TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Grambling State  12-22 (0.353)  |  SWAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.138 (313th)
Schedule Strength: 0.290 (318th)
Record Quality: -0.365 (340th)
Avg. Season Rank: 303.47 (309th)
Pace: 63.84 (336th)
Momentum: 2.29 (79th)
Off. Momentum: -0.61 (239th)
Def. Momentum: 2.90 (28th)
Consistency: -10.15 (268th)
Res. Consistency: -13.69 (259th)
Away From Home: 1.19 (30th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 2.52 (6th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 95.16 24.78 72.71 84.93 40.30 27.82 31.25 25.86 34.58 31.25 53.08 11.91 13.18 6.16 32.75 30.45 36.79 1.96
RANK: 350th 282nd 167th 289th 335th 333rd 308th 60th 284th 208th 342nd 196th 248th 160th 332nd 46th 164th 71st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 110.06 26.93 -- 87.76 43.97 34.99 36.60 20.39 37.62 32.37 55.94 13.53 14.96 5.59 39.87 23.24 36.89 2.03
RANK: 219th 167th -- 208th 169th 249th 312th 138th 189th 198th 80th 280th 208th 127th 248th 127th 192nd 149th

ANALYSIS:
If you're looking for a squad in the bottom quartile of all Division I basketball teams this year, Grambling State likely fits the bill. Their record this season is 12-22, and the club is ranked 313th overall (out of 364) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #6 team (out of 12) in the SWAC (average ranking 318.6).

Offense comes as a real struggle to Grambling State this year. The team is rated 350th in offensive efficiency and scores fewer than 96 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Grambling State will have a really tough time winning games when taking into consideration their shooting percentage near the basket. The team is ranked 342nd in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 53.1% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. Moreover, they find themselves in the bottom-50 in overall offensive field goal percentage, converting just 40.3% of their total attempts vs. AO.

Even though the team ranks considerably higher in defensive efficiency, Grambling State isn't a powerhouse on that end of the floor either. Allowing roughly 110 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #219 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Grambling State tends to struggle a bit against teams that shoot the three. They rank 312th nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 36.6% of their attempts from afar.

On the road, Grambling State performs somewhat better than their norm, as the squad is nationally ranked 30th in our away-from-home metric.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Grambling State performs worse against squads that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities. When facing teams that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 87.87, Grambling State is more efficient than normal 10% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 71% of the time.
When playing teams that prefer the outside shot, Grambling State usually performs better than average. Grambling State is more efficient than normal 85% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.00. In all other contests, Grambling State performs better than average 28% of the time.
Grambling State is typically worse vs. teams that have trouble defending the mid-range shot. Against foes that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 39.58%, Grambling State performs above their norm 27% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 65% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25313th313th311th340thSWAC336th268th318th6th30th309th
2023-24273rd273rd134th217thSWAC333rd248th282nd356th54th315th
2022-23197th197th42nd136thSWAC246th281st353rd331st160th232nd
2021-22306th306th272nd298thSWAC67th16th235th173rd120th319th
2020-21328th328th179th275thSWAC129th180th343rd36th39th327th
2019-20320th320th166th266thSWAC223rd16th348th209th216th297th
2018-19285th285th183rd264thSWAC80th32nd343rd278th324th297th
2017-18319th319th154th228thSWAC15th56th340th28th20th319th
2016-17333rd333rd207th294thSWAC229th235th347th349th272nd340th
2015-16343rd343rd341st349thSWAC280th125th318th185th148th347th
2014-15351st351st348th351stSWAC166th284th342nd338th229th351st
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25350th282nd167th289th335th333rd308th60th284th208th342nd196th248th160th332nd46th164th71st
2023-24281st193rd275th265th208th356th93rd24th234th192nd274th102nd235th166th355th15th172nd27th
2022-23280th45th350th263rd197th358th146th21st337th114th174th132nd19th76th361st14th94th13th
2021-22317th221st300th152nd307th351st237th94th327th15th343rd145th199th142nd351st101st14th2nd
2020-21328th152nd298th299th280th351st269th100th275th64th318th102nd46th212th347th73rd37th10th
2019-20328th171st308th231st286th342nd322nd51st169th118th319th123rd168th202nd342nd38th101st21st
2018-19317th117th224th349th260th349th10th41st247th265th339th326th284th213th337th17th190th60th
2017-18338th111th234th281st332nd348th338th20th288th183rd322nd63rd187th162nd348th13th157th22nd
2016-17328th171st334th112th326th330th337th57th322nd81st315th88th143rd138th332nd60th104th34th
2015-16344th163rd302nd325th338th274th345th167th297th218th321st107th261st320th241st121st141st116th
2014-15351st319th267th341st351st343rd348th47th343rd306th347th162nd322nd348th327th12th252nd86th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25219th167th--208th169th249th312th138th189th198th80th280th208th127th248th127th192nd149th
2023-24250th221st--207th218th259th247th198th246th128th227th91st351st300th250th191st122nd107th
2022-2387th354th--38th65th256th110th70th36th57th133rd112th309th188th313th119th92nd54th
2021-22246th355th--51st180th296th276th2nd68th206th140th128th347th287th330th3rd253rd105th
2020-21279th330th--178th185th318th279th53rd323rd163rd50th286th348th314th321st46th157th67th
2019-20274th270th--214th201st307th273rd75th134th198th192nd273rd273rd210th301st57th173rd104th
2018-19172nd327th--208th98th230th69th142nd248th189th71st313th305th211th214th126th177th167th
2017-18183rd325th--42nd243rd188th102nd60th277th163rd277th299th317th302nd252nd84th206th144th
2016-17321st327th--6th350th105th350th10th351st199th320th181st22nd294th237th20th298th234th
2015-16304th326th--32nd313th277th208th21st308th123rd338th169th172nd214th327th30th178th74th
2014-15349th270th--294th342nd310th249th48th338th277th347th334th215th306th294th24th239th155th