TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Vermont  28-7 (0.800)  |  America East
All-Play Percentage: 0.687 (114th)
Schedule Strength: 0.368 (242nd)
Record Quality: 0.213 (78th)
Avg. Season Rank: 116.07 (114th)
Pace: 64.21 (348th)
Momentum: -1.83 (252nd)
Off. Momentum: -2.45 (326th)
Def. Momentum: 0.61 (119th)
Consistency: -8.14 (50th)
Res. Consistency: -10.55 (62nd)
Away From Home: 0.23 (144th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.66 (142nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.80 24.59 72.17 85.78 42.72 38.13 33.47 20.06 40.17 27.60 57.35 9.31 10.92 3.73 44.45 23.38 32.17 2.12
RANK: 204th 252nd 176th 161st 251st 22nd 231st 266th 133rd 295th 191st 293rd 294th 332nd 25th 270th 303rd 347th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 98.68 25.00 -- 86.65 40.80 30.58 31.79 24.87 34.88 31.19 54.36 10.45 12.10 4.20 35.30 28.70 36.00 1.99
RANK: 56th 125th -- 244th 37th 138th 46th 269th 25th 193rd 52nd 105th 75th 34th 100th 260th 174th 219th

ANALYSIS:
As an average to slightly above-average foe, Vermont should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. Their record this season is 28-7, and the club is ranked 114th overall (out of 362) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the best team (out of nine) in the America East (average ranking 234.8).

Vermont has a fairly effective defensive attack. Occupying the #56 slot in our defensive efficiency ratings and preferring a more deliberate, half-court style of play (the 15th-slowest pace in D1), they will allow about 99 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Vermont will take a bite out of many opponents' shooting percentages, based on the fact that the team ranks in the top-50 in three of our four primary defensive field goal categories. They'll inflict the most harm on the outside, allowing AO to convert just 31.8% of their three-pointers (46th in the nation), 34.9% of their mid-range chances (25th), and 40.8% of their total shots from the field (37th). Vermont is also one of the better teams when it comes to not allowing opponents to convert scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 4.2% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 34th in the NCAA).

The offense for Vermont, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the defense is. The team is ranked 204th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 104 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Vermont is one of the more deficient teams in the nation as it pertains to scoring off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team converts only 3.7% of all second-chance opportunities (332nd nationally).

Vermont is one of the more consistent teams in Division I (presently ranked 50th in consistency), so forecasting the outcomes of their future contests tends to be easier than the norm.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that allow more chances at the line, Vermont often performs better than normal. Vermont is more efficient than usual 80% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 27.25. In their other contests, Vermont performs better than the norm 26% of the time.
Vermont does worse vs. clubs that tend to get off more shots. When playing squads that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 84.37, Vermont performs above average 25% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 59% of the time.
Vermont performs better against squads that do not defend well on the perimeter. When facing teams that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.09%, Vermont is more efficient than normal 59% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 25% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25257th257th90th174thAmerica East353rd235th312th208th214th240th
2023-24114th114th10th78thAmerica East348th50th242nd142nd144th114th
2022-2392nd92nd58th111thAmerica East327th253rd224th355th331st107th
2021-2252nd52nd7th77thAmerica East304th334th325th321st268th76th
2020-21123rd123rd68th160thAmerica East268th347th331st318th12th84th
2019-2083rd83rd15th80thAmerica East268th301st289th269th213th84th
2018-1967th67th23rd65thAmerica East240th181st280th277th262nd81st
2017-18101st100th20th67thAmerica East331st83rd235th129th74th87th
2016-1760th59th13th46thAmerica East314th257th251st281st228th63rd
2015-16146th146th103rd137thAmerica East209th172nd246th274th56th159th
2014-1597th97th120th159thAmerica East139th297th285th322nd315th112th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25316th269th195th272nd332nd74th268th138th70th359th337th303rd358th363rd48th118th355th356th
2023-24204th252nd176th161st251st22nd231st266th133rd295th191st293rd294th332nd25th270th303rd347th
2022-2362nd260th223rd104th80th10th84th282nd19th298th75th285th329th336th11th297th312th351st
2021-2226th247th99th92nd30th33rd37th325th174th100th22nd331st334th229th46th332nd119th265th
2020-2178th49th16th254th94th130th144th317th235th96th79th293rd319th125th96th313th73rd175th
2019-2085th186th146th152nd99th41st147th336th209th90th81st341st326th258th46th337th99th250th
2018-1994th142nd50th238th116th112th51st209th13th245th225th344th312th247th91st199th237th262nd
2017-1876th31st37th310th66th234th32nd299th231st65th150th348th256th200th182nd286th37th76th
2016-1758th195th141st108th37th213th108th272nd12th18th126th301st187th97th227th286th24th38th
2015-16101st121st151st295th42nd262nd13th184th104th152nd112th259th268th211th237th153rd117th104th
2014-15165th94th135th329th62nd298th193rd302nd200th35th88th312th275th132nd257th288th11th24th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25165th164th--300th106th209th123rd336th273rd100th84th264th122nd67th155th319th64th121st
2023-2456th125th--244th37th138th46th269th25th193rd52nd105th75th34th100th260th174th219th
2022-23125th51st--181st174th136th218th277th156th150th206th37th47th96th124th274th143rd197th
2021-2289th42nd--225th135th90th200th324th107th127th139th46th11th18th83rd322nd107th210th
2020-21200th151st--172nd238th144th276th310th330th91st94th26th97th28th134th313th84th136th
2019-2073rd135th--129th74th156th194th161st71st174th45th163rd26th68th184th171st191st188th
2018-1968th130th--81st89th58th184th258th92nd128th60th176th25th52nd87th278th170th231st
2017-18140th14th--251st205th117th176th288th217th169th221st214th3rd71st89th279th142nd202nd
2016-1768th37th--240th128th17th108th262nd152nd326th57th55th197th101st10th251st312th335th
2015-16216th208th--217th194th90th289th217th184th267th103rd294th165th162nd71st200th254th281st
2014-1569th253rd--90th73rd24th25th152nd154th288th33rd185th263rd209th26th193rd309th321st