Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2018-19 Weber State 18-15 (0.545) | Big Sky

All-Play Percentage: 0.358 (227^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.358 (304^th)	Record Quality: -0.080 (212^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 188.47 (186^th)
Pace: 72.22 (29^th)	Momentum: -4.00 (322^nd)	Off. Momentum: -2.09 (311^th)	Def. Momentum: -1.91 (258^th)
Consistency: -8.90 (88^th)	Res. Consistency: -12.08 (166^th)	Away From Home: -1.33 (294^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: -1.37 (219^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2019. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

98.56

25.79

73.83

79.29

43.86

29.51

33.74

22.05

37.88

27.73

59.38

9.75

9.57

4.45

37.21

27.81

34.98

2.02

RANK:

248^th

195^th

93^rd

324^th

176^th

267^th

209^th

138^th

88^th

260^th

182^nd

271^st

344^th

312^th

217^th

103^rd

211^th

173^rd

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

104.18

24.67

86.16

45.32

27.80

31.93

21.83

38.04

36.53

59.85

12.46

13.10

6.46

32.27

25.34

42.40

1.90

RANK:

178^th

112^th

290^th

218^th

22^nd

41^st

226^th

269^th

346^th

168^th

243^rd

130^th

222^nd

10^th

204^th

339^th

346^th

ANALYSIS:
While not an atrocious team by any means, Weber State is not exactly one that should appear in many top-100 rankings either. They have a record of 18-15 and are ranked 227th overall (out of 353) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #3 team (out of 11) in the Big Sky (average ranking 257.4).

Though their offense is far from the worst in the game, Weber State is not terribly gifted on that end of the court either. Scoring about 99 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked at #248 in offensive efficiency. Weber State poses no threat whatsoever to grab rebounds off their own misses. Against AO, the ball-club has a rating of 9.57 in potential points scored off of second chances (tenth from the bottom nationally), and they convert just 4.5% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 312th) as well. Weber State is also one of the more inferior teams in the college game when it comes to maximizing opportunities to score on offense. The team is nationally ranked 324th in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 79.29 vs. AO.

Though they rate better on defense than they do on offense, Weber State still isn't one of the more capable defensive teams in college hoops. Allowing roughly 104 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #178 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Weber State will allow opponents more chances to shoot than the norm. The team is ranked 290th in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 86.16 vs. AO. If Weber State does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to hinder opponents from sinking threes. AO will convert only 31.9% of their three-point attempts, and the team ranks 41st-best in the NCAA in that category because of it.

