TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 Washington  16-15 (0.516)  |  Pac-12
All-Play Percentage: 0.669 (117th)
Schedule Strength: 0.638 (75th)
Record Quality: 0.135 (100th)
Avg. Season Rank: 82.66 (79th)
Pace: 65.95 (152nd)
Momentum: -3.82 (325th)
Off. Momentum: -0.60 (257th)
Def. Momentum: -3.22 (302nd)
Consistency: -10.89 (322nd)
Res. Consistency: -14.40 (316th)
Away From Home: 0.23 (139th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.89 (176th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 104.35 28.40 70.04 83.03 45.15 27.15 34.95 28.99 36.91 26.89 64.33 9.98 14.68 7.35 32.70 34.91 32.39 2.00
RANK: 88th 188th 153rd 126th 79th 212th 147th 75th 104th 247th 30th 259th 205th 94th 223rd 74th 265th 192nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.79 25.79 -- 87.18 42.28 27.92 32.41 30.32 34.60 28.95 59.84 11.64 16.09 6.58 32.02 34.77 33.20 1.99
RANK: 168th 68th -- 337th 118th 172nd 62nd 336th 138th 197th 195th 191st 241st 152nd 94th 307th 120th 188th

ANALYSIS:
They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but Washington, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. Carrying a record of 16-15, they are currently rated #117 overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage this season. Of the 12 schools in the Pac-12 (average ranking 82.7), they're currently ranked as our #10 team in the conference.

Washington succeeds primarily through their offense. They are ranked 88th in offensive efficiency and score in excess of 104 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Washington has the potential to make you pay if you let them get close to the rim. The team is ranked 30th in the country in near-proximity field goal percentage, making approximately 64.3% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. However, even with their high conversion rate on near-proximity attempts, this team usually settles for shots from longer distances. Only about 32.4% of their total attempts vs. AO are from the inside.

Washington is also a fairly decent team on the defensive end of the court. The team ranks 168th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 101 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Washington owns a pretty good track record against teams that shoot the three. They rank 62nd in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 32.4% of their attempts from afar. Washington also makes a point to avoid fouls and prevent opponents from getting to the free throw line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 25.79 vs. AO, they are currently rated 68th in the country in that category. If Washington does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's propensity to allow too many shot attempts per trip. The squad has a rating of 87.18 in defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO, which ranks 15th-worst in college basketball.

Washington has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 325th in the country in positive momentum. Washington has also been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 322nd in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Washington is typically worse vs. teams that effectively clean the offensive glass. Against foes that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 14.72, Washington performs above their norm 32% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 75% of the time.
When facing teams that convert well from the charity stripe, Washington often performs better than normal. Washington is more efficient than usual 59% of the time when facing teams that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 65.88%. In their other contests, Washington performs better than the norm 22% of the time.
Washington does better vs. clubs that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. When playing squads that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 13.45, Washington performs above average 65% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 29% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25107th107th270th150thBig Ten119th290th36th235th221st95th
2023-2457th57th174th83rdPac-1231st282nd32nd200th167th58th
2022-23105th105th193rd124thPac-1281st203rd64th150th50th102nd
2021-22135th135th171st99thPac-1299th304th77th124th202nd142nd
2020-21125th125th333rd229thPac-1257th319th2nd158th286th146th
2019-2044th44th224th117thPac-1294th162nd51st148th244th43rd
2018-1954th54th31st24thPac-12286th86th60th34th156th55th
2017-1893rd93rd98th63rdPac-12116th285th72nd211th113th92nd
2016-17173rd173rd306th234thPac-1253rd102nd68th346th224th146th
2015-1662nd62nd146th86thPac-122nd250th49th246th278th69th
2014-15117th117th166th100thPac-12152nd322nd75th176th139th79th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25137th77th294th318th73rd301st41st132nd124th226th96th219th173rd111th268th101st175th121st
2023-2433rd150th164th211th14th184th27th244th183rd103rd11th113th198th37th177th237th96th130th
2022-23173rd133rd63rd324th106th239th266th166th259th276th6th169th212th87th191st134th237th215th
2021-22163rd47th225th138th175th299th243rd30th214th250th87th5th12th52nd306th30th255th114th
2020-21120th257th234th203rd64th116th94th110th46th319th34th97th212th123rd100th104th328th303rd
2019-2093rd71st165th285th48th176th144th155th116th299th5th42nd103rd135th132nd120th275th265th
2018-1998th129th201st269th53rd187th83rd117th227th296th7th8th67th32nd162nd95th273rd243rd
2017-18106th74th231st246th65th275th154th102nd171st200th19th28th158th89th255th88th184th123rd
2016-17151st154th326th136th100th278th136th79th135th107th109th190th31st19th289th85th130th67th
2015-1660th9th58th192nd90th241st166th108th170th171st53rd48th13th7th244th105th169th125th
2014-1588th188th153rd126th79th212th147th75th104th247th30th259th205th94th223rd74th265th192nd
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25124th135th--67th176th111th217th302nd121st45th287th228th21st75th157th326th61st116th
2023-2478th157th--256th71st131st57th340th223rd79th59th165th276th244th92nd336th62nd142nd
2022-2364th25th--355th36th266th4th360th103rd32nd218th242nd357th260th186th354th5th44th
2021-22137th133rd--238th149th131st126th339th242nd46th171st122nd267th298th110th341st39th113th
2020-21148th272nd--253rd85th130th72nd345th175th37th135th122nd227th44th92nd348th25th107th
2019-2027th154th--255th4th278th38th342nd73rd7th2nd48th232nd38th250th342nd5th16th
2018-1927th133rd--69th45th92nd92nd338th46th16th156th88th338th290th134th346th17th63rd
2017-1872nd168th--193rd87th96th23rd345th201st11th236th111th330th267th87th346th14th89th
2016-17200th152nd--267th160th64th282nd319th50th203rd196th313th213th182nd40th309th168th254th
2015-1666th270th--88th88th23rd51st234th12th236th166th45th257th220th28th260th257th305th
2014-15168th68th--337th118th172nd62nd336th138th197th195th191st241st152nd94th307th120th188th