TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2019-20 Weber State  12-20 (0.375)  |  Big Sky
All-Play Percentage: 0.276 (256th)
Schedule Strength: 0.535 (126th)
Record Quality: -0.168 (257th)
Avg. Season Rank: 295.19 (299th)
Pace: 68.35 (252nd)
Momentum: 1.45 (104th)
Off. Momentum: 2.55 (61st)
Def. Momentum: -1.09 (201st)
Consistency: -8.95 (156th)
Res. Consistency: -12.21 (192nd)
Away From Home: -0.84 (229th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.16 (201st)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through March 11, 2020. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 95.13 21.23 73.11 81.81 42.40 32.41 31.60 23.30 36.84 26.10 60.78 9.13 8.92 3.46 39.62 28.48 31.90 2.08
RANK: 239th 318th 112th 171st 217th 112th 273rd 151st 178th 262nd 121st 279th 341st 327th 114th 150th 266th 268th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.15 20.31 -- 88.86 44.54 30.75 36.03 25.47 35.61 32.65 59.51 11.53 11.91 4.13 34.60 28.66 36.74 1.98
RANK: 296th 26th -- 351st 239th 179th 308th 290th 111th 326th 188th 211th 98th 70th 69th 227th 245th 276th

ANALYSIS:
They're far from the worst of the worst, but Weber State should not be a terribly frightening opponent for most clubs. Carrying a record of 12-20, they are currently rated #256 overall (out of 353) in All-Play Percentage this season. Of the 11 schools in the Big Sky (average ranking 188.6), they're currently ranked as our #9 team in the conference.

Weber State does not provide much of a challenge on defense. They are ranked at #296 in efficiency on that end of the court and give up about 105 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Weber State allows the opposition to get off far too many shots from the floor. The team is ranked third from the bottom in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 88.86 vs. AO. Weber State also does a very lackluster job preventing opponents from draining threes. They rank 308th nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 36.0% of their attempts from afar. If Weber State does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their success preventing opponents from getting to the free throw line. The team has a defensive free throw attempt rate of 20.31 vs. AO, which ranks 26th-best in the country.