Weber State has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 322nd in the country in positive momentum.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Tue 11/6/2018	@ San Diego₇₆	L 63.55 - 78.61	L 66-83	0-1	91.64	93.14	▲ 1.50	106.56	113.92	▼ 7.36	▼ 5.86
Fri 11/9/2018	vs Bethesda	---	W 123-53	1-1	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Thu 11/15/2018	vs San Jose State₃₄₇ *	W 82.08 - 67.74	W 85-77	2-1	112.30	103.66	▼ 8.64	91.37	92.50	▼ 1.13	▼ 9.77
Fri 11/16/2018	vs Cent. Michigan₁₄₄ *	L 75.55 - 82.52	W 78-76	3-1	100.43	100.96	▲ 0.53	109.60	100.00	▲ 9.60	▲ 10.13
Sun 11/18/2018	vs CSU Bakersfield₂₁₈ *	L 70.94 - 71.19	L 67-68	3-2	102.96	95.04	▼ 7.92	101.99	91.89	▲ 10.10	▲ 2.18
Tue 11/27/2018	vs Benedictine Mesa	---	W 100-61	4-2	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Sat 12/1/2018	vs BYU₈₅	L 74.66 - 81.79	W 113-103	5-2	98.09	128.09	▲ 30.00	111.92	122.73	▼ 10.81	▲ 19.19
Wed 12/5/2018	@ Fresno State₉₆	L 67.41 - 81.01	L 52-71	5-3	94.90	68.21	▼ 26.69	107.66	93.22	▲ 14.44	▼ 12.25
Sat 12/8/2018	vs Utah State₅₀ *	L 66.74 - 81.85	L 67-76	5-4	92.82	90.14	▼ 2.68	111.62	101.02	▲ 10.60	▲ 7.92
Sat 12/15/2018	vs Utah Valley₁₀₅	L 72.96 - 78.24	L 63-75	5-5	100.00	86.72	▼ 13.28	110.94	109.85	▲ 1.09	▼ 12.19
Sat 12/22/2018	vs Delaware State₃₅₁	W 82.91 - 60.07	W 83-69	6-5	108.67	111.19	▲ 2.52	83.18	86.91	▼ 3.73	▼ 1.21
Sat 12/29/2018	@ E. Washington₂₄₄	L 71.52 - 73.91	W 84-72	7-5	101.80	116.13	▲ 14.33	99.42	80.32	▲ 19.10	▲ 33.43
Mon 12/31/2018	@ Idaho₃₅₀	W 79.27 - 67.60	W 93-87	8-5	115.07	136.79	▲ 21.72	93.63	122.88	▼ 29.25	▼ 7.53
Thu 1/3/2019	vs N. Arizona₂₉₈	W 80.29 - 71.61	W 77-52	9-5	106.94	102.12	▼ 4.82	99.74	71.73	▲ 28.01	▲ 23.19
Sat 1/5/2019	vs Southern Utah₂₇₀	W 76.63 - 69.90	L 82-90 (OT)	9-6	100.29	93.34	▼ 6.95	95.61	98.12	▼ 2.51	▼ 9.46
Sat 1/12/2019	@ Portland State₂₈₂	L 75.85 - 75.91	W 95-88 (OT)	10-6	107.06	119.64	▲ 12.58	101.00	109.83	▼ 8.83	▲ 3.75
Thu 1/17/2019	vs Idaho State₃₁₈	W 81.54 - 70.89	W 76-59	11-6	111.83	108.27	▼ 3.56	101.46	85.57	▲ 15.89	▲ 12.33
Sat 1/19/2019	vs N. Colorado₁₈₆	W 72.76 - 72.06	W 78-64	12-6	99.22	104.86	▲ 5.64	102.37	86.55	▲ 15.82	▲ 21.46
Thu 1/24/2019	@ Montana State₂₆₅	L 79.58 - 80.72	W 93-84	13-6	109.79	126.31	▲ 16.52	105.60	106.34	▼ 0.74	▲ 15.78
Sat 1/26/2019	@ Montana₁₄₃	L 68.63 - 78.77	L 68-75	13-7	97.71	95.33	▼ 2.38	106.20	97.50	▲ 8.70	▲ 6.32
Thu 1/31/2019	vs Portland State₂₈₂	W 79.48 - 72.32	L 75-76	13-8	107.06	105.95	▼ 1.11	101.00	104.92	▼ 3.92	▼ 5.03
Sat 2/2/2019	vs Sacramento St.₂₄₈	W 73.44 - 68.56	W 75-65	14-8	99.23	103.14	▲ 3.91	97.18	96.70	▲ 0.48	▲ 4.39
Thu 2/7/2019	@ Southern Utah₂₇₀	L 72.91 - 73.59	L 53-65	14-9	100.29	82.50	▼ 17.79	95.61	91.71	▲ 3.90	▼ 13.89
Sat 2/9/2019	@ N. Arizona₂₉₈	W 76.62 - 75.20	W 86-71	15-9	106.94	120.30	▲ 13.36	99.74	88.17	▲ 11.57	▲ 24.93
Thu 2/14/2019	vs Montana₁₄₃	L 72.23 - 75.23	L 80-83	15-10	97.71	102.77	▲ 5.06	106.20	110.29	▼ 4.09	▲ 0.97
Sat 2/16/2019	vs Montana State₂₆₅	W 83.30 - 76.97	W 94-82	16-10	109.79	116.17	▲ 6.38	105.60	105.20	▲ 0.40	▲ 6.78
Thu 2/21/2019	@ Sacramento St.₂₄₈	L 69.84 - 72.10	L 76-78	16-11	99.23	109.54	▲ 10.31	97.18	106.98	▼ 9.80	▲ 0.51
Thu 2/28/2019	@ N. Colorado₁₈₆	L 69.18 - 75.59	L 61-85	16-12	99.22	90.96	▼ 8.26	102.37	130.23	▼ 27.86	▼ 36.12
Mon 3/4/2019	@ Idaho State₃₁₈	W 77.96 - 74.48	L 74-78	16-13	111.83	112.94	▲ 1.11	101.46	114.17	▼ 12.71	▼ 11.60
Thu 3/7/2019	vs Idaho₃₅₀	W 82.81 - 64.10	W 93-59	17-13	115.07	118.56	▲ 3.49	93.63	63.21	▲ 30.42	▲ 33.91
Sat 3/9/2019	vs E. Washington₂₄₄	W 75.12 - 70.34	L 77-80	17-14	101.80	101.56	▼ 0.24	99.42	109.16	▼ 9.74	▼ 9.98
Thu 3/14/2019	vs Portland State₂₈₂ *	W 77.67 - 74.11	W 81-71	18-14	107.06	102.78	▼ 4.28	101.00	82.19	▲ 18.81	▲ 14.53
Fri 3/15/2019	vs Montana₁₄₃ *	L 70.43 - 76.99	L 49-78	18-15	97.71	72.93	▼ 24.78	106.20	136.17	▼ 29.97	▼ 54.75
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Weber State performs worse against squads that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. When facing teams that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 11.71, Weber State is more efficient than normal 25% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 68% of the time.
	When playing teams that effectively clean the offensive glass, Weber State usually performs better than average. Weber State is more efficient than normal 64% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 11.49. In all other contests, Weber State performs better than average 22% of the time.
	Weber State is typically better vs. teams that tend to get off more shots. Against foes that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 81.36, Weber State performs above their norm 65% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 27% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	Cold shooting dooms Portland State Vikings in Big Sky tournament loss to Weber State (3/14/2019 9:24:00 PM) BOISE — The Portland State Vikings struggled through poor shooting and lost to Weber State 81-71 Thursday in a Big Sky men’s basketball tournament quarterfinal ... tournament but were sloppy against the Wildcats, committing 18 turnovers.
	More From National Sports (3/8/2019 12:27:00 PM) Devonte Patterson added 13 points for the Panthers. Antione Lister chipped in 12, Gary… OGDEN, Utah (AP) — Jerrick Harding had 22 points as Weber State romped past Idaho 93-59 on Thursday night. Cody John added 20 points for the Wildcats. Brekkott ...
	Weber St. pummels Idaho men (3/8/2019 11:52:00 AM) OGDEN, Utah — The Idaho men’s basketball team entered its game against Weber State on Thursday flying ... digit loss this season, as UI fell 93-59 in a Big Sky Conference game.
	Martin CBB Blog (Day 106): A one-time UFR guest won his 800th career game (2/22/2019 11:57:00 AM) NAU sophomore Bernie Andre had 22 points and 13 rebounds. Sacramento State (12-12, 6-9) def. Weber State (16-11, 10-6): 78-76 -Marcus Graves had 24 points, seven rebounds, seven assists and the game-winning free throws. -Chris Clemons dropped in 27 for the ...
	Bruce Weber thinks Texas will be tough NCAA Tournament team (2/13/2019 1:26:00 AM) Bruce Weber’s Kansas State Wildcats may have beaten Texas 71-64 on Tuesday night, but the Longhorns left an impression. Texas led at the half before losing the lead in the second half.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR
2024-25	286	0.215	12-22 (0.353)	0.353	-0.262	Big Sky	65.27	-9.38	0.396	-1.45	0.87	254.21
2023-24	174	0.521	20-12 (0.625)	0.625	0.054	Big Sky	66.56	-9.24	0.373	0.61	-1.72	147.65
2022-23	183	0.497	18-15 (0.545)	0.545	0.025	Big Sky	65.71	-10.96	0.460	-1.00	-0.68	229.58
2021-22	191	0.465	21-12 (0.636)	0.636	0.021	Big Sky	69.20	-10.26	0.309	-5.19	3.07	175.51
2020-21	119	0.669	17-6 (0.739)	0.739	0.116	Big Sky	71.75	-10.39	0.384	-1.79	-0.98	165.67
2019-20	256	0.276	12-20 (0.375)	0.375	-0.168	Big Sky	68.35	-8.95	0.535	-1.16	-0.84	295.19
2018-19	227	0.358	18-15 (0.545)	0.545	-0.080	Big Sky	72.22	-8.90	0.358	-1.37	-1.33	188.47
2017-18	174	0.506	20-11 (0.645)	0.645	0.084	Big Sky	70.06	-8.69	0.450	-4.15	-1.28	149.87
2016-17	178	0.494	20-14 (0.588)	0.588	0.000	Big Sky	69.36	-7.85	0.410	-1.03	-0.10	173.35
2015-16	168	0.523	26-9 (0.743)	0.743	0.138	Big Sky	68.74	-7.59	0.381	0.58	-0.53	155.92
2014-15	260	0.260	13-17 (0.433)	0.433	-0.171	Big Sky	65.45	-8.52	0.426	-1.43	0.25	268.71

