Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 Washington16-15 (0.516) | Pac-12
All-Play Percentage: 0.669 (117th)
Schedule Strength: 0.638 (75th)
Record Quality: 0.135 (100th)
Avg. Season Rank: 82.66 (79th)
Pace: 65.95 (152nd)
Momentum: -3.82 (325th)
Off. Momentum: -0.60 (257th)
Def. Momentum: -3.22 (302nd)
Consistency: -10.89 (322nd)
Res. Consistency: -14.40 (316th)
Away From Home: 0.23 (139th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.89 (176th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
104.35
65.98
28.40
70.04
83.03
37.49
45.15
27.15
9.49
34.95
28.99
10.70
36.91
26.89
17.30
64.33
9.98
14.68
7.35
32.70
34.91
32.39
2.00
RANK:
88th
152nd
188th
153rd
126th
69th
79th
212th
185th
147th
75th
56th
104th
247th
124th
30th
259th
205th
94th
223rd
74th
265th
192nd
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
100.79
65.91
25.79
--
87.18
36.86
42.28
27.92
9.05
32.41
30.32
10.49
34.60
28.95
17.32
59.84
11.64
16.09
6.58
32.02
34.77
33.20
1.99
RANK:
168th
197th
68th
--
337th
241st
118th
172nd
103rd
62nd
336th
313th
138th
197th
206th
195th
191st
241st
152nd
94th
307th
120th
188th
ANALYSIS: They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but Washington, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. Carrying a record of 16-15, they are currently rated #117 overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage this season. Of the 12 schools in the Pac-12 (average ranking 82.7), they're currently ranked as our #10 team in the conference.
Washington succeeds primarily through their offense. They are ranked 88th in offensive efficiency and score in excess of 104 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Washington has the potential to make you pay if you let them get close to the rim. The team is ranked 30th in the country in near-proximity field goal percentage, making approximately 64.3% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. However, even with their high conversion rate on near-proximity attempts, this team usually settles for shots from longer distances. Only about 32.4% of their total attempts vs. AO are from the inside.
Washington is also a fairly decent team on the defensive end of the court. The team ranks 168th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 101 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Washington owns a pretty good track record against teams that shoot the three. They rank 62nd in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 32.4% of their attempts from afar. Washington also makes a point to avoid fouls and prevent opponents from getting to the free throw line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 25.79 vs. AO, they are currently rated 68th in the country in that category. If Washington does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's propensity to allow too many shot attempts per trip. The squad has a rating of 87.18 in defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO, which ranks 15th-worst in college basketball.
Washington has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 325th in the country in positive momentum. Washington has also been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 322nd in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Washington is typically worse vs. teams that effectively clean the offensive glass. Against foes that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 14.72, Washington performs above their norm 32% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 75% of the time.
When facing teams that convert well from the charity stripe, Washington often performs better than normal. Washington is more efficient than usual 59% of the time when facing teams that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 65.88%. In their other contests, Washington performs better than the norm 22% of the time.
Washington does better vs. clubs that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. When playing squads that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 13.45, Washington performs above average 65% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 29% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.