Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 Tulane 15-16 (0.484) | American

All-Play Percentage: 0.337 (233^rd)	Schedule Strength: 0.498 (166^th)	Record Quality: -0.021 (182^nd)	Avg. Season Rank: 204.34 (204^th)
Pace: 64.48 (244^th)	Momentum: -4.44 (332^nd)	Off. Momentum: -0.39 (246^th)	Def. Momentum: -4.05 (333^rd)
Consistency: -9.17 (171^st)	Res. Consistency: -11.60 (180^th)	Away From Home: 2.81 (7^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: -1.10 (202^nd)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

93.98

27.96

63.24

82.74

40.52

29.27

31.56

24.61

37.67

28.85

52.06

10.70

16.44

6.18

35.38

29.75

34.87

2.01

RANK:

282^nd

201^st

331^st

137^th

277^th

127^th

296^th

202^nd

72^nd

153^rd

320^th

210^th

102^nd

221^st

139^th

211^th

166^th

195^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

99.54

28.21

78.87

45.28

25.49

36.42

24.89

37.36

28.49

60.13

11.14

12.21

7.02

32.32

31.56

36.13

1.96

RANK:

139^th

148^th

61^st

259^th

76^th

269^th

144^th

243^rd

177^th

211^th

143^rd

16^th

205^th

109^th

201^st

223^rd

247^th

ANALYSIS:
While not an atrocious team by any means, Tulane is not exactly one that should appear in many top-100 rankings either. Their record this season is 15-16, and the club is ranked 233rd overall (out of 351) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #8 team (out of 11) in the AAC (average ranking 151.7).

Tulane will likely call on their defense to win a majority of their games. The team is ranked 139th in defensive efficiency and allows fewer than 100 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Tulane does a super job to deny opponents offensive rebounds and second chances. They have a rating of 12.21 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (ranked 16th in the country). Tulane also has been doing fairly decent work to prevent opponents from getting off shots from the field. The club is ranked 61st in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 78.87 vs. AO.

The offense for Tulane, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the defense is. The team is ranked 282nd in offensive efficiency, scoring about 94 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Tulane has had serious struggles making their free throws this year. Converting just 63.2% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #331 overall in free throw percentage. Tulane also won't provide opponents much of a scare with their shooting percentage from the inside. The team is ranked 320th in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 52.1% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO.

