Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 Wisconsin 36-4 (0.900) | Big Ten

All-Play Percentage: 0.997 (2^nd)	Schedule Strength: 0.781 (3^rd)	Record Quality: 0.674 (2^nd)	Avg. Season Rank: 2.57 (2^nd)
Pace: 59.89 (348^th)	Momentum: -0.98 (223^rd)	Off. Momentum: 3.74 (25^th)	Def. Momentum: -4.72 (340^th)
Consistency: -11.61 (342^nd)	Res. Consistency: -12.68 (243^rd)	Away From Home: -0.93 (269^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: -2.40 (279^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

126.82

31.60

77.41

88.27

50.50

34.01

38.85

23.74

42.95

30.52

69.34

7.36

13.87

7.57

38.53

26.90

34.58

2.04

RANK:

1^st

70^th

6^th

4^th

22^nd

18^th

233^rd

4^th

82^nd

4^th

346^th

245^th

83^rd

59^th

293^rd

179^th

255^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

91.40

19.29

85.27

40.69

22.09

35.67

35.15

34.83

28.03

52.00

7.94

10.22

4.22

25.90

41.22

32.88

1.93

RANK:

22^nd

2^nd

307^th

65^th

12^th

233^rd

351^st

145^th

150^th

15^th

6^th

1^st

4^th

351^st

110^th

291^st

ANALYSIS:
Wisconsin is among the very best of the best in NCAA hoops this year. They have a record of 36-4 and are ranked second overall (out of 351) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the best team (out of 14) in the Big Ten (average ranking 57.3). With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.781 (which ranks third nationally), Wisconsin is one of the more battle-tested teams in the college game.

Utilizing an extremely deliberate pace (the fourth-slowest in D1), Wisconsin is one of the very most competent offensive teams in the country. Ranked first in offensive efficiency, they'll rack up more than 126 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Wisconsin is one of the most lethal teams in the country when it comes to shooting the basketball, ranking in the top-25 in each of our four major field goal categories. They make 38.9% of their three-pointers (18th in the nation), 42.9% of their mid-range jumpers (fourth), 69.3% of their near-proximity chances (fourth), and 50.5% of their total shots from the field (fourth) vs. AO. Wisconsin is also deadly accurate at the free throw line. Making 77.4% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked sixth nationally in free throw percentage. Moreover, they get ample opportunity to beat you from the line, as the ball-club falls in the top-75 in free throw attempt rate with a rating of 31.60 vs. AO. Wisconsin is lastly one of the very best when it comes to maximizing field goal opportunities. The team is ranked sixth in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 88.27 vs. AO.

Wisconsin plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 22nd nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 91 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Wisconsin does a super job to deny opponents offensive rebounds and second chances. They have a rating of 10.22 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (ranked first in the country), and they allow AO to convert just 4.2% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked fourth) as well. Wisconsin is also a superior unit when it comes to preventing opponents from getting to the foul line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 19.29 vs. AO, they are currently rated second in the country in that category. Wisconsin lastly does tremendous work shutting down the opposition from the inside. They are ranked 15th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 52.0% of their attempts from close-up. If Wisconsin does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's unwillingness to take risks in order to score fast points off of the opposition's turnovers. The squad only has a rating of 7.36 in potential points scored off of steals vs. AO, which ranks sixth-worst in the college game.

