TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Troy  23-11 (0.676)  |  Sun Belt
All-Play Percentage: 0.722 (102nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.420 (187th)
Record Quality: 0.137 (102nd)
Avg. Season Rank: 113.00 (110th)
Pace: 65.82 (239th)
Momentum: 1.89 (101st)
Off. Momentum: 0.47 (170th)
Def. Momentum: 1.41 (85th)
Consistency: -9.42 (180th)
Res. Consistency: -10.31 (46th)
Away From Home: 0.24 (117th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -3.11 (327th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 107.85 29.78 72.18 88.23 42.21 38.62 30.76 11.83 32.35 37.77 57.00 16.70 16.94 6.07 43.77 13.41 42.81 2.01
RANK: 172nd 84th 189th 122nd 256th 56th 326th 356th 336th 16th 236th 19th 68th 172nd 62nd 355th 21st 162nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.91 26.62 -- 86.19 41.07 33.66 32.68 19.32 37.19 33.21 51.83 11.82 15.06 6.01 39.05 22.42 38.53 2.01
RANK: 63rd 151st -- 139th 64th 180th 95th 86th 168th 240th 16th 152nd 217th 179th 205th 94th 260th 213th

ANALYSIS:
Troy is a fairly decent basketball team that, while likely better than average, isn't quite good enough to crack any top-25 rankings this year. Haslametrics has them ranked 102nd overall (out of 364) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 23-11. Of the 14 schools in the Sun Belt (average ranking 222.8), they're currently ranked as our #2 team in the conference.

Troy will mainly try to find success through their defense. They are ranked 63rd in defensive efficiency and allow fewer than 101 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Troy does tremendous work shutting down the opposition from the inside. They are ranked 16th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 51.8% of their attempts from close-up. Troy also thrives on scoring fast and easy points off of steals. They're ranked 19th in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 16.70.

Though they're not quite as efficient offensively as they are defensively, Troy still does OK when they have possession of the ball. The team ranks 172nd nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 108 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Troy will routinely look to penetrate, pound the ball inside, and score from as short a distance as possible. The ball-club is 21st in the NCAA in ratio of near-proximity attempts to total field goal attempts. As far as converting those near-proximity shots goes, the team shoots 57.0% vs. AO, which falls somewhere in the middle of the pack of the rankings in that category. Troy also does an adequate job of creating chances for themselves off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 16.94 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked 68th in the NCAA). If Troy does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's inability to drain mid-range jumpers. The squad makes just 32.3% of their mid-range field goal attempts vs. AO, which ranks 29th-worst in the nation.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot, Troy usually performs worse than average. Troy is more efficient than normal 20% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 36.49%. In all other contests, Troy performs better than average 73% of the time.
Troy is typically better vs. teams that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. Against foes that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 44.99%, Troy performs above their norm 85% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 37% of the time.
When facing teams that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities, Troy often performs better than normal. Troy is more efficient than usual 77% of the time when facing teams that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 11.16. In their other contests, Troy performs better than the norm 33% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25102nd102nd58th102ndSun Belt239th180th187th327th117th110th
2023-24120th120th94th139thSun Belt62nd1st212th270th317th158th
2022-23124th123rd111th144thSun Belt148th219th160th193rd203rd125th
2021-22221st221st107th155thSun Belt185th44th217th76th209th231st
2020-21310th310th256th303rdSun Belt159th214th221st263rd234th323rd
2019-20297th297th310th302ndSun Belt114th202nd166th29th269th287th
2018-19250th249th257th222ndSun Belt140th252nd127th37th1st219th
2017-18153rd153rd195th196thSun Belt172nd147th154th193rd194th144th
2016-17116th114th117th145thSun Belt211th159th220th113th118th147th
2015-16277th277th306th296thSun Belt181st169th173rd220th25th242nd
2014-15277th277th283rd307thSun Belt167th32nd253rd16th49th287th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25172nd84th189th122nd256th56th326th356th336th16th236th19th68th172nd62nd355th21st162nd
2023-24156th30th108th285th212th140th125th359th321st13th311th3rd130th220th112th358th5th64th
2022-23166th155th178th115th238th70th326th289th332nd116th93rd13th61st106th77th299th133rd234th
2021-22267th105th177th287th286th187th268th244th302nd192nd254th132nd217th274th158th219th153rd186th
2020-21315th72nd176th335th309th242nd354th165th207th280th219th218th264th217th192nd118th222nd203rd
2019-20279th233rd290th125th330th68th243rd280th323rd127th333rd228th120th243rd68th287th139th243rd
2018-19239th288th147th218th194th152nd211th241st267th148th175th169th173rd87th141st243rd136th179th
2017-18129th218th107th105th172nd46th247th271st68th165th170th271st64th85th65th287th186th270th
2016-1781st89th87th102nd134th100th167th276th32nd69th234th175th84th102nd121st290th90th187th
2015-16295th172nd344th62nd312th158th330th293rd214th13th337th203rd32nd88th180th311th21st56th
2014-15248th155th310th253rd210th198th204th313th197th31st272nd101st59th62nd173rd309th23rd78th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2563rd151st--139th64th180th95th86th168th240th16th152nd217th179th205th94th260th213th
2023-24102nd299th--12th180th72nd262nd6th39th289th114th340th203rd176th158th16th346th318th
2022-2398th147th--58th130th155th158th94th52nd168th182nd145th264th305th214th130th229th190th
2021-22145th264th--68th161st180th211th137th224th116th103rd315th144th143rd214th171st145th139th
2020-21264th74th--257th284th248th330th158th260th211th228th344th109th305th227th134th194th160th
2019-20284th186th--112th306th305th247th70th270th96th336th252nd146th181st327th78th108th53rd
2018-19253rd176th--221st213th225th290th14th251st330th82nd255th341st331st203rd9th329th268th
2017-18178th157th--259th167th189th124th83rd305th308th67th244th296th288th142nd62nd296th269th
2016-17208th135th--233rd159th302nd149th7th111th331st100th234th238th214th292nd3rd319th223rd
2015-16247th124th--237th210th273rd278th31st179th301st111th216th288th165th254th15th287th219th
2014-15273rd25th--296th287th332nd225th10th269th315th251st194th226th291st317th1st288th153rd