Tulane has been playing some of their worst basketball of the season as of late, and they're presently ranked 332nd in positive momentum because of it. When playing on the road, Tulane has played their best basketball this season. The team is currently ranked seventh in the country in the away-from-home metric our site tracks.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Mon 11/17/2014	vs Wake Forest₁₁₅	L 64.39 - 67.51	L 49-71	0-1	92.05	66.10	▼ 25.95	102.01	101.79	▲ 0.22	▼ 25.73
Thu 11/20/2014	vs Miss. Valley St.₃₄₉	W 78.40 - 57.07	W 100-61	1-1	109.75	127.22	▲ 17.47	84.68	73.34	▲ 11.34	▲ 28.81
Sat 11/22/2014	vs Southern-New Orleans	---	W 89-45	2-1	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Tue 11/25/2014	vs Southern₂₉₈	W 64.04 - 56.23	W 74-59	3-1	95.10	94.33	▼ 0.77	88.13	78.97	▲ 9.16	▲ 8.39
Fri 11/28/2014	vs SE Louisiana₃₀₇	W 67.32 - 58.62	W 71-61	4-1	98.47	104.60	▲ 6.13	91.17	95.40	▼ 4.23	▲ 1.90
Sun 11/30/2014	vs Tenn. Tech₂₃₈	W 67.90 - 64.01	W 73-68	5-1	100.02	105.98	▲ 5.96	99.87	104.46	▼ 4.59	▲ 1.37
Wed 12/3/2014	@ Loyola-Chicago₁₄₄	L 56.22 - 64.59	W 83-70	6-1	94.45	129.32	▲ 34.87	102.25	104.54	▼ 2.29	▲ 32.58
Sat 12/6/2014	vs Miss. State₁₅₈	L 60.64 - 61.35	W 59-54	7-1	92.28	90.68	▼ 1.60	98.45	86.05	▲ 12.40	▲ 10.80
Tue 12/16/2014	vs Savannah State₃₃₅	W 64.47 - 51.51	W 75-67	8-1	96.81	99.85	▲ 3.04	82.40	91.70	▼ 9.30	▼ 6.26
Fri 12/19/2014	vs Jackson State₂₉₃	W 62.06 - 54.64	W 56-49	9-1	95.43	83.18	▼ 12.25	89.09	79.53	▲ 9.56	▼ 2.69
Mon 12/22/2014	@ Washington₁₁₇	L 59.23 - 69.54	L 57-66	9-2	94.36	82.97	▼ 11.39	104.16	92.55	▲ 11.61	▲ 0.22
Sun 12/28/2014	vs St. John's₄₆ *	L 59.47 - 73.09	L 57-82	9-3	89.47	75.76	▼ 13.71	109.34	110.61	▼ 1.27	▼ 14.98
Wed 12/31/2014	@ ECU₂₃₉	L 60.06 - 63.08	W 67-59	10-3	99.74	118.49	▲ 18.75	98.54	98.75	▼ 0.21	▲ 18.54
Sat 1/3/2015	@ Memphis₉₉	L 56.85 - 68.84	W 74-66	11-3	89.96	116.82	▲ 26.86	102.14	100.15	▲ 1.99	▲ 28.85
Wed 1/7/2015	vs Temple₆₆	L 58.12 - 65.46	L 56-64	11-4	87.27	87.35	▲ 0.08	103.53	106.20	▼ 2.67	▼ 2.59
Sun 1/11/2015	vs USF₂₈₆	W 64.45 - 58.00	W 56-51 (OT)	12-4	98.47	73.70	▼ 24.77	94.05	82.28	▲ 11.77	▼ 13.00
Wed 1/14/2015	@ UCF₂₈₅	L 65.01 - 65.40	L 100-103 (3OT)	12-5	103.65	117.03	▲ 13.38	98.31	111.09	▼ 12.78	▲ 0.60
Sat 1/17/2015	@ Houston₂₀₄	L 59.79 - 64.43	W 68-65	13-5	96.95	118.27	▲ 21.32	98.17	108.26	▼ 10.09	▲ 11.23
Wed 1/21/2015	vs SMU₂₃	L 55.86 - 67.36	L 52-66	13-6	85.80	85.16	▼ 0.64	109.40	112.97	▼ 3.57	▼ 4.21
Sat 1/24/2015	vs Memphis₉₉ *	L 58.66 - 66.99	L 55-57	13-7	89.96	85.94	▼ 4.02	102.14	89.06	▲ 13.08	▲ 9.06
Tue 1/27/2015	vs Tulsa₁₀₆	L 57.25 - 61.14	L 55-62	13-8	86.57	77.91	▼ 8.66	98.14	96.91	▲ 1.23	▼ 7.43
Sat 1/31/2015	@ Temple₆₆	L 54.54 - 69.27	L 37-55	13-9	87.27	60.87	▼ 26.40	103.53	90.01	▲ 13.52	▼ 12.88
Sat 2/7/2015	vs UConn₇₅	L 56.58 - 62.56	L 53-62	13-10	89.04	77.33	▼ 11.71	104.22	96.91	▲ 7.31	▼ 4.40
Sat 2/14/2015	@ Cincinnati₅₃	L 50.12 - 65.00	W 50-49	14-10	86.02	86.30	▲ 0.28	104.46	76.06	▲ 28.40	▲ 28.68
Thu 2/19/2015	vs UCF₂₈₅	W 68.61 - 61.78	L 55-69	14-11	103.65	91.67	▼ 11.98	98.31	122.27	▼ 23.96	▼ 35.94
Sun 2/22/2015	@ UConn₇₅	L 53.15 - 66.16	L 60-67	14-12	89.04	98.21	▲ 9.17	104.22	103.38	▲ 0.84	▲ 10.01
Wed 2/25/2015	@ Tulsa₁₀₆	L 53.70 - 64.76	L 55-76	14-13	86.57	72.46	▼ 14.11	98.14	105.50	▼ 7.36	▼ 21.47
Sat 2/28/2015	vs Cincinnati₅₃	L 53.46 - 61.53	L 47-63	14-14	86.02	67.86	▼ 18.16	104.46	119.30	▼ 14.84	▼ 33.00
Wed 3/4/2015	vs Houston₂₀₄	W 63.33 - 60.76	L 63-68 (OT)	14-15	96.95	93.75	▼ 3.20	98.17	99.69	▼ 1.52	▼ 4.72
Sat 3/7/2015	@ USF₂₈₆	L 60.90 - 61.51	W 67-63	15-15	98.47	121.84	▲ 23.37	94.05	104.44	▼ 10.39	▲ 12.98
Thu 3/12/2015	vs Houston₂₀₄ *	L 61.56 - 62.59	L 60-66	15-16	96.95	98.36	▲ 1.41	98.17	108.20	▼ 10.03	▼ 8.62
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	When facing teams that aren't terribly skilled defensively, Tulane often performs better than normal. Tulane is more efficient than usual 65% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 95.18. In their other contests, Tulane performs better than the norm 20% of the time.
	Tulane does better vs. clubs that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. When playing squads that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 39.66%, Tulane performs above average 65% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 20% of the time.
	Tulane performs better against squads that allow more chances at the line. When facing teams that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 27.62, Tulane is more efficient than normal 75% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 33% of the time.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR
2024-25	136	0.628	19-15 (0.559)	0.559	0.032	AAC	65.98	-10.10	0.454	-2.28	-3.11	132.48
2023-24	151	0.584	14-17 (0.452)	0.452	0.003	AAC	71.88	-6.81	0.539	-3.06	-1.98	129.62
2022-23	111	0.696	20-11 (0.645)	0.645	0.220	AAC	73.21	-9.08	0.539	-0.57	-0.84	96.25
2021-22	85	0.765	14-15 (0.483)	0.483	0.085	AAC	68.52	-8.45	0.595	-0.91	-0.11	132.01
2020-21	183	0.486	10-13 (0.435)	0.435	-0.011	AAC	69.33	-10.07	0.580	-1.46	2.31	216.47
2019-20	185	0.480	12-18 (0.400)	0.400	-0.017	AAC	70.48	-10.72	0.591	-0.99	0.08	173.41
2018-19	260	0.267	4-27 (0.129)	0.129	-0.299	AAC	70.47	-9.17	0.629	0.86	-0.94	271.86
2017-18	176	0.500	14-17 (0.452)	0.452	-0.025	AAC	70.85	-11.12	0.530	-0.97	0.71	151.41
2016-17	233	0.337	6-25 (0.194)	0.194	-0.241	AAC	72.31	-8.21	0.608	-0.98	0.59	265.70
2015-16	212	0.397	12-22 (0.353)	0.353	-0.104	AAC	69.47	-10.21	0.578	-0.93	0.87	191.87
2014-15	233	0.337	15-16 (0.484)	0.484	-0.021	AAC	64.48	-9.17	0.498	-1.10	2.81	204.34