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	101.56	25.92	70.16	85.28	42.90	32.53	31.37	21.85	37.84	30.90	58.61	11.61	11.64	4.72	38.14	25.62	36.23	2.02
2023-24	105.83	26.39	73.63	83.95	44.75	33.62	33.52	19.88	37.37	30.45	61.97	12.15	12.71	5.83	40.05	23.68	36.28	2.04
2022-23	99.43	23.57	75.63	81.04	43.85	32.04	32.86	23.91	43.41	25.09	58.31	9.87	10.24	3.58	39.54	29.50	30.96	2.09
2021-22	100.64	26.51	75.19	79.38	44.11	32.17	33.15	21.40	35.31	25.81	65.09	13.06	8.53	2.98	40.53	26.95	32.52	2.08
2020-21	105.90	27.27	77.45	78.64	47.13	31.16	34.22	19.30	44.20	28.18	63.40	11.04	8.44	2.72	39.62	24.54	35.84	2.04
2019-20	95.13	21.23	73.11	81.81	42.40	32.41	31.60	23.30	36.84	26.10	60.78	9.13	8.92	3.46	39.62	28.48	31.90	2.08
2018-19	98.56	25.79	73.83	79.29	43.86	29.51	33.74	22.05	37.88	27.73	59.38	9.75	9.57	4.45	37.21	27.81	34.98	2.02
2017-18	101.57	23.48	76.87	77.86	45.56	32.23	39.01	21.10	38.74	24.54	60.01	10.02	8.04	3.60	41.39	27.09	31.51	2.10
2016-17	105.08	28.76	73.65	78.00	45.90	31.26	39.30	20.76	37.50	25.98	60.55	9.45	9.86	4.70	40.07	26.61	33.31	2.07
2015-16	98.04	30.14	67.06	75.91	44.23	30.86	34.58	20.27	40.81	24.79	59.04	9.47	11.01	5.33	40.65	26.70	32.65	2.08
2014-15	94.58	31.74	75.10	75.69	40.13	29.00	34.49	24.03	32.88	22.66	55.02	9.32	12.88	4.85	38.31	31.75	29.94	2.08