Wisconsin has been one of the most erratic teams in college basketball this year (currently ranked tenth from the bottom overall in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their future games far more difficult to predict.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Fri 11/14/2014	vs N. Kentucky₂₃₁	W 79.66 - 50.77	W 62-31	1-0	132.63	102.74	▼ 29.89	89.69	55.05	▲ 34.64	▲ 4.75
Sun 11/16/2014	vs Chattanooga₁₆₄	W 79.68 - 52.99	W 89-45	2-0	128.39	126.84	▼ 1.55	90.75	67.82	▲ 22.93	▲ 21.38
Wed 11/19/2014	vs Green Bay₇₁	W 74.11 - 53.92	W 84-60	3-0	118.25	124.70	▲ 6.45	91.45	93.28	▼ 1.83	▲ 4.62
Sat 11/22/2014	vs Boise State₄₁	W 71.42 - 54.92	W 78-54	4-0	120.05	137.93	▲ 17.88	98.01	99.64	▼ 1.63	▲ 16.25
Wed 11/26/2014	vs UAB₁₂₂ *	W 75.06 - 54.91	W 72-43	5-0	125.60	116.00	▼ 9.60	92.45	61.22	▲ 31.23	▲ 21.63
Thu 11/27/2014	vs Georgetown₂₈ *	W 70.83 - 58.52	W 68-65	6-0	119.34	113.33	▼ 6.01	99.11	108.33	▼ 9.22	▼ 15.23
Fri 11/28/2014	vs Oklahoma₁₂ *	W 69.51 - 61.30	W 69-56	7-0	113.23	100.00	▼ 13.23	100.13	81.16	▲ 18.97	▲ 5.74
Wed 12/3/2014	vs Duke₃	W 71.18 - 66.25	L 70-80	7-1	114.11	113.70	▼ 0.41	112.05	136.30	▼ 24.25	▼ 24.66
Sat 12/6/2014	@ Marquette₇₉	W 69.07 - 56.06	W 49-38	8-1	120.25	93.71	▼ 26.54	92.82	67.40	▲ 25.42	▼ 1.12
Wed 12/10/2014	@ Milwaukee₁₉₈	W 75.52 - 54.29	W 93-54	9-1	127.99	145.52	▲ 17.53	87.20	72.03	▲ 15.17	▲ 32.70
Sat 12/13/2014	vs Nicholls₃₃₉	W 84.93 - 44.70	W 86-43	10-1	134.26	152.91	▲ 18.65	76.03	47.09	▲ 28.94	▲ 47.59
Mon 12/22/2014	@ California₁₁₄	W 73.38 - 56.94	W 68-56	11-1	122.02	112.97	▼ 9.05	90.57	78.06	▲ 12.51	▲ 3.46
Sun 12/28/2014	vs Buffalo₆₄	W 79.65 - 59.50	W 68-56	12-1	123.01	108.50	▼ 14.51	97.58	96.30	▲ 1.28	▼ 13.23
Wed 12/31/2014	vs Penn State₆₈	W 74.73 - 54.77	W 89-72	13-1	119.37	138.70	▲ 19.33	92.76	114.84	▼ 22.08	▼ 2.75
Sun 1/4/2015	@ Northwestern₁₂₀	W 69.03 - 53.59	W 81-58	14-1	126.38	140.23	▲ 13.85	93.61	79.38	▲ 14.23	▲ 28.08
Wed 1/7/2015	vs Purdue₃₃	W 72.37 - 56.35	W 62-55	15-1	119.05	103.93	▼ 15.12	98.68	96.19	▲ 2.49	▼ 12.63
Sun 1/11/2015	@ Rutgers₁₉₉	W 74.50 - 53.41	L 62-67	15-2	124.93	109.87	▼ 15.06	85.83	112.55	▼ 26.72	▼ 41.78
Thu 1/15/2015	vs Nebraska₁₀₇	W 72.51 - 50.05	W 70-55	16-2	119.10	129.68	▲ 10.58	88.21	94.64	▼ 6.43	▲ 4.15
Tue 1/20/2015	vs Iowa₂₂	W 71.77 - 57.04	W 82-50	17-2	117.60	139.89	▲ 22.29	99.63	76.14	▲ 23.49	▲ 45.78
Sat 1/24/2015	@ Michigan₃₇	W 65.88 - 56.93	W 69-64 (OT)	18-2	121.39	114.74	▼ 6.65	100.06	108.79	▼ 8.73	▼ 15.38
Sat 1/31/2015	@ Iowa₂₂	W 68.14 - 60.56	W 74-63	19-2	117.60	125.00	▲ 7.40	99.63	100.67	▼ 1.04	▲ 6.36
Tue 2/3/2015	vs Indiana₅₇	W 80.72 - 61.80	W 92-78	20-2	127.97	162.25	▲ 34.28	104.11	98.62	▲ 5.49	▲ 39.77
Sat 2/7/2015	vs Northwestern₁₂₀	W 72.46 - 50.26	W 65-50	21-2	126.38	115.03	▼ 11.35	93.61	92.77	▲ 0.84	▼ 10.51
Tue 2/10/2015	@ Nebraska₁₀₇	W 68.89 - 53.45	W 65-55	22-2	119.10	106.15	▼ 12.95	88.21	87.19	▲ 1.02	▼ 11.93
Sun 2/15/2015	vs Illinois₅₄	W 72.90 - 54.58	W 68-49	23-2	119.28	134.53	▲ 15.25	95.50	100.89	▼ 5.39	▲ 9.86
Wed 2/18/2015	@ Penn State₆₈	W 71.01 - 58.30	W 55-47	24-2	119.37	97.80	▼ 21.57	92.76	78.06	▲ 14.70	▼ 6.87
Sat 2/21/2015	vs Minnesota₄₄	W 77.50 - 59.81	W 63-53	25-2	121.36	102.20	▼ 19.16	99.50	90.69	▲ 8.81	▼ 10.35
Tue 2/24/2015	@ Maryland₃₀	W 68.48 - 59.46	L 53-59	25-3	119.19	97.61	▼ 21.58	98.03	104.30	▼ 6.27	▼ 27.85
Sun 3/1/2015	vs Michigan State₁₁	W 69.17 - 58.79	W 68-61	26-3	115.67	117.03	▲ 1.36	103.65	99.33	▲ 4.32	▲ 5.68
Thu 3/5/2015	@ Minnesota₄₄	W 73.70 - 63.39	W 76-63	27-3	121.36	126.30	▲ 4.94	99.50	98.75	▲ 0.75	▲ 5.69
Sun 3/8/2015	@ Ohio State₁₈	W 69.81 - 63.64	W 72-48	28-3	118.01	127.50	▲ 9.49	102.74	77.42	▲ 25.32	▲ 34.81
Fri 3/13/2015	vs Michigan₃₇ *	W 67.59 - 55.26	W 71-60	29-3	121.39	132.69	▲ 11.30	100.06	113.73	▼ 13.67	▼ 2.37
Sat 3/14/2015	vs Purdue₃₃ *	W 70.56 - 58.05	W 71-51	30-3	119.05	136.00	▲ 16.95	98.68	104.08	▼ 5.40	▲ 11.55
Sun 3/15/2015	vs Michigan State₁₁ *	W 67.39 - 60.41	W 80-69 (OT)	31-3	115.67	123.21	▲ 7.54	103.65	121.05	▼ 17.40	▼ 9.86
Fri 3/20/2015	vs Coast. Carolina₁₄₁ *	W 76.14 - 55.21	W 86-72	32-3	128.31	142.59	▲ 14.28	93.44	103.70	▼ 10.26	▲ 4.02
Sun 3/22/2015	vs Oregon₄₂ *	W 76.66 - 62.42	W 72-65	33-3	123.88	118.64	▼ 5.24	102.02	103.45	▼ 1.43	▼ 6.67
Thu 3/26/2015	vs North Carolina₉ *	W 74.50 - 67.39	W 79-72	34-3	117.12	133.90	▲ 16.78	105.65	118.03	▼ 12.38	▲ 4.40
Sat 3/28/2015	vs Arizona₄ *	W 68.07 - 65.29	W 85-78	35-3	110.72	130.77	▲ 20.05	106.34	120.00	▼ 13.66	▲ 6.39
Sat 4/4/2015	vs Kentucky₁ *	L 62.26 - 63.66	W 71-64	36-3	106.96	126.79	▲ 19.83	108.68	112.28	▼ 3.60	▲ 16.23
Mon 4/6/2015	vs Duke₃ *	W 69.33 - 68.02	L 63-68	36-4	114.11	106.78	▼ 7.33	112.05	113.33	▼ 1.28	▼ 8.61
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Wisconsin is typically better vs. teams that effectively clean the offensive glass. Against foes that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 16.77, Wisconsin performs above their norm 83% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 43% of the time.
	When facing teams that tend to get off more shots, Wisconsin often performs better than normal. Wisconsin is more efficient than usual 77% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 83.70. In their other contests, Wisconsin performs better than the norm 39% of the time.
	Wisconsin does better vs. clubs that do not defend well on the perimeter. When playing squads that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 31.31%, Wisconsin performs above average 67% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 31% of the time.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR
2024-25	11	0.972	27-10 (0.730)	0.730	0.452	Big Ten	67.20	-9.78	0.747	2.07	-0.20	17.66
2023-24	20	0.947	22-14 (0.611)	0.611	0.327	Big Ten	66.22	-9.46	0.756	1.10	-1.08	22.58
2022-23	65	0.820	20-15 (0.571)	0.571	0.274	Big Ten	64.53	-8.83	0.729	1.54	0.12	65.79
2021-22	33	0.910	25-8 (0.758)	0.758	0.498	Big Ten	67.12	-7.77	0.723	-0.76	0.79	26.74
2020-21	18	0.952	18-13 (0.581)	0.581	0.285	Big Ten	66.22	-10.60	0.790	-5.11	-1.02	13.69
2019-20	26	0.929	21-10 (0.677)	0.677	0.395	Big Ten	65.83	-11.52	0.764	0.75	-2.22	41.53
2018-19	18	0.952	23-11 (0.676)	0.676	0.415	Big Ten	65.12	-9.65	0.785	-3.60	-0.14	14.68
2017-18	65	0.817	15-18 (0.455)	0.455	0.115	Big Ten	65.09	-9.91	0.733	-4.11	-0.62	78.63
2016-17	22	0.940	27-10 (0.730)	0.730	0.434	Big Ten	65.54	-9.98	0.729	-1.47	-1.58	18.78
2015-16	40	0.889	22-13 (0.629)	0.629	0.310	Big Ten	65.77	-8.90	0.709	1.05	0.40	57.66
2014-15	2	0.997	36-4 (0.900)	0.900	0.674	Big Ten	59.89	-11.61	0.781	-2.40	-0.93	2.57