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	110.32	28.65	74.91	86.39	45.00	32.75	33.90	20.64	38.44	33.00	60.13	14.52	14.92	7.05	37.91	23.89	38.19	2.00
2023-24	108.50	32.34	72.31	80.35	46.63	27.99	36.36	19.21	39.96	33.14	59.17	12.33	10.84	4.86	34.83	23.91	41.25	1.94
2022-23	107.35	26.68	77.98	81.95	46.30	29.71	35.89	24.14	39.15	28.10	63.44	11.95	8.81	3.53	36.25	29.46	34.29	2.02
2021-22	109.50	26.17	75.51	84.28	46.50	29.69	38.29	25.82	39.08	28.76	61.62	10.86	11.39	4.70	35.23	30.64	34.13	2.01
2020-21	96.32	27.85	75.28	83.77	39.53	30.04	30.34	25.16	31.93	28.57	55.90	13.47	12.90	4.20	35.86	30.03	34.11	2.02
2019-20	97.95	25.68	71.46	81.81	42.39	31.13	32.90	23.86	35.66	26.81	59.40	13.79	13.34	5.14	38.06	29.17	32.77	2.05
2018-19	97.25	23.98	69.76	82.33	42.98	28.94	33.72	23.12	34.77	30.26	58.10	9.53	15.29	5.96	35.16	28.09	36.76	1.98
2017-18	102.46	26.74	71.95	80.68	45.67	27.21	35.00	24.59	36.69	28.87	63.39	8.76	15.69	7.15	33.73	30.48	35.79	1.98
2016-17	99.42	28.69	71.78	80.40	43.51	26.63	33.28	24.87	36.68	28.90	58.81	11.63	16.83	7.39	33.12	30.94	35.94	1.97
2015-16	94.30	25.89	66.73	83.55	40.86	27.83	31.38	24.87	30.80	30.85	57.53	9.96	18.43	8.73	33.31	29.76	36.93	1.96
2014-15	93.98	27.96	63.24	82.74	40.52	29.27	31.56	24.61	37.67	28.85	52.06	10.70	16.44	6.18	35.38	29.75	34.87	2.01