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	113.37	30.92	--	85.50	45.08	36.23	37.25	19.77	37.92	29.50	59.50	13.47	12.74	5.94	42.37	23.12	34.51	2.08
2023-24	107.24	24.37	--	83.35	47.50	28.94	36.62	21.29	43.80	33.11	59.39	9.68	10.72	4.85	34.73	25.55	39.73	1.95
2022-23	100.52	23.39	--	82.73	43.70	32.74	36.15	23.30	37.61	26.68	58.30	10.28	11.74	4.85	39.58	28.17	32.25	2.07
2021-22	103.17	21.98	--	84.32	45.25	28.77	38.04	25.32	34.50	30.22	61.13	10.82	14.25	5.60	34.12	30.03	35.85	1.98
2020-21	101.97	23.67	--	83.26	44.20	30.92	35.54	23.54	35.28	28.80	60.80	10.96	11.27	3.79	37.14	28.27	34.59	2.03
2019-20	105.15	20.31	--	88.86	44.54	30.75	36.03	25.47	35.61	32.65	59.51	11.53	11.91	4.13	34.60	28.66	36.74	1.98
2018-19	104.18	24.67	--	86.16	45.32	27.80	31.93	21.83	38.04	36.53	59.85	12.46	13.10	6.46	32.27	25.34	42.40	1.90
2017-18	103.06	25.16	--	85.44	44.76	25.74	34.63	24.01	34.40	35.70	59.02	11.22	14.71	6.07	30.12	28.10	41.78	1.88
2016-17	107.62	25.16	--	87.39	46.22	23.53	35.77	28.84	37.98	35.03	60.02	9.97	16.48	8.84	26.92	33.00	40.08	1.87
2015-16	99.60	24.64	--	87.15	42.81	23.74	35.25	30.09	35.13	33.33	55.13	11.06	17.35	8.05	27.24	34.52	38.24	1.89
2014-15	104.36	27.76	--	83.11	45.80	24.28	33.73	25.20	38.99	33.63	59.61	13.79	14.46	7.96	29.22	30.32	40.47	1.89

