TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2019-20 Wright State  25-7 (0.781)  |  Horizon
All-Play Percentage: 0.599 (142nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.330 (322nd)
Record Quality: 0.159 (101st)
Avg. Season Rank: 142.15 (136th)
Pace: 73.38 (25th)
Momentum: -3.74 (324th)
Off. Momentum: -3.33 (343rd)
Def. Momentum: -0.41 (152nd)
Consistency: -8.23 (68th)
Res. Consistency: -10.58 (86th)
Away From Home: -2.03 (306th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.03 (189th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through March 11, 2020. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 99.93 29.81 67.41 81.36 43.13 28.20 34.22 20.11 34.32 33.05 56.08 11.20 16.41 6.56 34.66 24.72 40.62 1.94
RANK: 156th 29th 286th 185th 180th 256th 119th 256th 287th 30th 264th 157th 32nd 43rd 260th 254th 29th 42nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 99.12 23.61 -- 84.41 43.47 27.57 32.11 26.72 39.18 30.12 57.67 9.81 14.68 6.89 32.66 31.65 35.68 1.97
RANK: 164th 105th -- 280th 163rd 59th 101st 318th 250th 256th 125th 69th 293rd 328th 32nd 308th 211th 293rd

ANALYSIS:
They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but Wright State, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. Haslametrics has them ranked 142nd overall (out of 353) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 25-7. Of the 10 schools in the Horizon League (average ranking 240.5), they're currently ranked as the best team in the conference.

Wright State will likely rely on their offense more than anything else to win games. The team is ranked 156th in offensive efficiency and scores more than 99 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Wright State does a really good job to acquire opportunities from the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 29.81 vs. AO, they are ranked 29th in the nation at getting to the charity stripe. Unfortunately, they don't convert a ton of their free throws and make just 67.4% of their attempts. Wright State will also make a strong effort to get off as many field goals close to the basket as they can. The ball-club is 29th in the NCAA in ratio of near-proximity attempts to total field goal attempts. Curiously enough, though they shoot a fair amount of field goals from the inside, they don't really make a whole bunch of them, converting only 56.1% of their near-proximity attempts vs. AO.

Wright State plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 164th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 99 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Although they have a capable defense, Wright State doesn't stand out in any one particular area on that end of the court, and they fall outside the top-100 in every one of the defensive categories we take into consideration for this analysis. If Wright State does exhibit a weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's issues trying to stop opponents from obtaining and converting second-chance opportunities via offensive rebounds. The squad has a defensive second-chance conversion percentage of 6.9% vs. AO, which ranks 26th-worst in the nation.

