Wed 2/26/2020	vs Utah Valley₂₄₂	W 74.56 - 69.06	W 73-66	20-8	102.45	95.87	▼ 6.58	99.60	88.44	▲ 11.16	▲ 4.58
Sat 2/29/2020	vs Seattle₂₀₈	W 74.81 - 71.64	W 88-87 (OT)	21-8	102.93	106.78	▲ 3.85	102.99	122.29	▼ 19.30	▼ 15.45
Thu 3/5/2020	@ New Mexico St.₉₉	L 61.80 - 72.97	L 50-83	21-9	97.47	56.99	▼ 40.48	109.36	129.37	▼ 20.01	▼ 60.49
Sat 3/7/2020	@ UT Rio Grande₂₃₈	L 72.71 - 74.17	L 76-79 (OT)	21-10	104.03	98.16	▼ 5.87	101.83	88.53	▲ 13.30	▲ 7.43
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	When facing teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint, Cal Baptist often performs worse than normal. Cal Baptist is more efficient than usual 11% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 57.91%. In their other contests, Cal Baptist performs better than the norm 78% of the time.
	Cal Baptist does worse vs. clubs that shoot the ball well from the field. When playing squads that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 42.98%, Cal Baptist performs above average 18% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 81% of the time.
	Cal Baptist performs better against squads that allow more chances at the line. When facing teams that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 27.16, Cal Baptist is more efficient than normal 72% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 22% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	Varner takes over late sending UTRGV past Cal Baptist in OT (3/7/2020 10:56:00 PM) Lesley Varner II scored 22 points and his 3-pointer with four seconds left gave UT Rio Grande Valley a 79-76 win over California Baptist on Saturday. De'jon Davis tied the game at 76 for California Baptist just three seconds before Varner's shot.
	Giles propels UMKC to 69-63 victory over California Baptist (2/20/2020 1:06:00 AM) KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) — Jordan Giles tossed in 17 points and Missouri-Kansas City turned back California Baptist 69-63 on Wednesday night. Giles knocked down 7 of 11 shots from the floor, including both of his 3-pointers, for the Kangaroos (14-14, 6-7 Western Athletic Conference). Brandon McKissic added 13 points and three steals, while Javan ...
	Alexander: Cal Baptist’s De’jon Davis owns the glass (2/7/2020 1:08:00 PM) And don’t think Cal Baptist’s De’jon Davis hasn’t already heard that piece of trivia ... 10-rebound performance Thursday night in the Lancers’ 74-69 home victory over Cal State Bakersfield. He was WAC Player of the Week last week after 17 and 19 rebounds in back-to-back road games. He’s not often needed to score, alongside offensive ...
	UVU men's basketball can't complete rally, loses to California Baptist (1/29/2020 10:45:00 PM) UVU rallied from a 16-point second-half deficit to get within one point on multiple occasions and had chances in the final seconds to tie or take the lead -- but in the end California Baptist was able to hang on for the 65-61 win. "We came out and played ...
	Poor 1st half plagues GCU in loss to California Baptist (1/11/2020 11:16:00 PM) PHOENIX (AP) — Brandon Boyd had 16 points as California Baptist edged past Grand Canyon 61-57 on Saturday night. Ferron Flavors Jr. had 11 points and seven rebounds for California Baptist (12-5 ...

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR
2024-25	181	0.504	17-15 (0.531)	0.531	-0.008	WAC	65.68	-9.35	0.397	0.19	-0.30	165.10
2023-24	230	0.366	16-17 (0.485)	0.485	-0.061	WAC	64.53	-10.64	0.406	-1.71	-0.64	185.41
2022-23	184	0.497	17-16 (0.515)	0.515	-0.016	WAC	65.62	-9.14	0.426	-0.14	-2.65	156.09
2021-22	211	0.412	18-16 (0.529)	0.529	-0.049	WAC	67.34	-7.72	0.377	-0.84	-0.52	197.81
2020-21	208	0.419	13-10 (0.565)	0.565	-0.125	WAC	71.18	-7.90	0.386	3.20	-0.03	234.40
2019-20	217	0.386	21-10 (0.677)	0.677	0.032	WAC	69.42	-11.03	0.338	-4.22	0.36	200.98
2018-19	177	0.497	16-15 (0.516)	0.516	-0.086	WAC	67.40	-9.16	0.441	-2.43	-1.99	190.58