Though they rate better on offense than they do on defense, Weber State still isn't one of the more capable offensive teams in college hoops. Scoring roughly 95 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #239 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Weber State poses no threat whatsoever to grab rebounds off their own misses. Against AO, the ball-club has a rating of 8.92 in potential points scored off of second chances (341st nationally), and they convert just 3.5% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 327th) as well. Weber State also struggles to draw fouls and earn opportunities at the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 21.23 vs. AO, they are 318th in the overall rankings for that category.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that convert well from the charity stripe, Weber State usually performs better than average. Weber State is more efficient than normal 70% of the time when facing clubs that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 0.70%. In all other contests, Weber State performs better than average 33% of the time.
Weber State is typically worse vs. teams that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. Against foes that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 60.79%, Weber State performs above their norm 33% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 70% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Harding's 33 points not enough, Weber falls to Sac State 62-54 in Big Sky Tournament opener
(3/11/2020 4:06:00 PM) By Ty Bianucci, KSL.com | Posted - Mar. 11, 2020 at 12:28 p.m. SALT LAKE CITY — A balanced Sacramento State attack was too much for a one-dimensional Weber State Wednesday morning as the Wildcats fell 62-54 in the opening round of the Big Sky Tournament. Three Hornets finished the game in double figures, led by Osi Nwachukwu with 16 points on ...
Wilson lifts George Mason over Saint Joseph's in A10 tourney
(3/11/2020 3:53:00 PM) NEW YORK -- AJ Wilson scored a career-high 24 points as George Mason beat Saint Joseph's 77-70 to open the Atlantic 10 Conference Tournament on Wednesday. No. 12 seed George Mason will face fifth-seeded St.
Sacramento State defeats Weber State in Big Sky tourney
(3/11/2020 3:33:00 PM) Get real-time COLLEGEBASKETBALL basketball coverage and scores as Sacramento State Hornets takes on Weber State Wildcats. We bring you the latest game previews, live stats, and recaps on CBSSports.com
E. Washington takes Big Sky title with win over Weber St.
(3/8/2020 1:40:00 AM) Get real-time COLLEGEBASKETBALL basketball coverage and scores as Weber State Wildcats takes on Eastern Washington Eagles. We bring you the latest game previews, live stats, and recaps on CBSSports.co
Bengals beat Weber State to end losing streak
(3/3/2020 1:30:00 AM) OGDEN, Utah (KIFI/KIDK) - Idaho State put to bed a 12 game losing streak by beating rival Weber State Monday 78-70. It is the Bengals second win in Ogden in the last three seasons. Four players scored in double figures for Idaho State. Malik Porter came off the bench to lead the way with 12 points. He also grabbed a team high seven rebounds.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25285th285th311th312thBig Sky277th176th215th231st57th256th
2023-24174th174th94th143rdBig Sky264th181st235th49th321st145th
2022-23183rd182nd155th160thBig Sky303rd342nd168th194th189th230th
2021-22191st191st97th163rdBig Sky88th296th304th354th6th174th
2020-21119th118th30th119thBig Sky80th289th264th240th264th162nd
2019-20256th256th278th257thBig Sky252nd156th126th201st229th299th
2018-19227th227th141st212thBig Sky29th88th304th219th294th186th
2017-18174th174th80th128thBig Sky187th132nd220th338th264th148th
2016-17178th178th120th174thBig Sky235th52nd264th177th160th171st
2015-16168th168th34th109thBig Sky238th28th286th67th227th155th
2014-15260th259th227th262ndBig Sky179th88th242nd223rd136th273rd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25274th226th255th268th219th223rd302nd176th157th216th171st219th313th300th195th162nd184th174th
2023-24166th181st122nd255th140th110th223rd268th256th193rd70th135th209th145th92nd263rd176th244th
2022-23247th257th54th329th175th142nd248th185th14th335th195th230th337th339th100th146th311th310th
2021-22185th104th65th348th132nd130th172nd282nd295th304th32nd59th354th346th76th247th247th295th
2020-2175th82nd25th303rd41st162nd157th289th24th173rd57th169th347th349th119th270th115th187th
2019-20239th318th112th171st217th112th273rd151st178th262nd121st279th341st327th114th150th266th268th
2018-19248th195th93rd324th176th267th209th138th88th260th182nd271st344th312th217th103rd211th173rd
2017-18172nd274th27th330th111th121st28th227th103rd309th166th226th350th349th75th185th277th295th
2016-1799th113th76th326th90th117th24th269th123rd275th137th254th339th324th72nd241st227th266th
2015-16222nd111th283rd345th137th103rd186th294th20th325th164th254th325th303rd50th251st266th308th
2014-15271st66th25th346th293rd141st167th224th280th341st265th295th287th326th62nd157th317th318th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25285th312th--99th231st293rd327th110th198th75th200th274th53rd165th311th124th99th63rd
2023-24219th95th--75th330th71st313th118th338th281st243rd56th17th91st85th139th308th312th
2022-23121st99th--98th157th254th287th170th171st61st157th143rd39th117th291st192nd71st59th
2021-22215th62nd--174th257th92nd351st226th53rd244th247th184th242nd255th97th219th243rd273rd
2020-21207th134th--225th190th189th251st197th79th199th250th165th88th51st166th189th192nd182nd
2019-20296th26th--351st239th179th308th290th111th326th188th211th98th70th69th227th245th276th
2018-19178th112th--290th218th22nd41st226th269th346th168th243rd130th222nd10th204th339th346th
2017-18173rd128th--308th175th17th128th242nd54th345th137th209th182nd100th4th212th334th345th
2016-17278th84th--343rd256th6th196th331st233rd345th170th107th295th329th1st307th325th347th
2015-16118th48th--336th123rd17th194th334th137th313th52nd193rd303rd273rd5th311th267th332nd
2014-15237th127th--216th282nd37th119th157th307th326th185th324th111th278th28th149th325th324th