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR
2024-25	286^th	286	285^th	285	311^th	311	312^th	312	Big Sky	Big Sky	277^th	277	176^th	176	215^th	215	228^th	228	57^th	57	255^th	255
2023-24	174^th	174	174^th	174	94^th	94	143^rd	143	Big Sky	Big Sky	264^th	264	181^st	181	235^th	235	49^th	49	321^st	321	145^th	145
2022-23	183^rd	183	182^nd	182	155^th	155	160^th	160	Big Sky	Big Sky	303^rd	303	342^nd	342	168^th	168	194^th	194	189^th	189	230^th	230
2021-22	191^st	191	191^st	191	97^th	97	163^rd	163	Big Sky	Big Sky	88^th	88	296^th	296	304^th	304	354^th	354	6^th	6	174^th	174
2020-21	119^th	119	118^th	118	30^th	30	119^th	119	Big Sky	Big Sky	80^th	80	289^th	289	264^th	264	240^th	240	264^th	264	162^nd	162
2019-20	256^th	256	256^th	256	278^th	278	257^th	257	Big Sky	Big Sky	252^nd	252	156^th	156	126^th	126	201^st	201	229^th	229	299^th	299
2018-19	227^th	227	227^th	227	141^st	141	212^th	212	Big Sky	Big Sky	29^th	29	88^th	88	304^th	304	219^th	219	294^th	294	186^th	186
2017-18	174^th	174	174^th	174	80^th	80	128^th	128	Big Sky	Big Sky	187^th	187	132^nd	132	220^th	220	338^th	338	264^th	264	148^th	148
2016-17	178^th	178	178^th	178	120^th	120	174^th	174	Big Sky	Big Sky	235^th	235	52^nd	52	264^th	264	177^th	177	160^th	160	171^st	171
2015-16	168^th	168	168^th	168	34^th	34	109^th	109	Big Sky	Big Sky	238^th	238	28^th	28	286^th	286	67^th	67	227^th	227	155^th	155
2014-15	260^th	260	259^th	259	227^th	227	262^nd	262	Big Sky	Big Sky	179^th	179	88^th	88	242^nd	242	223^rd	223	136^th	136	273^rd	273

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	274^th	274	226^th	226	255^th	255	265^th	265	220^th	220	217^th	217	303^rd	303	174^th	174	162^nd	162	218^th	218	173^rd	173	217^th	217	313^th	313	300^th	300	194^th	194	160^th	160	185^th	185	178^th	178
2023-24	166^th	166	181^st	181	122^nd	122	255^th	255	140^th	140	110^th	110	223^rd	223	268^th	268	256^th	256	193^rd	193	70^th	70	135^th	135	209^th	209	145^th	145	92^nd	92	263^rd	263	176^th	176	244^th	244
2022-23	247^th	247	257^th	257	54^th	54	329^th	329	175^th	175	142^nd	142	248^th	248	185^th	185	14^th	14	335^th	335	195^th	195	230^th	230	337^th	337	339^th	339	100^th	100	146^th	146	311^th	311	310^th	310
2021-22	185^th	185	104^th	104	65^th	65	348^th	348	132^nd	132	130^th	130	172^nd	172	282^nd	282	295^th	295	304^th	304	32^nd	32	59^th	59	354^th	354	346^th	346	76^th	76	247^th	247	247^th	247	295^th	295
2020-21	75^th	75	82^nd	82	25^th	25	303^rd	303	41^st	41	162^nd	162	157^th	157	289^th	289	24^th	24	173^rd	173	57^th	57	169^th	169	347^th	347	349^th	349	119^th	119	270^th	270	115^th	115	187^th	187
2019-20	239^th	239	318^th	318	112^th	112	171^st	171	217^th	217	112^th	112	273^rd	273	151^st	151	178^th	178	262^nd	262	121^st	121	279^th	279	341^st	341	327^th	327	114^th	114	150^th	150	266^th	266	268^th	268
2018-19	248^th	248	195^th	195	93^rd	93	324^th	324	176^th	176	267^th	267	209^th	209	138^th	138	88^th	88	260^th	260	182^nd	182	271^st	271	344^th	344	312^th	312	217^th	217	103^rd	103	211^th	211	173^rd	173
2017-18	172^nd	172	274^th	274	27^th	27	330^th	330	111^th	111	121^st	121	28^th	28	227^th	227	103^rd	103	309^th	309	166^th	166	226^th	226	350^th	350	349^th	349	75^th	75	185^th	185	277^th	277	295^th	295
2016-17	99^th	99	113^th	113	76^th	76	326^th	326	90^th	90	117^th	117	24^th	24	269^th	269	123^rd	123	275^th	275	137^th	137	254^th	254	339^th	339	324^th	324	72^nd	72	241^st	241	227^th	227	266^th	266
2015-16	222^nd	222	111^th	111	283^rd	283	345^th	345	137^th	137	103^rd	103	186^th	186	294^th	294	20^th	20	325^th	325	164^th	164	254^th	254	325^th	325	303^rd	303	50^th	50	251^st	251	266^th	266	308^th	308
2014-15	271^st	271	66^th	66	25^th	25	346^th	346	293^rd	293	141^st	141	167^th	167	224^th	224	280^th	280	341^st	341	265^th	265	295^th	295	287^th	287	326^th	326	62^nd	62	157^th	157	317^th	317	318^th	318

