TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 Wright State  22-14 (0.611)  |  Horizon
All-Play Percentage: 0.557 (159th)
Schedule Strength: 0.343 (266th)
Record Quality: 0.030 (159th)
Avg. Season Rank: 190.64 (192nd)
Pace: 69.58 (70th)
Momentum: 4.82 (14th)
Off. Momentum: 3.16 (34th)
Def. Momentum: 1.67 (63rd)
Consistency: -8.99 (150th)
Res. Consistency: -13.23 (260th)
Away From Home: 0.40 (143rd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.14 (205th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 104.13 26.69 76.68 84.55 44.24 27.17 32.58 28.89 39.98 28.49 59.69 9.75 17.06 5.94 32.14 34.17 33.70 1.98
RANK: 114th 99th 27th 171st 128th 285th 209th 57th 72nd 199th 146th 235th 25th 71st 285th 52nd 198th 108th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.83 21.77 -- 85.82 45.83 27.28 35.10 30.19 41.62 28.34 60.65 10.24 14.84 5.98 31.79 35.18 33.03 1.99
RANK: 231st 55th -- 245th 285th 46th 266th 337th 317th 149th 229th 141st 283rd 291st 29th 339th 121st 263rd

ANALYSIS:
As an average to slightly above-average foe, Wright State should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. Carrying a record of 22-14, they are currently rated #159 overall (out of 358) in All-Play Percentage this season. Of the 12 schools in the Horizon League (average ranking 248.3), they're currently ranked as our #2 team in the conference.

Based on the data, Wright State will likely find more success on offense than on defense. Scoring about 104 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #114 slot in the rankings for offensive efficiency. Wright State appears to be one of the top-notch offensive rebounding teams you will find this year. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 17.06 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked 25th in the NCAA). Wright State also does a really good job converting from the free throw line. Making 76.7% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked 27th nationally in free throw percentage. Moreover, they get ample opportunity to beat you from the line, as the ball-club falls in the top-100 in free throw attempt rate with a rating of 26.69 vs. AO.

The defense for Wright State, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the offense is. The team is ranked 231st in defensive efficiency, allowing about 104 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Wright State has done a lackluster job this year when defending the mid-range shot. The squad is ranked 317th nationally in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on 41.6% of their attempts from those in-between spots on the floor. Making matters worse, AO will take advantage of that weakness and put up mid-range shots in abundance. Of AO's total field goals, a huge portion of them (35.2%) will be from those in-between locations.

Wright State has been playing some of its most efficient basketball of the season recently and is presently ranked 14th in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Wright State does better vs. clubs that have trouble defending the mid-range shot. When playing squads that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 40.51%, Wright State performs above average 83% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 26% of the time.
Wright State performs worse against squads that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. When facing teams that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 4.28%, Wright State is more efficient than normal 30% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 75% of the time.
When playing teams that shoot the ball well from the field, Wright State usually performs worse than average. Wright State is more efficient than normal 18% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 43.18%. In all other contests, Wright State performs better than average 58% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Koloko, Arizona overpower Wright State in NCAA 1st round
(3/18/2022 9:50:02 PM) SAN DIEGO (AP) — Christian Koloko scored 17 points, grabbed 13 rebounds and keyed a big second-half surge for top-seeded Arizona, which beat No. 16 Wr...
No. 1 Arizona Cruises Past Wright State, Advances to 2nd Round of NCAA Tournament
(3/18/2022 9:34:01 PM) The Arizona Wildcats are one step closer to their first Final Four since the 2000-01 season. Arizona defeated the 16th-seeded Wright State Raiders 87-70 in...
Wright State beats Bryant 93-82 for NCAA Tournament win
(3/17/2022 10:31:44 AM) Tanner Holden had 37 points and 11 rebounds and Wright State beat Bryant 93-82 on Wednesday night for its first NCAA Tournament victory.
Wright State rallies, beats Northern Kentucky to win Horizon tourney
(3/9/2022 5:05:46 AM) Trey Calvin made a jumper from just inside the free-throw line with 10.5 seconds left to complete a late comeback from 16 points down to earn Wright State a 72-71 win over Northern Kentucky
Vinson sparks Northern Kentucky past Wright State 75-71
(2/13/2022 2:52:56 PM) DAYTON, Ohio (AP) — Sam Vinson had 20 points as Northern Kentucky turned back Wright State 75-71 on Sunday.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25205th205th231st236thHorizon League156th148th213th178th249th173rd
2023-24155th155th150th165thHorizon League17th10th210th179th25th157th
2022-23199th199th155th211thHorizon League21st237th295th235th45th198th
2021-22159th158th121st159thHorizon League70th150th266th205th143rd192nd
2020-2163rd62nd25th113thHorizon League40th346th300th142nd3rd63rd
2019-20142nd142nd17th101stHorizon League25th68th322nd189th306th136th
2018-1989th89th106th133rdHorizon League290th195th173rd232nd343rd101st
2017-18140th140th41st97thHorizon League186th112th244th196th93rd143rd
2016-17150th147th85th125thHorizon League120th240th195th209th299th174th
2015-16138th137th95th125thHorizon League298th199th199th183rd307th178th
2014-15236th236th280th274thHorizon League246th288th135th189th43rd192nd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25122nd341st242nd151st57th191st42nd205th55th121st112th242nd253rd270th199th208th130th131st
2023-2438th191st53rd263rd4th344th11th54th17th171st13th202nd250th137th345th43rd146th36th
2022-23181st344th98th166th64th341st194th30th13th140th173rd216th267th107th340th26th153rd35th
2021-22114th99th27th171st128th285th209th57th72nd199th146th235th25th71st285th52nd198th108th
2020-2195th114th138th120th98th265th100th180th133rd43rd207th239th18th24th278th189th50th49th
2019-20156th29th286th185th180th256th119th256th287th30th264th157th32nd43rd260th254th29th42nd
2018-19100th120th77th120th181st86th143rd233rd196th159th191st243rd159th246th98th248th176th231st
2017-18233rd109th158th182nd277th157th279th135th298th248th194th254th224th244th146th120th242nd224th
2016-17133rd155th20th303rd173rd52nd96th270th170th322nd158th310th255th274th27th256th305th329th
2015-16206th315th209th252nd144th171st50th87th69th327th185th252nd346th347th153rd67th319th278th
2014-15257th332nd176th227th166th191st236th112th12th285th222nd236th340th296th179th94th284th227th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25292nd244th--184th323rd54th343rd301st240th195th307th177th230th277th52nd303rd202nd276th
2023-24333rd110th--172nd357th169th360th173rd260th221st345th310th88th266th160th172nd220th218th
2022-23195th110th--254th208th198th213th257th152nd181st278th315th263rd287th169th239th148th172nd
2021-22231st55th--245th285th46th266th337th317th149th229th141st283rd291st29th339th121st263rd
2020-2152nd8th--289th87th41st71st342nd172nd190th54th281st246th267th21st335th152nd280th
2019-20164th105th--280th163rd59th101st318th250th256th125th69th293rd328th32nd308th211th293rd
2018-1989th69th--55th212th38th158th349th322nd11th304th29th4th48th61st351st16th112th
2017-1867th89th--103rd107th155th179th315th103rd13th220th31st125th164th194th331st19th55th
2016-17190th231st--43rd244th182nd184th275th308th16th321st272nd17th159th235th315th32nd48th
2015-1677th317th--4th143rd73rd84th137th65th33rd287th33rd13th48th201st241st112th122nd
2014-15211th280th--48th249th63rd166th215th219th117th300th50th225th271st95th262nd163rd214th