TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 Tulane  20-11 (0.645)  |  American
All-Play Percentage: 0.696 (111th)
Schedule Strength: 0.539 (110th)
Record Quality: 0.220 (75th)
Avg. Season Rank: 96.25 (95th)
Pace: 73.21 (2nd)
Momentum: -4.59 (343rd)
Off. Momentum: -1.13 (289th)
Def. Momentum: -3.47 (333rd)
Consistency: -9.08 (167th)
Res. Consistency: -11.54 (134th)
Away From Home: -0.84 (205th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.57 (156th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 107.35 26.68 77.98 81.95 46.30 29.71 35.89 24.14 39.15 28.10 63.44 11.95 8.81 3.53 36.25 29.46 34.29 2.02
RANK: 95th 107th 17th 305th 57th 244th 79th 176th 109th 244th 58th 107th 356th 343rd 211th 149th 207th 182nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 101.06 24.15 -- 85.08 42.07 35.60 35.24 21.82 39.16 27.66 53.16 9.87 18.39 6.28 41.85 25.65 32.51 2.09
RANK: 129th 128th -- 189th 84th 338th 256th 96th 236th 99th 23rd 103rd 361st 300th 337th 76th 76th 34th

ANALYSIS:
Tulane is a fairly decent basketball team that, while likely better than average, isn't quite good enough to crack any top-25 rankings this year. Their record this season is 20-11, and the club is ranked 111th overall (out of 363) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #7 team (out of 11) in the AAC (average ranking 111.8).

Utilizing one of the game's most blistering paces (the second-fastest in D1), Tulane succeeds primarily through their offense. They are ranked 95th in offensive efficiency and score in excess of 107 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Tulane is deadly accurate at the free throw line. Making 78.0% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked 17th nationally in free throw percentage. Tulane has also been fairly successful when shooting from the field. The squad is ranked 57th in the country in field goal percentage, making approximately 46.3% of their attempts vs. AO. If Tulane does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's difficulties obtaining second-chance opportunities from offensive rebounds. The squad only has a rating of 8.81 vs. AO in potential points off of second chances, which ranks eighth-worst in college hoops.

Tulane plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 129th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 101 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Tulane does tremendous work shutting down the opposition from the inside. They are ranked 23rd in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 53.2% of their attempts from close-up. If Tulane does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's difficulties stopping opponents from obtaining second-chance opportunities via offensive rebounds. The squad has a rating of 18.39 in potential points allowed off of second chances vs. AO, which ranks third-worst in college hoops.

Tulane has definitely not been as efficient as of late compared to earlier in the season and, consequently, the team is nationally ranked 343rd in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that prefer the outside shot, Tulane often performs worse than normal. Tulane is more efficient than usual 30% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 1.96. In their other contests, Tulane performs better than the norm 73% of the time.
Tulane does worse vs. clubs that find ways to get to the free throw line. When playing squads that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 27.36, Tulane performs above average 18% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 60% of the time.
Tulane performs better against squads that do not defend well on the perimeter. When facing teams that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.00%, Tulane is more efficient than normal 67% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 25% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25136th136th145th160thAAC223rd261st159th291st352nd127th
2023-24151st151st244th176thAAC14th2nd109th323rd328th125th
2022-23111th111th85th75thAAC2nd167th110th156th205th95th
2021-2285th85th208th132ndAAC131st97th91st187th195th127th
2020-21183rd183rd225th185thAAC205th259th111th228th20th212th
2019-20185th185th272nd191stAAC120th333rd93rd185th149th175th
2018-19260th258th350th314thAAC78th128th75th44th265th277th
2017-18176th176th222nd191stAAC134th338th131st185th63rd150th
2016-17233rd233rd343rd289thAAC65th82nd87th173rd86th270th
2015-16212th212th279th223rdAAC188th316th109th187th91st190th
2014-15233rd233rd195th182ndAAC244th171st166th202nd7th204th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25129th123rd88th215th121st211th185th211th136th136th123rd58th163rd75th202nd206th133rd133rd
2023-24113th10th167th352nd64th298th70th289th140th88th118th126th298th240th248th257th41st55th
2022-2395th107th17th305th57th244th79th176th109th244th58th107th356th343rd211th149th207th182nd
2021-2246th114th55th190th44th217th7th135th105th188th91st170th285th202nd219th133rd181st161st
2020-21231st59th56th92nd327th200th316th108th342nd154th258th57th170th255th228th124th176th146th
2019-20198th156th164th172nd218th168th208th127th230th232nd162nd44th146th152nd162nd128th244th225th
2018-19275th264th218th228th214th285th210th105th217th169th220th282nd88th171st270th91st153rd99th
2017-18152nd142nd162nd235th108th284th175th107th193rd156th67th286th118th129th278th97th139th92nd
2016-17200th115th129th238th193rd260th262nd133rd164th143rd192nd115th56th99th252nd119th128th93rd
2015-16293rd270th295th103rd288th209th303rd145th333rd83rd210th226th30th36th231st166th111th103rd
2014-15282nd201st331st137th277th127th296th202nd72nd153rd320th210th102nd221st139th211th166th195th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25155th119th--274th90th350th134th79th123rd119th107th119th351st205th341st55th92nd44th
2023-24221st183rd--254th157th316th281st156th200th120th132nd129th352nd343rd312th140th106th65th
2022-23129th128th--189th84th338th256th96th236th99th23rd103rd361st300th337th76th76th34th
2021-22121st80th--197th66th355th217th82nd41st15th153rd5th295th164th355th77th10th3rd
2020-21121st79th--78th155th350th303rd43rd146th26th184th16th248th243rd353rd55th30th7th
2019-20181st51st--79th278th340th259th24th204th57th334th8th55th264th346th26th71st18th
2018-19231st145th--313th158th326th213th134th239th175th139th277th322nd266th296th92nd125th84th
2017-18210th236th--178th198th110th220th225th207th205th157th280th146th254th102nd231st197th229th
2016-17255th220th--129th268th196th295th131st215th180th240th174th199th284th203rd141st186th183rd
2015-16119th176th--142nd125th101st250th215th127th192nd65th249th175th116th110th223rd208th227th
2014-15139th148th--61st259th76th269th144th243rd177th211th143rd16th205th109th201st223rd247th