TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2018-19 Washington St.  11-21 (0.344)  |  Pac-12
All-Play Percentage: 0.375 (222nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.554 (110th)
Record Quality: -0.099 (220th)
Avg. Season Rank: 187.39 (183rd)
Pace: 70.28 (84th)
Momentum: -6.13 (346th)
Off. Momentum: -5.57 (350th)
Def. Momentum: -0.55 (171st)
Consistency: -10.61 (286th)
Res. Consistency: -15.13 (316th)
Away From Home: -0.66 (240th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.01 (185th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2019. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.28 22.72 76.54 82.30 45.35 35.57 37.26 18.76 36.20 27.97 61.76 10.87 13.62 5.93 43.22 22.79 33.99 2.09
RANK: 133rd 291st 23rd 231st 111th 74th 47th 243rd 160th 251st 105th 209th 167th 177th 63rd 244th 242nd 293rd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 109.12 23.72 -- 87.32 46.11 35.50 36.28 18.82 36.46 33.01 62.17 15.52 12.41 5.88 40.65 21.55 37.80 2.03
RANK: 283rd 72nd -- 324th 261st 306th 267th 82nd 186th 278th 241st 345th 83rd 150th 262nd 53rd 222nd 169th

ANALYSIS:
While not an atrocious team by any means, Washington St. is not exactly one that should appear in many top-100 rankings either. Ranked 222nd overall (out of 353) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 11-21. They are also ranked by this site as the #11 team (out of 12) in the Pac-12 (average ranking 107.2).

Based on the data, Washington St. will likely find more success on offense than on defense. Scoring about 105 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #133 slot in the rankings for offensive efficiency. Washington St. is deadly accurate at the free throw line. Making 76.5% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked 23rd nationally in free throw percentage. Unfortunately, with a free throw attempt rate of just 22.72 vs. AO, they don't provide themselves a whole lot of opportunities at the foul line. Washington St. is also one of the more accurate teams in the college game when it comes to shooting the three. They're ranked 47th nationally in three-point field goal percentage and make about 37.3% of their attempts from there vs. AO. The team will try to shoot a fair amount of threes, too. Roughly 43.2% of their field goal attempts vs. AO are from long, giving the team a top-75 ranking in that category. If Washington St. does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's penchant for allowing too many easy buckets off of giveaways. The squad has a rating of 15.52 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of steals, which ranks ninth-worst in the college game.

The defense for Washington St., on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the offense is. The team is ranked 283rd in defensive efficiency, allowing about 109 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Washington St. struggles on occasion to deny opponents opportunities to shoot from the floor. The team is ranked 324th in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 87.32 vs. AO.

