TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 Troy  20-13 (0.606)  |  Sun Belt
All-Play Percentage: 0.660 (124th)
Schedule Strength: 0.464 (160th)
Record Quality: 0.067 (144th)
Avg. Season Rank: 129.81 (125th)
Pace: 68.40 (148th)
Momentum: 0.14 (168th)
Off. Momentum: 0.93 (161st)
Def. Momentum: -0.80 (187th)
Consistency: -9.48 (219th)
Res. Consistency: -10.13 (65th)
Away From Home: -0.81 (203rd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.00 (193rd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.97 25.87 71.81 86.01 42.79 34.62 31.10 20.48 33.97 30.91 61.73 15.54 16.31 5.89 40.25 23.81 35.94 2.04
RANK: 166th 155th 178th 115th 238th 70th 326th 289th 332nd 116th 93rd 13th 61st 106th 77th 299th 133rd 234th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 99.16 24.43 -- 81.53 43.16 30.52 33.73 21.79 35.04 29.21 59.07 10.32 14.94 6.35 37.44 26.73 35.83 2.02
RANK: 98th 147th -- 58th 130th 155th 158th 94th 52nd 168th 182nd 145th 264th 305th 214th 130th 229th 190th

ANALYSIS:
They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but Troy, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. Their record this season is 20-13, and the club is ranked 124th overall (out of 363) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #6 team (out of 14) in the Sun Belt (average ranking 178.6).

Troy has a fairly effective defensive attack. Occupying the #98 slot in our defensive efficiency ratings, they will allow about 99 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Troy thrives on scoring fast and easy points off of steals. They're ranked 13th in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 15.54. Troy has also been fairly decent in preventing teams from draining shots from between the three-point stripe and the low post. They're ranked 52nd in Division I in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 35.0% of their attempts from that distance.

Troy is also a fairly decent team on the offensive end of the court. The team ranks 166th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 103 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Troy does an adequate job of creating chances for themselves off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 16.31 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked 61st in the NCAA). If Troy does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's inability to drain mid-range jumpers. The squad makes just 34.0% of their mid-range field goal attempts vs. AO, which ranks 32nd-worst in the nation.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities, Troy usually performs better than average. Troy is more efficient than normal 78% of the time when facing clubs that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 10.68. In all other contests, Troy performs better than average 29% of the time.
Troy is typically worse vs. teams that effectively clean the offensive glass. Against foes that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 13.72, Troy performs above their norm 29% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 78% of the time.
When facing teams that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter, Troy often performs better than normal. Troy is more efficient than usual 67% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 1.97. In their other contests, Troy performs better than the norm 20% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25102nd102nd58th101stSun Belt237th181st187th328th118th111th
2023-24120th120th94th139thSun Belt62nd1st212th270th317th158th
2022-23124th123rd111th144thSun Belt148th219th160th193rd203rd125th
2021-22221st221st107th155thSun Belt185th44th217th76th209th231st
2020-21310th310th256th303rdSun Belt159th214th221st263rd234th323rd
2019-20297th297th310th302ndSun Belt114th202nd166th29th269th287th
2018-19250th249th257th222ndSun Belt140th252nd127th37th1st219th
2017-18153rd153rd195th196thSun Belt172nd147th154th193rd194th144th
2016-17116th114th117th145thSun Belt211th159th220th113th118th147th
2015-16277th277th306th296thSun Belt181st169th173rd220th25th242nd
2014-15277th277th283rd307thSun Belt167th32nd253rd16th49th287th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25171st82nd189th124th256th55th324th356th336th16th236th19th69th175th61st355th19th162nd
2023-24156th30th108th285th212th140th125th359th321st13th311th3rd130th220th112th358th5th64th
2022-23166th155th178th115th238th70th326th289th332nd116th93rd13th61st106th77th299th133rd234th
2021-22267th105th177th287th286th187th268th244th302nd192nd254th132nd217th274th158th219th153rd186th
2020-21315th72nd176th335th309th242nd354th165th207th280th219th218th264th217th192nd118th222nd203rd
2019-20279th233rd290th125th330th68th243rd280th323rd127th333rd228th120th243rd68th287th139th243rd
2018-19239th288th147th218th194th152nd211th241st267th148th175th169th173rd87th141st243rd136th179th
2017-18129th218th107th105th172nd46th247th271st68th165th170th271st64th85th65th287th186th270th
2016-1781st89th87th102nd134th100th167th276th32nd69th234th175th84th102nd121st290th90th187th
2015-16295th172nd344th62nd312th158th330th293rd214th13th337th203rd32nd88th180th311th21st56th
2014-15248th155th310th253rd210th198th204th313th197th31st272nd101st59th62nd173rd309th23rd78th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2563rd153rd--139th63rd184th95th84th171st239th16th155th219th184th206th90th260th214th
2023-24102nd299th--12th180th72nd262nd6th39th289th114th340th203rd176th158th16th346th318th
2022-2398th147th--58th130th155th158th94th52nd168th182nd145th264th305th214th130th229th190th
2021-22145th264th--68th161st180th211th137th224th116th103rd315th144th143rd214th171st145th139th
2020-21264th74th--257th284th248th330th158th260th211th228th344th109th305th227th134th194th160th
2019-20284th186th--112th306th305th247th70th270th96th336th252nd146th181st327th78th108th53rd
2018-19253rd176th--221st213th225th290th14th251st330th82nd255th341st331st203rd9th329th268th
2017-18178th157th--259th167th189th124th83rd305th308th67th244th296th288th142nd62nd296th269th
2016-17208th135th--233rd159th302nd149th7th111th331st100th234th238th214th292nd3rd319th223rd
2015-16247th124th--237th210th273rd278th31st179th301st111th216th288th165th254th15th287th219th
2014-15273rd25th--296th287th332nd225th10th269th315th251st194th226th291st317th1st288th153rd