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	105.27	24.38	75.25	90.20	42.30	32.42	32.70	21.86	36.89	35.92	54.26	11.63	16.65	6.66	35.95	24.24	39.82	1.96
2023-24	100.22	27.53	68.66	87.68	40.42	31.51	33.13	21.59	35.90	34.59	49.88	7.08	14.35	4.69	35.93	24.62	39.45	1.96
2022-23	100.40	24.46	65.69	86.29	42.11	36.21	32.18	19.89	37.20	30.19	57.27	6.70	14.16	3.98	41.96	23.05	34.99	2.07
2021-22	97.47	24.90	68.44	83.22	41.47	34.23	33.31	20.83	33.17	28.16	57.53	9.43	12.04	4.07	41.13	25.03	33.84	2.07
2020-21	103.11	25.76	74.57	79.97	44.93	32.02	37.59	16.81	33.98	31.13	58.40	8.75	13.57	4.61	40.04	21.02	38.93	2.01
2019-20	100.42	22.84	79.56	85.44	40.75	35.62	35.40	21.88	35.76	27.95	51.49	8.43	14.08	4.78	41.68	25.60	32.71	2.09
2018-19	105.75	24.30	77.90	87.03	42.77	36.63	33.78	15.63	36.28	34.76	55.17	7.94	12.50	4.16	42.10	17.96	39.94	2.02

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	106.67	26.18	--	87.02	45.01	30.68	33.94	22.83	40.49	33.51	58.23	10.91	13.90	6.94	35.26	26.23	38.51	1.97
2023-24	106.29	23.29	--	87.10	45.74	25.82	37.54	23.89	40.44	37.39	54.80	9.71	10.59	4.29	29.65	27.43	42.92	1.87
2022-23	102.61	23.59	--	87.33	43.61	28.69	31.50	28.54	40.62	30.10	57.98	9.72	12.20	4.78	32.85	32.68	34.46	1.98
2021-22	101.01	27.87	--	83.97	43.51	26.82	31.94	25.28	39.38	31.86	56.53	9.21	14.07	5.36	31.94	30.11	37.95	1.94
2020-21	106.02	28.70	--	82.54	46.40	27.46	37.83	23.20	42.50	31.88	56.63	12.20	13.69	6.71	33.27	28.10	38.62	1.95
2019-20	105.14	27.12	--	85.84	44.42	29.93	32.57	24.07	38.24	31.84	60.23	12.81	12.18	4.96	34.87	28.04	37.09	1.98
2018-19	108.03	29.48	--	88.04	43.04	31.06	35.25	19.56	37.96	37.42	52.15	11.98	12.16	4.27	35.28	22.22	42.50	1.93

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR
2024-25	181^st	181	181^st	181	165^th	165	177^th	177	WAC	WAC	252^nd	252	172^nd	172	213^th	213	71^st	71	186^th	186	161^st	161
2023-24	230^th	230	230^th	230	208^th	208	211^th	211	WAC	WAC	345^th	345	325^th	325	206^th	206	254^th	254	239^th	239	178^th	178
2022-23	184^th	184	182^nd	182	183^rd	183	181^st	181	WAC	WAC	309^th	309	173^rd	173	200^th	200	117^th	117	348^th	348	153^rd	153
2021-22	211^th	211	211^th	211	176^th	176	206^th	206	WAC	WAC	207^th	207	20^th	20	229^th	229	179^th	179	245^th	245	201^st	201
2020-21	208^th	208	208^th	208	133^rd	133	235^th	235	WAC	WAC	101^st	101	59^th	59	260^th	260	5^th	5	195^th	195	228^th	228
2019-20	217^th	217	217^th	217	54^th	54	166^th	166	WAC	WAC	188^th	188	343^rd	343	312^th	312	345^th	345	122^nd	122	203^rd	203
2018-19	177^th	177	176^th	176	165^th	165	217^th	217	WAC	WAC	253^rd	253	127^th	127	234^th	234	290^th	290	326^th	326	189^th	189