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	107.26	25.93	--	89.12	42.13	39.36	33.45	19.14	36.19	30.61	57.00	11.32	17.89	6.18	44.17	21.48	34.35	2.10
2023-24	107.27	26.16	--	86.81	43.87	35.00	36.01	22.18	39.23	29.63	56.62	10.80	17.05	7.04	40.31	25.55	34.13	2.06
2022-23	101.06	24.15	--	85.08	42.07	35.60	35.24	21.82	39.16	27.66	53.16	9.87	18.39	6.28	41.85	25.65	32.51	2.09
2021-22	98.37	22.41	--	84.80	40.93	38.67	34.05	22.31	34.14	23.81	58.48	7.36	15.15	4.81	45.61	26.31	28.08	2.18
2020-21	97.47	21.98	--	79.99	43.56	36.57	36.58	19.74	37.65	23.68	59.25	7.87	13.74	5.52	45.72	24.68	29.60	2.16
2019-20	99.78	21.92	--	79.43	45.45	35.74	34.96	18.31	37.81	25.38	65.72	7.72	11.15	5.66	45.00	23.05	31.96	2.13
2018-19	106.68	25.41	--	86.93	44.08	36.35	35.18	20.01	37.37	30.57	59.04	13.06	16.35	6.82	41.81	23.01	35.17	2.07
2017-18	104.67	27.70	--	82.17	45.17	29.20	36.24	23.53	38.01	29.44	59.75	12.18	14.29	7.62	35.54	28.64	35.82	2.00
2016-17	106.60	28.68	--	80.96	46.46	29.79	37.95	22.62	37.76	28.55	62.23	10.77	14.80	7.96	36.79	27.94	35.27	2.02
2015-16	99.63	28.90	--	81.44	42.87	27.43	36.35	24.73	34.91	29.28	55.72	11.77	14.90	6.19	33.68	30.37	35.95	1.98
2014-15	99.54	28.21	--	78.87	45.28	25.49	36.42	24.89	37.36	28.49	60.13	11.14	12.21	7.02	32.32	31.56	36.13	1.96

