TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 W. Michigan  12-20 (0.375)  |  Mid-American
All-Play Percentage: 0.253 (271st)
Schedule Strength: 0.409 (198th)
Record Quality: -0.187 (276th)
Avg. Season Rank: 280.10 (285th)
Pace: 67.30 (132nd)
Momentum: 3.84 (34th)
Off. Momentum: 2.57 (54th)
Def. Momentum: 1.27 (90th)
Consistency: -11.85 (351st)
Res. Consistency: -17.56 (355th)
Away From Home: 1.42 (18th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.62 (46th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.19 26.70 67.99 92.67 40.97 31.79 28.62 24.75 35.64 36.12 55.51 12.92 19.41 7.26 34.31 26.71 38.98 1.95
RANK: 252nd 197th 318th 14th 316th 245th 361st 94th 246th 39th 284th 136th 19th 66th 297th 133rd 108th 64th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 112.78 26.51 -- 86.74 47.00 34.21 36.07 19.87 41.00 32.66 62.09 12.59 16.18 6.42 39.44 22.91 37.65 2.02
RANK: 268th 145th -- 162nd 308th 212th 292nd 117th 306th 214th 296th 216th 291st 229th 222nd 113th 221st 178th

ANALYSIS:
While not an atrocious team by any means, W. Michigan is not exactly one that should appear in many top-100 rankings either. Haslametrics has them ranked 271st overall (out of 364) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 12-20. They are also ranked by this site as the #9 team (out of 12) in the MAC (average ranking 226.5).

W. Michigan does not provide much of a challenge on defense. They are ranked at #268 in efficiency on that end of the court and give up about 113 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. W. Michigan allows opponents to make good on a fair number of their overall field goal attempts. The ball-club ranks #308 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO will convert approximately 47.0% of their total attempts from the floor.

W. Michigan doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 103 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #252 in the nation in offensive efficiency. W. Michigan is one of the least accurate teams when shooting from long-distance. They are ranked fourth from the bottom in three-point field goal percentage nationally and make just 28.6% of their attempts from long vs. AO. Moreover, they find themselves in the bottom-50 in overall offensive field goal percentage, converting just 41.0% of their total attempts vs. AO. W. Michigan is also not one of the better teams when it comes to sinking foul shots. Converting just 68.0% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #318 overall in free throw percentage. If W. Michigan does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to successfully get off shots each possession. The squad has a field goal attempt rate of 92.67 vs. AO, which ranks #14 in college basketball.

W. Michigan has been playing better basketball in their most recent outings, as evidenced by the team's #34 ranking in positive momentum. W. Michigan has also been one of the most erratic teams in college basketball this year (currently ranked 351st overall in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their future games far more difficult to predict. When playing on the road, W. Michigan has played their best basketball this season. The team is currently ranked 18th in the country in the away-from-home metric our site tracks.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
W. Michigan performs worse against squads that do not defend well on the perimeter. When facing teams that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.17%, W. Michigan is more efficient than normal 35% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 91% of the time.
When playing teams that convert well from the charity stripe, W. Michigan usually performs better than average. W. Michigan is more efficient than normal 78% of the time when facing clubs that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 0.73%. In all other contests, W. Michigan performs better than average 23% of the time.
W. Michigan is typically worse vs. teams that aren't terribly skilled defensively. Against foes that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 107.81, W. Michigan performs above their norm 38% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 90% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25271st271st294th276thMAC132nd351st198th46th18th285th
2023-24321st321st289th299thMAC126th100th243rd145th278th319th
2022-23331st331st338th340thMAC300th316th227th173rd40th332nd
2021-22335th335th326th330thMAC338th132nd195th313th57th339th
2020-21325th325th315th307thMAC233rd22nd165th257th193rd271st
2019-20246th246th264th235thMAC182nd33rd138th95th268th260th
2018-19246th246th331st291stMAC101st97th95th112th60th222nd
2017-18195th195th166th180thMAC158th76th186th154th8th189th
2016-17159th159th179th182ndMAC185th350th142nd108th331st182nd
2015-16193rd193rd242nd225thMAC200th245th150th50th224th187th
2014-15171st171st107th105thMAC155th102nd138th194th72nd134th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25252nd197th318th14th316th245th361st94th246th39th284th136th19th66th297th133rd108th64th
2023-24307th212th360th154th308th129th246th116th304th294th239th287th26th44th130th113th304th285th
2022-23252nd328th180th18th330th30th325th177th241st241st276th273rd106th209th58th216th292nd320th
2021-22296th291st211th203rd322nd27th257th289th180th294th323rd216th326th285th26th287th297th332nd
2020-21326th312th302nd323rd252nd220th238th159th72nd295th308th333rd136th69th179th116th257th229th
2019-20244th146th181st308th236th200th202nd152nd252nd280th171st274th239th247th168th111th254th229th
2018-19279th131st246th288th266th165th297th205th113th231st245th317th113th144th130th187th206th227th
2017-18176th83rd133rd91st256th185th252nd64th267th260th180th142nd92nd120th204th72nd275th210th
2016-17147th136th157th126th150th314th62nd24th173rd233rd168th205th54th108th319th27th243rd101st
2015-16194th36th114th223rd247th316th293rd42nd288th213th130th276th176th155th315th35th201st81st
2014-15123rd42nd86th267th163rd166th131st264th327th149th115th275th238th198th137th251st116th164th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25268th145th--162nd308th212th292nd117th306th214th296th216th291st229th222nd113th221st178th
2023-24308th191st--310th274th227th270th112th203rd331st236th347th259th187th164th67th305th265th
2022-23356th241st--306th326th313th331st37th231st321st289th204th159th251st277th17th288th191st
2021-22338th238th--343rd284th306th159th63rd203rd335th330th325th246th243rd236th20th299th221st
2020-21303rd121st--345th229th303rd88th210th289th251st269th317th318th257th239th138th179th144th
2019-20235th144th--270th244th96th249th237th27th283rd291st295th326th323rd64th224th265th289th
2018-19173rd99th--212th184th175th247th76th128th306th108th350th194th278th162nd65th295th265th
2017-18209th117th--56th291st218th297th68th276th152nd259th88th28th126th262nd91st186th131st
2016-17184th158th--82nd263rd102nd155th109th249th208th269th252nd11th119th140th130th248th238th
2015-16198th150th--129th212th293rd231st77th186th140th239th230th11th56th304th87th144th75th
2014-15258th158th--165th262nd278th242nd130th42nd123rd348th186th119th169th283rd129th122nd82nd