TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 William & Mary  5-27 (0.156)  |  Colonial
All-Play Percentage: 0.090 (326th)
Schedule Strength: 0.443 (163rd)
Record Quality: -0.387 (339th)
Avg. Season Rank: 331.79 (337th)
Pace: 69.17 (91st)
Momentum: 1.00 (128th)
Off. Momentum: -2.21 (312th)
Def. Momentum: 3.21 (15th)
Consistency: -9.51 (220th)
Res. Consistency: -12.16 (187th)
Away From Home: 1.12 (75th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.08 (44th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 89.96 22.94 71.20 81.52 39.37 30.43 30.99 20.64 32.28 30.45 52.56 11.36 12.17 4.49 37.33 25.32 37.35 2.00
RANK: 344th 257th 189th 301st 334th 193rd 286th 299th 346th 116th 333rd 137th 232nd 232nd 157th 280th 75th 133rd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 106.26 21.83 -- 85.27 45.99 35.39 33.98 20.90 41.72 28.97 63.75 14.42 10.17 4.37 41.51 24.52 33.98 2.08
RANK: 270th 57th -- 224th 293rd 335th 214th 35th 322nd 180th 329th 351st 24th 103rd 331st 22nd 160th 58th

ANALYSIS:
William & Mary presently has one of the below-average teams in college basketball. They have a record of 5-27 and are ranked 326th overall (out of 358) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the 10 schools in the Colonial (average ranking 176.9), they're currently ranked as the worst team in the conference.

William & Mary has one of the most anemic offenses around. They rank 344th in efficiency on that end of the court and score fewer than 90 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. William & Mary tends to be very careless with the ball and allows far too many breakaway opportunities off of their own turnovers. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 14.42, which ranks eighth from the bottom in D1. William & Mary also struggles to drain shots consistently from most spots on the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four primary field goal shooting categories. They are worse off shooting inside the three-point stripe, making good on just 32.3% of their mid-range jumpers (346th in the nation), 52.6% of their near-proximity chances (333rd), and 39.4% of their total shots from the field (334th) vs. AO.