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	284^th	284	312^th	312	--	--	99^th	99	233^rd	233	291^st	291	327^th	327	110^th	110	198^th	198	76^th	76	200^th	200	271^st	271	51^st	51	166^th	166	310^th	310	123^rd	123	100^th	100	64^th	64
2023-24	219^th	219	95^th	95	--	--	75^th	75	330^th	330	71^st	71	313^th	313	118^th	118	338^th	338	281^st	281	243^rd	243	56^th	56	17^th	17	91^st	91	85^th	85	139^th	139	308^th	308	312^th	312
2022-23	121^st	121	99^th	99	--	--	98^th	98	157^th	157	254^th	254	287^th	287	170^th	170	171^st	171	61^st	61	157^th	157	143^rd	143	39^th	39	117^th	117	291^st	291	192^nd	192	71^st	71	59^th	59
2021-22	215^th	215	62^nd	62	--	--	174^th	174	257^th	257	92^nd	92	351^st	351	226^th	226	53^rd	53	244^th	244	247^th	247	184^th	184	242^nd	242	255^th	255	97^th	97	219^th	219	243^rd	243	273^rd	273
2020-21	207^th	207	134^th	134	--	--	225^th	225	190^th	190	189^th	189	251^st	251	197^th	197	79^th	79	199^th	199	250^th	250	165^th	165	88^th	88	51^st	51	166^th	166	189^th	189	192^nd	192	182^nd	182
2019-20	296^th	296	26^th	26	--	--	351^st	351	239^th	239	179^th	179	308^th	308	290^th	290	111^th	111	326^th	326	188^th	188	211^th	211	98^th	98	70^th	70	69^th	69	227^th	227	245^th	245	276^th	276
2018-19	178^th	178	112^th	112	--	--	290^th	290	218^th	218	22^nd	22	41^st	41	226^th	226	269^th	269	346^th	346	168^th	168	243^rd	243	130^th	130	222^nd	222	10^th	10	204^th	204	339^th	339	346^th	346
2017-18	173^rd	173	128^th	128	--	--	308^th	308	175^th	175	17^th	17	128^th	128	242^nd	242	54^th	54	345^th	345	137^th	137	209^th	209	182^nd	182	100^th	100	4^th	4	212^th	212	334^th	334	345^th	345
2016-17	278^th	278	84^th	84	--	--	343^rd	343	256^th	256	6^th	6	196^th	196	331^st	331	233^rd	233	345^th	345	170^th	170	107^th	107	295^th	295	329^th	329	1^st	1	307^th	307	325^th	325	347^th	347
2015-16	118^th	118	48^th	48	--	--	336^th	336	123^rd	123	17^th	17	194^th	194	334^th	334	137^th	137	313^th	313	52^nd	52	193^rd	193	303^rd	303	273^rd	273	5^th	5	311^th	311	267^th	267	332^nd	332
2014-15	237^th	237	127^th	127	--	--	216^th	216	282^nd	282	37^th	37	119^th	119	157^th	157	307^th	307	326^th	326	185^th	185	324^th	324	111^th	111	278^th	278	28^th	28	149^th	149	325^th	325	324^th	324