TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2020-21 Merrimack  9-9 (0.500)  |  Northeast
All-Play Percentage: 0.230 (275th)
Schedule Strength: 0.270 (336th)
Record Quality: -0.168 (264th)
Avg. Season Rank: 270.53 (278th)
Pace: 67.07 (308th)
Momentum: -0.75 (209th)
Off. Momentum: 0.02 (202nd)
Def. Momentum: -0.77 (194th)
Consistency: -8.87 (135th)
Res. Consistency: -12.93 (214th)
Away From Home: 1.35 (67th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.54 (230th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2021. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 89.68 21.62 64.75 78.41 41.56 33.49 31.38 14.91 38.73 30.01 54.33 14.78 10.75 4.32 42.71 19.02 38.28 2.04
RANK: 323rd 300th 328th 312th 268th 89th 290th 352nd 150th 83rd 291st 29th 276th 234th 50th 348th 51st 201st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.13 26.98 -- 80.94 44.21 26.69 34.52 25.31 39.69 28.94 57.09 12.42 14.39 5.17 32.97 31.27 35.76 1.97
RANK: 175th 260th -- 122nd 192nd 31st 206th 277th 232nd 209th 113th 263rd 285th 207th 41st 291st 234th 300th

ANALYSIS:
Not one of the better ball-clubs in college basketball, Merrimack should be a fairly easy win for most capable opponents. They have a record of 9-9 and are ranked 275th overall (out of 357) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the 10 schools in the NEC (average ranking 266.2), they're currently ranked as our #5 team in the conference. With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.270 (which ranks 336th in the nation), Merrimack has faced some of the easiest opponents in all of college basketball.

If there is a strength for Merrimack this year, it's probably on the defensive end of the court. The team is rated 175th in defensive efficiency, allowing fewer than 101 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Merrimack does a pretty solid job providing themselves chances to score quickly off of steals. They're ranked 29th in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 14.78.

The offense for Merrimack, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the defense is. The team is ranked 323rd in offensive efficiency, scoring about 90 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Merrimack is not one of the better teams when it comes to sinking foul shots. Converting just 64.8% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #328 overall in free throw percentage. Merrimack is also one of the more inferior teams in the college game when it comes to maximizing opportunities to score on offense. The team is nationally ranked 312th in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 78.41 vs. AO.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Merrimack does worse vs. clubs that tend to get off more shots. When playing squads that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 80.83, Merrimack performs above average 30% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 75% of the time.
Merrimack performs better against squads that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. When facing teams that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 46.26%, Merrimack is more efficient than normal 75% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 30% of the time.
When playing teams that convert well from outside the arc, Merrimack usually performs worse than average. Merrimack is more efficient than normal 30% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 32.88%. In all other contests, Merrimack performs better than average 75% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Elisias scores 20 to lead Bryant over Merrimack 76-60
(2/21/2021 7:01:11 PM) NORTH ANDOVER, Mass. (AP) — Hall Elisias had a career-high 20 points plus 10 rebounds as Bryant topped Merrimack 76-60 on Sunday.
Minor leads Merrimack over Central Connecticut 62-46
(2/11/2021 10:41:15 PM) Jordan Minor had 15 points as Merrimack beat Central Connecticut 62-46 on Thursday night.
Minor scores 20 to carry Merrimack over LIU-Brooklyn 68-63
(1/27/2021 6:41:01 PM) NEW YORK (AP) — Jordan Minor tied his career high with 20 points plus 12 rebounds as Merrimack narrowly beat Long Island-Brooklyn 68-63 on Wednesday.
Minor carries Merrimack past Fairleigh Dickinson 62-51
(1/21/2021 9:59:36 PM) NORTH ANDOVER, Mass. (AP) — Mykel Derring scored a career-high 19 points and Jordan Minor tallied 11 points and 10 rebounds to lift Merrimack to a 62-51 win over Fairleigh Dickinson on Thursday night.
Thomas lifts Mount St. Mary's past Merrimack 63-52
(1/15/2021 6:41:38 PM) EMMITSBURG, Md. (AP) -- Deandre Thomas had 18 points off the bench to lead Mount St. Mary's to a 63-52 win over Merrimack on Friday.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25198th198th155th211thMAAC330th154th307th168th41st196th
2023-24236th236th84th195thNEC154th57th351st105th197th230th
2022-23273rd273rd176th238thNEC213th42nd337th356th108th322nd
2021-22303rd303rd214th266thNEC352nd349th329th183rd34th303rd
2020-21275th274th179th264thNEC308th135th336th230th67th278th
2019-20237th237th80th173rdNEC342nd264th309th136th171st271st
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25278th351st208th83rd308th50th262nd196th258th280th241st3rd362nd364th65th213th304th326th
2023-24331st290th133rd350th294th97th317th337th221st220th260th4th354th351st44th336th135th266th
2022-23350th200th290th359th335th102nd245th362nd363rd81st339th1st360th361st37th360th21st176th
2021-22320th307th326th269th305th88th224th343rd336th72nd317th23rd245th303rd68th343rd58th194th
2020-21323rd300th328th312th268th89th290th352nd150th83rd291st29th276th234th50th348th51st201st
2019-20323rd324th319th296th297th63rd129th348th322nd100th332nd3rd314th328th41st346th72nd233rd
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2599th196th--148th125th47th80th245th140th235th123rd11th362nd262nd57th262nd251st302nd
2023-2486th202nd--62nd182nd8th118th187th196th321st106th143rd349th351st16th220th337th353rd
2022-23115th126th--110th192nd19th211th219th138th296th142nd318th310th306th30th245th318th343rd
2021-22258th299th--129th266th47th262nd253rd232nd247th222nd235th351st356th54th272nd263rd298th
2020-21175th260th--122nd192nd31st206th277th232nd209th113th263rd285th207th41st291st234th300th
2019-20123rd299th--33rd242nd2nd83rd249th294th257th141st138th347th353rd9th302nd313th339th