Though they rate better on defense than they do on offense, William & Mary still isn't one of the more capable defensive teams in college hoops. Allowing roughly 106 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #270 in the nation in defensive efficiency. William & Mary has done a pretty poor job this season to prevent opponents from making shots from the inside. The team is ranked 329th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on 63.7% of their attempts from close-up. William & Mary has also done a lackluster job this year when defending the mid-range shot. The squad is ranked 322nd nationally in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on 41.7% of their attempts from those in-between spots on the floor. Thankfully, AO will take nowhere near as many mid-range shots vs. William & Mary as they typically would, as only 24.5% of their field goal attempts will come from in-between locations. If William & Mary does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their success stopping opponents from earning second-chance opportunities via offensive boards. The team has a rating of 10.17 in potential points allowed off of second chances vs. AO, which ranks 24th-best in college hoops.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
William & Mary does better vs. clubs that convert well from the charity stripe. When playing squads that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 0.74%, William & Mary performs above average 82% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 30% of the time.
William & Mary performs better against squads that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. When facing teams that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.53%, William & Mary is more efficient than normal 69% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 27% of the time.
When playing teams that convert well from outside the arc, William & Mary usually performs better than average. William & Mary is more efficient than normal 62% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 31.91%. In all other contests, William & Mary performs better than average 20% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Friday's local scoreboard for Feb. 11
(2/12/2022 9:31:00 PM) Feb. 12—College hockey Friday's results Miami 5, Omaha 4 Western Michigan 5, St. Cloud State 5, OT (WM wins SO) Denver 5, Minnesota-Duluth 3 First period — 1. UND, Judd Caulfield (Connor Ford) 9:02, SH; 2. UND, Ethan Frisch (Tyler Kleven, Ashton Calder) 15:46…
Morse carries James Madison over William & Mary 69-55
(2/12/2022 6:57:43 PM) Vado Morse had 15 points as James Madison got past William & Mary 69-55 on Saturday.
Charleston (SC) hosts William & Mary after Kochera’s 23-point game
(1/24/2022 1:43:30 AM) William & Mary Tribe (4-15, 3-3 CAA) at Charleston (SC) Cougars (9-8, 1-4 CAA)
King, Edwards lift Valparaiso past William & Mary 88-66
(12/22/2021 3:31:47 PM) VALPARAISO, Ind. (AP) — Kobe King had 19 points as Valparaiso easily defeated William & Mary 88-66 on Wednesday.
Kochera, William & Mary host Fairfield
(12/10/2021 3:34:01 PM) WILLIAMSBURG, Va. - Fairfield (6-3) vs. William & Mary (1-10)
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25236th236th164th213thCAA19th215th244th93rd296th222nd
2023-24302nd302nd318th325thCAA294th246th274th128th188th308th
2022-23339th339th270th294thColonial276th172nd274th307th349th324th
2021-22326th326th351st339thColonial91st220th163rd44th75th337th
2020-21300th298th236th226thColonial186th338th184th305th28th279th
2019-20183rd182nd72nd124thColonial230th275th222nd33rd177th160th
2018-19209th209th223rd221stColonial143rd156th205th246th228th209th
2017-18163rd163rd104th142ndColonial114th267th191st217th13th176th
2016-17133rd132nd151st153rdColonial58th307th134th152nd350th157th
2015-1698th98th85th89thColonial173rd205th125th36th191st87th
2014-15131st131st107th140thColonial239th269th177th229th239th100th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25192nd194th177th347th167th16th125th359th324th215th141st147th346th313th4th359th149th337th
2023-24272nd174th264th106th344th10th310th347th325th152nd338th315th285th348th12th350th177th326th
2022-23310th263rd311th306th285th194th90th238th186th214th346th281st330th315th148th208th183rd194th
2021-22344th257th189th301st334th193rd286th299th346th116th333rd137th232nd232nd157th280th75th133rd
2020-21289th116th49th255th329th152nd343rd353rd241st19th349th243rd169th251st132nd351st10th62nd
2019-20117th199th12th274th73rd173rd99th278th40th132nd165th281st241st234th130th271st106th168th
2018-19193rd151st264th314th94th183rd232nd343rd172nd53rd119th212th293rd174th127th336th26th86th
2017-1833rd220th2nd303rd19th59th6th327th4th221st96th209th331st248th34th315th176th284th
2016-1757th90th236th305th28th102nd27th340th84th46th87th206th289th226th71st338th32nd152nd
2015-1656th131st85th216th39th104th61st308th45th79th103rd163rd255th218th96th310th70th164th
2014-1546th238th74th263rd31st14th21st345th82nd205th61st119th346th331st12th343rd175th327th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25271st280th--124th282nd270th224th23rd308th244th246th197th176th301st287th19th268th161st
2023-24310th278th--221st289th133rd208th137th146th307th308th214th173rd188th102nd125th299th294th
2022-23345th149th--264th355th167th288th198th349th281st335th193rd160th314th126th173rd262nd254th
2021-22270th57th--224th293rd335th214th35th322nd180th329th351st24th103rd331st22nd160th58th
2020-21294th21st--351st273rd208th122nd245th297th325th259th323rd311th167th101st167th267th277th
2019-20262nd88th--338th192nd158th281st289th164th280th128th301st182nd67th76th240th215th252nd
2018-19279th108th--303rd233rd121st300th264th99th277th215th293rd13th82nd72nd238th241st267th
2017-18335th131st--215th343rd227th338th139th343rd216th319th237th30th163rd210th125th202nd169th
2016-17273rd212th--231st224th261st239th48th191st286th158th217th138th112th246th34th275th210th
2015-16151st22nd--318th156th335th98th135th274th188th176th263rd53rd52nd311th97th133rd64th
2014-15254th49th--320th226th312th232nd123rd242nd226th226th312th230th230th289th78th170th106th