TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 Texas A&M-Comm.  13-20 (0.394)  |  Southland
All-Play Percentage: 0.149 (309th)
Schedule Strength: 0.283 (331st)
Record Quality: -0.260 (311th)
Avg. Season Rank: 310.95 (319th)
Pace: 66.53 (263rd)
Momentum: 1.60 (96th)
Off. Momentum: 4.05 (20th)
Def. Momentum: -2.45 (285th)
Consistency: -8.14 (46th)
Res. Consistency: -8.48 (9th)
Away From Home: 0.43 (65th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 2.42 (6th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 99.26 20.93 69.41 85.00 43.23 35.45 31.71 21.15 39.75 28.40 60.21 7.35 10.88 3.94 41.70 24.88 33.41 2.08
RANK: 250th 342nd 271st 158th 218th 49th 300th 272nd 90th 231st 131st 344th 322nd 318th 51st 278th 233rd 307th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 111.63 30.38 -- 83.09 47.57 30.27 35.74 17.65 42.16 35.17 60.46 9.88 13.82 5.69 36.43 21.24 42.33 1.94
RANK: 342nd 340th -- 107th 341st 144th 273rd 6th 339th 356th 233rd 105th 176th 234th 173rd 5th 363rd 332nd

ANALYSIS:
Texas A&M-Comm. presently has one of the below-average teams in college basketball. Haslametrics has them ranked 309th overall (out of 363) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 13-20. Of the 10 schools in the Southland (average ranking 295.4), they're currently ranked as our #5 team in the conference.

Defense is the farthest thing from a strength for Texas A&M-Comm. this year. The team ranks 342nd in defensive efficiency, allowing more than 111 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Texas A&M-Comm. is extremely underskilled to force steals that turn into quick and easy points. They're ranked #344 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 7.35 vs. AO. Texas A&M-Comm. is also one of the very worst teams in the country in terms of overall defensive field goal percentage. The ball-club ranks #341 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO will convert approximately 47.6% of their total attempts from the floor. Texas A&M-Comm. lastly fouls far too much and sends the opposition to the line way too often. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 30.38 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #340 in the country in that category.

Though they rate better on offense than they do on defense, Texas A&M-Comm. still isn't one of the more capable offensive teams in college hoops. Scoring roughly 99 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #250 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Texas A&M-Comm. does an extremely poor job drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 20.93 vs. AO, they are 342nd in the overall rankings for that category. Texas A&M-Comm. also does a fairly poor job cleaning the offensive glass. Against AO, the ball-club has a rating of 10.88 in potential points scored off of second chances (322nd nationally), and they convert just 3.9% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 318th) as well.

Texas A&M-Comm. is one of the more consistent teams in Division I (presently ranked 46th in consistency), so forecasting the outcomes of their future contests tends to be easier than the norm.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Texas A&M-Comm. does worse vs. clubs that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. When playing squads that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 46.40%, Texas A&M-Comm. performs above average 13% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 65% of the time.
Texas A&M-Comm. performs worse against squads that do not defend well on the perimeter. When facing teams that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.77%, Texas A&M-Comm. is more efficient than normal 21% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 69% of the time.
When playing teams that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities, Texas A&M-Comm. usually performs worse than average. Texas A&M-Comm. is more efficient than normal 15% of the time when facing clubs that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 10.98. In all other contests, Texas A&M-Comm. performs better than average 58% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25339th339th356th345thSouthland171st64th201st280th113th348th
2023-24335th334th280th308thSouthland243rd249th276th319th219th320th
2022-23309th309th270th311thSouthland263rd46th331st6th65th319th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25344th349th356th259th300th57th297th285th255th282nd204th22nd302nd247th38th283rd268th329th
2023-24343rd257th263rd194th357th49th354th205th73rd293rd360th171st224th319th47th210th298th322nd
2022-23250th342nd271st158th218th49th300th272nd90th231st131st344th322nd318th51st278th233rd307th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25264th282nd--50th325th84th351st5th185th352nd184th339th322nd291st131st7th363rd343rd
2023-24295th280th--91st347th30th268th76th317th345th269th75th309th323rd40th89th353rd351st
2022-23342nd340th--107th341st144th273rd6th339th356th233rd105th176th234th173rd5th363rd332nd