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	125.06	31.86	83.67	87.50	47.72	41.02	36.31	14.45	44.02	32.03	64.00	9.32	13.76	6.33	46.88	16.52	36.60	2.10
2023-24	118.75	30.33	76.32	86.73	48.37	31.74	36.88	20.33	45.31	34.66	60.68	9.89	13.21	6.18	36.59	23.44	39.97	1.97
2022-23	106.45	24.93	68.74	88.03	43.86	34.70	34.88	23.79	35.09	29.54	61.46	7.45	11.07	3.56	39.42	27.03	33.56	2.06
2021-22	107.83	29.70	73.73	85.65	44.76	29.67	31.22	28.03	37.99	27.96	65.92	8.63	11.66	5.29	34.64	32.72	32.64	2.02
2020-21	109.90	24.89	77.42	85.57	45.43	34.93	36.91	24.82	40.96	25.82	61.25	10.82	9.24	4.14	40.82	29.00	30.17	2.11
2019-20	108.22	24.86	75.96	83.51	45.32	36.70	37.17	24.25	42.07	22.56	62.07	7.27	11.33	4.30	43.95	29.04	27.01	2.17
2018-19	109.64	24.47	65.59	87.16	47.11	30.89	37.09	18.53	38.45	37.75	59.56	7.34	12.57	6.45	35.43	21.26	43.31	1.92
2017-18	107.31	27.95	68.55	83.13	46.72	30.55	34.29	20.02	40.28	32.56	62.34	6.85	13.04	6.25	36.75	24.08	39.17	1.98
2016-17	111.27	29.52	62.58	86.34	46.85	32.00	37.14	21.27	36.86	33.07	62.68	8.22	15.49	6.91	37.07	24.63	38.30	1.99
2015-16	106.34	32.17	69.22	82.83	44.21	30.26	35.80	25.15	37.03	27.42	60.08	7.64	14.85	6.90	36.53	30.36	33.11	2.03
2014-15	126.82	31.60	77.41	88.27	50.50	34.01	38.85	23.74	42.95	30.52	69.34	7.36	13.87	7.57	38.53	26.90	34.58	2.04

