TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Washington  13-18 (0.419)  |  Big Ten
All-Play Percentage: 0.711 (106th)
Schedule Strength: 0.718 (36th)
Record Quality: 0.055 (150th)
Avg. Season Rank: 97.12 (95th)
Pace: 67.49 (120th)
Momentum: -4.48 (338th)
Off. Momentum: 0.12 (193rd)
Def. Momentum: -4.60 (352nd)
Consistency: -10.34 (288th)
Res. Consistency: -15.42 (323rd)
Away From Home: -0.68 (222nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.43 (226th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 110.05 30.08 68.88 84.03 46.52 29.97 37.20 23.41 38.78 30.64 61.56 11.53 14.74 6.63 35.67 27.86 36.47 1.99
RANK: 135th 76th 294th 318th 72nd 301st 39th 132nd 124th 227th 91st 220th 172nd 112th 267th 102nd 176th 122nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.97 26.36 -- 84.59 44.11 32.12 34.78 24.31 36.06 28.16 61.71 12.84 11.85 5.14 37.97 28.73 33.29 2.05
RANK: 124th 135th -- 67th 176th 112th 221st 302nd 122nd 44th 285th 232nd 21st 77th 156th 325th 61st 115th

ANALYSIS:
They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but Washington, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. They are ranked #106 (out of 364) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 13-18. Of the 18 schools in the Big Ten (average ranking 41.3), they're currently ranked as the worst team in the conference.

Based on their performances this year, Washington will likely find more success on defense than they will on offense. Allowing about 106 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #124 slot in the ratings for defensive efficiency. Washington does a super job to deny opponents offensive rebounds and second chances. They have a rating of 11.85 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (ranked 21st in the country). Washington also has been doing fairly decent work to prevent opponents from getting off shots from the field. The club is ranked 67th in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 84.59 vs. AO.

Washington plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 135th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 110 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Washington is one of the more accurate teams in the college game when it comes to shooting the three. They're ranked 39th nationally in three-point field goal percentage and make about 37.2% of their attempts from there vs. AO. Though they convert many of their threes, the team doesn't really shoot a ton of them. Only 35.7% of their total attempts vs. AO are from long-distance. Washington has also been fairly successful when shooting from the field. The squad is ranked 72nd in the country in field goal percentage, making approximately 46.5% of their attempts vs. AO. If Washington does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's difficulties in getting off a sufficient number of shots each possession. The squad has a field goal attempt rate of just 84.03 vs. AO, which ranks 47th-worst in college basketball.

Washington has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 338th in the country in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that favor a faster tempo, Washington usually performs better than average. Washington is more efficient than normal 100% of the time when facing clubs that have a pace vs. AO greater than 67.31. In all other contests, Washington performs better than average 40% of the time.
Washington is typically worse vs. teams that find ways to get to the free throw line. Against foes that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 29.93, Washington performs above their norm 33% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 87% of the time.
When facing teams that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter, Washington often performs worse than normal. Washington is more efficient than usual 41% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.03. In their other contests, Washington performs better than the norm 85% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25106th106th270th150thBig Ten120th288th36th226th222nd95th
2023-2457th57th174th83rdPac-1231st282nd32nd200th167th58th
2022-23105th105th193rd124thPac-1281st203rd64th150th50th102nd
2021-22135th135th171st99thPac-1299th304th77th124th202nd142nd
2020-21125th125th333rd229thPac-1257th319th2nd158th286th146th
2019-2044th44th224th117thPac-1294th162nd51st148th244th43rd
2018-1954th54th31st24thPac-12286th86th60th34th156th55th
2017-1893rd93rd98th63rdPac-12116th285th72nd211th113th92nd
2016-17173rd173rd306th234thPac-1253rd102nd68th346th224th146th
2015-1662nd62nd146th86thPac-122nd250th49th246th278th69th
2014-15117th117th166th100thPac-12152nd322nd75th176th139th79th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25135th76th294th318th72nd301st39th132nd124th227th91st220th172nd112th267th102nd176th122nd
2023-2433rd150th164th211th14th184th27th244th183rd103rd11th113th198th37th177th237th96th130th
2022-23173rd133rd63rd324th106th239th266th166th259th276th6th169th212th87th191st134th237th215th
2021-22163rd47th225th138th175th299th243rd30th214th250th87th5th12th52nd306th30th255th114th
2020-21120th257th234th203rd64th116th94th110th46th319th34th97th212th123rd100th104th328th303rd
2019-2093rd71st165th285th48th176th144th155th116th299th5th42nd103rd135th132nd120th275th265th
2018-1998th129th201st269th53rd187th83rd117th227th296th7th8th67th32nd162nd95th273rd243rd
2017-18106th74th231st246th65th275th154th102nd171st200th19th28th158th89th255th88th184th123rd
2016-17151st154th326th136th100th278th136th79th135th107th109th190th31st19th289th85th130th67th
2015-1660th9th58th192nd90th241st166th108th170th171st53rd48th13th7th244th105th169th125th
2014-1588th188th153rd126th79th212th147th75th104th247th30th259th205th94th223rd74th265th192nd
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25124th135th--67th176th112th221st302nd122nd44th285th232nd21st77th156th325th61st115th
2023-2478th157th--256th71st131st57th340th223rd79th59th165th276th244th92nd336th62nd142nd
2022-2364th25th--355th36th266th4th360th103rd32nd218th242nd357th260th186th354th5th44th
2021-22137th133rd--238th149th131st126th339th242nd46th171st122nd267th298th110th341st39th113th
2020-21148th272nd--253rd85th130th72nd345th175th37th135th122nd227th44th92nd348th25th107th
2019-2027th154th--255th4th278th38th342nd73rd7th2nd48th232nd38th250th342nd5th16th
2018-1927th133rd--69th45th92nd92nd338th46th16th156th88th338th290th134th346th17th63rd
2017-1872nd168th--193rd87th96th23rd345th201st11th236th111th330th267th87th346th14th89th
2016-17200th152nd--267th160th64th282nd319th50th203rd196th313th213th182nd40th309th168th254th
2015-1666th270th--88th88th23rd51st234th12th236th166th45th257th220th28th260th257th305th
2014-15168th68th--337th118th172nd62nd336th138th197th195th191st241st152nd94th307th120th188th