Wright State has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 324th in the country in positive momentum. When playing on the road, Wright State performs somewhat worse than they normally do on their home court. The club is nationally ranked 306th in our site's away-from-home metric.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that are typically efficient on offense, Wright State usually performs worse than average. Wright State is more efficient than normal 20% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 95.13. In all other contests, Wright State performs better than average 60% of the time.
Wright State is typically better vs. teams that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. Against foes that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 61.71%, Wright State performs above their norm 67% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 29% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Raiders burned by Flames in HL semifinals
(3/10/2020 12:05:00 AM) INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — Tarkus Ferguson tied his career high with 25 points and Illinois-Chicago advanced to its first Horizon League championship game since 2004 with a 73-56 victory over top-seeded Wright State. Marcus Ottey had 13 points for UIC. Braelen Bridges added 10 points, and Godwin Boahen had nine points and 10 rebounds as the Flames ...
N. Kentucky tops Green Bay, heads to Horizon finals
(3/9/2020 11:53:00 PM) INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. -- Jalen Tate made 10 of 15 free throws and scored 23 points, including a go-ahead layup with 9:52 to play, and No. 2-seed Northern Kentucky beat third-seeded Green Bay 80-69 in Monday night's Horizon League tournament semifinal.
Wright State vs. UIC: Raiders lose to Flames in Horizon League semifinal
(3/9/2020 11:33:14 PM) The Wright State Raiders (25-6 and 15-3), return to the court tonight in the semifinals of the Horizon League tournament in Indianapolis against the University of Illinois Chicago. The Raiders are seeded number one in the tournament and are playing the fourth-seeded Flames after UIC’s win over Youngstown State last Thursday.
UIC advances to 1st Horizon League title game since 2004
(3/9/2020 11:26:00 PM) Get real-time COLLEGEBASKETBALL basketball coverage and scores as Illinois-Chicago Flames takes on Wright State Raiders. We bring you the latest game previews, live stats, and recaps on CBSSports.com
Illinois-Chicago advances to 1st Horizon League title game since 2004
(3/9/2020 11:10:00 PM) INDIANAPOLIS - Tarkus Ferguson tied his career high with 25 points and Illinois-Chicago advanced to its first Horizon League championship game since 2004 with a 73-56 victory over top-seeded Wright State on Monday night. UIC, which lost at Wright State by 17 points on Feb. 14, jumped out to a 17-6 lead after Wright State made just one field ...
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25205th205th231st236thHorizon League156th150th212th177th250th173rd
2023-24155th155th150th165thHorizon League17th10th210th179th25th157th
2022-23199th199th155th211thHorizon League21st237th295th235th45th198th
2021-22159th158th121st159thHorizon League70th150th266th205th143rd192nd
2020-2163rd62nd25th113thHorizon League40th346th300th142nd3rd63rd
2019-20142nd142nd17th101stHorizon League25th68th322nd189th306th136th
2018-1989th89th106th133rdHorizon League290th195th173rd232nd343rd101st
2017-18140th140th41st97thHorizon League186th112th244th196th93rd143rd
2016-17150th147th85th125thHorizon League120th240th195th209th299th174th
2015-16138th137th95th125thHorizon League298th199th199th183rd307th178th
2014-15236th236th280th274thHorizon League246th288th135th189th43rd192nd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25122nd341st242nd151st55th191st42nd205th54th122nd112th242nd254th269th199th207th131st132nd
2023-2438th191st53rd263rd4th344th11th54th17th171st13th202nd250th137th345th43rd146th36th
2022-23181st344th98th166th64th341st194th30th13th140th173rd216th267th107th340th26th153rd35th
2021-22114th99th27th171st128th285th209th57th72nd199th146th235th25th71st285th52nd198th108th
2020-2195th114th138th120th98th265th100th180th133rd43rd207th239th18th24th278th189th50th49th
2019-20156th29th286th185th180th256th119th256th287th30th264th157th32nd43rd260th254th29th42nd
2018-19100th120th77th120th181st86th143rd233rd196th159th191st243rd159th246th98th248th176th231st
2017-18233rd109th158th182nd277th157th279th135th298th248th194th254th224th244th146th120th242nd224th
2016-17133rd155th20th303rd173rd52nd96th270th170th322nd158th310th255th274th27th256th305th329th
2015-16206th315th209th252nd144th171st50th87th69th327th185th252nd346th347th153rd67th319th278th
2014-15257th332nd176th227th166th191st236th112th12th285th222nd236th340th296th179th94th284th227th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25292nd243rd--186th324th53rd343rd301st242nd196th305th178th230th278th52nd303rd201st275th
2023-24333rd110th--172nd357th169th360th173rd260th221st345th310th88th266th160th172nd220th218th
2022-23195th110th--254th208th198th213th257th152nd181st278th315th263rd287th169th239th148th172nd
2021-22231st55th--245th285th46th266th337th317th149th229th141st283rd291st29th339th121st263rd
2020-2152nd8th--289th87th41st71st342nd172nd190th54th281st246th267th21st335th152nd280th
2019-20164th105th--280th163rd59th101st318th250th256th125th69th293rd328th32nd308th211th293rd
2018-1989th69th--55th212th38th158th349th322nd11th304th29th4th48th61st351st16th112th
2017-1867th89th--103rd107th155th179th315th103rd13th220th31st125th164th194th331st19th55th
2016-17190th231st--43rd244th182nd184th275th308th16th321st272nd17th159th235th315th32nd48th
2015-1677th317th--4th143rd73rd84th137th65th33rd287th33rd13th48th201st241st112th122nd
2014-15211th280th--48th249th63rd166th215th219th117th300th50th225th271st95th262nd163rd214th