Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Washington13-18 (0.419) | Big Ten
All-Play Percentage: 0.711 (106th)
Schedule Strength: 0.718 (36th)
Record Quality: 0.055 (150th)
Avg. Season Rank: 97.12 (95th)
Pace: 67.49 (120th)
Momentum: -4.48 (338th)
Off. Momentum: 0.12 (193rd)
Def. Momentum: -4.60 (352nd)
Consistency: -10.34 (288th)
Res. Consistency: -15.42 (323rd)
Away From Home: -0.68 (222nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.43 (226th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 6, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
110.05
67.66
30.08
68.88
84.03
39.09
46.52
29.97
11.15
37.20
23.41
9.08
38.78
30.64
18.86
61.56
11.53
14.74
6.63
35.67
27.86
36.47
1.99
RANK:
135th
112th
76th
294th
318th
138th
72nd
301st
210th
39th
132nd
106th
124th
227th
174th
91st
220th
172nd
112th
267th
102nd
176th
122nd
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
105.97
67.32
26.36
--
84.59
37.32
44.11
32.12
11.17
34.78
24.31
8.77
36.06
28.16
17.38
61.71
12.84
11.85
5.14
37.97
28.73
33.29
2.05
RANK:
124th
230th
135th
--
67th
127th
176th
112th
143rd
221st
302nd
260th
122nd
44th
101st
285th
232nd
21st
77th
156th
325th
61st
115th
ANALYSIS: They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but Washington, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. They are ranked #106 (out of 364) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 13-18. Of the 18 schools in the Big Ten (average ranking 41.3), they're currently ranked as the worst team in the conference.
Based on their performances this year, Washington will likely find more success on defense than they will on offense. Allowing about 106 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #124 slot in the ratings for defensive efficiency. Washington does a super job to deny opponents offensive rebounds and second chances. They have a rating of 11.85 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (ranked 21st in the country). Washington also has been doing fairly decent work to prevent opponents from getting off shots from the field. The club is ranked 67th in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 84.59 vs. AO.
Washington plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 135th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 110 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Washington is one of the more accurate teams in the college game when it comes to shooting the three. They're ranked 39th nationally in three-point field goal percentage and make about 37.2% of their attempts from there vs. AO. Though they convert many of their threes, the team doesn't really shoot a ton of them. Only 35.7% of their total attempts vs. AO are from long-distance. Washington has also been fairly successful when shooting from the field. The squad is ranked 72nd in the country in field goal percentage, making approximately 46.5% of their attempts vs. AO. If Washington does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's difficulties in getting off a sufficient number of shots each possession. The squad has a field goal attempt rate of just 84.03 vs. AO, which ranks 47th-worst in college basketball.
Washington has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 338th in the country in positive momentum.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that favor a faster tempo, Washington usually performs better than average. Washington is more efficient than normal 100% of the time when facing clubs that have a pace vs. AO greater than 67.31. In all other contests, Washington performs better than average 40% of the time.
Washington is typically worse vs. teams that find ways to get to the free throw line. Against foes that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 29.93, Washington performs above their norm 33% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 87% of the time.
When facing teams that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter, Washington often performs worse than normal. Washington is more efficient than usual 41% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.03. In their other contests, Washington performs better than the norm 85% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.