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR
2024-25	136^th	136	136^th	136	145^th	145	160^th	160	AAC	AAC	223^rd	223	261^st	261	159^th	159	291^st	291	352^nd	352	127^th	127
2023-24	151^st	151	151^st	151	244^th	244	176^th	176	AAC	AAC	14^th	14	2^nd	2	109^th	109	323^rd	323	328^th	328	125^th	125
2022-23	111^th	111	111^th	111	85^th	85	75^th	75	AAC	AAC	2^nd	2	167^th	167	110^th	110	156^th	156	205^th	205	95^th	95
2021-22	85^th	85	85^th	85	208^th	208	132^nd	132	AAC	AAC	131^st	131	97^th	97	91^st	91	187^th	187	195^th	195	127^th	127
2020-21	183^rd	183	183^rd	183	225^th	225	185^th	185	AAC	AAC	205^th	205	259^th	259	111^th	111	228^th	228	20^th	20	212^th	212
2019-20	185^th	185	185^th	185	272^nd	272	191^st	191	AAC	AAC	120^th	120	333^rd	333	93^rd	93	185^th	185	149^th	149	175^th	175
2018-19	260^th	260	258^th	258	350^th	350	314^th	314	AAC	AAC	78^th	78	128^th	128	75^th	75	44^th	44	265^th	265	277^th	277
2017-18	176^th	176	176^th	176	222^nd	222	191^st	191	AAC	AAC	134^th	134	338^th	338	131^st	131	185^th	185	63^rd	63	150^th	150
2016-17	233^rd	233	233^rd	233	343^rd	343	289^th	289	AAC	AAC	65^th	65	82^nd	82	87^th	87	173^rd	173	86^th	86	270^th	270
2015-16	212^th	212	212^th	212	279^th	279	223^rd	223	AAC	AAC	188^th	188	316^th	316	109^th	109	187^th	187	91^st	91	190^th	190
2014-15	233^rd	233	233^rd	233	195^th	195	182^nd	182	AAC	AAC	244^th	244	171^st	171	166^th	166	202^nd	202	7^th	7	204^th	204

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	129^th	129	123^rd	123	88^th	88	215^th	215	121^st	121	211^th	211	185^th	185	211^th	211	136^th	136	136^th	136	123^rd	123	58^th	58	163^rd	163	75^th	75	202^nd	202	206^th	206	133^rd	133	133^rd	133
2023-24	113^th	113	10^th	10	167^th	167	352^nd	352	64^th	64	298^th	298	70^th	70	289^th	289	140^th	140	88^th	88	118^th	118	126^th	126	298^th	298	240^th	240	248^th	248	257^th	257	41^st	41	55^th	55
2022-23	95^th	95	107^th	107	17^th	17	305^th	305	57^th	57	244^th	244	79^th	79	176^th	176	109^th	109	244^th	244	58^th	58	107^th	107	356^th	356	343^rd	343	211^th	211	149^th	149	207^th	207	182^nd	182
2021-22	46^th	46	114^th	114	55^th	55	190^th	190	44^th	44	217^th	217	7^th	7	135^th	135	105^th	105	188^th	188	91^st	91	170^th	170	285^th	285	202^nd	202	219^th	219	133^rd	133	181^st	181	161^st	161
2020-21	231^st	231	59^th	59	56^th	56	92^nd	92	327^th	327	200^th	200	316^th	316	108^th	108	342^nd	342	154^th	154	258^th	258	57^th	57	170^th	170	255^th	255	228^th	228	124^th	124	176^th	176	146^th	146
2019-20	198^th	198	156^th	156	164^th	164	172^nd	172	218^th	218	168^th	168	208^th	208	127^th	127	230^th	230	232^nd	232	162^nd	162	44^th	44	146^th	146	152^nd	152	162^nd	162	128^th	128	244^th	244	225^th	225
2018-19	275^th	275	264^th	264	218^th	218	228^th	228	214^th	214	285^th	285	210^th	210	105^th	105	217^th	217	169^th	169	220^th	220	282^nd	282	88^th	88	171^st	171	270^th	270	91^st	91	153^rd	153	99^th	99
2017-18	152^nd	152	142^nd	142	162^nd	162	235^th	235	108^th	108	284^th	284	175^th	175	107^th	107	193^rd	193	156^th	156	67^th	67	286^th	286	118^th	118	129^th	129	278^th	278	97^th	97	139^th	139	92^nd	92
2016-17	200^th	200	115^th	115	129^th	129	238^th	238	193^rd	193	260^th	260	262^nd	262	133^rd	133	164^th	164	143^rd	143	192^nd	192	115^th	115	56^th	56	99^th	99	252^nd	252	119^th	119	128^th	128	93^rd	93
2015-16	293^rd	293	270^th	270	295^th	295	103^rd	103	288^th	288	209^th	209	303^rd	303	145^th	145	333^rd	333	83^rd	83	210^th	210	226^th	226	30^th	30	36^th	36	231^st	231	166^th	166	111^th	111	103^rd	103
2014-15	282^nd	282	201^st	201	331^st	331	137^th	137	277^th	277	127^th	127	296^th	296	202^nd	202	72^nd	72	153^rd	153	320^th	320	210^th	210	102^nd	102	221^st	221	139^th	139	211^th	211	166^th	166	195^th	195

