TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Bryant  20-13 (0.606)  |  America East
All-Play Percentage: 0.463 (195th)
Schedule Strength: 0.369 (241st)
Record Quality: 0.026 (161st)
Avg. Season Rank: 192.49 (188th)
Pace: 73.53 (3rd)
Momentum: -0.17 (181st)
Off. Momentum: 1.52 (105th)
Def. Momentum: -1.69 (257th)
Consistency: -8.86 (147th)
Res. Consistency: -11.35 (121st)
Away From Home: -0.14 (194th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.08 (192nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 99.86 23.66 65.94 82.11 44.65 32.32 33.86 17.33 41.91 32.46 56.85 11.35 10.20 4.79 39.36 21.10 39.54 2.00
RANK: 273rd 288th 341st 324th 147th 150th 200th 333rd 68th 113th 210th 188th 330th 248th 106th 322nd 69th 160th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 101.93 27.69 -- 88.26 40.88 31.46 33.13 21.78 37.26 35.02 50.11 13.80 16.68 5.81 35.65 24.68 39.68 1.96
RANK: 107th 246th -- 306th 43rd 183rd 119th 133rd 103rd 332nd 7th 330th 347th 224th 117th 103rd 307th 296th

ANALYSIS:
Regardless of what the win percentage says, Bryant isn't a very good team this year. They have a record of 20-13 and are ranked 195th overall (out of 362) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #3 team (out of nine) in the America East (average ranking 234.8).

Based on their performances this year, Bryant will likely find more success on defense than they will on offense. Allowing about 102 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO and favoring one of the game's most blistering paces (the third-fastest in D1), they currently occupy the #107 slot in the ratings for defensive efficiency. Bryant does tremendous work shutting down the opposition from the inside. They are ranked seventh in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 50.1% of their attempts from close-up. Bryant also boasts one of the better overall defensive field goal percentages in the country. The team ranks #43 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO only makes good on about 40.9% of their total attempts from the floor. If Bryant does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's difficulties stopping opponents from obtaining second-chance opportunities via offensive rebounds. The squad has a rating of 16.68 in potential points allowed off of second chances vs. AO, which ranks 16th-worst in college hoops.

Unfortunately, Bryant is not even remotely close to being as good on offense as they are on defense. The team is ranked 273rd in offensive efficiency, scoring about 100 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Bryant has had serious struggles making their free throws this year. Converting just 65.9% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #341 overall in free throw percentage. Bryant also has some difficulty protecting the ball efficiently when in possession, which leads to some quick and easy baskets for the opposition. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 13.80, which ranks 330th in D1.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Bryant does worse vs. clubs that do a nice job converting inside the paint. When playing squads that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 55.39%, Bryant performs above average 21% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 83% of the time.
Bryant performs better against squads that have trouble defending the mid-range shot. When facing teams that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 38.83%, Bryant is more efficient than normal 73% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 19% of the time.
When playing teams that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint, Bryant usually performs better than average. Bryant is more efficient than normal 80% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 58.76%. In all other contests, Bryant performs better than average 29% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25137th137th74th163rdAmerica East8th114th314th343rd287th147th
2023-24195th195th111th161stAmerica East3rd147th241st192nd194th188th
2022-23212th212th140th182ndAmerica East24th286th257th261st186th199th
2021-22196th195th62nd142ndNEC5th73rd348th338th302nd217th
2020-21177th177th60th163rdNEC2nd67th326th34th252nd161st
2019-20255th255th224th273rdNEC102nd191st331st42nd68th217th
2018-19325th325th301st319thNEC180th279th335th333rd289th337th
2017-18343rd343rd349th349thNEC65th122nd300th134th112th341st
2016-17264th264th269th304thNEC67th30th311th67th194th247th
2015-16337th337th323rd339thNEC170th327th281st270th29th334th
2014-15234th233rd166th207thNEC255th215th297th162nd148th225th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25168th242nd182nd38th194th192nd246th70th291st191st73rd267th42nd16th231st97th243rd177th
2023-24273rd288th341st324th147th150th200th333rd68th113th210th188th330th248th106th322nd69th160th
2022-23196th150th137th267th194th109th288th358th308th15th199th152nd115th55th83rd359th7th98th
2021-22174th64th101st119th285th53rd335th332nd335th67th177th65th9th29th56th337th83rd225th
2020-21174th212th35th253rd187th127th76th346th330th44th250th93rd195th47th90th345th31st131st
2019-20266th172nd294th165th315th44th311th263rd181st248th288th166th116th123rd45th269th257th304th
2018-19284th178th46th247th324th83rd276th274th230th219th332nd296th235th273rd67th267th194th264th
2017-18304th316th197th174th318th81st200th229th275th228th331st125th222nd298th78th235th232nd275th
2016-17232nd256th122nd197th248th106th218th251st172nd175th281st145th168th258th104th259th170th218th
2015-16326th347th304th172nd292nd137th277th230th330th141st241st179th250th275th136th229th146th191st
2014-15182nd281st14th87th278th33rd199th262nd288th206th261st285th233rd238th38th286th243rd300th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25113th119th--310th85th120th141st238th60th315th48th243rd326th273rd79th218th273rd298th
2023-24107th246th--306th43rd183rd119th133rd103rd332nd7th330th347th224th117th103rd307th296th
2022-23214th258th--232nd173rd174th179th263rd232nd173rd170th334th75th102nd152nd252nd149th187th
2021-22224th96th--336th189th155th183rd300th338th273rd47th300th325th304th93rd270th211th259th
2020-21192nd136th--315th152nd227th35th216th267th244th176th198th268th102nd167th180th202nd186th
2019-20228th184th--318th169th159th122nd216th233rd303rd130th280th266th273rd94th176th263rd272nd
2018-19344th282nd--134th349th104th337th90th345th289th272nd232nd69th245th113th91st301st285th
2017-18350th187th--273rd347th302nd350th120th273rd208th347th260th220th293rd277th96th169th121st
2016-17292nd262nd--142nd293rd151st125th233rd265th130th337th170th235th323rd153rd241st129th171st
2015-16333rd139th--322nd293rd329th139th204th305th157th345th303rd324th331st298th154th94th52nd
2014-15280th192nd--280th205th270th89th164th277th212th239th323rd283rd189th234th133rd174th154th