TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Wyoming  15-17 (0.469)  |  Mountain West
All-Play Percentage: 0.562 (160th)
Schedule Strength: 0.570 (95th)
Record Quality: -0.010 (186th)
Avg. Season Rank: 185.23 (177th)
Pace: 67.65 (185th)
Momentum: 4.41 (29th)
Off. Momentum: 2.69 (48th)
Def. Momentum: 1.72 (63rd)
Consistency: -8.19 (52nd)
Res. Consistency: -11.65 (139th)
Away From Home: 0.39 (124th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.85 (166th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 107.10 29.19 74.74 82.72 44.75 31.02 36.26 21.39 42.24 30.31 55.19 7.95 15.15 5.34 37.49 25.86 36.64 2.01
RANK: 141st 67th 78th 307th 142nd 202nd 73rd 221st 56th 203rd 249th 340th 96th 187th 158th 200th 160th 181st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 106.92 23.19 -- 88.41 43.97 34.12 35.38 26.55 39.75 27.75 58.56 12.10 12.54 5.46 38.59 30.03 31.38 2.07
RANK: 208th 55th -- 309th 165th 293rd 237th 310th 227th 62nd 207th 231st 106th 173rd 257th 299th 35th 51st

ANALYSIS:
Wyoming is a fairly decent basketball team that, while likely better than average, isn't quite good enough to crack any top-25 rankings this year. They have a record of 15-17 and are ranked 160th overall (out of 362) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the 11 schools in the MWC (average ranking 114.8), they're currently ranked as our #8 team in the conference.

Based on the data, Wyoming will likely find more success on offense than on defense. Scoring about 107 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #141 slot in the rankings for offensive efficiency. Wyoming does fairly solid work converting shots between the three-point stripe and the low post. The squad is ranked 56th nationally in mid-range field goal percentage, making about 42.2% of their attempts from those locations vs. AO. Wyoming also acquires a fair amount of chances from the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 29.19 vs. AO, they are ranked 67th in the nation at getting to the charity stripe. In addition, the team is in the top-100 in free throw shooting, converting a solid 74.7% of their attempts.

Wyoming doesn't perform as well defensively as they do offensively. The team is ranked 208th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 107 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Wyoming is extremely underskilled to force steals that turn into quick and easy points. They're ranked #340 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 7.95 vs. AO.

Wyoming has been playing better basketball in their most recent outings, as evidenced by the team's #29 ranking in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that effectively clean the offensive glass, Wyoming often performs worse than normal. Wyoming is more efficient than usual 32% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 11.07. In their other contests, Wyoming performs better than the norm 73% of the time.
Wyoming does worse vs. clubs that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities. When playing squads that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 11.72, Wyoming performs above average 20% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 60% of the time.
Wyoming performs worse against squads that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. When facing teams that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.02%, Wyoming is more efficient than normal 35% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 70% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25200th199th294th222ndMWC322nd120th97th258th311th160th
2023-24160th159th226th186thMWC185th52nd95th166th124th177th
2022-23151st150th327th233rdMWC251st285th53rd157th309th147th
2021-2279th79th40th36thMWC256th45th96th275th258th79th
2020-21189th189th137th142ndMWC94th158th207th201st168th230th
2019-20232nd232nd321st258thMWC217th233rd88th184th29th298th
2018-19306th306th331st310thMWC138th170th196th140th246th293rd
2017-18109th109th109th75thMWC14th145th81st9th48th122nd
2016-17114th114th113th109thMWC24th57th141st168th322nd116th
2015-16157th157th224th185thMWC316th146th103rd33rd134th156th
2014-15103rd103rd39th57thMWC344th323rd157th33rd344th84th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25246th271st349th174th192nd186th201st107th110th269th191st347th82nd117th187th106th274th233rd
2023-24141st67th78th307th142nd202nd73rd221st56th203rd249th340th96th187th158th200th160th181st
2022-23150th145th198th316th130th52nd94th344th134th191st160th363rd274th332nd26th341st149th298th
2021-2280th31st158th283rd74th97th144th268th30th269th67th358th251st263rd74th254th242nd289th
2020-21107th107th182nd234th134th25th124th349th10th138th266th289th303rd332nd16th347th117th284th
2019-20304th246th96th348th259th93rd199th293rd278th318th187th298th351st332nd40th265th269th315th
2018-19323rd118th148th353rd264th174th206th245th317th343rd106th342nd350th314th58th172nd313th320th
2017-18140th37th79th343rd122nd78th168th318th106th286th76th133rd315th278th32nd298th228th303rd
2016-17115th143rd98th282nd130th38th101st275th184th314th81st265th257th174th26th265th295th328th
2015-16110th32nd162nd346th118th4th36th337th229th349th23rd336th342nd331st1st326th346th350th
2014-15137th141st94th335th58th87th213th305th263rd288th1st223rd347th338th41st285th227th292nd
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25164th313th--71st165th136th179th266th298th57th127th224th102nd63rd178th295th81st119th
2023-24208th55th--309th165th293rd237th310th227th62nd207th231st106th173rd257th299th35th51st
2022-23216th118th--173rd169th248th248th204th313th106th98th15th107th98th255th207th90th92nd
2021-2280th63rd--306th54th194th14th305th207th173rd61st23rd109th51st150th294th114th172nd
2020-21298th215th--139th335th36th197th320th346th156th324th63rd101st231st42nd324th165th270th
2019-20136th229th--158th111th239th133rd298th123rd25th271st283rd167th187th238th310th18th35th
2018-19256th198th--288th175th268th179th344th297th17th310th337th265th154th234th342nd7th16th
2017-1895th169th--65th141st37th214th343rd225th10th186th171st49th85th54th347th18th111th
2016-17121st227th--262nd63rd168th36th344th83rd35th230th254th228th106th115th341st26th75th
2015-16230th236th--269th155th254th236th345th251st7th257th215th189th121st222nd345th5th19th
2014-1584th9th--310th74th289th217th348th110th2nd210th70th45th50th250th345th1st8th