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	95.60	22.02	--	89.51	38.02	35.47	32.31	27.65	29.10	26.38	55.03	8.95	12.53	3.48	39.63	30.90	29.48	2.10
2023-24	97.56	23.56	--	81.99	43.01	28.68	34.95	28.40	37.68	24.90	58.36	8.78	9.87	3.89	34.98	34.64	30.37	2.05
2022-23	93.35	21.25	--	83.34	42.19	29.85	30.03	27.64	40.47	25.85	58.07	7.11	10.71	3.57	35.81	33.17	31.02	2.05
2021-22	90.92	22.31	--	84.30	39.91	28.44	29.48	29.57	37.03	26.29	54.44	8.30	10.11	2.91	33.74	35.07	31.19	2.03
2020-21	89.17	20.79	--	82.74	39.55	27.90	31.19	29.28	33.44	25.56	55.67	8.53	8.33	2.49	33.72	35.39	30.89	2.03
2019-20	89.50	20.08	--	84.91	39.32	28.04	32.13	28.22	31.82	28.65	53.75	9.39	11.31	3.97	33.03	33.23	33.74	1.99
2018-19	89.09	19.22	--	86.03	38.45	30.55	31.53	25.30	32.27	30.18	50.64	8.85	13.71	5.15	35.51	29.41	35.08	2.00
2017-18	96.65	22.76	--	81.93	43.28	25.95	32.54	27.92	40.50	28.06	55.98	10.62	11.79	4.92	31.67	34.08	34.25	1.97
2016-17	89.94	21.89	--	81.54	39.29	27.22	35.58	30.29	33.46	24.03	50.84	9.68	9.79	4.02	33.38	37.15	29.46	2.04
2015-16	91.04	26.35	--	80.39	40.25	22.73	33.95	29.64	32.79	28.02	53.26	10.64	14.39	5.30	28.28	36.87	34.85	1.93
2014-15	91.40	19.29	--	85.27	40.69	22.09	35.67	35.15	34.83	28.03	52.00	7.94	10.22	4.22	25.90	41.22	32.88	1.93