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	155^th	155	119^th	119	--	--	274^th	274	90^th	90	350^th	350	134^th	134	79^th	79	123^rd	123	119^th	119	107^th	107	119^th	119	351^st	351	205^th	205	341^st	341	55^th	55	92^nd	92	44^th	44
2023-24	221^st	221	183^rd	183	--	--	254^th	254	157^th	157	316^th	316	281^st	281	156^th	156	200^th	200	120^th	120	132^nd	132	129^th	129	352^nd	352	343^rd	343	312^th	312	140^th	140	106^th	106	65^th	65
2022-23	129^th	129	128^th	128	--	--	189^th	189	84^th	84	338^th	338	256^th	256	96^th	96	236^th	236	99^th	99	23^rd	23	103^rd	103	361^st	361	300^th	300	337^th	337	76^th	76	76^th	76	34^th	34
2021-22	121^st	121	80^th	80	--	--	197^th	197	66^th	66	355^th	355	217^th	217	82^nd	82	41^st	41	15^th	15	153^rd	153	5^th	5	295^th	295	164^th	164	355^th	355	77^th	77	10^th	10	3^rd	3
2020-21	121^st	121	79^th	79	--	--	78^th	78	155^th	155	350^th	350	303^rd	303	43^rd	43	146^th	146	26^th	26	184^th	184	16^th	16	248^th	248	243^rd	243	353^rd	353	55^th	55	30^th	30	7^th	7
2019-20	181^st	181	51^st	51	--	--	79^th	79	278^th	278	340^th	340	259^th	259	24^th	24	204^th	204	57^th	57	334^th	334	8^th	8	55^th	55	264^th	264	346^th	346	26^th	26	71^st	71	18^th	18
2018-19	231^st	231	145^th	145	--	--	313^th	313	158^th	158	326^th	326	213^th	213	134^th	134	239^th	239	175^th	175	139^th	139	277^th	277	322^nd	322	266^th	266	296^th	296	92^nd	92	125^th	125	84^th	84
2017-18	210^th	210	236^th	236	--	--	178^th	178	198^th	198	110^th	110	220^th	220	225^th	225	207^th	207	205^th	205	157^th	157	280^th	280	146^th	146	254^th	254	102^nd	102	231^st	231	197^th	197	229^th	229
2016-17	255^th	255	220^th	220	--	--	129^th	129	268^th	268	196^th	196	295^th	295	131^st	131	215^th	215	180^th	180	240^th	240	174^th	174	199^th	199	284^th	284	203^rd	203	141^st	141	186^th	186	183^rd	183
2015-16	119^th	119	176^th	176	--	--	142^nd	142	125^th	125	101^st	101	250^th	250	215^th	215	127^th	127	192^nd	192	65^th	65	249^th	249	175^th	175	116^th	116	110^th	110	223^rd	223	208^th	208	227^th	227
2014-15	139^th	139	148^th	148	--	--	61^st	61	259^th	259	76^th	76	269^th	269	144^th	144	243^rd	243	177^th	177	211^th	211	143^rd	143	16^th	16	205^th	205	109^th	109	201^st	201	223^rd	223	247^th	247