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	222^nd	222	297^th	297	78^th	78	48^th	48	254^th	254	226^th	226	250^th	250	175^th	175	200^th	200	46^th	46	316^th	316	215^th	215	77^th	77	108^th	108	257^th	257	197^th	197	80^th	80	74^th	74
2023-24	264^th	264	134^th	134	302^nd	302	76^th	76	331^st	331	178^th	178	244^th	244	208^th	208	297^th	297	53^rd	53	353^rd	353	351^st	351	133^rd	133	263^rd	263	220^th	220	235^th	235	72^nd	72	96^th	96
2022-23	224^th	224	216^th	216	337^th	337	102^nd	102	268^th	268	35^th	35	278^th	278	304^th	304	217^th	217	143^rd	143	226^th	226	353^rd	353	180^th	180	314^th	314	46^th	46	316^th	316	186^th	186	283^rd	283
2021-22	248^th	248	178^th	178	285^th	285	240^th	240	273^rd	273	76^th	76	162^nd	162	294^th	294	338^th	338	214^th	214	208^th	208	253^rd	253	239^th	239	268^th	268	61^st	61	290^th	290	190^th	190	274^th	274
2020-21	110^th	110	130^th	130	67^th	67	258^th	258	109^th	109	136^th	136	30^th	30	336^th	336	306^th	306	56^th	56	196^th	196	297^th	297	134^th	134	200^th	200	103^rd	103	334^th	334	40^th	40	132^nd	132
2019-20	147^th	147	282^nd	282	7^th	7	33^rd	33	293^rd	293	42^nd	42	67^th	67	201^st	201	227^th	227	193^rd	193	338^th	338	309^th	309	110^th	110	192^nd	192	64^th	64	225^th	225	248^th	248	277^th	277
2018-19	119^th	119	256^th	256	6^th	6	33^rd	33	223^rd	223	52^nd	52	208^th	208	315^th	315	156^th	156	36^th	36	284^th	284	338^th	338	239^th	239	330^th	330	82^nd	82	329^th	329	58^th	58	168^th	168

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	138^th	138	129^th	129	--	--	178^th	178	228^th	228	57^th	57	165^th	165	240^th	240	292^nd	292	252^nd	252	158^th	158	91^st	91	129^th	129	300^th	300	61^st	61	244^th	244	258^th	258	304^th	304
2023-24	194^th	194	63^rd	63	--	--	266^th	266	264^th	264	9^th	9	338^th	338	232^nd	232	255^th	255	352^nd	352	64^th	64	57^th	57	14^th	14	44^th	44	3^rd	3	214^th	214	355^th	355	358^th	358
2022-23	165^th	165	105^th	105	--	--	300^th	300	150^th	150	90^th	90	54^th	54	335^th	335	293^rd	293	207^th	207	146^th	146	97^th	97	49^th	49	104^th	104	57^th	57	324^th	324	158^th	158	255^th	255
2021-22	170^th	170	293^rd	293	--	--	159^th	159	185^th	185	34^th	34	109^th	109	225^th	225	259^th	259	299^th	299	91^st	91	59^th	59	230^th	230	229^th	229	33^rd	33	226^th	226	311^th	311	327^th	327
2020-21	300^th	300	313^th	313	--	--	193^rd	193	293^rd	293	51^st	51	337^th	337	175^th	175	310^th	310	316^th	316	97^th	97	252^nd	252	245^th	245	336^th	336	45^th	45	182^nd	182	316^th	316	327^th	327
2019-20	295^th	295	255^th	255	--	--	322^nd	322	227^th	227	138^th	138	129^th	129	238^th	238	226^th	226	304^th	304	215^th	215	303^rd	303	117^th	117	170^th	170	74^th	74	199^th	199	261^st	261	278^th	278
2018-19	257^th	257	295^th	295	--	--	339^th	339	114^th	114	131^st	131	219^th	219	111^th	111	268^th	268	353^rd	353	15^th	15	203^rd	203	65^th	65	18^th	18	60^th	60	68^th	68	340^th	340	334^th	334