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR
2024-25	11^th	11	11^th	11	37^th	37	16^th	16	Big Ten	Big Ten	140^th	140	220^th	220	21^st	21	10^th	10	175^th	175	14^th	14
2023-24	20^th	20	20^th	20	109^th	109	39^th	39	Big Ten	Big Ten	285^th	285	210^th	210	4^th	4	30^th	30	281^st	281	20^th	20
2022-23	65^th	65	65^th	65	138^th	138	51^st	51	Big Ten	Big Ten	343^rd	343	133^rd	133	12^th	12	17^th	17	97^th	97	67^th	67
2021-22	33^rd	33	33^rd	33	32^nd	32	9^th	9	Big Ten	Big Ten	229^th	229	23^rd	23	10^th	10	172^nd	172	107^th	107	24^th	24
2020-21	18^th	18	18^th	18	127^th	127	48^th	48	Big Ten	Big Ten	333^rd	333	302^nd	302	26^th	26	338^th	338	268^th	268	12^th	12
2019-20	26^th	26	26^th	26	54^th	54	21^st	21	Big Ten	Big Ten	340^th	340	351^st	351	9^th	9	61^st	61	317^th	317	36^th	36
2018-19	18^th	18	18^th	18	59^th	59	21^st	21	Big Ten	Big Ten	336^th	336	196^th	196	8^th	8	337^th	337	185^th	185	13^th	13
2017-18	65^th	65	65^th	65	214^th	214	115^th	115	Big Ten	Big Ten	349^th	349	279^th	279	26^th	26	337^th	337	190^th	190	76^th	76
2016-17	22^nd	22	22^nd	22	40^th	40	18^th	18	Big Ten	Big Ten	340^th	340	296^th	296	30^th	30	231^st	231	303^rd	303	17^th	17
2015-16	40^th	40	40^th	40	95^th	95	41^st	41	Big Ten	Big Ten	341^st	341	170^th	170	26^th	26	42^nd	42	127^th	127	52^nd	52
2014-15	2^nd	2	2^nd	2	4^th	4	2^nd	2	Big Ten	Big Ten	348^th	348	342^nd	342	3^rd	3	279^th	279	269^th	269	2^nd	2

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	12^th	12	42^nd	42	1^st	1	163^rd	163	38^th	38	19^th	19	67^th	67	338^th	338	17^th	17	175^th	175	40^th	40	321^st	321	220^th	220	139^th	139	17^th	17	344^th	344	173^rd	173	319^th	319
2023-24	16^th	16	38^th	38	35^th	35	114^th	114	23^rd	23	170^th	170	53^rd	53	262^nd	262	12^th	12	50^th	50	89^th	89	263^rd	263	192^nd	192	111^th	111	191^st	191	268^th	268	63^rd	63	99^th	99
2022-23	116^th	116	190^th	190	292^nd	292	39^th	39	172^nd	172	62^nd	62	129^th	129	190^th	190	302^nd	302	170^th	170	103^rd	103	342^nd	342	315^th	315	342^nd	342	104^th	104	219^th	219	228^th	228	261^st	261
2021-22	63^rd	63	13^th	13	113^th	113	108^th	108	100^th	100	220^th	220	276^th	276	71^st	71	160^th	160	224^th	224	18^th	18	294^th	294	265^th	265	128^th	128	230^th	230	82^nd	82	245^th	245	181^st	181
2020-21	31^st	31	164^th	164	26^th	26	43^rd	43	87^th	87	55^th	55	47^th	47	119^th	119	73^rd	73	268^th	268	106^th	106	179^th	179	336^th	336	257^th	257	88^th	88	158^th	158	304^th	304	299^th	299
2019-20	35^th	35	193^rd	193	34^th	34	94^th	94	68^th	68	26^th	26	24^th	24	112^th	112	16^th	16	338^th	338	78^th	78	348^th	348	252^nd	252	239^th	239	36^th	36	133^rd	133	341^st	341	342^nd	342
2018-19	63^rd	63	251^st	251	329^th	329	27^th	27	37^th	37	223^rd	223	54^th	54	252^nd	252	70^th	70	8^th	8	173^rd	173	347^th	347	234^th	234	113^th	113	265^th	265	275^th	275	20^th	20	28^th	28
2017-18	82^nd	82	94^th	94	289^th	289	115^th	115	67^th	67	172^nd	172	218^th	218	254^th	254	54^th	54	41^st	41	90^th	90	341^st	341	247^th	247	207^th	207	178^th	178	267^th	267	48^th	48	83^rd	83
2016-17	40^th	40	86^th	86	341^st	341	14^th	14	56^th	56	94^th	94	81^st	81	249^th	249	154^th	154	29^th	29	84^th	84	312^th	312	119^th	119	141^st	141	151^st	151	291^st	291	55^th	55	126^th	126
2015-16	95^th	95	46^th	46	196^th	196	136^th	136	138^th	138	126^th	126	122^nd	122	134^th	134	100^th	100	244^th	244	137^th	137	328^th	328	182^nd	182	143^rd	143	137^th	137	139^th	139	248^th	248	249^th	249
2014-15	1^st	1	70^th	70	6^th	6	6^th	6	4^th	4	22^nd	22	18^th	18	233^rd	233	4^th	4	82^nd	82	4^th	4	346^th	346	245^th	245	83^rd	83	59^th	59	293^rd	293	179^th	179	255^th	255