Washington St. has been playing some of their worst basketball of the season as of late, and they're presently ranked eighth from the bottom in positive momentum because of it.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities, Washington St. often performs worse than normal. Washington St. is more efficient than usual 36% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 83.33. In their other contests, Washington St. performs better than the norm 90% of the time.
Washington St. does worse vs. clubs that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. When playing squads that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.70%, Washington St. performs above average 32% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 85% of the time.
Washington St. performs better against squads that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities. When facing teams that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 11.57, Washington St. is more efficient than normal 77% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 37% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Oregon Whips Washington State In Pac-12 Tournament
(3/14/2019 10:54:00 AM) (Las Vegas, NV) -- The Ducks suffocated Washington State 84-51 in a Pac-12 Tournament first-round game in Las Vegas. Ehab Amin led Oregon scorers with 17 points. The Ducks will try to extend their ...
Pac-12 men's basketball tournament: McKinley Wright leads Colorado over California; Oregon dominates Washington State
(3/14/2019 9:45:00 AM) Ehab Amin scored 17 points, Miles Norris added 14 and Oregon rolled over Washington State 84-51 Wednesday night in the most lopsided game in Pac-12 tournament history. The sixth-seeded Ducks (20-12) jumped on the Cougars from the start, racing out to a 15 ...
Live Coverage: Analysis, Updates from Oregon vs Washington State
(3/13/2019 10:09:00 PM) The 2018-19 Pac-12 Tournament kicks off for the Oregon Ducks (19-12, 10-8) Wednesday night with a first-round matchup against the No. 11 seed Washington State Cougars (11-20, 4-16). The Ducks and ...
Washington State’s Jeff Pollard named to Pac-12 All-Academic First Team for second straight year
(3/12/2019 9:23:00 PM) Washington State’s Jeff Pollard was one of six players named to the All-Pac-12 Men’s Basketball All-Academic First Team ... Pollard’s carrying a 3.73 grade point average. The Cougars have had at least one player recognized as a Pac-12 All-Academic ...
OSU men's basketball: Beavers clinch Pac-12 tournament bye with win at Washington State
(3/9/2019 10:45:00 PM) The closing stretch of the Pac-12 schedule was filled with disappointment and close defeats, but Oregon State finally accomplished what it was chasing. Saturday’s 85-77 win at Washington State ...
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25124th124th145th111thWCC45th187th98th161st226th91st
2023-2446th46th34th24thPac-12336th134th76th120th273rd47th
2022-2371st71st193rd106thPac-12311th287th40th184th355th64th
2021-2256th56th130th76thPac-12237th291st83rd193rd113th50th
2020-2171st71st175th96thPac-12174th120th66th11th96th124th
2019-20125th125th192nd121stPac-1247th101st82nd126th210th118th
2018-19222nd222nd289th220thPac-1284th286th110th185th240th183rd
2017-18182nd181st268th178thPac-12178th236th75th237th135th153rd
2016-17190th190th251st178thPac-12226th215th67th279th109th197th
2015-16196th196th306th230thPac-12151st150th42nd330th323rd139th
2014-15189th188th241st146thPac-1253rd318th53rd220th296th193rd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2583rd205th245th324th18th175th47th311th58th118th28th201st180th97th129th302nd74th143rd
2023-2464th92nd238th86th48th294th139th88th40th91st87th297th30th13th307th102nd117th68th
2022-2364th167th215th128th101st50th5th301st256th139th197th255th114th30th55th309th170th265th
2021-2282nd112th128th17th264th12th141st230th263rd211th224th114th6th44th44th269th278th320th
2020-21131st113th180th269th121st137th59th279th35th171st279th176th101st144th101st272nd130th208th
2019-20179th173rd44th143rd228th140th261st243rd251st108th203rd35th126th215th141st248th115th171st
2018-19133rd291st23rd231st111th74th47th243rd160th251st105th209th167th177th63rd244th242nd293rd
2017-18117th325th52nd210th90th11th89th342nd89th244th79th257th328th303rd6th341st231st332nd
2016-17154th331st37th275th40th277th57th96th117th230th21st326th333rd148th255th77th192nd122nd
2015-16204th272nd86th328th58th327th175th84th46th250th72nd322nd311th238th308th48th172nd76th
2014-1595th86th62nd298th75th196th149th211th19th242nd113th341st217th183rd153rd181st191st198th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25204th187th--331st109th271st163rd105th102nd330th67th341st347th296th207th58th292nd231st
2023-2429th99th--246th30th31st39th344th130th171st12th43rd30th18th24th344th151st281st
2022-2370th52nd--245th92nd95th58th222nd247th310th29th169th186th60th72nd209th295th304th
2021-2244th144th--125th62nd105th13th165th127th242nd70th54th117th28th121st173rd250th262nd
2020-2128th206th--102nd35th92nd36th242nd213th160th6th303rd158th27th99th262nd182nd225th
2019-2070th104th--75th155th77th54th225th195th132nd228th83rd120th89th91st248th170th223rd
2018-19283rd72nd--324th261st306th267th82nd186th278th241st345th83rd150th262nd53rd222nd169th
2017-18273rd47th--341st214th329th142nd97th287th283rd201st275th184th214th286th46th216th133rd
2016-17226th45th--339th173rd289th127th238th80th229th271st307th54th69th215th178th147th147th
2015-16205th98th--326th134th140th184th257th168th294th71st311th78th46th73rd210th248th273rd
2014-15301st156th--329th238th170th252nd274th341st257th107th202nd128th221st111th222nd197th225th