TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 Bryant  3-28 (0.097)  |  Northeast
All-Play Percentage: 0.023 (343rd)
Schedule Strength: 0.366 (300th)
Record Quality: -0.571 (349th)
Avg. Season Rank: 340.20 (341st)
Pace: 72.25 (65th)
Momentum: -0.85 (210th)
Off. Momentum: 0.41 (162nd)
Def. Momentum: -1.26 (218th)
Consistency: -8.60 (122nd)
Res. Consistency: -9.62 (44th)
Away From Home: 0.22 (112th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.52 (134th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 94.03 22.02 71.12 82.02 40.64 33.84 34.60 20.99 34.74 27.19 52.70 11.65 13.56 4.99 41.26 25.59 33.15 2.08
RANK: 304th 316th 197th 174th 318th 81st 200th 229th 275th 228th 331st 125th 222nd 298th 78th 235th 232nd 275th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 118.61 26.38 -- 84.29 50.80 33.63 41.92 21.17 39.49 29.49 69.04 11.92 15.14 8.14 39.90 25.11 34.99 2.05
RANK: 350th 187th -- 273rd 347th 302nd 350th 120th 273rd 208th 347th 260th 220th 293rd 277th 96th 169th 121st

ANALYSIS:
Bryant is a poor basketball team, arguably one of the very worst in all of college hoops. They are ranked #343 (out of 351) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 3-28. Of the 10 schools in the NEC (average ranking 278.1), they're currently ranked as the worst team in the conference.

Defense is the farthest thing from a strength for Bryant this year. The team ranks second from the bottom in defensive efficiency, allowing more than 118 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Bryant allows the opposition far too many easy shots from the floor and ranks in the bottom-25 in three of our four major defensive field goal shooting categories. AO will convert a healthy 41.9% of their three-pointers (second from the bottom in the nation), 69.0% of their near-proximity attempts (fifth from the bottom), and 50.8% of their total shots from the field (fifth from the bottom).

Bryant doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 94 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #304 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Bryant will have a really tough time winning games when taking into consideration their shooting percentage near the basket. The team is ranked 331st in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 52.7% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. Moreover, they find themselves in the bottom-50 in overall offensive field goal percentage, converting just 40.6% of their total attempts vs. AO. Bryant also struggles to draw fouls and earn opportunities at the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 22.02 vs. AO, they are 316th in the overall rankings for that category.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that have trouble defending the mid-range shot, Bryant often performs better than normal. Bryant is more efficient than usual 67% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.35%. In their other contests, Bryant performs better than the norm 23% of the time.
Bryant does worse vs. clubs that find ways to get to the free throw line. When playing squads that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 23.78, Bryant performs above average 36% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 78% of the time.
Bryant performs better against squads that aren't terribly skilled defensively. When facing teams that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 107.83, Bryant is more efficient than normal 78% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 36% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25137th137th74th163rdAmerica East7th115th314th343rd288th147th
2023-24195th195th111th161stAmerica East3rd147th241st192nd194th188th
2022-23212th212th140th182ndAmerica East24th286th257th261st186th199th
2021-22196th195th62nd142ndNEC5th73rd348th338th302nd217th
2020-21177th177th60th163rdNEC2nd67th326th34th252nd161st
2019-20255th255th224th273rdNEC102nd191st331st42nd68th217th
2018-19325th325th301st319thNEC180th279th335th333rd289th337th
2017-18343rd343rd349th349thNEC65th122nd300th134th112th341st
2016-17264th264th269th304thNEC67th30th311th67th194th247th
2015-16337th337th323rd339thNEC170th327th281st270th29th334th
2014-15234th233rd166th207thNEC255th215th297th162nd148th225th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25168th243rd182nd39th193rd194th246th73rd291st189th74th267th43rd17th231st97th243rd173rd
2023-24273rd288th341st324th147th150th200th333rd68th113th210th188th330th248th106th322nd69th160th
2022-23196th150th137th267th194th109th288th358th308th15th199th152nd115th55th83rd359th7th98th
2021-22174th64th101st119th285th53rd335th332nd335th67th177th65th9th29th56th337th83rd225th
2020-21174th212th35th253rd187th127th76th346th330th44th250th93rd195th47th90th345th31st131st
2019-20266th172nd294th165th315th44th311th263rd181st248th288th166th116th123rd45th269th257th304th
2018-19284th178th46th247th324th83rd276th274th230th219th332nd296th235th273rd67th267th194th264th
2017-18304th316th197th174th318th81st200th229th275th228th331st125th222nd298th78th235th232nd275th
2016-17232nd256th122nd197th248th106th218th251st172nd175th281st145th168th258th104th259th170th218th
2015-16326th347th304th172nd292nd137th277th230th330th141st241st179th250th275th136th229th146th191st
2014-15182nd281st14th87th278th33rd199th262nd288th206th261st285th233rd238th38th286th243rd300th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25113th120th--310th84th120th140th239th60th316th47th243rd326th273rd79th218th273rd299th
2023-24107th246th--306th43rd183rd119th133rd103rd332nd7th330th347th224th117th103rd307th296th
2022-23214th258th--232nd173rd174th179th263rd232nd173rd170th334th75th102nd152nd252nd149th187th
2021-22224th96th--336th189th155th183rd300th338th273rd47th300th325th304th93rd270th211th259th
2020-21192nd136th--315th152nd227th35th216th267th244th176th198th268th102nd167th180th202nd186th
2019-20228th184th--318th169th159th122nd216th233rd303rd130th280th266th273rd94th176th263rd272nd
2018-19344th282nd--134th349th104th337th90th345th289th272nd232nd69th245th113th91st301st285th
2017-18350th187th--273rd347th302nd350th120th273rd208th347th260th220th293rd277th96th169th121st
2016-17292nd262nd--142nd293rd151st125th233rd265th130th337th170th235th323rd153rd241st129th171st
2015-16333rd139th--322nd293rd329th139th204th305th157th345th303rd324th331st298th154th94th52nd
2014-15280th192nd--280th205th270th89th164th277th212th239th323rd283rd189th234th133rd174th154th