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	19^th	19	23^rd	23	--	--	286^th	286	12^th	12	269^th	269	75^th	75	355^th	355	2^nd	2	18^th	18	57^th	57	15^th	15	43^rd	43	1^st	1	238^th	238	353^rd	353	9^th	9	37^th	37
2023-24	42^nd	42	71^st	71	--	--	38^th	38	108^th	108	64^th	64	210^th	210	343^rd	343	123^rd	123	8^th	8	199^th	199	18^th	18	7^th	7	23^rd	23	91^st	91	354^th	354	17^th	17	91^st	91
2022-23	19^th	19	34^th	34	--	--	117^th	117	91^st	91	130^th	130	17^th	17	320^th	320	289^th	289	43^rd	43	149^th	149	3^rd	3	14^th	14	17^th	17	144^th	144	330^th	330	43^rd	43	109^th	109
2021-22	22^nd	22	74^th	74	--	--	173^rd	173	38^th	38	80^th	80	31^st	31	330^th	330	146^th	146	66^th	66	53^rd	53	21^st	21	21^st	21	4^th	4	85^th	85	336^th	336	66^th	66	175^th	175
2020-21	16^th	16	40^th	40	--	--	202^nd	202	27^th	27	62^nd	62	44^th	44	343^rd	343	27^th	27	71^st	71	74^th	74	31^st	31	1^st	1	5^th	5	55^th	55	344^th	344	66^th	66	179^th	179
2019-20	21^st	21	22^nd	22	--	--	297^th	297	25^th	25	74^th	74	103^rd	103	336^th	336	14^th	14	189^th	189	40^th	40	47^th	47	61^st	61	54^th	54	42^nd	42	327^th	327	132^nd	132	250^th	250
2018-19	7^th	7	4^th	4	--	--	284^th	284	11^th	11	105^th	105	32^nd	32	327^th	327	38^th	38	155^th	155	9^th	9	17^th	17	179^th	179	77^th	77	67^th	67	324^th	324	124^th	124	210^th	210
2017-18	61^st	61	58^th	58	--	--	167^th	167	124^th	124	21^st	21	36^th	36	324^th	324	303^rd	303	154^th	154	56^th	56	155^th	155	19^th	19	24^th	24	18^th	18	333^rd	333	146^th	146	274^th	274
2016-17	12^th	12	17^th	17	--	--	160^th	160	22^nd	22	70^th	70	186^th	186	343^rd	343	55^th	55	32^nd	32	9^th	9	85^th	85	1^st	1	5^th	5	69^th	69	347^th	347	36^th	36	118^th	118
2015-16	11^th	11	85^th	85	--	--	95^th	95	38^th	38	10^th	10	119^th	119	327^th	327	52^nd	52	147^th	147	27^th	27	157^th	157	141^st	141	43^rd	43	10^th	10	342^nd	342	164^th	164	301^st	301
2014-15	22^nd	22	2^nd	2	--	--	307^th	307	65^th	65	12^th	12	233^rd	233	351^st	351	145^th	145	150^th	150	15^th	15	6^th	6	1^st	1	4^th	4	4^th	4	351^st	351	110^th	110	291^st	291